in Re Adolph Rodriguez
Opinion
Opinion issued October 6, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
habeas corpus and an order either discharging him from custody or reducing the amount of the bond.
This Court does not have “original habeas corpus jurisdiction of a bail issue”
in a criminal case. In re Thomas, No. 01–15–00786–CR, 2015 WL 6081429, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 13, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.— Amarillo 2009, no pet.) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d)); see also Ex parte Barnes, No. 03–13–00429–CV, 2013 WL 3723333, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 12, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release or reduction in appeal bond when relator was convicted of felony offense of aggravated assault). In criminal matters, our habeas corpus jurisdiction is appellate only, and we do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction. See Thomas, 2015 WL 6081429, at *1; Ashorn v. State, 77 S.W.3d 405, 409 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d); Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding); see also Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Adolph Rodriguez (in Re Adolph Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.