In Re: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Reinforcement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Reinforcement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 7, 2020·No. 54 ID·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE > No. 54 1D

Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4" day of December, 2020, it is hereby ordered that Joan Marie Etzweiler, Attorney Registration No. 81904, is administratively suspended pursuant to Pa. R.D.E. 219(f). Said administrative suspension shall take effect 30 days after the date of this order pursuant to Pa. R.D.E. 217(d).

NO AVAL

( John A. Vaskov ~ Deputy Prothonotary

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE > No. 54 1D

Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4" day of December, 2020, it is hereby ordered that Joan Marie Etzweiler, Attorney Registration No. 81904, is administratively suspended pursuant to Pa. R.D.E. 219(f). Said administrative suspension shall take effect 30 days after the date of this order pursuant to Pa. R.D.E. 217(d).

NO AVAL

( John A. Vaskov ~ Deputy Prothonotary

In Re: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Reinforcement, (Pa. 2020).

Pincite

In Re: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Reinforcement (In Re: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219(f) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Reinforcement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.