In Re Administrative Plans for the Ninth Judicial District Court and the Thirtieth Judicial District Court

2020 Ark. 304
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 1, 2020
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 Ark. 304 (In Re Administrative Plans for the Ninth Judicial District Court and the Thirtieth Judicial District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Administrative Plans for the Ninth Judicial District Court and the Thirtieth Judicial District Court, 2020 Ark. 304 (Ark. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 304 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered October 1, 2020 IN RE AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE PLANS FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT AND THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

PER CURIAM

Administrative Order No. 18 requires a state district court or a local district court to

prepare an administrative plan when the court operates a specialty court program, when

multiple judges preside in the district, or when the court has multiple venues in the

district. Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 18, amended administrative plans have

been submitted by the Ninth District which is composed of the District Court of Faulkner

County and the District Court of Van Buren County, and the Thirtieth District which is

composed of the District Court of Lonoke County. The amended administrative plans for

these state district courts have been approved as submitted. Both amended administrative

plans are effective January 1, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-administrative-plans-for-the-ninth-judicial-district-court-and-the-ark-2020.