In re Adena I.
91 A.D.3d 484, 935 N.Y.2d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 2012·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Under the circumstances presented, the court properly found that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; see also Matter of Kayla W., 47 AD3d 571, 572 [2008]). Respondent’s appeal from the dispositional order is dismissed, since its placement terms have expired (see Matter of Pedro C. [Josephine B.], 1 AD3d 267 [2003]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Adena I., 91 A.D.3d 484, 935 N.Y.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
91 A.D.3d 484 (In re Adena I.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Adam T. (Artur T.--Asai G.)
2020 NY Slip Op 05167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Ta Aisha H.
99 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Kaila A.
95 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)