Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Adena I.

In re Adena I.

91 A.D.3d 484, 935 N.Y.2d 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 A.D.3d 484 (In re Adena I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Adena I., 91 A.D.3d 484, 935 N.Y.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Under the circumstances presented, the court properly found that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; see also Matter of Kayla W., 47 AD3d 571, 572 [2008]). Respondent’s appeal from the dispositional order is dismissed, since its placement terms have expired (see Matter of Pedro C. [Josephine B.], 1 AD3d 267 [2003]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Adam T. (Artur T.--Asai G.)
2020 NY Slip Op 05167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Ta Aisha H.
99 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Kaila A.
95 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 484, 935 N.Y.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adena-i-nyappdiv-2012.