In re Adelman

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Adelman

195 Ill. 2d 601

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 2001

DocketMR 17480

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Ill. 2d 601 (In re Adelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Adelman, 195 Ill. 2d 601 (Ill. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent James Lorin Adelman is suspended from the practice of law for two years.

Respondent James Lorin Adelman shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent James Lorin Adelman is suspended from the practice of law for two years.

Respondent James Lorin Adelman shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. 2d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adelman-ill-2001.