In Re: Adeline Kristine Jemente v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Adeline Kristine Jemente v. the State of Texas (In Re: Adeline Kristine Jemente v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
IN RE: § No. 08-24-00346-CV
ADELINE KRISTINE JEMENTE § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
Relator. § IN MANDAMUS
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Adeline Kristine Jemente has filed a mandamus petition against Respondent, the
Honorable Jesus M. Rodriguez, Judge of County Court at Law Number 5 of El Paso County, Texas.
Relator asks that we compel Respondent to vacate his September 26, 2024 order on de novo
hearing of Relator’s objection to the Associate Judge. Respondent’s September 26 order affirmed
the Associate Judge’s order overruling Relator’s objection to the Associate Court. We deny the
petition.
Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to
compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011); In re Prudential Insurance Co. of
America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). After reviewing the mandamus petition, record, and response, we conclude that Relator has failed to establish she is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition.
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
October 15, 2024
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret) Rodriguez, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Adeline Kristine Jemente v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adeline-kristine-jemente-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.