In re Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Adams

68 A.D. 644, 74 N.Y.S. 1119

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 N.Y.S. 591 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1902·Published

Opinion

We think that the claim of the-petitioners in this matter should be determined upon a summary application at Special Term before any action is taken by the Appellate Division looking ' toward a future investigation of these charges. The affidavits submitted by the petitioners in reply to the attorney’s defense are, in many respects, too vague to be -accepted as positive denials. If the summary application results unfavorably to the attorney, this proceeding may be renewed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think that the claim of the-petitioners in this matter should be determined upon a summary application at Special Term before any action is taken by the Appellate Division looking ' toward a future investigation of these charges. The affidavits submitted by the petitioners in reply to the attorney’s defense are, in many respects, too vague to be -accepted as positive denials. If the summary application results unfavorably to the attorney, this proceeding may be renewed.

In re Adams, 68 A.D. 644, 74 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

68 A.D. 644 (In re Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.