In re Adams

167 A.3d 1293, 230 N.J. 391, 2017 WL 4070601, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 926
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 14, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.3d 1293 (In re Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Adams, 167 A.3d 1293, 230 N.J. 391, 2017 WL 4070601, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 926 (N.J. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-319, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JEFFREY M. ADAMS, formerly of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and who has been suspended from practice since May 1, 2016, should be disbarred for unethical conduct that includes violations of RPC 1.16(a) and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979) and In re Hollendonner, 102 N.J. 21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1986) (knowing misappropriation of trust and/or escrow funds), RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safeguard client or third-party funds), RPC 1.15(b)(failure to promptly return client or third party funds), RPC 5.5(a)(1)(praetieing law while ineligible), RPC 8.1(a)(making a false statement to ethics authorities), RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with an ethics investigation), and RPC 8.4(d)(failure to file a Rule 1:20-20 affidavit following a temporary suspension);

And JEFFREY M. ADAMS having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JEFFREY M. ADAMS be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that JEFFREY M. ADAMS be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Wilson
409 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Matter of Hollendonner
504 A.2d 1174 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.3d 1293, 230 N.J. 391, 2017 WL 4070601, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adams-nj-2017.