in Re Adam Robert Mulhall
This text of in Re Adam Robert Mulhall (in Re Adam Robert Mulhall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00004-CV ____________________
IN RE ADAM ROBERT MULHALL
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Original Proceeding 317th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-197,668 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Adam Robert Mulhall filed petitions for writs of mandamus and habeas
corpus. Mulhall alleges that his confinement is illegal because he has been denied
credit for time served on his sentence. Additionally, Mulhall suggests the Sheriff of
Jefferson County, Texas, has not permitted him to receive the time credit to which
he is entitled. See Ex parte Acly, 711 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. 1986).
We refer this matter to the 317th District Court for the development of a record
of the facts regarding the allegations made by Mulhall in his petitions for mandamus
and habeas corpus. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b); see also Ex parte
1 Berryhill, 741 S.W.2d 186, 190 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1987, orig. proceeding). The
trial court shall also determine whether Mulhall is indigent and entitled to appointed
counsel to represent Mulhall during said proceedings. The record of said proceedings
in the 317th District Court is due to be filed with this Court on or before March 23,
2018.
ORDER ENTERED February 21, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Adam Robert Mulhall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adam-robert-mulhall-texapp-2018.