in Re Adam Gonzales
This text of in Re Adam Gonzales (in Re Adam Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 8, 2017
No. 04-16-00783-CR
IN RE Adam GONZALES
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on December 2, 2016, complaining that the trial court had not ruled on his motions for post-conviction DNA testing and for appointment of counsel in connection with his request for DNA testing. On January 24, 2017, Respondent filed a copy of an order denying the motions. Because the trial court has ruled on the motions, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered moot. Accordingly, this original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
It is so ORDERED on February 8, 2017.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of February, 2017.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. A02-136, styled State v. Adam Gonzales, in the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Adam Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adam-gonzales-texapp-2017.