In Re Adam Cherrington and Jevanna Cherrington v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Adam Cherrington and Jevanna Cherrington v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2025·No. 04-25-00560-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00560-CV

IN RE Adam CHERRINGTON and Jevanna Cherrington Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relators filed their petition for writ of mandamus on September 3, 2025. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed their reply as the real party in interest on September 11, 2025. The relators have filed a response to the real party in interest’s reply. Having considered the arguments of the parties, the record provided, and the applicable law, the court has determined that relators are not entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025-PA-01434, styled In the Interest of X.I.H., a Child, pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Elizabeth Martinez presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00560-CV

IN RE Adam CHERRINGTON and Jevanna Cherrington Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relators filed their petition for writ of mandamus on September 3, 2025. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed their reply as the real party in interest on September 11, 2025. The relators have filed a response to the real party in interest’s reply. Having considered the arguments of the parties, the record provided, and the applicable law, the court has determined that relators are not entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025-PA-01434, styled In the Interest of X.I.H., a Child, pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Elizabeth Martinez presiding.

In Re Adam Cherrington and Jevanna Cherrington v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re Adam Cherrington and Jevanna Cherrington v. the State of Texas (In Re Adam Cherrington and Jevanna Cherrington v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.