In Re Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas (In Re Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00303-CV
In re Adam Ahmad Noureddine
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Adam Ahmad Noureddine, appearing pro se, has filed a notice of appeal that we
construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, in which he complains of the trial court’s failure to
rule on his motion to dismiss and motion for a speedy hearing. Both motions were filed on
March 11, 2024, in response to a motion to adjudicate, in which the State seeks to revoke
Noureddine’s deferred-adjudication community supervision.
To obtain mandamus relief for a trial court’s failure to rule on a properly filed
motion, the relator must establish that a ruling on the motion was requested and that the trial
court has either refused to rule on the motion or failed to rule within a reasonable time. In re
Whitfield, No. 03-19-00582-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 3353, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin
Apr. 22, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex.
App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding)). Here, the Relator has failed to demonstrate that he
brought the motions to the attention of trial court, see In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861
(Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding) (observing that “mere filing of a motion with a trial court clerk does not equate to a request that the trial court rule on the motion”), and that the
motions have been pending for an unreasonable length of time, see In re Halley, No. 03-15-
00310-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 7188, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 14, 2015, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.) (concluding that six-months delay did not constitute unreasonable length
of time under “failure to rule” analysis). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Filed: June 27, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Adam Ahmad Noureddine v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adam-ahmad-noureddine-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.