In re Ackers

134 So. 3d 579, 2014 WL 814393
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 21, 2014
DocketNo. 2014-B-0075
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 3d 579 (In re Ackers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ackers, 134 So. 3d 579, 2014 WL 814393 (La. 2014).

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent negligently commingled and converted client funds and charged her client legal fees for nonlegal services. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rules 1.5(a) and 1.15(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Samantha R. Ackers, Louisiana Bar Roll number 32086, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 3d 579, 2014 WL 814393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ackers-la-2014.