In re Ackerman

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Ackerman

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 404

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1916·No. No. 15467·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Now came the sheriff of the said county of Franklin and made return of the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case. And upon the hearing of the case the court find that the said Marie M. Ackerman is unlawfully detained by the said William H. Pritchard, superintendent of the Columbus State Hospital.

It is therefore ordered that the said Marie M. Ackerman be forthwith discharged from her said detention.

Order of discharge to issue.

■ Nichols, C. J., Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Johnson, J., not participating. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Now came the sheriff of the said county of Franklin and made return of the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case. And upon the hearing of the case the court find that the said Marie M. Ackerman is unlawfully detained by the said William H. Pritchard, superintendent of the Columbus State Hospital.

It is therefore ordered that the said Marie M. Ackerman be forthwith discharged from her said detention.

Order of discharge to issue.

■ Nichols, C. J., Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Johnson, J., not participating. '

In re Ackerman, 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 404 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 404 (In re Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.