In re Ackerman

Second Circuit

In re Ackerman

297 F. 224, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1924

DocketNo. 281

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 F. 224 (In re Ackerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ackerman, 297 F. 224, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813 (2d Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the creditor appellant, in making the sales sought to be rescinded, relied solely, or indeed mainly, upon an admittedly false financial statement made by bankrupts. In a careful and persuasive opinion the special master found that no such reliance was given by appellant. To this finding of fact the lower court agreed. The importance attached to such concurring findings is too well established to need citation.

We see no reason to disagree, and affirm the order, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the creditor appellant, in making the sales sought to be rescinded, relied solely, or indeed mainly, upon an admittedly false financial statement made by bankrupts. In a careful and persuasive opinion the special master found that no such reliance was given by appellant. To this finding of fact the lower court agreed. The importance attached to such concurring findings is too well established to need citation.

We see no reason to disagree, and affirm the order, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 F. 224, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ackerman-ca2-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack