In re Ackerman

Second Circuit

In re Ackerman

297 F. 224, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 10, 1924·No. No. 281·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the creditor appellant, in making the sales sought to be rescinded, relied solely, or indeed mainly, upon an admittedly false financial statement made by bankrupts. In a careful and persuasive opinion the special master found that no such reliance was given by appellant. To this finding of fact the lower court agreed. The importance attached to such concurring findings is too well established to need citation.

We see no reason to disagree, and affirm the order, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the creditor appellant, in making the sales sought to be rescinded, relied solely, or indeed mainly, upon an admittedly false financial statement made by bankrupts. In a careful and persuasive opinion the special master found that no such reliance was given by appellant. To this finding of fact the lower court agreed. The importance attached to such concurring findings is too well established to need citation.

We see no reason to disagree, and affirm the order, with costs.

In re Ackerman, 297 F. 224, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813 (2d Cir. 1924).

Pincite

297 F. 224 (In re Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related