In re Acker

5 Dem. Sur. 19
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Dem. Sur. 19 (In re Acker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Acker, 5 Dem. Sur. 19 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

This will must be regarded as sufficiently executed, in all respects. The only question relates to the subscription. That the place where she wrote her name was intended by her to be a subscription of her will, there can be no doubt, and it was that signature which the witnesses attested. That it was written in a blank space in the attestation clause, can make no difference, when it distinctly appears that it was intended bjr her, and so understood by the witnesses, as her subscription of the will, and it is, sub[21]*21stantially, at the end thereof. There is nothing in the case of Sisters of Charity v. Kelly (67 N. Y., 409) which conflicts with this view.

The will is, therefore, admitted to probate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent De Paul v. Kelly
67 N.Y. 409 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Dem. Sur. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-acker-nysurct-1886.