in Re Academy, LTD. Dba Academy Sports and Outdoors
This text of in Re Academy, LTD. Dba Academy Sports and Outdoors (in Re Academy, LTD. Dba Academy Sports and Outdoors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 22, 2019
No. 04-19-00219-CV
IN RE ACADEMY, LTD. DBA ACADEMY SPORTS AND OUTDOORS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 2 Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
On April 9, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on May 22, 2019.
_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of May, 2019.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2017CI23341; 2018CI14368; 2018CI23302; 2018CI23299, styled Robert Braden v. Academy, Ltd. d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors and Chancie McMahan, et al. v. Academy, Ltd. d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding. 2 Chief Justice Marion dissents to the denial without requesting a response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Academy, LTD. Dba Academy Sports and Outdoors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-academy-ltd-dba-academy-sports-and-outdoors-texapp-2019.