In re A.C.

877 N.E.2d 692, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1433
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 2007
Docket2007-1994
StatusPublished

This text of 877 N.E.2d 692 (In re A.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re A.C., 877 N.E.2d 692, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1433 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23627, 2007-Ohio-5527. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Furthermore, it appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due December 3, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kershner, 06-Coa-015 (10-15-2007)
2007 Ohio 5527 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 N.E.2d 692, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ac-ohio-2007.