Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Abramson

In re Abramson

940 N.E.2d 914, 15 N.Y.3d 936, 2010 NY Slip Op 90572, 915 N.Y.S.2d 209, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3549
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 14, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 940 N.E.2d 914 (In re Abramson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Abramson, 940 N.E.2d 914, 15 N.Y.3d 936, 2010 NY Slip Op 90572, 915 N.Y.S.2d 209, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3549 (N.Y. 2010).

Opinion

Motion by petitioner for relief related to the October 26, 2010 determination of respondent dismissed upon the ground that it is not authorized by the Judiciary Law or otherwise and that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it. The proper method for seeking review of a determination of the Judicial Conduct Commission is to file a written request pursuant to section 44 (7) of the Judiciary Law. Petitioner’s resignation does not excuse that procedure (see Judiciary Law § 47; Matter of Backal, 87 NY2d 1 [1995]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Backal
660 N.E.2d 1104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
940 N.E.2d 914, 15 N.Y.3d 936, 2010 NY Slip Op 90572, 915 N.Y.S.2d 209, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 3549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abramson-ny-2010.