In re Abrams

674 A.2d 499, 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 65, 1996 WL 210901
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1996·No. No. 91-BG-1518·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[500] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the opposition thereto, respondent’s supplemental memorandum, and the supplemental memorandum of the Board on Professional Responsibility and Bar Counsel, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the opinion and judgment of July 10, 1995 are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk within 10 days from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Abrams, 674 A.2d 499, 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 65, 1996 WL 210901 (D.C. 1996).

674 A.2d 499 (In re Abrams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Abrams
689 A.2d 6 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)