In re Abramowitz

940 A.2d 298, 193 N.J. 490
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 14, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-185, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 4(f) (default by respondent) that ARNOLD N. ABRAMOWITZ of IRVINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ARNOLD M. ABRAMOWITZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Abramowitz, 940 A.2d 298, 193 N.J. 490 (N.J. 2008).

940 A.2d 298 (In re Abramowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.