In re Abramovitz

253 F. 299, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 841
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedMay 25, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 253 F. 299 (In re Abramovitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Abramovitz, 253 F. 299, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 841 (S.D. Fla. 1918).

Opinion

CALL, District Judge.

On April 25, 1918, certain specifications of objection to discharge were filed. These specifications, two in number, were signed Beasley Shoe Company, by Rand & Kurtz, attorneys. This is sworn to on information and belief. On April 25, 1918, a paper styled “Supplemental Specifications of Grounds of Opposition to Bankrupt’s Discharge,” was filed, signed “Rand & Kurtz, Attorneys for Beasley Shoe Company.” These, consisting of five, and all, except the fifth, made on information and belief, are sworn to by F„ B. Kurtz. This appears to be a carbon copy of the same paper filed. May 17th, except it is sworn to on information and belief by J. T. Gilliam, as treasurer, and signed by “Beasley Shoe Company, by Rand & Kurtz, Its Attorneys.” Motions are made by the bankrupt to strike the papers filed April 25th and May 17th, on the ground that the same are not signed by objecting creditors, nor sworn to as required.

[1] Section 18c of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 551 [Comp. St. 1916, § 9602]) requires all pleadings setting up matters of fact shall be verified under oath. In Re Brown, 112 Fed. 49, 50 C. C. A. 118, the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit decided that specifications of objection to bankrupt’s discharge are pleadings, and the form of oath attached to these papers did not [300]*300authorize the court to hear and determine same. The motion to strike same will therefore he granted.

[2] There are other grounds of the motions which are not necessary to decide, but, since the attorneys for the creditor request leave to amend its specifications filed April 25th, by having the proper oath made to them, which request will be granted, it is better that I call attention to the so-called supplemental specifications. The first four are made on information and belief, and enter into no details as to property, etc. It does not seem to me that these four state, either .in the form in which they are filed, or the matter stated therein, proper specifications of objection to discharge.

[3, 4] Specifications of objection to a bankrupt’s discharge are made by the creditor. If it is an individual, he should sign such specifications. If it is a corporation, such specifications should be signed by the-corporation, and the only way a corporation may sign an instrument or pleading requiring its signature is by having its seal affixed by proper authority. The decision by Judge Hammond (In re Glass [D. C.] 119 Fed. 509) is enlightening, and I think.states the law.

An order will be made, granting the motions to strike and allowing the creditor 20 days within which to make such amendments as it may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manson v. Inge
13 F.2d 567 (Fourth Circuit, 1926)
Koch v. Sidney Blumenthal & Co.
3 F.2d 395 (First Circuit, 1924)
In re Slatkin
286 F. 242 (E.D. Michigan, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 F. 299, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abramovitz-flsd-1918.