In re Abraham BB.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Abraham BB.

210 A.D.2d 556, 619 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 556 (In re Abraham BB.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Abraham BB., 210 A.D.2d 556, 619 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Meddaugh, J.), entered October 5, 1993.

This appeal seeks to reverse a Family Court determination which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, purportedly adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent and [557]*557placed Mm with the State Division for Youth in a limited secure detention facility for a period of 12 months. No such dispositional order has been included in the record before tMs Court. The order appealed from concerns respondent’s unrelated foster care placement with petitioner pursuant to Social Services Law §392. Inasmuch as Family Court’s determination is not embodied in a written dispositional order before tMs Court, this appeal must be dismissed (see, Castro v Castro, 198 AD2d 594).

Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Meddaugh, J.), entered October 5, 1993.

This appeal seeks to reverse a Family Court determination which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, purportedly adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent and [557]*557placed Mm with the State Division for Youth in a limited secure detention facility for a period of 12 months. No such dispositional order has been included in the record before tMs Court. The order appealed from concerns respondent’s unrelated foster care placement with petitioner pursuant to Social Services Law §392. Inasmuch as Family Court’s determination is not embodied in a written dispositional order before tMs Court, this appeal must be dismissed (see, Castro v Castro, 198 AD2d 594).

Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 556, 619 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abraham-bb-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack