In re Abigail Askew of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Reg. No. 497703

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Abigail Askew of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Reg. No. 497703

167 A.3d 551

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 17, 2017

DocketNo. 17–BG–152

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.3d 551 (In re Abigail Askew of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Reg. No. 497703) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Abigail Askew of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Reg. No. 497703, 167 A.3d 551 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility's Report and Recommendation, this court's March 10, 2017, order directing respondent to show cause why she should not be suspended pending final action on the Board's report, and the response of respondent wherein she does not oppose the imposition of an interim suspension, it is

ORDERED that Abigail Askew is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility's Report and Recommendation, this court's March 10, 2017, order directing respondent to show cause why she should not be suspended pending final action on the Board's report, and the response of respondent wherein she does not oppose the imposition of an interim suspension, it is

ORDERED that Abigail Askew is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.3d 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abigail-askew-of-columbia-court-of-appeals-bar-reg-no-497703-dc-2017.