In re Abigail Askew
This text of In re Abigail Askew (In re Abigail Askew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 17-BG-152
IN RE ABIGAIL ASKEW 2013 BDN 238 A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Reg. No. 497703
BEFORE: Glickman and Beckwith, Associate Judges, and Farrell, Senior Judge.
ORDER (Filed – August 17, 2017)
On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation, this court’s March 10, 2017, order directing respondent to show cause why she should not be suspended pending final action on the Board’s report, and the response of respondent wherein she does not oppose the imposition of an interim suspension, it is
ORDERED that Abigail Askew is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Abigail Askew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abigail-askew-dc-2017.