In re Abbady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Abbady

216 A.D.2d 115, 629 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 115 (In re Abbady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Abbady, 216 A.D.2d 115, 629 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered September 9,1994, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in the amount of $86,492.38, representing unpaid condominium common charges, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The warranty of habitability (Real Property Law § 235-b) does not apply to an individual unit within a condominium, and an individual unit owner cannot withhold payment of common charges and assessments in derogation of the condominium’s bylaws based on defective conditions in his or her unit or in the common areas, or a disagreement with actions lawfully taken by the Board of Managers (Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt., 190 [116]*116AD2d 383, 389). Defendants’ arguments at bar run almost exclusively to the merits of their counterclaims, which remain pending in the IAS Court without affecting the obligation to pay common charges (Residential Bd. of Mgrs. v Berman, 213 AD2d 206). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered September 9,1994, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in the amount of $86,492.38, representing unpaid condominium common charges, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The warranty of habitability (Real Property Law § 235-b) does not apply to an individual unit within a condominium, and an individual unit owner cannot withhold payment of common charges and assessments in derogation of the condominium’s bylaws based on defective conditions in his or her unit or in the common areas, or a disagreement with actions lawfully taken by the Board of Managers (Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt., 190 [116]*116AD2d 383, 389). Defendants’ arguments at bar run almost exclusively to the merits of their counterclaims, which remain pending in the IAS Court without affecting the obligation to pay common charges (Residential Bd. of Mgrs. v Berman, 213 AD2d 206). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 115, 629 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-abbady-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack