in Re: Aaron Vaughan and Lacy Vaughan

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2014·No. 12-14-00006-CV·Published

Opinion

NO. 12-14-00006-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

' APPEAL FROM THE

IN RE: AARON VAUGHAN AND ' 321ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LACY VAUGHAN, RELATORS ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

On September 17, 2014, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Aaron Vaughan and Lacy Vaughan, Relators. That opinion directed Respondent to vacate her order signed on December 19, 2013, setting aside Lacy Vaughan’s jury trial demand. Respondent has complied with our order and opinion of September 17, 2014. All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot. Opinion delivered September 30, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

IN RE: AARON VAUGHAN AND LACY VAUGHAN, RELATORS ______________________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ______________________________________________________________________________

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by AARON VAUGHAN AND LACY VAUGHAN, RELATORS, who are the relators in Cause No. 12-2355-D, pending on the docket of the 321st Judicial District Court of Smith County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on January 7, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that A Writ of Mandamus Should Not Issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that the Relators, AARON VAUGHAN AND LACY VAUGHAN, pay all costs incurred by reason of this proceeding. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Aaron Vaughan and Lacy Vaughan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re: Aaron Vaughan and Lacy Vaughan (in Re: Aaron Vaughan and Lacy Vaughan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.