In re Aaron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Aaron

252 A.D. 279, 299 N.Y.S. 160, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5632

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In three separate instances the respondent applied the moneys of his clients to his own use with the intention of replacing the same before being called upon to account therefor. He has admitted his misconduct and has repaid the moneys so converted.

The respondent should be suspended for one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Coen and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In three separate instances the respondent applied the moneys of his clients to his own use with the intention of replacing the same before being called upon to account therefor. He has admitted his misconduct and has repaid the moneys so converted.

The respondent should be suspended for one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Coen and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

In re Aaron, 252 A.D. 279, 299 N.Y.S. 160, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 279 (In re Aaron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.