In Re Aaron Holsey

872 F.2d 417, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3619, 1989 WL 29604
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 1989·No. 88-8045·Unpublished

Opinion

872 F.2d 417
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Aaron HOLSEY, Petitioner.

No. 88-8045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1989.
Decided March 24, 1989.

Aaron Holsey, petitioner pro se.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey, a Maryland prisoner, petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing that his cases be assigned to a different Maryland district judge. As it is obvious that Holsey's allegations of bias are based on his disagreement with Judge Kaufman's actions in his cases, rather than on any extrajudicial bias, we find that he is not entitled to relief. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987). Thus, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Aaron Holsey, 872 F.2d 417, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3619, 1989 WL 29604 (4th Cir. 1989).

872 F.2d 417 (In Re Aaron Holsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)