in Re Aaron Charles Hill

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
Docket09-14-00317-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Aaron Charles Hill (in Re Aaron Charles Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Aaron Charles Hill, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________

NO. 09-14-00317-CR ________________

IN RE AARON CHARLES HILL __________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Aaron Charles Hill filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which

he complains that the Clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals failed to forward a copy

of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus to the Court of

Criminal Appeals.1 The Clerk of the Court of Appeals has no role in forwarding

post-conviction habeas petitions to the Court of Criminal Appeals; rather, the clerk

of the convicting court must transmit the application to the Court of Criminal

Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3(c) (West Supp. 2013). We

take judicial notice that the District Clerk of Jefferson County is Jane Birge, and

1 This Court recently affirmed the trial court’s judgments of conviction. Hill v. State, Nos. 09-13-00479-CR, 09-13-00480-CR, 2014 WL 3387383 (Tex. App.— Beaumont July 9, 2014, no pet. h.). 1 we consider this petition as if she had been named as the respondent. See Tex. R.

Evid. 201; Tex. R. App. P. 52.2.

Other than to protect our jurisdiction, this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction

does not extend to the District Clerk. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West

2004). The proceedings at issue are post-conviction matters that do not implicate

this Court’s jurisdiction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3(a).

Mandamus relief in a post-conviction habeas proceeding must be obtained from the

Court of Criminal Appeals. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 19, 2014 Opinion Delivered August 20, 2014 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Aaron Charles Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aaron-charles-hill-texapp-2014.