in Re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 30, 2012
Docket03-12-00001-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson (in Re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-12-00001-CV

In re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson



ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


Relator Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson, an inmate, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). In the petition, Johnson asks this Court to "grant him relief by way of remanding his application [for writ of habeas corpus] back to the district court and ordering it to hear his writ." See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011).

The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. Id.; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). While a post-conviction application for habeas relief under article 11.07 must be filed in the court of original conviction, that court does not decide the merits of the application, but simply makes any necessary findings of fact and forwards the record to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a final ruling. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5. Only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Martinez, 175 S.W.3d 510, 512-13 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding). Because Johnson's petition for mandamus relief is based on the trial court's failure to act on his post-conviction writ of habeas corpus, we lack jurisdiction over his complaint. See McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: May 30, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Martinez
175 S.W.3d 510 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
McCree v. Hampton
824 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aaron-angel-gregory-johnson-texapp-2012.