In re Aaliyah R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Aaliyah R.

65 A.D.3d 1154, 885 N.Y.S.2d 225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.3d 1154 (In re Aaliyah R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Aaliyah R., 65 A.D.3d 1154, 885 N.Y.S.2d 225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the maternal grandmother appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated April 3, 2008, which, after a fact-finding hearing, directed that she have no contact with the subject child for a period of one year.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal dated April 29, 2008, is deemed to be a notice of appeal by the maternal grandmother, Jacqueline McD. (see CPLR 2001; Matter of Tagliaferri v 'Weiler; 1 NY3d 605 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order of protection is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order of protection expired by its own terms on April 3, 2009, and the determination of the appeal from that order would, under the facts of this case, have no direct effect upon the parties. Accordingly, the appeal from the order of protection must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Beverly R., 38 AD3d 668, 669 [2007]; Matter of Q.-L. H., 27 AD3d 738, 739 [2006]). Mastro, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the maternal grandmother appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated April 3, 2008, which, after a fact-finding hearing, directed that she have no contact with the subject child for a period of one year.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal dated April 29, 2008, is deemed to be a notice of appeal by the maternal grandmother, Jacqueline McD. (see CPLR 2001; Matter of Tagliaferri v 'Weiler; 1 NY3d 605 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order of protection is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order of protection expired by its own terms on April 3, 2009, and the determination of the appeal from that order would, under the facts of this case, have no direct effect upon the parties. Accordingly, the appeal from the order of protection must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Beverly R., 38 AD3d 668, 669 [2007]; Matter of Q.-L. H., 27 AD3d 738, 739 [2006]). Mastro, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.3d 1154, 885 N.Y.S.2d 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aaliyah-r-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack