In re Aaliyah H.
This text of 89 A.D.3d 557 (In re Aaliyah H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The placement was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion, and it constituted the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and best interests and the community’s need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Appellant had already been on probation for a prior delinquency adjudication, but her pattern of unlawful behavior continued to escalate. In addition, she had a very poor academic and attendance record at school, along with behavior problems and inadequate supervision at home. For the same reasons, the length of the placement was not excessive. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Catterson, Richter and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 557, 932 N.Y.2d 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aaliyah-h-nyappdiv-2011.