In re: AA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re: AA. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Haw. 270
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 2020·No. SCWC-19-0000711·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 30-DEC-2020 08:58 AM Dkt. 31 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE INTEREST OF AA

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; FC-S NO. 16-00249)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on November 2, 2020, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 30, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: AA, (haw 2020).

In re: AA (In re: AA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.