in Re: A Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc.

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-14-00357-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/5/2015 9:42:20 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

04 -14 -00357 CV

RECEIVED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS Jn 'ar:be QCourt <!&f §ppealg SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS jfor 'ar:be jfourtb f!\igtritt <!&f 'ar:exag 08/05/15 9:42:20 PM g,an §nto nio 'ar:exag KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk

BURTON KAHN APPELLANT

V.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC.

APPELLEE.

On Appeal From The 224 Judicial District Court Of Bexar County, Texas Trial Court, No. 2013-CI -18355 Hon. Margret Tanner Presiding

3RD AMENDED BRIEF OF APPELLANT AND REPLY BREIEF OF APPELLEES'S BRIEF

Burton Kahn prose 1706 Alpine Circle San Antonio, TX 78248 210-408-9199 glentrail@yahoo.com

IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Appellant certifies that the following is a complete list of the parties,

attorneys and any other person who has any interest in the outcome of this lawsuit:

Attorneys for Appellant: Burton Kahn Pro-se 1706 Alpine Circle San Antonio, TX 78248 Tel (210) 408-9199 glentrail@yahoo.corn

Attorneys for Appellee: Elizabeth Conry Davidson Attorney at Law 926 Chulie Drive San Antonio, Texas 78216 (210) 380-4899 telephone (210) 225-2300 facsimile conrydavidson@gmail.com

Resigned Haynes and Boone LLP Lisa Barkley 112 E. Pecan St. Suite 1200 San Antonio, TX 78205 - 1524 Tel (210) 978-7427 Fax (210) 0427 Lisa.Barkley@ haynesboone.com

Resigned Haynes & Boone, LLP Werner A. Powers Natalie DuBose Scott Everett 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas 7 5219 Tel (214) 651-5487 Fax (214) 200-0468 Werner.Powers@hayneshoone.com

Real Party of Interest Puerto Verde Ltd. (Bahamian) For Appellee Real Party of Interest Puerto Verde Ltd. (Bahamian) For Appellee

Trial Judge: Hon. Martha Tanner 224 th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas

Previous Attorney Appellant Appellant has represented himself pro se since December 14, 2013. His previous counsel was: L. Terry George died on June 29, 2014. Fort Worth, Texas

Jay R. Petterson Jay R. Petterson, Attorney at Law, PLLC 12274 Bandera Road, Suite 210 Helotes, Texas 78023

Kathleen A. Cassidy Goodman Law Office of Kathleen Cassidy Goodman 12274 Bandera Road, Suite 210 Helotes, Texas 78023

Richard H. Sommer 8610 N. New Braunfels Ave., Suite 309 San Antonio, Texas 78217

Robert W. Wachsmuth Zachary J. F anucci Robert Wachsmuth & Associates 9311 San Pedro, Suite 707 San Antonio, Texas 78216

111

RELATED LITIGATION

The following litigation matters are related to this appeal:

I. APPEALS IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

1. Appeal No. 04-14-00258-CV

In re a Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on August 20, 2014.

2. Appeal No. 04-14-00012-CV

Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on July 16, 2014 and denied Kahn's motion for en bane consideration on September 25, 2014. Kahn's deadline for filing his Petition for Review to the Texas Supreme Court has been extended to December 10, 2014.

3. Appeal No. 04-14-00319-CV

Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. The Court dismissed this appeal on July 9, 2014.

4. Appeal No. 04-14-00569-CV

Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. This appeal is pending.

II. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS, PENDING:

1. In re: Burton M. Kahn, Debtor, Case No. 14-50980, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.

2. In re: Burton M. Kahn, Debtor, Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. v.

Burton Al. Kahn, Adversary Proceeding Case No. 14-5052, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.

llL PENDING BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION:

PENDING BEXAR COUNTY LITIGATION

1. Burton Kahn v. Joabert Development Company and John Ripley, Cause No. 2013-CI-17012, 37th Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas.

2. Paradiv Corporation and [Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. v. ACSBLDR and Robert Ripley, Cause No. 2013-CI-17889, 166th Judicial District, Bexar County Texas. (Burton Kahn filed this action under Helvetia's name).

3. Burton Kahn v. Robert Ripley, et al., Cause No. 2014-CI-3453, 225th Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas. (This action was severed from Cause No. 2013-Cl-l 8355 in May 2014.)

1 j\r

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page IDENTITY OF PARTIES ........ ... .......... ..... ....... ............. ......... ..... ........ i

RELATED LITIGATION .............................................................. .iii.

TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................v

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ......... ........... ... .. ...... . ............ .............. vii

STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................................... xi.

STATEMENT REGARDNG ORAL ARGUMENTT ................... xii

STATEMENT REGARDNG JURISDICTION ........................... xii

RECORD REFERENCES ..... ... .... ...... ..... ... .. . ........ ......... ..... .......... xiii

ISSUES PRESENTED ............................... .. ... ......... . .... xv

STATEMENTOF FACTS ....................................................................................... 1

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................................................ 7

ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES ............................................................... 8

BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 8

ISSUEl ........................................................................................................... 10

1. Kahn Cannot Be Charged Monetary Sanction Under Tex. Civ, Prac. & Rem Code Ann§ 10:1004(D) VVhen The Party Is Representative By Counsel

ISSUE 2 .......................................................................................................... 13

APPELLATE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 5 2. Appellant Filed Under The § 5 1.903 Because He Was President And Owner Of Helvetia, Kahn's Filing Under §51 903 Is Not Sanctionable iv

v

ISSUE 3 .......................................................................................................... 19

3 Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions On Unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement ISSUE 4 ......................................................................................................... 23

4 Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On Ownership Of Stock.

CONCLUSION ............ ... .......... ........ ... .......... ..... ....... ... ........... 24

PRAYER ................................................. ........................ ................... 25

VERIFICATION ......... ........................ ....................................... 25

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .. . .......... ........... ... ..................... 26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ............................................. . . . .. . .. ... ........ 26

APPENDIX .................................................................................................... 27

EXHIBITS A. Motion 2013-CI-17516

B. Motion 2013-CI--18394

C. Final Judgment and Sanction Order

D. Petterson Contract.

E. Statute § 51.903

F. Wiring Instructions Handwritten Receipt

G. Appellee's Stock certificate in 2013-CI-17516

H. Appellant's Stock certificate

J. . Exhibit 39 iv

Vl

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Benavides v. Knapp Chevrolet, Inc., No. 01-08-00212-CV, 2009 WL 349813, at *5 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2009, no writ.) ......................................... 11

BMG Direct Mktg.,Inc.v. Peake, 178 S.W.3d 7763,767 (Texas 2005) ........................................................................ 21

Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 553-54 (Tex.2000) ........................................................................ 24-

Buffalo Bag Co. v. Joachim, 704 SW 2d 482, 483 (Tex App -Houston [I st Dist 11986, writ refd nre.). ...................................................................................................................... 20

Burnaman v. Heaton , 150 Tex. 333 (1951)240 S.W.2d288 ........ ............ .............. ........... ... ......... ............. 21

Cetti v. Dunman, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 433 [26 Tex. Civ. App. 433], 64 S.W. 787 (1901, writrefd). ........................................................................................ 22

City ofAllen v. Pub. Util. Comm 'n of Tex., 161 S.W.3d 195, 199 (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) ........................................ 24

City ofDeSoto v. White , 288 S.W.3d 359, 393 (Tex. 2009) ......................................................................... 24

City ofHouston v. Rhule, 417 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam) ....... ......... ................... ......... ......... 23

City ofRoonoke v. T. of Westlake, I 11 S.W.3d 617 (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 2003). ............................................................................ 21

CometAluminum Co v Dibrell, 450 SW 2d 56, 58 (Tex 1970) (ong proceeding) ... ....................................................... 20

Conner v, Johnson, 02-03-31 6-cv (Tex App -Ft Worth 10-28-.2004) .................................................... 15

vu

Duncan v Smith, 393 s W 2d 798, 80304 (Tex. 1 965)) .................................................................................. 15

Dunlap v. Villnreal, 91 S.W.2d 1124, 1125 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1936, no writ). .. ........................... 22

Early v. Bums, 142 S.W.2d 260 (Tex.Civ.App. - Beaumont 1940, writ refd) ...................................... 22

Entergy Corp. v. Jenkins, 01-12-00470-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 11-6-2014)................................... 23

Ex Parte Preston, 833 8W.24 515 (Tex.Cr.App. I 992) ... . .. ..... ................................................... ....... 20

Failv. Lee, 535 S.W.2d 203, 207-08 (Tex. Civ.App. -Fort Worth 1976, no writ)" .......................... 22

Fin. Comm'n ofTex. v. Norwood, 418 S.W.3d 566, 578 (Tex. 2013) ...... . .. ...... ......... .............. ....................... .......... 23

First Coppell Bank v. Smith, 742 S.W.2d 454, 460 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, no writ) .......................................... 16

Fortune Prod. Co. v. Conoco, Inc., 52 S.W.3d 671, 678 (Tex. 2000) ......................................................................... 16

Gomer v. Davis, 419 S.W.3d 470 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2013) .......................................... 11

Gym-N-I Playgrounds v. Snider, 220 S.W. 3d 905 (Tex. 2007). ................................................................................. 21

In re Estate ofFlores, 76 S.W.3d 624, 630 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) ................................ 16

In re United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 307 S.W.3d 299, 309 (Tex. 2010). .......................................................................... 24

V111

In Re Guerrero, 440 S.W.3d 917 (Tex.App.-Amarillo-2014). ............................................ .. .................. 20

Johnson v. Rancho Guadalupe, inc., 789 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Tex. App. -Texarkana 1990, writ denied). .................................. 22

Loejjler v. Lytle Indep. Sch. Dist., 211 S.W.3d 331, 349-50 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) .................... 12

Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d 609 (Tex, . 2007) ................................................................................. 11

McMillan v. McMillan, 72 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App. - Dallas 1934, no writ). ............................. .................... 22

Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And Baylor College OfMedicine, 12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) ....................................................................................... 10

Pierce v. Terra Mar Consultants, inc., 566 S.W.2d 49 (Tex.Civ.App. - Texarkana 1978, writ dismd). ................................... 22

Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 431, 127 S.Ct. 1184, 1191 (2007)) ............ .............. ........ ...... ........... 23

Solano v. Landamerica Commw., 02-07-152-cv (Tex.App. -Ft. Worth 12-4-2008) ...... .............. ......... .............. ........... 16

Swanberg v. Swanberg, 01-12-00375-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 8-22-2013). .................................. 11

Travelers Companies. v. Wolfe 838 S.W.2d 708, 714 Tex.App.-Amarillo 1992,no writ ............................................... .15

Univ. of Tex. at Arlington v. Bishop, 997 S.W.2d 350, 357 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied) ........................... 12

Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Loutzenhiser, 140 S.W.3d 351, 359 (Tex. 2004). .......................................................................... 24

Walden v Sanger,

lX

250 S.W.2d 312,; Tex.App.-Austin 1952, no writ. .................................................. 22

Williams v. Nolan, 58 Tex. 708, 713-14 (1883); ............................................................................................. 22.

STATUTES

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 10.001; .......................................... 10,.11, 24

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.§ 10.004(d) (Vernon 2002) ...... .......... 7, 11,24

Tex. Gov' t Code . § 51903 ............................................................................ 7,13,25 RULES

Tex. R. Civ. P. Rule 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 7,20,21.25

OTHER AUTHORITIES

25 *., p. 385, et seq.;... . .. .... . .... . .. ............ . .. ................... . .. . ..... 21.

49 C.J.S., Judgments, § 173, page 308, et seq. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 21.

x

STATEMENT OF CASE

Nature the case this is an appeal arising out of the granting sanctions for a

fictitious filing and attempted withdrawal of a Rule 11 Agreement. 3CR 229.256.

Course ofproceeding. The On November 5, 2013 1 CRlHelvetia filed the

lawsuit giving rise to this appeal as an "action on fraudulent lien on property"

pursuant to section§ 51.903 of the Texas Government Code. Hon. Judge John

D. Gabriel signed in order stating that the deeds are fraudulent. 1 CR 76. On

December 11, 2013 Hon. Karen H Pozza signed an order setting aside

November 5, 2013:2 CR 11 On April 1, 2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final

Judgment and Order of Sanctions against Kahn and his attorney 3CR 229.

Judge Tanner denied Kahn's motion to reconsider, vacate, modify, correct or

reform the Sanctions Judgment on April 11, 2014. 4CR 23 9.

Disposition Of The Case, Kahn filed his notice of appeal on May 14,

2014. 4CR 243. On November 3, 2014 Appellee filed its Brief and Motion. This

reply is in response to that Brief and Motion.

Xl

STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

Kahn does not believe that oral argument is necessary as the arguments

in brief hopefully will convince the Court to reverse the sanctions

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant appeals final judgment setting aside the 224thjudicial District

order set aside judicial findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding a

document or instrument 40 to create a lien or claim on December 11, 2013.

There is no dispute regarding the fourth Court of Appeals have appellate

jurisdiction over this matter.

Xll

RECORD REFERENCES The Reporter's Record will be cited as

follows: [Vol.] RR [page]

The Clerk's Record will be cited as follows:

[Vol.] CR [page]

Comments about the Reporter's Record

Recorder Record in Exhibit 5 has the exhibits presented at the hearing

and the record and Exhibits of the December 9, 2013 t December 11,

2013. The following is a table of contents of this volume.

Table of contents volume 5

Exhibit 1 Motion for case 2013-CI-18394 pages 6 - 81 Secretary of State page 41-64 Exhibit 2 Order for case 2013-CI-18394 pages 82 - 88 Exhibit 3 order setting aside motion case 2013- CI-18394 pages 89-91 Exhibit 4 stock certificate pages 93-94 Exhibit 5 Corporate Minutes pages 95 - 96 Exhibit 6 tax return page 97 - 113 Exhibit 7 Paradiv warranty deeds pages 114- 127 Exhibit 9 Order case 2013-CI-17516 pages 128 -139 Exhibit 10 Commission v. Howard Kahn pages 140-144 Exhibit 11 Rodriguez v. U.S. Tank pages 145-171 Exhibit 12 Routh v. Bank of America pages 172-179 Exhibit.13 Draxz v. American General pages 180-189 Exhibit 14 USA v. Revels pages 200 -203 Exhibit.15 Powers letter to George November 4, 2013 pages 204-205 Exhibit 16 Powers letter to George November 5, 2013 pages 206-208

X111

Exhibit 17 Barkley letter to Peterson November 2013 pages 209-210 Exhibit 18 Powers letter to Peterson November 6, 2013 pages 211-213 Exhibit 19 Gonzales letter to Kahn, September 17, 2007 pages 214- 216 Exhibit 20 Kahn letter to NA Title November 25, 2007 pages 217-225 Exhibit 21 Handwritten by Ripley September 17, 2007 pages 226-227 Exhibit 22 Settlement statement November 13, 2007 pages 228-235 Exhibit 23 Ripley e-mail to Kahn September 20, 2013 pages 236-238 Exhibit 24 Ripley e-mail to Kahn September 8, 2013 pages 239-241 Exhibit 25 Motion to DA Re Joseph Lobley 1990 pages 242-249 Exhibit 26 Summary Judgment Kahn v. National S 1988 pages 250-254 Exhibit 27 Order Jacobson v. Kahn 1983 pages 255- 270 Exhibit 28 Sellers/borrowers affidavit, page 271-272 Exhibit 29 Haynes Boone Time Sheet 3/3 2014 pages 273-274 Exhibit 30 Haynes and Boone time sheet pages.275-281 Exhibit 31 Haynes and Boone time fee sheet pages.282-283

D Exhibit 1 Attorney client contract Pederson Kahn pages 284-292 D Exhibit 2 City of Roanoke v. T Westlake pages 293-294 D Exhibit 2 Kahn's Counterclaim v Ripley pages 295-305 D Exhibit. 3 Organizational Minutes forged by Moore pages 306-311 D Exhibit 4 stock certificate forged by Moore pages 312-313 D Exhibit 5 Motion case 2013-CI-17516 pages 314-340 D Exhibit 6 Secretary of State page 341 - 3 62 D Exhibit 7 Secretary of State page 363 - 365 D Exhibit 8 Vol. 4 of Hearing December 10, 2013 pages 366-525 D Exhibit 8 Vol. 5 of Hearing December 11, 2013 pages 526-559 D Exhibit 8 Vol. 1 Excerpts Hearing Dec.9,10 11 , 2013 pages 560-665 D Exhibit 9 Vol. Master Index Hearing Dec.9- 11, 2013 pages 666-674 D Exhibit 9 Vol. 2 of Hearing December 9, 2013 pages 675-713 D Exhibit 9 Vol. 3 of Hearing December 9, 2013 pages 714-839 D Exhibit 10 Trial EXHIBIT 39 pages 840-882 D Exhibit 10 George letter to Morrison September 19, 2007 page 883 D Exhibit 11 Gonzales letter to Kahn, August 22,, 2007 pages 884-885

XlV

ISSUES PRESENTED

Issue 1) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due to

the A Party cannot be charged monetary sanction under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.

Code Ann. § 10.004(d) when the party is representative by counsel.

Issue 2) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due

to filing a fictitious suit is that the filing was not in accordance with Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.§ 10.001

Issue 3) The Trial Court sanction order was an abuse of discretion due to

t5he Rule 11 Agreement was unenforceable and the Court did not have authority to

impose Sanctions.

Issue 4) Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To

Rule On Ownership Of Stock.

xv

STATEMENTOF FACTS

After Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. ("Helvetia")terminated Burton Kahn

("Kahn")'s employment (no evidence of Kahn was employed by Helvetia)

Kahn was a one third owner of the stock in Joabert Development Company

("Joabert") (Owner and builder of the Royal Crest Subdivision) and was working

for benefit of Joabert. 3RR 82

Helvetia was a conduit to accumulate funds for Joabert. Robert Ripley

("Ripley") testified that the funds go to Joabert. 5RR 793. Kahn testified that the

funds go to Joabert. In Helvetia' s original petition funds were earmarked to go to

Joabert. CR m 3 Kahn testified that the money in Helvetia went to Contour and

to Joabert. 5RR 483 Maple Bush Holding Ltd(" Maple Bush") purchased John

Ripley's loan notes on Key Largo Subdivision, using funds of EFG Bank

(Bahamas) to Falcon International Bank 5RR 819. Maple Bush foreclosed on

these loan notes 5RR 820 to become owner of Key Largo subdivision Maple Bush

sold Key Largo to Helvetia 5RR 229

1. Kahn Cannot Be Charged Monetary Sanction Under Tex. Civ, Prac. &

Rem. Code Ann§ 10:1004(D) When The Party IsRepresentative By Counsel

Kahn on November 1, 2013 hired Jay R. Peterson, Attorney at Law, PLCC

("Petterson") to represent him in several cases pending in Bexar County, Texas.

5RR 284, DF Exl

Case 2013 CI 18394 was filed on November 5, 2013 and signed by

Petterson. lCR 1-95, 5RR 6-12, 5RR 210, Pl Ex 1

Kahn fired Peterson on November 22, 2013. 5RR 444

2. Appellant filed under the § 5 1.903 because he was President and

Owner ofHelvetia Kahn 'sfiling under §51 903 are not sanctionable.

On October 23 , 2013, Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian Corporation, claimed

to be a 100% stockholder Helvetia filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, Order 5RR

128-139, Motion, 5RR 315-340 in the style of "Action on Fraudulent Lien on

Property. " Ripley swore that the documents in this suit were true , showing

proof that Puerto Verde Ltd. is the owner of Helvetia . These documents were of

Certificate of Formation 5RR 321, Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of

The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A for-profit Corporation dated

August 17, 2015 (:Original Minutes") 5RR 322 and a stock certificate 001 dated

August 20, 2007. 5RR 327

The Original Minutes stated that the offer of stock was to Puerto Verde Ltd.

5RR 324 But the stock certificate stated Puerto Verde Inc. The stock certificate

was signed by Kenneth Moore ("Moore") who was named president in the initial

minutes. 5RR 323

On November 5, 2013, Kahn claiming I 00% stockholder Helvetia filed a

lawsuit 2013-CI-18394 , in the style of "Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property.

Motion lCRl,, Order lCR 76. In that Motion Kahn's Attorney Jay R Petterson

("Petterson") claims that the documents included in 2013-CI-17516 are forgeries.

The form of the stock certificate was not the correct form. 5RR 10, 5RR 68

Ripley did not contact Terry George ("George") the organizer and attorney for

Helvetia for the proper form of certificate. 5RR 536, 738 George testified that he

never provided any copies of the minutes to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544

Ripley stated he did not have the form of the stock certificate so he made one up

and faxed the certificate to his brother John Ripley from Toronto, Canada. 5RR

797. There are no fax markings on the certificate so that faxing is questionable.

Ripley never contacted George until September 2013, 5RR 738.

Moore testified that he never issued any shares. 5RR 503 Moore testified

that he never sold any shares. 5RR 503 Moore testified that he never received any

money for shares. 5RR 503

Moore testified that two of his signatures were Moore's but not the third

signature. 5RR 509

Moore testified was not the custodian of records 5RR 504,

On August 21, 2007 the Title Company sent Kahn an email wiring

instructions for the $1.2 million money trail exchange. Robert Ripley took this

document and crossed out sender and in his own handwriting that stated "Please

transfer 1.2 million USD to my escrow agent as outlined in these instructions. The

4

funds will be used to capitalize a Texas holding (-hold) co. and in return Puerto

Verde will receive 1000 shares." 5RR 227 Robert testified that this document was

a receipt from the title company however Robert crossed out the name of the Title

Company' s sender. 5RR 831 Ripley testified that the funds for the transfer came

from the Ripley family trust. 5RR 571 There are no Bank records of this transfer

and there are no records of the title company that this document was in existence

and was given or received.

Robert testified that Scott Morrison ("Morrison") was the trust officer for

the Bahamian bank 5RR 705 and as of October 22, 2007 he did not have any

documentation on the ownership. 5RR 704-705 These instructions were never sent

to Morrison but Morrison sent the transfer funds. Ripley testified that he owns

both Maple Bush and Puerto Verde Ltd. 5RR 799 Ripley testified that the funds

used to purchase the notes were from computer company he closed down. 5RR

746 On February 8, 2008. Ripley's sent email to Kahn again questioning

ownership 5RR 573. Ripley does not have the original stock certificate 5RR 801

nor the receipt from the Title Company nor the minutes of the original meeting,

that he claimed in his affidavits and testimony previously cited above.

Ripley submitted to the court Exhibit 39 5RR 840, DF Ex 10 which he

called a kit. 5RR844 Ripley claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George.

5RR743 George testified that he never provided any copies to anyone but Burt

Kahn. 5RR 544 Exhibit 39 was comprised of transmittal and instruction letter, By

laws and the Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting Of The Board Of Directors

Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A for-profit Corporation dated of August 8, 2,007.(" August

8, 2007 minutes") The transmittal does not have any information on who has sent it

nor is there a signature but it does state to review and call if there are any changes.

5RR 851-882 The By laws and August 8, 2007 has George's signature on dated

August 8, 2007 as of these documents are final. George testified that he never

provided any copies to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544 George testified that he

Exhibit 39 was not his work. 5RR 549-557 The shares to be issued to Puerto

Verde, Inc. 1000. are written in pencil. 5RR 553 Also per August 8, 2007 minutes

state that George resigned on August 8, 2007. Ripley testified that he received

Exhibit 39 by courier in Canada but does not have any envelope that it came in.

5RR 738 Ripley testified that this document was specially flown in to San

Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing. 5RR 711 The bylaws state in

pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is different from the minutes of

August 17, 2007 which has George' s address. 5RR 393

3 Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions

On Unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement.

On November 15, 2013 Appellant's attorneys and Peterson and Kathleen

Goodman ("Goodman") signed a Rule 11 Agreement without Kahn' s, consent to

6

any of the details 5RR 442. Kahn fired Petterson and Goodman. 5RR 444, At the

injunction Judge Pozza stated that she could not enforce the Rule 11 Agreement

5RR661

4 Court Abused Its Discretion Because The Court Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On Ownership OfStock.

The Courts first statement twas "So we're not on the merits today? 2RR 5

The court stated on the issue of who owns the stock, "Well that's a subject of

a different type of motion that is the one right now. But you're certainly welcome

to urge that to some court when you file a proper motion." 3RR 20.

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

Tex, Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 10.004(d) does not authorize the

award of monetary sanctions against Appellant for an act when Kahn was

represented by counsel. Appellant was represented by counsel and any monetary

sanctions should be stricken .

Appellant filed Under § 5 1. 903 Because He Was Owner And President Of

Helvetia and the filing have evidentiary support and him was not fictitious and

should have not been sanctioned for making a legal contention claim of ownership.

Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions On Unenforceable

Rule 11 Agreement.

Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On

Ownership Of Stock.

ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES

BACKGROUND

Burton Kahn ("Kahn") ("Appellant") and John Ripley founded the Joabert

Development Company ("Joabert") in 2006 to develop and sell housing lots in

Northeast San Antonio. Appellant did all the work and John Ripley supplied the

funds. John Ripley sold some of his properties in order to supply funds for

Joabert. One of these properties was a subdivision named Key Largo, which John

Ripley foreclosed on himself. The foreclosed property was sold to a holding

corpora ti on named Helvetia As set Recovery, Inc. ( " Helvetia " ).

Appellant' s responsibilities was to purchase properties, secure funds, design

subdivisions infrastructure and roadways. construct the design and to do all the

necessary paper work including dealing with local authorities. Kahn never got any

compensation for the eight years that he worked. Kahn had invested

approximately $100, 000 of his own money.

Appellant was selling lots from the subdivision to provide Joabert with

construction funds. The relationship ended in August 26, 2013 and Appellant was

holding approximately $290,000 of funds slated to go to Joabert. Robert

Ripley("Ripley"), John's brother was not a stockholder in Joabert. 5RR 809-810

Ripley wanted to take the Helvetia property for himself. The shares of Helvetia

were never purchased and to protect Helvetia/Joabert from Ripley, Appellant

9

purchased the 1000 shares. 5RR408-410 Knowing there was a $1.2 million debt,

and the property would go to Joabert like all the other items Appellant purchased.

On September 16, 2013, Robert Ripley and John Ripley went to Randolph Brooks

Federal Credit Union and submitted over 50 pages of documents to the bank to

take over Helvetia' s bank account. 5RR 794 John and Robert Ripley were refused

access.

On October 23, 2013 Appellee filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, claiming that

Puerto Verde Ltd. ("PVL") owned 100% the Helvetia stock. EXHIBIT A. 5RR

314, DF Ex 5 Included in the motion was documentation of Puerto Verde Ltd. 's

ownership.

On November 5, 2013 Appellant filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-18394, claiming

that Appellant owned 100% the Helvetia stock. EXHIBIT B lCRl, DF Ex 5.

Included in the motion was detailed explanations why documentation of 2013-CI-

17516 was a forgery.

At an Injunction Hearing was held on December 9- 11, 2013, Appellant

was ordered to place the funds into the registry of the court . A sanction hearing

was conducted in March 3 and 4 , 2014 and Appellant was sanctioned for filing a

fictitious suit but not his attorney who signed the pleading and for withdrawal of

an unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement. (EXHIBIT C Order Final Judgment

and Order of Sanctions ) 3CR229

ISSUE 1

KAHN CANNOT BE CHARGED MONETARY SANCTION UNDER TEX. CIV,PRAC. &REM CODE§ 10:1004(D)WHEN1HEPARTYIS REPRESENTATIVE BY COUNSEL

On November 1, 2013 Kahn hired Jay R Petterson as his representative in

the series of lawsuits involving the case EXHIBIT D.

On November 3, 2013 Petterson spent 7 hours reviewing documents and

preparing Motion For Findings And Conclusions Of Law, review and organize

exhibits and statute.

On November 5, 2013 Peterson spent 4 hours reviewing emergency motion

for discovery filed by adverse party, prepared final drafts of Motions Findings And

Conclusions Of Law and travel to and from court. Peterson signed the Motion and

had an Ex Parte hearing with Hon. Judge John D Gabriel, who signed order.

EXHIBITB

The employment contract (EXHIBIT D) between Kahn, and Peterson shows

Kahn as Client and Petterson as the attorney.

The motion for § 51. 903 is outlined in the statute EXHIBIT E ." Movant

further acknowledges that movant may be subject to sanctions as provided by Chapter

10 Civil Practice And Remedies Code, if this motion is determined to the frivolous." In

Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And Baylor College OfMedicine, 12-0620 (Tex.

8-29-2014) states:

However, Chapter I 0 provides that a claim that lacks a legal or factual basis - without more - is sanctionable. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ I 0.001 ; see also Low, 221 S.W.3d at 617. Legally, the claim must be warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to change existing law. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 10.001 (2). But Chapter 10 expressly prohibits monetary sanctions against a represented party based on the legal contentions in a pleading. Id. § I 0.004( d) ("The court may not award monetary sanctions against a represented party for a violation of Section 10.001(2). "). Accordingly, the trial court could not have properly awarded sanctions against Nath for groundless legal contentions in his tortuous interference claim.

Chapter I 0 requires that each factual contention must have evidentiary support or be likely to receive it after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. Id. § 10.001(3); Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d at 616-17.

InSwanbergv. Swanberg, 01-12-00375-cv(Tex.App.-Houston [I st Dist.]

8-22-2013) States

"But section 10.004(d) specifically provides that "[t]he court may not award monetary sanctions against a represented party for a violation of Section I 0.001 (2)." Id.§ 10.004(d); see also Benavides v. Knapp Chevrolet, Inc., No. 01-08-00212-CV, 2009 WL 349813, at *5 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2009, no pet.) (overturning sanctions award under chapter I 0 when trial court's monetary sanctions "could only have been based on section 10.001(2)"). Because the order awarded sanctions based on a violation of section 10.001(2) and Mark was represented by counsel when he filed his petition, the monetary award against him was a violation of section 10.004(d).

In Gomer v. Davis, 419 S.W.3d 470 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2013)

states:

Section 10.004(d), however, provides that the trial court "may not award monetary sanctions against a represented party for a violation of Section 10.001(2)." TEX. Civ. PRAC. & REMCODE ANN.§ 10.004(d) (Vernon 2002). Here, the trial court imposed $5,000 in sanctions against Gomer, a represented party. Under these facts, therefore, section 10.001(2) cannot support this sanctions award against Gomer, although Gomer's attorney may be sanctioned under this section. See Univ. of Tex. at Arlington v. Bishop, 997 S.W.2d 350, 357 (Tex.App.- Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied)~ see also Loeffler v. Lytle Indep. Sch. Dist., 211 S.W.3d 331, 349-50 (Tex.App.- San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) (holding that because attorney decides which legal claims to file and party provides, at most, factual basis for claims, party "should not be punished for their attorney's conduct unless the party is implicated apart from having entrusted its legal representation, and trial court abused its discretion in sanctioning party under Chapter 10).

In this case Appellant's only action was the claiming of his property. Each

allegation in 2013-CI-18394 was supported by a nonfrivolous argument. The

injunction hearing of December 9 - 11 , 2013 showed that the statement of facts

and all the allegations made in the motion were true. Petterson did all the

necessary investigations. George had no final say in the motion and was too ill to

participate. George was also a represented party as stated in the Appellee's First

Amended Motion for Sanctions 2CR 135 That is the reason why he recommended

Goodman who then recommended Petterson.

CONCLUSION ISSUE 1

Based on above, the trial court abused its discretion by sanctioning

Appellant who was represented by attorney, Peterson.

ISSUE 2

2 .. KAHN FILED UNDER THE § 5 1.903 BECAUSE HE WAS OWNER AND PRESIDENT OF HELVETIA KAHN'S FILING UNDER §51 903 IS NOT SANCTIONABLE

The shares of Helvetia were never purchased and to protect Helvetia/Joabert

from Ripley, Appellant purchased the 1000 shares. EXHIBIT H 5RR 93 PL Ex 4.

Appellant was president and director of Helvetia according the Secretary of State

except for the period from September 20, 2013 to October 4, 2013.SRR 41-64 The

issue in the dispute is who owns the shares of Helvetia.

STOCK CERTIFICATE

Robert Ripley claims that he purchased the shares for Helvetia from Moore

on August 20, 2007. 5RR 327 EHIBIT G, DF Ex.4 His claim is based on the

stock certificate. 5RR 796 Ripley claims that he did not have correct form of

certificate 5RR 10, 5RR 68 so he made one on his computer 5RR 743 and did not

contact George the originator and attorney of Helvetia. 5RR 536,738 Ripley who

was in Canada then faxed the blank certificate which he had just created to his

brother John in San Antonio. 5RR 743 There are no fax documentation on the

certificate 1 similar to the fax sent by Appellee to Secretary of State .. 5RR 300,

14

5RR 354 Ripley then claims that he was faxed back the certificate after Moore

signed the certificate but does not have a copy. 5RR 801 Again there are no fax

documentation marks on the certificate. Moore testified that he did not issue any

stock. 5RR 501 Moore testified that he did not get any money. 5RR 503 Moore

testified that two of the three signatures on his but not the third signature. 5RR 509

Moore testified that he was not the custodian of records which the stock certificate

stated he was. 5RR 504 .

The name on the site certificate is Puerto Verde Inc, yet Ripley is claiming

that the owner is Puerto Verde Ltd.

To sum up the testimony at this juncture of the testimony and

documentation of the stock certificate: Ripley claimed that he faxed without faxed

documentation on the form that was not according to the official minutes to his

brother John Ripley who had Moore sign and issue the certificate that Moore

claimed he never issued. The certificate had a third signature which was not

Moore's.

EXHIBIT F.

Ripley claims that he received a receipt from the title company $1.2 million

and payment of $1,000 for shares in a Hold co on September 17, 2007 5RR394

EXHIBIT F, PL Ex.21 Although the receipt states Hold Co Ripley meant

Helvetia. This receipt is only written on a Tile Company memo of August 21,

15

2013. It does not state who received it. If it is wiring instructions why would the

title company give a receipt?. Who in the title company gave this receipt?

When EXHIBIT F was submitted to the Court it was objected by Appellant

on the grounds of hearsay and authenticity. Afterward Appellee's attorney asked

"this is your handwriting. Right? Answer "That is my handwriting. The court then

admitted the document. 5RR 687 This document was written on the Land America

Lawyers Title Company of San Antonio ("Title company") s email on August 21, 2007

and the document was handwritten on September 17, 2007. The self serving handwriting,

does not make the document authentic ..

In Conner v, Johnson, 02-03-31 6-cv (Tex App -Ft Worth 10-28-.2004)

"The facts: stated :should not be. self-serving. Travelers Companies. v. Wolfe 838 S.W.2d 708, 714 (citing Duncan v Smith, 393 SW 2d 798, 80304 (Tex. 1 965)) (holding that not only should the statement be against interest but also that the "facts stated" should be against interest because that increases the. likelihood of its truth)

This document EXHIBIT F is completely self -serving and should not

have been admitted and the Court abused its discretion by allowing EXHIBIT

F to be in evidence and has caused an improper judgment of the Temporary

Injunction. Hearing of December 9-11,2013 and this Final judgment and

Sanction Order.

The document EXHIBIT F was not presented in 2013-Cl-17516 as a

exhibit to show Ownership. Ownership was questioned by Robert Ripley in a

email dated February 8, 2008 .5RR573 The Banker Scott Morrison, 5RR 705

who issued the $1.2 million transfer on September 17, 2007 but on October 22,

2007 did not have any documentation as to the ownership of the stock of

Helvetia . 5RR 704-705. If Morrison did not have any documentation , then

Morrison did not get EXHIBIT F. Robert Ripley testified that the funds came

from the Ripley family trust.5RR571,

It EXHIBIT F is proof of ownership, then the stock certificate mentioned

above must be of forgery. There was only 1000 shares available so there can be

only one sale.

In Solano v. Landamerica Commw., 02-07-152-cv (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth

12-4-2008) states:

If a person signs another's name to a document with authority to do so, there is no forgery. See In re Estate of Flores, 76 S.W.3d 624, 630 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) (explaining that "forgery is defined as altering, making, completing, executing, or authenticating a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not authorize that act"); First Coppell Bank v. Smith, 742 S.W.2d 454, 460 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, no writ), overruled on other grounds, Fortune Prod. Co. v. Conoco, Inc., 52 S.W.3d 671 , 678 (Tex. 2000) (concluding that forgery was established because the witness testified "unequivocally that she did not authorize anyone to sign her name to the deed of trust");

In this case the stock certificate was altered by placing a signature that was

Moore's and thus is a forgery.

MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING

In order to get the minutes to correct the Inc. or Ltd. suffixes,, Ripley

submitted to the court Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J which he called a kit. Ripley

claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George. 5RR735 George testified that he

never provided any copies to anyone but Burt Kahn. 5RR 544 George testified that

Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J was not his work. 5RR 549,--5RR 557 Exhibit 39

EXHIBIT J was comprised of an instructional transmittal letter, By Laws and the

initial meeting minutes of August 8, 2,007. The transmittal does not have any

information on who has sent it nor a signature but it does state to review and call if

there are any changes. 5RR 851-882 The By Laws and initial minutes have

George's signature on dated August 8, 2007 as if to make these documents final.

George testified that the signatures looked like his but the documents were not the

documents George gave to Kahn. 5RR 548 The shares to be issued to Puerto

Verde, Inc. 1000. is written in pencil. 5RR 553 Also per August 8, 2007 minutes

state that George resigned on August 8, 2007. Robert testified that he received

Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J by courier in Canada but does not have any envelope that

it came in. 5RR 738 Ripley testified that this document was specially flown in to

San Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing. 5RR 711 The bylaws state

18

in pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is different from the minutes of

August 17, 2007 which has George' s address. 5RR 393

QUESTIONS FROM EVIDENCE PRESENTED

1. What was the date that Puerto Verde Ltd purchased the stock?

a)Was it on August 20, 2007, on the certificate form signed by Moore

who never received any funds and never issued stock and was never a

custodian of records and who did not sign the third signature on the

certificate that was faxed without fax markings?

b) Was the date September 17, 2007 the wiring instructions from

Morrison who never knew of the transfer instructions and from the funds of

the Ripley Family Trust and not from Puerto Verde Ltd. ' s Bank account.

2. Who purchased the stock of Helvetia?

a) Was the purchase on August 20, 2007, Puerto Verde Inc or Puerto

Verde Ltd?

b) Was the purchase on September 17, 2007 Puerto Verde Inc or Ltd ?

c) Was the purchase on September 17,, 2007 Stock was not for

Helvetia but for Hold Co

d) On September 17, 2007 the transfer funds came from the Ripley

Family Trust per testimony of Ripley, 5RR 571 Is the owner of the

shares per the handwritten note, the Ripley Family Trust?

e) There are no bank statements for these transfers. Who did them?

3. What is the date of the minutes of the organizational of Helvetia?

a) Was the date on August 17, 2007, as per Case No 2013-CI-17516

or August 8, 2007 per Exhibit 39 EXHIBIT J?

b) Was the date per Organizer, attorney George or was it according to

the specially flown in to the hearing document with blanks and

penciled fill ins?

The maneuvers of Appellee show that a conspiracy occurred and that there is

a great deal of perjury in regards to the ownership of the stock of Helvetia.

Appellant requests that this Appellate Court inform the District Attorney of Bexar

County to investigate the possibility of Subornation of Perjury by Werner A,

Powers and Lisa S. Barkley.

CONCLUSION ISSUE 2

Based on the evidence presented and in the questions that have arisen from

this evidence establishes that Petterson did not file a frivolous motion because he

had evidentiary support for each allegation.

ISSUE 3

3 Court Did Not Have Authority To Impose Sanctions On Unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement

The trial court Judge Tanner imposed Sanctions on Appellant. April 1, 2014.

Court Order 1.... based, on the attempted withdrawal of the unauthorized Rule

I !Agreement. 3CR 229 At the Injunction. hearing on December: 9,, 2013 to

December 11, 2013 the issue to enforce the Rule 11 Agreement was brought to the

court, Judge Pozza stated .".Well I am not. sure ..... You can brief it if you like, but

I'm not sure the Court can enforce the Rule 11 Agreement, because it does not seem

that Mr. Kahn perhaps either never consented. or withdrew his consent"' Thus Judge

Pozza ruled orally that without a motion or a briefing she could, not enforce the Rule

11 Agreement. There was never any further motions or briefing. In InRe Guerrero,

440 S.W.3d 917 (Tex.App.-Amarillo-2014)

Rendition of judgment is the pronouncement by the court of its conclusions and decision upon the matter submitted to it for adjudication. Buffalo Bag Co. v. Joachim, 704 SW 2d 482, 483 (re App -Houston [1 4th Dist 11986, writ refd nre.). A trial court .renders judgment when it officially announces its decision either orally in open court or by a memorandum filed with the clerk of the court CometAluminum Co v Dibrell, 450 S W 2d 56, 58 (Tex 1970) (ong proceeding) If a trial court's order is adequately reflected in the reporter's record, a formal written order is not essential to obtaining mandamus relief

Prior to any additional motions or briefs the Court had stated it was "not

sure". This is defined as reasonable doubt, Ex Parte Preston, 833 8W.24 515

(Tex.Cr.App. I 992). The issues were decided not to enforce the Rule 11

Agreement at that time unless subsequenfAction was done to further litigate the

validity of the Rule 11 Agreement. No subsequent action occurred and therefore

the Court could not enforce the Rule 11 Agreement. This makes the Rule 11

Agreement unenforceable. With no subsequent action the Rule 11 Agreement was

fully litigated and collaterally, estoppel will prevent the Rule 11 Agreement from

any other action.

Kahn did not review the Rule 11 Agreement prior to it being signed by

Petterson. The employment. contract (EXHIBIT D) 5RR 284-291 between Kahn and

Peterson states on page 3 that "it is the attorney's responsibility to advise you on legal

ramifications of the decisions but-you must make. the actual decisions" Kahn did not

make that decision to sign away I 00% of Appellant' s work that he had done and get

0% back When Kahn realized that Petterson had signed away Kahn's rights including

a jury trial Kahn fired. Petterson. 55RR 464 The withdrawal of the rule 1.1 agreement

is a Contract RIGHT. In Gym-N-1 Playgrounds v. Snider, 220 S.W. 3d 905 (Tex.

2007)

Texas strongly favors parties freedom of contract BMG Direct Mktg.,Inc.v. Peake, 178 S.W.3d 7763 ,767 (Texas 2005)

In Burnaman v. Heaton , 150 Tex. 333 (1951)240 S.W.2d 288

" The judgment was rendered on the agreement of the attorneys and was therefore a consent judgment. 25 Tex.Jur., p. 385, et seq.; 49 C.J.S., Judgments, § 173, page 308, et seq. A valid consent judgment cannot be rendered by a court when consent of one of the parties thereto is wanting. "

This sentiment is echoed in many cases:

In City ofRoanoke v. T. ofWestlnke, 111 S.W.3d 617 (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth2003)

.9

"We agree that an attorney retained for litigation is presumed to possess authority to enter into a settlement on behalf of a client. Williams v. Nolan, 58 Tex. 708, 713-14 (1883); Walden v Sanger, 250 S.W.2d 312, 316; Dunlnp v. Villareal, 91 S.W.2d 1124, 1125 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1936, no writ). This is a presumption of actual authority, however, and may be rebutted by affirmative proof that the client did not authorize his attorney to enter into the settlement. Walden, 250 S.W.2d at 316; Johnson v. Rancho Guadalupe, inc., 789 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Tex. App. - Texarkana 1990, writ denied) (op. on rehg) (noting that there is no implied authority for an attorney to release the very right or interest he is employed to protect); Fail v. Lee, 535 S.W.2d 203, 207-08 (Tex. Civ.App. -Fort Worth 1976, no writ)"

InJohnson v. Rancho Guadalupe Inc., 789 S.W.2d 596(Tex.App.-Texarkana1 990)

An attorney is a special agent and is presumed to have authority to act for, and institute legal proceedings in behalf of any person whom he professes to represent. Slattery v. Adams, 279 S.W.2d 445 (Tex.Civ.App. - Beaumont 1954), affirmed, 156 Tex. 433, 295 S.W.2d 859 (1956). However, there is no implied authority for an attorney to release the very right in interest he has been employed to secure and protect. Cetti v. Dunman, 26 Tex. Civ. App. 433 [26 Tex. Civ. App. 433], 64 S.W. 787 (1901, writ refd). By virtue of his employment, an attorney does not have an implied power to compromise an action which he has been engaged to defend. Early v. Bums, 142 S.W.2d 260 (Tex.Civ.App. - Beaumont 1940, writ refd). A compromise by an attorney without his clients knowledge or consent, which has the effect of depriving the client of his day in court, is an unauthorized act. Pierce v. Terra Mar Consultants, inc., 566 S.W.2d 49 (Tex.Civ.App. - Texarkana 1978, writ dismd). Where a substantial right has been violated by the attorneys entering into an unauthorized compromise agreement, a judgment based thereon will be set aside. McMillan v. McMillan, 72 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App. - Dallas 1934, no writ).

CONCLUSION ISSUE 3

Thus Appellant had a right to withdraw from the Rule 11 Agreement and it was

an abuse of discretion for the Court to make an arbitrary and unreasonable order.

ISSUE 4

Ruling on ownership was not set for the Sanction Hearing.

The Courts first statement twas " So we're not on the merits today? 2RR 5

The court stated on the issue of who owns the stock, "Well that's a subject of a

different type of motion that is the one right now. But you're certainly welcome to

urge that to some court when you file a proper motion. " 3RR 20.

Thus the court declared that the ownership of the stock was not in her subject

matter jurisdiction at the hearing.

In Entergy Corp. v. Jenkins, 01-12-00470-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.]

11-6-2014) states:

"Subject matter jurisdiction is 'essential to a court's power to decide a case."' City ofHouston v. Rhule, 417 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam) (quoting Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 553-54 (Tex. 2000)). "Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause~ it may not assume jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding the merits of the case." Fin. Comm'n ofTex. v. Norwood, 418 S.W.3d 566, 578 (Tex. 2013) (quoting Sinochem Int'l Co. v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422, 431, 127 S.Ct. 1184, 1191 (2007)). "The failure of a jurisdictional requirement deprives the court of the power to act (other than to

determine that is has no jurisdiction), and ever to have acted, as a matter of law. 11 City ofDeSoto v. White, 288 S.W.3d 359, 393 (Tex. 2009) (quoting Univ. ofTex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Loutzenhiser, 140 S.W.3d 351, 359 (Tex. 2004)). Thus, 11 [a] judgment is void if rendered by a court without subject matter jurisdiction. 11 In re United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 307 S.W.3d 299, 309 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding). 11 [N]ot only may an issue of subject matter jurisdiction 'be raised for the first time on appeal by the parties or by the court', a court is obliged to ascertain that subject matter jurisdiction exists regardless of whether the parties questioned it. 11 Id. at 306 (quoting Loutzenhiser, 140 S.W.3d at 358) (emphasis in original)~ City ofAllen v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Tex., 161 S.W.3d 195, 199 (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) ("[T]he question of jurisdiction is fundamental and can be raised at any time in the trial of a case or on appeal. 11 ) .

CONCLUSION ISSUE 4

By the Courts statement it had no jurisdiction to determine ownership at the

hearing. Thus the Sanction Order is void.

CONCLUSION

This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions

Order based on Tex, Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 10.004(d) does not

authorize the award of monetary sanctions against Appellant for an act when

Kahn was represented by counsel. Appellant was represented by counsel and any

monetary sanctions should be stricken .

This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order

based on Appellant' s filing under § 5 1.903 because all the allegations had

evidentiary support and was not fictitious.

This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order

based on court did not have authority to impose sanctions on the withdrawal of an

unenforceable Rule 11 Agreement.

This Appellate Court should reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order

based on Court Abused Its Discretion Because It Lacked Jurisdiction To Rule On

Ownership Of Stock.

PRAYER

For the reasons, Appellant prays that this Honorable Court of Appeals will

reverse the Final Judgment and Sanctions Order

Respectfully submitted,

.~/~ Burton Kahn. Pro-se 1706 Alpine Cir., San Antonio, TX 78248 glentrail@yahoo.com Tel (210) 408-9199

VERIFICATION

State of Texas § County of Bexar § Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 132.001

My name is Burton Kahn. I am over the age of 18 and am fully competent to make this unswom declaration. My date of birth is in August 1933 and my address is 1706 Alpine Circle, San Antonio, Texas 78248. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Bexar County, State of Texas on the day of August 5, 2015.

~/~ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Based on a word count run in Microsoft Word 2010 , this brief contains

5,889 words, excluding the caption, identity of the parties and counsel, statement

regarding oral argument, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the

case, statement of issues presented, citations to record, signature, proof of service,

certificate of compliance, and appendix, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4.

~~ Burton Kahn Pro-se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this Motion was served on Appellee, Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. through counsel of record on August 5, 2015 by

Elizabeth Conry Davidson Attorney at Law 926 Chulie Drive San Antonio, Texas 78216 (210) 380-4899 telephone (210) 225-2300 facsimile conrydavidson@gmail.com

Burton Kahn Pro-se

APPENDIX

A. Motion 2013-CI-17516 5RR 314 DF EX 5

B. Motion 2013-CI-18394 lCRl. 5RR 6 PL Ex 1

C. Final Judgment and Sanction Order 3CR229

D. Petterson Contract.5RR 284 DF Ex 1

E. Statute § 51. 903

F. Wiring Instructions Handwritten Receipt 5RR 226 PL Ex 21

G.Appellee's Stock certificate in 2013-CI-17516 5RR 327 DF Ex 4

H. Appellant's Stock certificate 5RR 93 Pl Ex 4

J. Exhibit 39 5RR 840 DF ExlO

EXHIBIT A ." .•

Jl,{llE~ A PURPORTED LIEN § .@R: CLAIM AGATNSTHELVETlA § ASSET RECOVER.Y ~ JNC, § § Property Owner § §

JlJDICJ,,(L FINDJNG OF ll"A:CT A.ND. m1aus.ION OF;J.A)V REGARQ~ A DQCUMEN.T U&lMSTRUMlGNT PllRPQl[lNG TO.ClfEAfl;;;\ EIENt>R CLAIM On the ~!l-Y of 0~ . -. ~·lt~~ .m. the abo~. ~iitltd and oumbe1Cd .cause~ this ~µit ·Q;.t.<.iewcd a mo~ veriti~ Pl afr~vit, of Robert "R~pley and the

doourmmaq1m [*bed. tltereto. .Adgi"tiona.lly, t'he ~ reviewed .the -~1.wammty .Deed' 1 and

. . . ~

there any ootfoc,_ofiM'Coun'-~ l"(:V.B;.wi .tb@ eQ'1.11 having made t}l:euetennination t.¥tll)Beci:sion rourd be made sc1ie1y on review of the docum.en1ation ~ ih..c authority vested in ·~e Court undt1-S~apter J, Chapter 5.:t.el1he Texas f'.s0v~ Co&=.

~ Coun finds -as fq~: the W.manty De:edy attached hereto as Exhibit I; the Re~ A _,.

w~ty l1eed, attache4 bmrto· as Exhibit 2~-and the Correction Wammty Deed, attached tum:f:i>..

~ as Exhibit 3 {CQUectiveJy, the "Wattanty D~tl's!'}, are KOT created bY ·implied or expr~.

i .

consent or agre.e.m.ern ·&r~· ob1igor, d~~• 6f the~ owner of the rea.l property or by impli.ed or

~e Watranty o•:1i'tjac~· hereto as ·sx1lil11ls l"'31 do nol ~t Pan;tdw OOrporation any interest ~n 4 the proper~"1d~scribed therein. l .4 !

• Tbe· G()uti makes ,oo :finding· a \l'i! Jwf: iti((dcdyiug claims Qt~ -~~~ involwd. and

p . expressly limits its ~of mcl and--co~l111iM1J>f~1,t0 the- teView of ·a m1.~aJ act. The G

& J!jll!~~°'"'"'...;.._.CONCLfSl~_~J!~~~~~--,·-' ~ _ •.....,'A~:ORfNSTRUMENTPURPOR~\WRf.FJW~1lt'tA1M . . . .. . . .

...

. .. .. .

'•··Mn OF A FACT AND CONCLU~'i"IFJ:.AW Pitt~ "'T.¥1lr"I t ()t:l 2-

REGARD!

&ook 164a3 Paoe 313 12r:las

...... .,. •• ...., .... '" .. 11 •• 1· 1 11•·1 • tJt 1A111M'f' ui 1· p ,, "1 ...... ) d ,......... ..... . ± • ... ~ .. - ..... b. "'',..

'Signed On thil! the u rd' day· of . och, ~I .·~. 3

d;;,.~ [ ... :,..,~..·.. . 1....

f.

••.

,: ..... .

,: .'

.•.• •• • • • · . '

·' • ....

.

" .

~ '

' . .

~S11\!CT JUOOE· /143lzhi8iaW ~-It '11>'1--

BeJ<ar CoUnty,. T~

'~"°' ..,,,.,,.,A~OR.

~ -- .. ..... o).!'FM'l" -OONC-.ON INfiRtJMENT .. < ON Of.l.J.J' ~Wd.iWMi.. OFAFACT~.Nl:fCtit.tGLUSIQNflF- PURPOR1tliJlllllm!)f~~'u:mwr . INf\lur.:

· · · · · · "1'11&P Page2of12 LAW REGAROI

__________ ___ .-.......,..,,...,.... ......., ·•(tr'JJT It · +;;.w. . 1 r. r •o:• ' •·

.... :J.;•-:·

~ ·~:.' ... Grutor:. .llliint1A ASSET.(cQVERV't JI(¢.

-~opmrrv·~

=~d:

~~TSN:ANf> NOIJOO IJOi.l.AR:Sanr;J:.po(lanc! val~~~ ··... · ~~~>"

~ (UdUiliiJiiiyfatpow:cmmni} ~-~ LOTt :etocx l LOT~ .~OCKJ LOT l ,BLOCJP Bl.OcXl .LOT' . ~~'19f 6, BLOCK 3 µ)T 7, :Ql..O(X.3 LOTS. B.4{~,:l_lHf 9. BLOCK 3 LOT lO, wt<•.

~~J.OT lJ • BLOCK :3 lOT U, BLOCIO LOT· 1);. BLOOK 3 LOT J6 •.BLOClU LOT 17. 8\tXX':3LOT 13~BLOC);3~19' . .

,BLOCK4.Jm''.l,,BiQCl.4Wf5,~l(.4i;Q(~7 Q'tOCKHAlTt,ji.OcK'4LQT9. =·:tgf.~1;:,=;~~·.~i.r/BJ'~~'4 ~J~ ~B~1~1-~~· 4 3

=:~~:·:~i~i!::tat~~·:-~:~~ 1 ~NLOT24. ,,~' I.OT::a .,.noocx ~ WJ::itt~ $ wr 3 ,nLOOt' ~-~ . ~OCK sLOT$. 9tOCJC,! LOT6 .·~ ji LQ"t::~'i';~ .5 LOTI .BLOCIC5 WT,'P.,.BLOCK SLOf.10, ~ '.!-O"f u . BLOCK' Wt ~,,,.-BLOCK H.ap~. Btc:X;X~UJ)T 14 I BLOCK~ LOT l5. BUXX:.5.·.Len' "·._'~ LOt 18.· a~,i-ltir J9. ,B~.- .~LOT 20, . ·_.· . 16. BL<>CK_5JgQ'i''t7,B_t.OCK_.

BLOClt1.U>Tll • BLOCX.:SU>T 22, MCK~WT~-.~'.·51.0T 24 .. ~OOKS LOT25. Bl.OCX$)LQTJ6:,m.oat5:t()T27.~.n.or:il'.Jll~s LOT~g·~~ocK, s LOT 30. BLOCK H:.OT 3'1 • BLOQ{P:•LOT 3~ ~ ,, .. . . ..

BLOCK 6 UlT1\..'BLOCX 6 UJ:r'.2 .~BLOCK 6;"1$1''3•. BtOCI{ 6:Ldt·A·;:m:.ocx 6 Ld'l''.! . .BLOCK. 6 LOT6)BUXX6 LOT7;,,-'BLOCK (i LOT' . BLOCK 61.::r:.rr.9 BLOCK~ J..OT.'lO •

J

.et.OCX· 6 LOT n .Bl.OCK 6 LOT J.2-;,.BtOCK nm 13 • BUX!k.·6,t.OT l4 'BLOCK 6 LOT l'- •.BOOCIC::61Df 16 ,·BLOCK~ LOTU., Bl..OOK6LOT1B. BLOCK6.t.OT 19, BLOCK6 LOT20 •. BUX:X,l'i.~21 • m.acxis, 411:~. ,'BLOCK 6 rmn ,8LOCK,it::t,QT2-4. Bf.OCK 6 LOT 2$ •· ... · 6 lprl6. BLOCK 6 ~[tJ.~ BLOCK 6 BLOC)( LPT 28.• $.()CJ{ l)';_l;PT29. BLOCK 61.0T~O • BLOCK,6.:tOT ll • BLQCk -~ ®"32 I

B~ 1 LOT 1 • aLQC'.I( 1 wi;:;zii m:.tJtK 1LOT3. su~:t(~:t"® •. BLOOC. 1 LOT ~ • ~- 7 tor 6. BLQCK 7 LOT1l j,BLQCX 7 LOT I • ~L0\¢1; 1tOT9 • BLOCK 1 LOT 10 • BLOCK 7--LOT 11 • BLOCK 7~~·. $LOCK 7 L01' ~3.J'.~~ 7 LOT t4 BLOCJ( 7 LOT ]~ I

.BLOCIC 7 LOT 16 .BLOCK 7 . . ·BJ.QCK 1 LOT 18-. ~ 7 LOT 19. BLOCK 7 ·LOT 20 . .Bt0(11 LQT-2:1 ~BtocK 7 LOT' .•iJLoCK 1I.Ofn•.~·7w24 I BLOCK 7 LOT~ • BLOCK.,7·~ 16, BLOCK 1 ~; .· , BLOCK 7 LOT 28 .-'.~ ,7li>T 42. BL()CK,7 LOT 43,

. . ,... ., -.--...,.-.--..,,,,,_,.-...,...-t[ .i=.xHIBIT 1 ~ 6oc:umenlT~~JudlclAL FINOJNGOFA FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAWREGARDI Page3 nf12

•• dbl 11:

.·-n -~"'····I , 1· ft( ......

'RESaRVATIONFmmud~1o~~,)'~:· ~ -rishfl-ol-~)l; .. pracripti\'C, .·~. -~ pf m;otd, (It rt.Qt;_ tll ,~y ~~ ~ tlD liftll *-' ~.. u.~·-i:bi; pro:pmy; ~tor~-,~ ~. fhe-·~·ofniciHJRritec •tuma· .

~ tar.:thnixlriiidimian,:ftltie~·of;wham fneknowl~ -~ 10 thP! ~s 'I . . . . . and jj'Olll ~- · · '\....._.~ . -r.',l'OJf,"¥ · · '~·- · · ..

...... -~,pan-. sel_It . ~~~·to Gnmce the. ,.,nM~ . and co-_n . .,.,,,,..,,f.

!. ~-tth ail ...,~tbe npsoMd ~~ mm'lf,iiSt •\cmtPftl to-~~-~ ' bQfif;~ lO ~ ~~. hd1i. ·c-.; idimniat«s. ~ or usip ~. ·Qiu.lot t,l~. 9fllHfm' _. OliUitOr'a hi:in.·"1cf..,.11, -1mi~11o '°'11 ,~ 11:i wanan1. and fv~ dChd an . i si1J8111ar tbe -~ ·m Grao1ce lrtCf ~is-~ ex~ a..binimrOll. ~·l!Mlusigni lphl:il ~t*so1 ~·1awfidlt~ or to claim the same or IUIY 1mdhcao( CKCDt um~ iam:YatioaS tom ad ~om m::~ and~·

I'••,,-'"-·-"·'"

~'fype: JU(ilCJALFlNDING OFA FA£:f,ANiJOONClUSION OF LAW REGAROI Page•t'of 12

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,__...,,:'·"'"'~·~''i'i!.;~~~:::.-,....- - - -..--- ·- ·--·-·-..·- .

- • •••- IP\M" t ... •1 • ;JCdb f ~- . ·u. f .... ~... ..~'Ji l .. PJ")i.tJBflt ltlf•'tl•trM&: A

_,

vl p 4

t G ~1_ ~ N~ 2o13Cl1.751$ ' -~--

--· ,,;._ ____ ···--·-.. -· OQOUl'l'letttl-~;pe: JUDICIAL FINDING Qr; A FACT tiNO-OONCLUSION OF LAW REGAROI PageS of IZ

..• ..•. 11 u '·"": .· .............. --~---

Gf'llMIW·:

Mut>rv ~fl(ji BBX'.Alt. CCM.B.rY~'TEXAS

~~iJ$.A.ND NOllOO:~/JtSana obir gooQaJ!i:!.r.el~c:onsidtmion · · ~~~

·~(.ncJaclina•m,y impDW112114sj_ &L(Q. 3 um i'BUU..31.Qt~ ,;Bt.ocl.1 LOT J. BI.9CK§ EOT4. BLOCl n.ar j . ;~ 1 .ujT ~. BU)C,K ~'.~'.7 .Bl,CICK 3 LOtt.. ~ 3 l.OT 9, Bi:.O(:k 3 LOT 10 • .ai:bc.K 3 LOT l l BLOCK l"IDf 12. BLOCK 3 LOI' ll B.UJClt;9 LOT 16. BLOCK. 3 l..0Tl1 •. 1IOOcK 1LOT1s:sI.OCKJton• • • ...... • ~4LOTI .BLOCK'.~'Wt·6,lllOCK.4 LOF2,!J•f.O(X4 WT8 .. BLOOK4'L0T9. JUOCl::'4lDT JO .:Bt.OCJt<J tOT t J • l:K..QCXA;.t;Ol').2'., lli.Qc:K 4 LOT 13'.; 81::.0tK 4 LOT 14, ~~.WT JS.~iV'fl6.~'' 11~ln.OCK41JJ1i1j,,Bt.Oac.·4LOT19, m.q~1ifPl' 20, ~:J;µn 21 ; B~ , _, ' JD ;BLOCK4 L~ri:J,,,DL()CK-4 LOT 2•, 8U.)t~l~r-tt.C)T 2S. H~LOT 26.: B~!Jm;'27. ~BLOCK 4 LQT'-3

.. ·. ·~\OT'i ~S"l.OJ Bl.OCK ... .4........ ... :Sit'Off.,iiL()cl(.s.~.·4.<j·ImOcK . · . . . ,s.t.M.·. 5 Bux:x:st0t:t .iltnGk.swr1 .~. .-,,, ·~:tt.arl 'Bux:K,sl::l'f.9.~BLocKl.tot tcr llUJCK 5.U:Ji'-rr.Hll.0:5 wt:~ ' .· ... sLOTh .BI.Oeks:tQT_l4, BWCK.S.ctff.']'5 I

8LOCKSWf'l6\~BLOCK51:Dl''f1~•. BtocK.s LOT 11BLOC.?te~·LOT19.BLOCK S'LOT20. ,,ILQCK 5 WT2t .BLOCKS·£m 22. BLOCK swr 23 'BLOClt'S-1.0T 24, BLOCICS LOT 2'~; "qt~ s LOT 216. R~!J.\01'. 27 . Rl..OC'K. s lDT lll. Bl.0Cc3 LOT 19 ~.BLOC): :S LOT ].O • ~qc;x 5 LOT31 , BL~I LO'f·n, 1 a/ ~K~6 LOTl 1 J~~"6 LOT2', ~6''Plf'l~~.6Wff;t·, ~§LOTS, .Bl(J(X6 LO'Lfi·~ ~6·LOT 1.. ,.BL'Ol.X.'fi.LOT I •..Bml'clt fi LOT 9 • BLOOft:'6 .LOT 10, -~ llt()CK.6.J..Ot ll t BLOCKii LOT IZ"lJQ)Olt'6'LQ'F t~'Bl..tic&6l:OT 14~ Bl..OCK-61.o't J'

,BLOCK;:UD:r;t•~. ~6lOJ~t,,~=t.tor11:;BLOCJC.4U,)P'.BLOCKli·t.OT20,

==,~~-~·-::tfil.~~-t~~·=.t.~;~~=·~lf1.r1i,;

J

~ BU>cX 6 't(j.t :Jft:~ Ii LOT"'~~~ YJ. • . • ·.r, - , • .

i. bLOClc1 tOT 1,, BbQCk,1 l.Otl ,isl.OOK:'1'LOT3'~~ 7 toT-4, ~:>fttn' S, ·v 9LO(r'l.7'LOT 6 I mxd::"l'LOT 7 ,. BLOCK ?itQ'.ll'IM~ IJtOCK 7 LOT·9:•.J)LOO&,''T LOT 10. p B~TLOT 11 •.~7U)T12 .. ~)l. ·.,'. lJ.\;,Dux..'1{ n.OT l4·~,l~UlCk1LO'f U ·B1Pm'S.WT1~.D~~l:LO'Tl7,~7',:, ~.~~K71.0Tl.9i.~JLOT:!:O. DtqClt 1··LOf 21 BU>erU:LOT22,;.BLlXIC 7 · at1:DCK 1 LOT24. m:.OCK 7 lDT2S 4 Bl£a. i.urt''A:BLOCk 7i.Or27.:"~1wT2t,8li,lcl(: '1tttr-42,8LQClt? IDT 43: ! p: G i~Number.

--.-.2013Cl17S~6 . ----..~, ...

...•.• ~ ...\..~d, ....... D., ...... ."

r:~: ~~T·2 DdCtiri14mType: JIJDICIA\,. FINDING Of A FAf;r~!)'<;ONCLUSION OF- LAWR£GARDI T-

Page6of 12

-------------------·........ __________________ ,

. "'"""' -~ :;·

·.•. ~,;...

flLOCK 9 L0f.·1. Bl..OCl 9 uJn,,·9~9 LOT 3 t BLOClt'9LOT 4, B~K 9 or.rt: .. _l'C;t.'i~ :BLOCK. 9 tor 6,,;ISLOCK "Wt i •. :or.ocx.

9lOT a. DL0Cl\>9;LQ.t:9 ~BLOCK. 'P LOT lO., BtOCK g LOT' fl •BtOCK 9 wrt1?.9t0CK. 9 LOf 13, IJ~ifi.OT .... BLOCK 9LOT" 1S •. BLOCK 9'1X1f 16. BtOCK 9~lJ01"17 • BLOCK. 9LOf lit, BLOCK 9UH 19 •. BLOCK 9 LOT 20 .• BLOCX 'l.OT ll .JWX!KUDT ZZ. BLOCK. 9'1.0T 2)., 9LOCK·9 LOT24, 6LOC~ 9 .EQT 2S • m.nctt 9 LOT2&.:8C.Q€K. 9".Lm" 21 • IH.OOK uqr za~.~BLOCIC. 9 .LOT 29 ~BLOCK ttar :10. BL()CX 9LQT11 ,..~ sa.x.or J:z,. BLOC({' 9·Wfll • BLOO,IC'9LOT14. ~~~~==~~TEXASASPIAT'UCOIWWlN

,=~~===l';::: ·~.1m1n1-.. .... ~ of~cr ~Iii~ bll llfRd lbt:""""""'*t • fudhlt: LWRl'ilC lirlm .....______ Ario. taxC5 yea-.~~~~~~~~ . . JIYl"W"'"1 . .. . .

tJantm. fbr~.~;of".Wtiiah is~,.•shuf,Jc todm~ ;tiom a:I ~·tD·~~~h-raaiy, pm:U. IClbi ~~·to Gmuice tlm ~. ~with.ID.aaiisiJJ&uls·tbe--·-ldd·~tbmJo·manywiie·belongjngiohhe•l · finva- o..riori '"-. . . _.., _ . , - - - ... ~· or 8l!li11118 i...u iUo n--- o..tlCC~• .i...::.:.. _ _ ,,._. -!=Wstmh- a -~ . • .~ ..~..cl~·~-~~~~ -:i14;~ '9 ~---i~· AbliM tll nd ....... lbe ~ to ~ Md ~~ ~ r:~ adniinistialoB,. iilliCmt111wuad miptpinltmt,,JICl'flft ~-~~or to etaim the .suntor 111.Y p8n dlllleof. ~ u .0.1he ~ m:.m iwt ~tt(~j;jme hd wanwtfy.

This ~~~d,'611.~'4.'2()13'by BUit<m.K:lbn. ~Bil~•= /lffd Rec4vay, 'liiifi.

p G 2 4 . ··.~-·-· ~----

~ae Number: Z013Cll7516 Document Type: JIJi5te~i;;)ff[QING·OF A FACT AND CONCLUSIONOFLA.WREGARDI f>age 7of12

·- ··-··.-· """':"ll',,,---.-,.--.

~. W 44 $$ L£4t.• It--..~ ... 'II .I I J~ 6*'-!) , ....... F I. iI •• .. ..• 4 • k.zaiit-"' ~-- . .... 1•·j··-~ M . •.

•· ·'

I, 0 I •

~ i ! :! l

Document Type: JUDICIAL FINDlNGOF A FA.Ct A.NO CONCLUSION OFlAW REGARD!

Page R~f l2

___ _________________ .,.,,,,.,......,... ... - ....... _____ ' ~ · '

' "

'

.

.

.

.

.

, .

.

_ , _ .

, .

.

.

, , .

~ · -

~ '

'

"

:

.

.

.

· · -

-

-

-

-

-

-

qaq. w:"·aF .

, p- lk-1)7' - .~ I •• .;: • • • !W"f ~•'ill• ~ ..

...

PM@WfiJllGIAl.l)f anM-GJl)lni.'IBXM ~.Mi1DlOIC!l.QOIU.U:•d!llill:·pat1Jii11f._..• ~- r rm. • 2 ~,... -......... _,:_,_. -a) . ' ., ..•... ' .. ''' ' ::t:~·:"',1RL~= s~tBl;~4t~s:Ji~w..

3

•QQi•~&I_I waC~,u .IK«%tiiiti~_:.ill.cD!:r.oi 11 &ua-,t.ai-17 .,_ -~);IOl"ll:•.o,Q(:'ij;·,n· . . .. ~ . ~ •

~-·

p G.

" -t.~·~·>.

2 4 - .

- - -. -....

., ~ ""'''"'~ '~- -~·

-- . ..... .:..:...-=:.::_·-_·-~-. --·....-------

!case.~.~~rl75~6 - i}o(;umentl)Pl[Y. JUDICIAL ANDING OF A F#\C'f MDCONCL.us!ONOF' LAmEGARm Page IO "fll

________________

. ........,,.,.,..,......,.,-... , ____ __ __ ____ ---."- ............,,. .,....,.. ....,. ,....

-•1.j ?~t ··~· .i¥t P. ·""' · .u.-4r • I I •T F ·1• I I I R. - r ll

r· \I

i

l

'j

II

.,I

I

I

l

0...-: t-

~J 'i.

.. 1 .1

J

Kj ~ .

I Docu~nt scanned 'as ·,

~ filed.

!-'-=-----_-_-"'_-._-_--~.--.----~-

. . . . . --------.-_-..,.,..-.-.,--~\·=-==--·::;::;::j.33~:==__=,=_=_ ..,.........

~~Number: 201sc111s1e '~T~pe: JUDICIAL FlNDING.p!\A'fACT AHG·GO!'ICLUSION OF LAW REGAf(DI ~el'lofU ·

--·. . . ···-··----------------~~""'!'····- .-

'-'*.!1" q_;;s mr lllJ fl ·* rrn:·;· _; __

Odo/Jer 24·t 1013 _,.,_

OCT 2 ~- 20\3

~l!lnl Type: JUOICIAL FINDING Of A FACT AN.D GQNJi;l,.,"'SlON QP I.AW REGAR DI F>age: n -arn

·-~-~--....---........,,., , .,1""."~•-T-"tW'.',.:,:;.·~....- · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

.......

. '

MonoRrOR~liVUWOF~A'l10N.OR 1*DJJMBNT PJl&ft)l\TING ro·CRlm:AMJ;BOllCLc\IM J'o{ow OOrDcS MoWnt ~.!A&Kt R.;.oveey1 lnc. t~i ud files 1]iis Motion fur

JudlcfaJ. .~l!W <if~iw hf5tlw1ieill ~tti:G'.teaz a Lien ar .Claim (lhc

n

On Oc1nber 4. 20131 in:tt..~ of the county c~ official .dutia• C'.otriy -~

ot·'D...Vn:..-1".--h~ Jo!!lii~ -...'""""''

Texas . ·• ·tho·.~ cte:ik -..;c_.J ~..a ji;..J c--.:.JI •.

. --..- ·-~.GUl<I Milll.IUAI tecOnmu.

...._.. the D-J.. J w,,__.,, ~:ir~~ - · - ·...T

~~g·dnc.,.... kl?il.1-G.. saiddoo~;puqMU10..haw;gnmlai«Zl111la

~'fromlielwti& to. hmfiv Corpontion. SH it

~"""' ·ffdvcliii all~ IIL dmi·dCJWY1111ild W111J11D1.Y Dee4··~~mt, M dcflDell by~-

.!L90l(cX2)(B)Oftlle Teut (l(Wemme:nt Code,~ iUCh- gret was ftOt "C11litld by iq!li.edor expn::sa ~~,·vr agRXIDCllt ohllc ..• owner of lhc ~ or pcrl(Kll) propeny .•. or by

MOTIONfOll~'.11MfiWOF~11.'fiqK : ~8tltffe.ft~- ... ~· Ol INSTllUMENT··~}.:ttNcTO~Ti§ A 1,Jl!M ORCL.AIM. Pqc I imptitd w ~ ~-or agtieem of a lgenl. ;~. m"O'l!m' t¥mmtattv.e. of tbat

pcroon." Tux. GoV;..Co.lm.§< s1.9Gt~)(B}. Tmdocwsicniati~k~ bcftto.sho'Wl che.c·

1. heikJ:'l~ lrie:.istke.sole~t\ffftl\'dica. Stti!xs.l~A, l·B, 1-C. 2. Bm'ttm-¥..Qn.~~~1 V~·fnc.11tbe~,J)~~ SH_E1l. l·D.

3. A m~19f'~~hol•9£HcTVcdawas'.wled mr~~ 16, 2013, 'IMtmg Xobfjj'fDiffi1 _.,..ffj U Pn!s!..t .... ,....mSAi~ .8'IRD U.eT~.

·<

4. On Scptt;mbet 2.\i, 2013. -~ -~ fld\liffd Mt. Kalm mi( to' -=' in . , ~- ~ bohaffibt.IRl...tia. ~. the ~ l{~ n.i gnUJling propaty fuw Hel'\llda to _t.ndjv ..

Corporattm is ~1, be.caullt n w not cnatt4 by tk 'CicPfm em~ of He~-* owner t4 ,_ _. ~; . i ~-not ~ by 1bc ~or expreas .cement of tie. ~~ve ofHelvcti.i; Rohcri ~ St~ Ti=. Gov.. Code § S1100l(e~)(9). 'l"bi;; llevicd

Warrem.y DC«l lbowq ~m...-;~T~ lo anmt Pnd,i-.~on ll1Y rnm:ai In me ~«scribectia'.tberein. &.iEx:. l.Q.

rv.

HcJvctiaattDSts.tUt....DoasbcrdJL UC tts and~ v.

..HelYdia does not . . the~~ q1lke w~um -.i1·~·dlim of 1ht JJitties"mvolYUI and ~&cs tha.t'iliii motion .dO~ti stek. to itfrih'dp a lrigit.inwe lien or.-"'*· """.... of llftJ.-.... ......... 'Wet · - . Helvetia . actnoWled~ thlllt . . u_t.....:

Qll!:~'8 ... nuy :& ...;~.to J""'" -11111ctinos., ._, . . ......

provided by. Chap1tt Io oftlie'Ci\lit Prl.Wce and~~ if1his motion is detc:rmin-1 u:>- ~;~lous.

-~·-·

•• rRADI ~.pmniaes (;()'~ Movant Helvetia :Asailt Reclcwtty. Inc_ resptedbl~

~that~ ~'mtew tbe~ ~.a . . . <ll1lcr ddl:lmining that PanMffy ~bu no~ in ~~-~~im the R.evt~ w~~mtty nerd,

~.bemto u Exhl"bit -l~~lOgcther wi~~.qttiC antesuthci ecwtcr.u:~.

MOTICN·PCHtMildAL QYJBWOf ~.AnoH OR IN~PaRPOR'l'DIC TO OBA.'TU:USrat Cl.Ml\.

• JN IE: APURJllOR1ED LIEN JN~JlUS.'Ql$Tiutt cilO*'T OR ct.AIM J.GAJNST HE..'/Sll1.l A$SBT RECOV£R.Y. JNC.. _JpnJCIA~j)~ ·DmVli4'i l.'.V'\'in.,..; ~;.u•;

Property Owner ~·"' '."WVV.1'11 • I', •.~o,

ifl'llAVIT. OFR9IJIT:..ft.!PLQ

" §: ...

'

BEFO"JIB l"J$eftM w11:lcr1igned Not'a:y :Publk:. on this ~1."pamally appcared Robelrt

1*1,iey, ~ \O·!U~ tp be 1ht por.so•nwhOK name i$ subscribcdhW'W, who being dul>.' sworn, ~and ·staes a follows:

I. My rusme i!J:Rtitiert llipJey, I am ~:~W.l!ni!Ninc t2J) ~ ~~.ap. and j ha'Vtl

fttlq bOC1'I ·00nvi'1;;d ,,Of~f flk)ny or Of ..,. ~t itlV.QIVing mOi't1 'Uj)!tudc. l • ·6.J~)i

~t cu uaDJddsi'Atnlla111t undcr..>mtn; hm abk l\11-wcar; • r l !im:b7 do awmr.-l.hilt'alt

of'tha f&cts Mn! mthiiAffld~truc and cortcet and wilhlnlftJ ~ knowktf&C.

2. Attached he~ 'u "Exhibit •w• is a true &ml. ~ ·COP)' of Helvetia A$Sei·

IW»v.try, Inc. •s ("'HclYciia~•·1. Ccrttfk:lle of Fcmn•ti~. eff~~t1g111t 2, 2001, ·lfioWma that RtlW&;is mthorizc4fto-JiM J,000 sblris:Cfttock.

-~, Atta~ llc:rcto • Exbibif ~9'·~ •··Wt: and ~ .~ of tfio Mim.itm•o1aho

()rpniUtkm M.~iif'The Board ~b-rs of Hclffria A~vi.ry, Ine.. a Por·Pr.ot'ti

Corporation, daWI:: ii'-~• J7, 200~. ~~ -'1,000 9h1r:H or :ttotJ;'W..l"uerto Verde, !Ad. $«

.lixhibit "'8" i.t ••

EXHIBi,f 1 l rA~.'f·

..

',i.!. ..

·e

4. t\ttal:hccl ht!I'~ ·.s Eit~t ..(; .. ~·."! ,trUe and corr=t :copy of Slwe Certffi~e

Number O(fl, datc0 Augast 2(1~ 2001., ~i.t~ Verde Jn;. owm 1.000 mares of

~

l.. I am )nlllidc:nt of'.Puc:.rm v~~; i.¢r<J~ helcfthe ofti(it;Of:p.ubfcl\t·of.'Puerto

v~ l.ld. since 2007;

6. Attached h~ ·a Blhiblt '1Y" is: a t:rilC:'W.:·.~ copy-ofi¢9r.re_s~~c· •nd

attachml:llt dated Fctn'il~r9" ~ .20QS trinrf .BW't .Kllbn w ltokl'I (Bvb) _.R,Jpl1:.J_ .~n.O'.'l!.l~~al!15 P\left:o v~e. Ltd. as die ~Pfffillvetiik 1. An.achc:d h~it;~ibh ue·i is a true and correct copy oftht.Mitiut~·or tm:

&tnordln_, Momin1 ofthc S~ldEfS of Helvetia Amfl-.l'~ lnc.• dltt,tcL$eincmbr:r I~.

• idfj, tlecting RObe11 Ripley 8S:~4enE Qf Hel~ri4.

&-pmnber 20. 201 ). from~ (ljob) RJpley to ·aurfK'altii,. lldvisina 'Mr. ~~ IU1t. to act In

&aY~ti on behaf:fottfd~ as or Sq,tcmber l~•.a(UL 9. Attached bmt(! -~ pxbibit "G" is a ttue:-!Qd ,~. copy of a Rcirised Warranty .

Deeg. 4$d and fll=d OCtolier 4•.20t3 in aexv Cc>UNY.~,Ttt!~-'Purportt~ t0 D:litifir property U~o''ft»m .HBivmia ta l'aradiv Corporati<m; ,$1~;'~Jll40JI K:ibi1 a "Ptesi&ni of Helv.ctil Asse1.R~.111.c.

i'.\GEl

r

I

... ... ..... _.. ... .. - .. -

, . .i ;:' ~"· . )

·1·1 .:::~- J' i ·' ,,, !~: t•trtt 1r ·Uf JP 1

';I: ti~.

s; ,I· . • iC- .. ~& ta t a,~t-· 1'r ' . ,I "' J ",,. .

'l IHI l ~~srr ~·1·- t: f I .fl ~ r.··.

I f.:f ,f .t..... · .

i::,•

~1 1 1 'f" • r~ : "1.,:·, ; a. a·. . ·~ t·.H Si!

·~

..• !! r . f f !· 1· . . ~i .fl ~ '.i· ti I I .111tJ.

a.r:l\I " '

f· I . •.

. ~ · · · : f.

i.Jl ,a. l· .... 'Id~.

I

.•

-~ ? ~

••. :

;f·l."""1 • ~

1 ~·:I'Si::2 ~~ ~

· : ·.,:

;1; .

! ,i·

a

i.

i.r 1:'Ra· f

i

S:i· . .;I ~Ht'~ ~ x~ !·!tl ¢

B ~ , I~ !. ;~Pl e

l

~ ;;' ,..; ~~·· "fl,.

. ~ =-

s f'jiS-2'3"

"' ti

i

z

.

r .

~· ~ , ~

~· •'.;I '

•l:I ft \

fig..

idjI ·i;l1 1 I . .

. -· '.'l .tl'l

'°.1 ~ ~.· ~· ::~J. . . ~ ~,., ~.i .~ 3. ~-

~.(~:. ~.

:A ! ~& . .'

!'!)~,~ <:] ti < il i ! . £.it :I ·... c 2..·.. ·t.·:I • ~· 'i"" ' .'.j:l I . ·....·. ' ·....:i.· =s tf ..., , 1· l ' ·$\": .......

l.--~ ~ ..

;;t ! fi .., :n.i . -· , .IL• .. . "*..~, \;l i.·~.ru,.

a,i a;:· 'l 1~· i .,· -~ · :.. "~ '' ,, II!

~· 1::- ·~· Di~.·.'.::

·,. i r tl i :. "'J·i: ·fl ti ;ii · ~:1. .; S.-· i p!I :~ '. s ~·-·. ,t B-t 8 Q .h..1£ff·.· i'i Jtl ' . ·~ fgl : ~·~· : ~' .~· ti. ~... -~: . ·r·il ~ . .;:; 1·

ii~'

0

1r ( ,iii 'JI i ~1.1 f·.·f':i.

'

'..

0

! [· i 1· .

...• ;:f'

n·l iai~1I.

f...-'f ~bt• f t I ·! l

I

-\U~£ 1R1t l~ij t J. ·,, · ~ri 1:i i~ ~e 2:-:

~r:l [ Ii' ~ ~ ~~ .~

I J 'f ! i

i :!!!; of 8119 .~-~· ~ .ea.ti $1J.J®~ l..000 P\ICIW v.,m, Ud.. '~;~duly ~;~J1,ttd q,rtitd, i1 WZl5 . 10:80J;NEV, \llat"PO!'~ l'l~'\bc ~~1'~",Uffi~ Q/~-~ :~ar.~zMJQi*'~.dirtif~1alhf~.llll'Mlfljbuw.dlO n:hUJn;.lf ~:~friimift)··fll.l\'9\;1.'IC!lhal the ~~bc:inJti:quited·fqr ~1 ,,_~~- nr.1 ror d\~1'ulmn.d1!1nncr 'RUOLVEl)~tltill tllt? BQ.iil~f'!>i~L,[l~"Bt~~p may upon~ ~·ll.libc'Soald.,.~ffi:.Iif»i~r~dnn may~Ji!µeBLi\bor~'tl'iaraoflW;i·. ~·~ f0r·..onai~'i1~•ft!\icti~ nf any;~·rir inianslblC 'l;lelldlttO the' ~,..~mothcr'_, """'~~"';"- ...-~~.:< . .ll!Y ~indornat1d1i*l.Da"

......h•1CJ1'1 . .• ,... U\8 ~-· . -~ · t ll90'Y· otJteS - ·' · ~pct~dllit.nCt!I fol_~tec. w ~ p:rrorma:S,.Olhrz_.uitiiil~'f$1;.~ ~- Qr sa:vi'l"ttes of.il!fy 9.hrt Olrpuralion. dom$i~,W Jm;tign, oidtber tntity.

MNK AceiWNT

3

--·

4

.

Upcm. ii:sotioD dD1 . . }'-~ · ~td. lil'lrl l!drri<d -.....a• ~~' ~ ·-• .

. ' "._i\•.1;.~

~J;.•~.tluit~~- nflht~ UUlUil!:.U(~.aliJ.in,lttfmmalion iOd ~'U'ie~~1r:Sc>'ll~t~rm•oft11eSiam'OJ''fmsa11d~ ~uifog.~'lid ~t'l(l "-ilhMldiiie lll'Ci,aiflrer·~

l1pcn.~oa~Y-·~~-~~·ti,,.riod. it was

. lttSQLvtPiiJt'lhtrliit!Ei::fiJ?~iflhc Hwira,..(~ e aoi~~· t~f~!l~~!i· ~fof.tJR~~ion a·n ~~n~!I ancl P'l""'t$ ~~ bel!Ollai~:"*-~~~· ~J:I to ~~'Lill lawful bWii~Hntf.aetMtir.s, 1md·-t.

'

~AUFICAT.ln~~ OTlft'rR )ll'IUSDJCTSONS

Upon ~Oii duiyll'.l. .)'Mecmckld PTid~tricd. ilWts 'RF.SOLY!D.~:fcr thepurpl:il:orawhctri:ting die 1Ni•~on'16&>:~~ Ui.~·~·~'°11 Dli~~ tiC~i.;Mni~$w~orany fercip:ooUr'tty in wbich'it i!I ,... ., m ~ped'ii!u .for~ ~~ cl.=im~!~~,"' b11r\WJcL lrotiii'le!l!J, ·t.M prciper nffi~ r:tf 1lMI austrieu ~o·we here~..aid.Jum~~m:qpP.Oint andsutii!itituEelll ~·agmwcr ~ Jbt:·~ct af~,ti) CbteruUc'a111hb11DF,-Ow. locaiicn'Of,all ~ lllltutor)I ~ ._.,10 make and fil• all ll&'C!IAAl)·r.crtinwtes..iepom. ~.of~ 111\d other t~!lilrli'maJtll: r£qUiJed,.~tM •111•~ltf~Ut:l·~1erritixy. ~·OTCOW'IEI\' ti) IUlbi'.riia ~ 6ulincss Corporation·u1 tll.ll).'l*!L hul41WS!!.1~.

JlUR.TH£.R l!'fS'fltllm"IOl'i8 TO OF111C£'RS

Qport moJfoi1 •'Yi....~;~d.. jt was -

Upon ~tJJ. iljlym111&, t.eCOUWan4 ~it ~<i ~'VJP mn;lhr. ,;£.n1n1·af •hclle mm.a.man~tutt fvltraiif~ Wioof .S;Wli\Jer cfnQ{i(!t o(lrifft1¢tint ~·tht~JwtttnriC!t

U,,oe·m<lti.IJI\ ciul)r made.,.secOndod lllld .._""Orrlcd.Jt Wll!l

bSOLWD that· Ui:JYh~(i~'n~'li'I8n.otrn:canddlra;lOrOt'1hc.B~ ~ IDd 1h&t tc.'liptlm'\lo'L°'lle.ci.:pil.ll. ~

~~~lil!dl:e]ted whether~~·~~ funher ~~'.«Jme bd'm lflc Dire'CTI)(S ar thi.~ ..~·-.~bai· ~.. . 111-.~·mcctin ............""'!!<' ..."" . . -.t~aUtlcid & ........ .. -·-··· •

DA tt: August J7, '2oo'7.

- <· .,.

WAIV'tii. 6J:'''NQ'S1~~ ANO CO~ . ~vt!J. lbat the ~'rd~~;~~ member of~ llolrd:ot if!itiil ~ !ifficm:tit.Assct~. lnt'.•·mi'l\lCGm•Thc Bo!dncss C~-Ccnift.CM of f~~iit-~th die ~'ttf~nm! af1'exu.-~·IPJ"O"lt11~11¢1~'1.• ~ Meelilli oftlie Olmetm llodliy lhis~ut!oft..dlxs hnbt''ii(i,b11r~qf ~ 1b.ea4 J)-.or~·~iig. cm'al:Jlm ,.., th=·tnmtl~ and aipp1uvm th: cmiteJ!Ml~~~~.f.Ai~ oftbe~~~J..ofthe l}irer.tcn.

l .hlYd Cicorgc. L')atc 11!1111ed: ·AtiiPAn7. 2c01

-

..

"' ~\~~,'.;.~:~· ~.·:·<~·!

.... 7·-.,

,........ ~..........,...' tI, • ~

.. ---.

'I r I ·.~.,·--------~ -· •,

••

Fromt B•Tt x.t;11 <P!ritf!i1®x.bs01~> D._c: Wal, Feb.,2Q; iji~~tJ0.:43 Ml: Subjelll: Fwd: J(ey'Uijo To: .Bob A ~.ipley <:ranclier®OO@!milili.oom>

Dc:ar Bott:

S~-~~ied minures ofmeetlnt wi({'llh dcc:liriii o~ip.

Please conttct if you ticc:d.ttiOtt. Burt

!No.li!o~ E~arded mCSSl&C ....-----.. Fl'W?_; a..x-M <BlentrailAv!h1»;carn> To; ~ Sluu Nlitiunal <5!d1Yla@hatw0J> cc:- Datc: Sun. 25°N<iv'~ t0:46:4l ...OBQO(PSTl SUll!cc.L; Key Lmgil SEE ATTAC.ffEl)

-EXtl!iTV'

-· BbllTON ~' P.I. ANJ'i~TIS ll06 ~-CUde ~- Antomo, Texas 78243.;

{210) 4(4.1H99 • <tl~)~19a.i;:AX

1

~ J.\mbaa@ynhoo,s.mn.

" Ndvembet· l®fi Nbrib.l\~Jltm·Col!:rpany J 2500~s.n;p~ A~. Stilt• .tMt s.n ~a,·f~1,,9g~J~ {llO)+~' {l IQ) 4,.._Q(m FAX r;pvi.eenat .ccm ATTN: M1. SUaMe lL l.>&vis kl(cyl.m'IQ

Dear~

E1ldMed is a coP,Y oftbe~·ofthe&ard l'.i~bfHelveda:Ucfzi\~JPtCtt­ Cammiler DfPoolic At:COO!ttl ahawl1tl};,lt\e 'D!nmtor Mr., L1Qt4:Gi0rge.

. Mr, George. wu~ attomey wile> inwrp~tt:d,ofHtM!tQ.. His plane;numbcds 2 JO 4ll1'~1. if ~~@lf!tUr1het <f.!:'J4tiona.

i '.Ila~'·~ tor llle. • lltt'rcn::rax:.

Rr:. ~will bu~for Glosiagu~·~mt>al'~.

Plea. ~~ ••Y" !!J!.,..,-.. .u ~ ··· ··if.you ............._'iliiMI...;,. · .-...11 .im.;;.w-wl!ed·W!

•JU et me.M;l!I ·- .. can dose.

If l wi be of UJY .furlber-~.PJeR contact me.

11\lnkyou ~ muds

·~:.

. ..

.

if~if;;j f 1'I~dt~I:~ if; f.- ~ 1 ih . j ·, 1'• ..·'~i .,. ~~-1.

;. . . . I· . ..lll; .~I_ Ii .'

i_ r·r_ r· t~ ~111 - ·, .· ·r · • · rf .I- ·" :f..;l_ i I l'il: ~-· 1 ii.~ .

'.I 1, :l ;;>-: •. . ..

8

. . .. ~ .

!

a-I 11 1 .,..i. I !-!"'11 .f-. ~. 1· ~ ~- I . a, . ·. ·S;:a .

,;,_·J_ .~ ... :. ....: . : .· . "·; .. ...

> .. 1~·1:i~- '.· . ;, -~• ·i

j.1· ~.-.·..: .!_~ .~.· e:·.t:f1i·:f·~. ·.2~ ·.·~ i· . .. ! . p ·• .

.. .•.cu;. ·"'· ,. . .

rif.,...' 'g . . :: :Bi !ii'· .Jl'..·i:·.1.ee . ; ,,..

..i ·r· , .i;. ..i ~- ;·1·!.1:· Ii! .!f; ·. ·,. _,,_.

.~ ..··;·'F :1·: ;I -~ -~ ff kl. ·, .~ ,,.§.· o.,....~" '. ' .... .·.a '·1· .

ik 1f_t1! fiUi i ·t ~ltl tl IHI: .· w; !!!.

1 1 s.

. ·· ~:_· t r~,,.· ·i:; ~.... ~-· ~ .., · : :r· ·i'·i ~ I. > ~ .. I 11' I ..

:f ·.r:i·_·~: · ~"-l -~

[~f I_.(, ·f::·~.· ,-1 ·~ I · . ,. .,.., . · lf .• jyjlf · I e H1~! . ~ -

1ltfl iJUI l ftt j~··· ·i ~4 1~~ 1 ~~m ~ ~ ·i!J

9

I'.

'I

MINUIEMK~~Q~~B:l.COlUJiB.

tl.•Sec.etuy.1ulimttteilto1ha~i!w:C01J)Dtate1a:ottUiaakfur~of1k ~~emi·nccmia. JJpoa~dtdy sudt,·~ lnd·mrlcd. itwu

· d.$OLV;t.D, ~~;~~'.mconl book is~•'the~~lq~ftbci -~ Qllfiµ1ha:, '

RtSOLV:U. tbltthc:lkmincAOBpomiartfl'llkllli%i·~·~:i@idi'in the. ~~~ · · · ~. . 1.u.i...1.:..-but.not ~~-~ .. • orcertl£ed-oae• • • · , . •.. :...1 t10 PJOS. . tn~._~WJr.u-S. · of.the B~·~~'tl,l'riainil~~•mcni:llr~'Ji~ QI ~-~odpOiit-of Fi-·~-~.r~~·· •~-~f~ofshmholifa:s anddiRctots, imd writtm~d~'--4~. . .

omciaUI '1lic Cminnan of the ndiDllhcn calW for 1hc dccliun of oftiQc:rs 1>f 1hc BusiDac Cmpimldoa.

1

~ :tbHowmgpmons WB•nomiJJl!:ed.1Q'lbe .office ~tq'.dldi: narne;

NIUilf K«lblthB. M~ ~B.Moet,e~·

'.k~'E. Moere '

Nc,.fiatl:as.iommattmui being madi! thencxnim.ti.om wm; eloled aod tbe·clilecfora ~to "'*on tili nomhaf:Cs. The Cbliimao 8rrAoutad that the ~nominees wme elec:md to tbe ~$Ctbd"•thelti~ Dlin*·to MWI 0:aich1Ube~of.ta Board of.Directors ~~10"1Htmni:Oitny'\Ytitttilt. .ployment~·.eaentea by1hc Businm ~un a8d taiospciCCl~o~

~~:CD.TD'JCA.TES

'tl»S~tu1omittm~~~f'.~lhuecenif~~-~··u·~ corpc;nre cortif1caae far ...... Upon mo~9n"dUlyn,.ide, ~-~·camtd, ttw USOL_ ......·. . .m;,n..: ..........,-"'.""" of..t.c ,~,~ that-~ -~~... "'-~'""'.Kiiitc ~tomcctu~fPl.....y ym;;_...~ oecatcKt · • · , ~-to .....

l'epl""""""·lb:ail~.· 'Sbiita Ofibe:~'Osponliun;·d1ahoy issmlcl <le!tificata,bioc all k~durul . -m_, •

~rcquim! by lbc: :a,Ltw1·0rJJ:e01u1loa Df'tbe BIUWa ~contnct or by law; · ~·anr.~ ~A1C$~plJ·~ iny.~fCJBCliU\ot~ 0y.i..~miQl~oflho ~-~~or lllP.lbbJelaw; mdb1~1M-'5ecmary·e-fihe &Bi11:u .COipotlU9nimc:taapedmcnGOPY,:ofmd·sbmaee:rdtit.mmihD~·boOkorihGBl•si!Jli!B' ~oa.

'l

• lS&ti~CJ: OfsBABD • Upo11t ~ d.uty·made. seccm&d.ani:f c.imid/it was . ·. . . -~~ RBSOLVID, . . .Coqtorati.GQil:u,c . . • ··. . .1000. •...!ofthelat.....-.

. . ...~ ~OJJ'li:~-...~OODIDWn . . (ftO·patVllut),.!C:t'i~-pri~ot$1.00, eaci).Q~ .

?!am! :&t:ft8am Oi"'mU!n. Yfls. PutJl1n vf'file. 11tl. l.0.00 ~ ·~000.

, Upon motion lfuly.lnade, sec:cmde1h:md·~ttY!'d

-ID'JK)LVWJ1:mat. U\')Cm:tecclpl oflbe ~~mo ~O,f.t.be , . _ .

r~,h.~toiiStiemre~· --.-·-" . . .. . .a.e, TA)... .,penansnaiiieifabow·.Md;m . .. . . . . .'!""

.diota:.

.......

if advisable, reprhen'iaDcmc tOQt any:p=11asef&dlW.!fRCim bd~um torhmmnmt putpoaw llDd. mn:fm dislri.bution., amJ,further

':BANJ< A<X.'OUN'l"

~,m.o1fc duly made; KCOlldcd ·w<*ried. it was.

.... iPOLVlOi-~ ~'~es11hlieh,'i~tm oamen·or,wn: UCOUl11S. Wf1h.·Obelormoro~~~;~:~toml•~~s~H~~~-·~"•:~wt~·~4 &i.da1 instlmdomt ~~i•t~~ff:l'-:Sct~fjht.BiiD$i•=: lllf:J· ~utima-:..:..A'iim:_ """I... _ <a1iiid . ~!ji . .

.. .. :=· . ~~cms-b·StlCfi~=,amt-fiS:.1-:--.

. . . .. ... .. . • .

-;~to-~ ...... m.

..... ., .~l!lmV piellOO or _pc:aom ~'fa Wri.lic ch=b an 11W:b. l.DCOW:ita .aa. w.aif old.t aii.inm ~

OllOdlZATIONAI,. COSTS· ~JICl1·~,~,~~and~ii-

JQ'$)l;Vll'Pi1hat the~~ fifing-~ CJlber ~1'11111 chirps im:umd aod tblt·aaay b6·irummld bJr ttte B\1smes! Q:rpomtion or,periom ~ cm·bl!baJf ofU. Buameu ~1nco1~rit#tioii'Ni1hibe'~Dfthe'BmjriP:tsCmporafKm.iit'Ci~snd ·•lialf'.~~;(iir~1'1)1~·~~

3

.;! ,.,o.·____.::,_ _ _ _ _ __ ·-· ~- - . _....,.___;_

• ~--, ·~ the'9.~ oftheBusiilea CGlpmltimn ~zed rodo~~ thinp • dtako·.U~on~ uci.bclpfbltc c.ty®l dll~vt ~~.-.all m oftbe .me __ --:. o~ ~ a'Dfperst)!IS ·. &,y~ ·acti.fti . . 1lssinrM · Cm"'

~ · lfti<~t irafiM. ililcii . ·· 'With tbubove· itaetdi0111•1812W'dt.doptid_• O. aeu. qftM Bi•finw Carpontfo•,

UJ)Oll ~doly made, MCODdad·and.·cmied, itwaa

'RESOLVED diat~.sjpi.nk.Q( '-.iJP~~1 ~i.iilmµi~.~f lllliniva ofll>tlceQftbC.~bt'tic:-J~ Upan mm:londilly made; ~ a:I wria. ttwu

RESOLVDJ lbll:UDJ,4'.~ill!li;iif.d\n:m·~ Ind dfiflmr cifthe ~ ~.mUtllit~.,_.~.

lbe~e.stea~·~'

. '' ,.,. . ·· ·· m 'WU8D)' :rwtm:·~ oomcbefG:t the Dirticto?&at tt:U ~ mi!'ftiirlH1'Jns no~. the ftWting wu~

DATE: Aijjjt --· 11:',)007;

'·.

·wJJVU.GJ·NOTIQ·ANDCONSIM ' :usoLVJW. um:~~j;~~~e sci~ mea1~e(c#,~ LDilial.lMld «' Dbecrtth , . . . Qflfe~. Alli!itcu-,;;...._, . 1~6 .~.:.,&J..- n. • ..:--if".I~~.

· ,,...~........ _.

=--~-J•,IU'iOr.-ii.oURD!PUWllO_.J"N:,..VBl...,...._11,u.

FDmLl.tion.fi.lcdwith~S~ofS~·~tt't~"-v~tila~ottlw:: OraaJ~1>f~"£,l~1 ·d·by~j$ieaol.Wian., di*~Wlivc·DOtfetDflbe time IDd pl•-<lf'h meetiJ;i&c;amaD 10 dicint:etiiiJ~and l;lprO\'tl tho i:OiltmS oftm M'mota oftbt~aoalMeatmg·oftbe·~

,.

s.

'\ 1'", • ' '"> -. • - : • I •I I '. ' '. ~ '1. ·1:. l .··~,1~ 1 ") .,.., • '. ~ ... • • . j 1 .....

Pip 1 vfl

~ •.

* .

0.ilicets'.and DiredOrS

1

HF.Lvh'nA ASsEtU<lOVBRY ING ~ .... ;.......;..~_;·...-·~~.:.----. . ~,;,_:...:~._r..,_;~.~J;r~~S~\~~;::_~~~""'"'.........'.-.-........-..-.....-:__,.-~ .

LetJrootiw:~ht!*il

()11'&11.nd.·~.infmrmiimnm'.itlll.sitil i•~~d!_ii1*n!Cd'~h~.~~) prot:lllSed-by 1he ~ of~{P} PnE.tf.ititWilf;••l frlndliel'lll~ tre ~-~lbi'$0S. Afta~B.tU~-ift,~~lbm~~ilOWl!lf'.h~w!lldt'is~oa e.i....io.1u._ 1"°infotl'l'~~·.'~~-~~~fi'C)Cll-.~

V(IB-.,oi'd11n1 ara~!ijt~R ·· ~ ~~ or'dornl'tiifttriif' MtioA=cana.t:..~:D'tMm. P0":-1~~ ·~-... - . - - . - . - IL• T.._:1w1::

~ . :Mlll[.--i•~ .............. W. . W •lo W oollt ... )!'#., .n . pd" ......... dl"l7'.....--..-,

Titlr. Nnne11'-~~ift\rt!W JJl'il"ilti---~lf°'* UlW: DIHCTOR LWYD.CIOR.GI jr. o. ao:;<"60s97 SAN AWrONIO. 1'X 181A«

I l/ZUl.2007

•MJN'trrE$ OF l'J,.tl:i;~OJW11"1A~Y'· -~'too:J;~TJm:$,K;AlUlffOLDSR3 • .qF·;Mm:.vstt;&l\'ssST·JUitOO~'Y~.

uws ~- mc!atirW. al"Shmn:holllOM af'ule C.,.,._lj(lri ,...MW. onitba,~· . . - 1at UM tlm..Mld ~~ ~ f,.U, ~ ibit nc)lj..,... gi..-. k.:lhoi> .1...wnaida!nl,-

'l.rpon ~- dl:ii:y ..ao; ~ens UrriCd..-i111i,f~l~w.tn1 MRI. OIO.:Moel diKIOtOr1I ~ Gtnoai; "> tcpl...,.. tlic.~~·~iiie_.: JOc' OM:' r~~ yinv;

.-....

•L .. .. ___ > . J. _ ..- J. .A- J.. J.. Ii' .f"· . ):n" 4 b ~:o· Q_ _J J .A n . . -b --- . LU_~-~~ M.~:~;A~k-~Jh~~ '.l"htre ~t$. ~'~~1f~i~ ~- ~·'~ns. ~ mO'lionckllll' ~- .,.,~~.Cl..~ mudy ClllYrii:d. .h wiut 4dio~.

...._ -----,"S "'""' 1tf ~ (j ----- P.orward(d in~_.___ nacb•.rtbob ..qy'~im•iJ-~> f«n1; 0 . Prl, S~20~201Ht ll:.13AM , Subjcct: ~inures ofl~:N!eet1111 Clflli: Shaft.'noJd~. of!'§t,.tlla ./15~ ;t.~ery lno. To:.Bim:.Kahn <tJlmttaU@Yehoo,mp, wnm~rybitcom. ":i~1@nstumns• <INplfl?lihftWg.nf:l> . . .-. - .

. , f'ICUC nno anacnea-~ Mtnuu:s{lcfthenxD'IOf<l.1n12y.M~~ Oflhe :S11u.Ghtilaen or.Jt'cfv~ AS11Ct n.ccovcry ]~. . .

Be ldvi:u:d that,au;f:~dn: of this mectirigfS!!Pff,~ 1.iii!J,.:YOU-im:not tn m:t in UIJI l!iipeciry 00 bcllalfof HeJvala Auct·R"°~ Jnc., further, yau aced .tt>wmwe.t1JJ'.busine&1 rtcar.ds, pa)'J"Oll rcc:ords. i RS fllinp or and retumSt 11 woiJ;~~atiy comracts oi:ber miieiia~~ r.):He.lvetia. Y® .mun also ~dcr 1oi new · management a!Lliari.k aooount5 lmd·prOYideJ comJi-~!l'C!)Jl1tin& for a!hecei:1:11SWld dlsburscmc:nisup 10 d•. l'hank )'OU,

Robert Ripley Praidc:111 HeJvma Mset tlC®~·fDC.

,. I ,.ill_.!

~ I

J }

l

.t l,~ I

EXHIBJT"G' l-· _ --

•

~··-am·t &Ux%tLOr'1 aocx.tU>T:1·_11W~\ftor4.~'wr!. Bi.Oct 9toT 5:uuq.,~.m"(,~lJ~9 l.DT a.'~ffilr 9. Btock 91.0T H,, ~i'Lql'lL •!S'li.ar.1i.l!U'.:lcx HDT l3. Bl..OCX9IDr1.c 1 111.DCX;'.9'.UJf'.15 ,·'.Bl.OCS::H:OT If, BU'IC& SI LOT fl.. Bl.OCK 9 LOT l ' ; IW)(X·9 00('19 ,lED.'9 tor lV_,"BµJCK.,tor:il,m.oc::;K.'LQ(.~,.:,B~.9WT.~:.:1!1':DCX9$.~~~'9 t»T». 8Loat9 LOT~····~,•~~-.o<st!ID.tl.tii.oao-1.ar;29 .sLOCJ. fL()T30T8LOCZ•wn~~;·~~.Jft~'.J1LocK9·1.0t·33'1~m.oc::t9Lorl4i lCBY LARGO ~-Offi6tft{IEJUR:COt.JNTY'.1'!XAIA8 Pl.ATllBCOuBD JN VOWME·9S'J3PAGE 13. . . . . . ._.Cc!umy.. T-. . UIBl.VATIONl'laal:m...,~a ~~iili.Sw...m,:

E-•HA10 ~" -.t ......... lie .ri,pll.· ........ Of m:ml • mi; aD p . t)'

~ . . . . . . . dlwl~ 1il!IM:.Md ~ 11i11lllllll111t,....mY. tlalfbUlle.GIWIM Jiilr, die NWof'.llilhklffbiiifie---.. .

a..,llrliloWllillallillD.~:CJ-,il--~......ttftlll~.---

. . . a.I ....... ID CX'llftl8,_...

-t~~ ... a4 C1111¥Q1 IO'Giiiiliiii. die Jftllaf;y0 ~whll·IDd-"-1-.,tJ-:.r..w;.; ..o!ll.ilW~ .............u ~-wberlof"ii ._,..__ • .....-- --..- . ·...-:"""". . . . . ....._ --~ ... . . JS W -~~- . MW it ta:~ ~11'..li;fs• •••~ Jn,i;..-...aa ... n ar .... ...._ 0..-- bblik Cbdi:w·-' ~~~·~!.t.1·-.--• ........,.. to.._. ... ......_. dlllnl .a m ·liDFJir tlle'J'l'PIY .m:·e..-~.a .ClDUile'1..~. eaoeccna; ..-;l!tiitillOla.

•1<11•• ¥ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-yperiad-..MPNUfJlnftlilltditiliif• IDclllm."9 w er Ill)'

IW'l~cmtp-•6.li~~:*'~--.o ctl~-.d"'*1•4 i && I A111 ·-

c -·-

......

.$. ··- 1 •

• 3 - ,

l \

.1 · ,_..

l .'

i . -~--·"

•.

~··. :. .

.

.

:.:Mil.~ '-~·

'l' ' .~• • I I

--- .l·f ............ ..wi.---··-··~·-· .... I .II• •

EXHIBITB

...

2013-CI-18394 224TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT EX PARTE HELVETIA ASSET RECOUERY INC US ORTE FILED' 11/a5l2013~

Q

IN RE: A PURPORTED § IN THE DISTRICT co~ _,_(ffe § ~ · .. ,µ~~~ LJEN OR CLAIM AGAINST § JU~ICIST~T -~:,%~.?"~ § I ~ ~ ' ·"' -rl.O '?:J0~'~ HELVETIA ASSETRRr.OVF.RY. lNr.. § RF.'XAR r.m1N . F.xis J' '\.. ;._&~, Property Owner § • S· "V ~ -r ~

MOTION FORJUDICIALREVJEWOJl'DOCUMENTATIONOR]NSTRU ~ -:;;:-~~ .\ PURPORTING TO CREATE A L1EN OR CLAIM ..::(_

Now comes,· HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., and files this motion requ . ~gJ'

judicial determination ofthe status ofdocwnentation or an instrument purporting to create an interest

m real or personal property or a lien or claim on real or personal. property or an interest in real or

personal property filed in the office of the Clerk of Bexar County, Texas, and in support of the motion would show the Court as follows:

I.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., Movant herein> owns the real property described

in the six (6) Warranty Deeds with Vendor's Lien attached hereto and made a part hereof by

reference as Exhibits A. B. C. D. E & F. See attached Exhibit 1. Affidavit of BURTON KAHN.

President of HELVE TIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., and Exhibits A, B, C, D, E & F.

II.

On September 18, 2013, in the exercise of the county clerk's official duties as County Clerk of.Bexar County. Texas, the county clerk received and filed three Warranty Deeds with Vendor's

Lien ana recorded tbe <tocwnentanon or instrUment attacheel hereto an<1,~ontaining ... three pages each

for a total of 9 pages. (Exhibits A, B & C) Said documentation or instruments purport to have created an interest in real property ftom HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC .. to ACSBLDR,

Ino. d/'o/o. Stollm Hoinoa.

Document

I EXHIBIT ,_ scanned . as filed.

~fl ----=''----

. .

m.

On October 28, 2013, in the exercise of the cowity clerk's official duties as County Clerk of

Bexar County. 1 Texas, ;

the county . .

cJerkreceived and filed three Warranty Deeds with Vendor's Lien

and recorded ~e documentation or instrument attached hereto and containing three pages each for a total of 9 p~es. (£xhibits D, E & F) Said documentation or instrtunents purport to have created

an interost in r~ property ftQm HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. ASSET REcOVBRY,

INC. to ACSBLDR, Inc. dlb/a Stellar Homes.

IV.

Movant, HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., alleges that the six (6) documcnfa -

namely, Warranty Deeds with Vendor's Lien, attached hereto as Exhibits A, B, C, D, E & F- are

fraudulent, as defined by Section 51.901(c)(2). Government Code, and that the documentation or

instruments do not grant any interest to ACSLBLDR, Inc., in the real property described in said ,.

Wammty Deeds with Vendor's Lien. The documents are :fraudulent because Robert Ripley ("Ripley'') was. not President of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. on the dates the Warranty

Deeds were .signed, or any date for that matter, and the docwnents purporting to transfer _shar~ of

the company to a non-existent corporation also is fraudulent as a forgery as described more fully

below.

Texas Government Code, Section 51.90l(c)(2)(B) provides: (~) For.purposes of this section, a document or instrument is presumed to be fraudulent if: (2) the document or instrument purports to create a lien or assert a claim against real or personal property or an interest in real or personal pwperty j:l.Ud; ·

(B) is not created by implied or express consent or agreement of the obligor, debtor, or the owner of the real or personal property or an interest in the rcol or personal property, if . required under the Ia.ws of this state, or by implied or express consent or ~eeinent of an agent, fiduciary, or other representative of that person; ...

TEX. Gov'T CODE 5l.90I(c)(2)(B).

. '

As aescribed in tile attached Affidavit ol .HU.KTUN KAHN, attached nereto as Exhibit I,

attests and atta~hes certified documents that show the documents attached as Exhibits A, B, C, D,

E & F, were n(Jt "created by implied or express consent or agreement of the obligor, debtor, or the

uvvu~1 v.f lhc 1~al u1· pi;;r:son"1.IJrupcxty unm iutcrc;sl in ll11:; re-al ur pcniumll prupcrly, lfrc:quin::d wider

the laws ofthis state, or by inlplied or express consent or agreement of an agent, fiduciary, or other tepresentativeof that person.11 Exhibit1.

-BURTON KARN rs PRESIDENT OF CRA.NTOR, NOT ROD:ERT RIPLEY WHO

PURPORTED TO SIGN AS PRESIDENT OF GRANTOR

BURTON KAHN has been the President of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. from

October 23, 2009 to the present - not ROBERT RIPLEY who signed the Warranty Deeds with

Vendor's Liens as President. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit G - the certified copy of the management

register of the Secretary of State of Texas showing officers of the Company. The records of the

Texas Secretary of State, show that BURTON KAHN was not President of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, lNC. only during the period of September 27, 2013 until October 4, 2013, based on

~ :lhiudulen~.:tl!ingwith th..:: Tt::1u1s Secretary of i5U1L~ by Ruben Rlpfoy who :signature appears on all

deeds as Presi4ent ofHELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. (Exhibit G includes said Certificate of Amendmen~ :fraudulently :filed onSeptember27, 2013t by Robert Ripley). BURTON KAHN, at the filing ofthis: motion is: the Ptts:ident ofHliLVETIA ASSHT RBCOVI1RY, INC_ gru1 :a.t :a.11 times:

material he~~to is shown to be the President of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC., including

the dates of the deeds and signatures on the deeds. (Exhibit G). Exhibit H, management records

of the Texas State Comptroller also confirm BURTON KAHN as President

4

• t

·~ .

-THESIGNER OF THE DEEDS HAS BEEN DENIED AN ATTEMPT TO TAKE

OVERTHE BANK ACCOUNTS AS PRESIDENT OF THE GRANTOR .

On September 16, 2013, RobertRipley ("Ripley'') posing as president ofHELVETIAASSET

RECOVERY, INC., submitted to Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union ("Randolph Brooks'') 50

pages of documentation, in an attempt to demonstrate to Randolph Brooks that he was entitled to

talceoverthebankaccountsofHELVETIAASSETRECOVERY1 1NC.. However,RandolphBrooks

refused to allow Ripley to take over the HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, JNC. bank accounts.

(Exhibit 1). Randolph Brooks then gave the documents supplied by Ripley to HELVETIA ASSET

RECOVERY, INC.'s President, BURTON KAHN, on September 23, 2013. (Exhibit 1).

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. 's President, BURTON KAHN, took these documents and

reported this incident to City of Live Oak Police Department. (Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1). i ., ·

-IN:DOCUMENTSPRESENTEDTOTllEDANKDYTIIESIGNEROFTHEDEEDS

WASACERTIFICATEOFSTOCKTOANON-EXISTENTENTITYCONTAINJNG

FORG,ED SIGNATURES

Included in the 50 pages: supplied by Ripley to Randolph Brooks, was a fraudulent Certificate

of Stock claiming that Puerto Verde Inc. owns 1000 shares of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY,

INC. and dated Monday, August 20, 2007. (Exhibit J). This Certificate is fraudulent as shown by

several facts. First, this document is a fraudulent document because Exhibit J is not the proper form

to demonstr~te share ownership of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.. Exhibit 1. Instead,

Exhibit K ls tl1e fom1 which was adopted and approved by the Board of Dir<Ntors iu tlie Minutes

of The Org~tional Meeting of The Board of Directors of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY,

INC. on Fri4'.ly;-August 17; 2007. (E:xhibit L), Page 2 ofsaid Minutes states in part: "RESOLVED that the fonn of the share certificates presented to the meeting is adopted to represent shares of the Business Corporation that any issue certificates bear all legends and restrictions required by the

Bylaws or :resolution of the '.Business Corporation ... "'~ ancl attal:bed to the Minutes is tbe propc:r . !.

fonn, Exhibit K, not Exhibit J• . . ··'··

Second, Ripley's fraudulent certificate (which is Exhibit J) purports to be signed on '

'-:'•:;/

Monday, August 20, 2007, cind tho Organizationcil Minutoa (Exhibtt L) WCI:) aigned on Friday,

August 17, 2007. There is no reason why, on the next business day following the signing of the

Organizational Mfoutes, that the fonn should be change - this is clearly a forgery. (Exhibit 1.)

AClilitinmtlly. the Orgimi7'Atlonal Minute~ re1111ired Puerta Verde. 1 ,td. tn pay~ 1.000.00 priOT to the

issuance of the stock certificates but the $1,000.00 was never paid. Additionally, the fraudulent

certificate states Puerta Verde, Inc. purchased the stock-not Puerta Verde, LTD. There is no Puerta

Verde, Inc., registered with the Secretary of State.

Exhibit J -the fraudulent Stock Certificate was sent to Mr. Curtis Baggett, a docwnent . .:.

examiner and expert witness, E:lhibit Mis Mr. Baggett's affidavit and bibliography stating that Mr. Moore's signature on Exhibit J is a forgery. The forgery includes the two signatures ·on the

Certificate as president 811d secretary.

v.

Movant, HELVETIAASSET RECOVERY, INC., attests that assertions herein are true and

correct VJ.

Movant does not request the court to make a finding as to any undedying claim of the parties

involved and ~knowledges that this motion does not seek to invalidate a. legitimate lien. Movant

further ackno~ledges that movant may be subject to sanctions, as provided by Chapter 10, Civil

Practice and Remedies Code, if this motion is detennined to be fiivolous.

5

;- .·

...

PRAYER Movant Helveta requests the Court to review the attached documentation. Warranty Deeds with Vendor's Liens, attached as Exhibits A, B, C, D, B & F, and enter an 9rder determining that

ABSBLDR, Inc, dlb/a Stellar Homes has no interest in the property described in Warranty Deeds

with Vendor's Liens, attached as Exhibits A, B1 c, D, E & F, together With such other orders as the

Court deems appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

ASSOCIATE ATIORNEY

State Bat No. 24045010 Jay R. Petterson, Attorney at Law, PLLC 12274 Bandera Rd., Ste. 210 Helotes, Texas 78023 Telephone (210) 695·6111 Facsimile (210) 695-6101 Attorney for Movant. HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

LEAD ATTORNEY L. Terry George State Bat No. 07806000 1117 Castle Top Fort Worth, Texas 76052 · Telephone (210) 535~7717 Facsimile (682) 730-1119 Attorney for Movant, HELVETIA ASSET RECQVERY, INC.

6

'· .·

THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared BURTON KAHN, who, being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows:

My name ie DURTON KAHN. I am over 21 years of cage, of cound mind, with peroonol

knowledge of the following facts, and fully competent to testify.

"1. Exhibits A, B, and C, attached to this Affidavit and made a parthereofby reference,

are certified copies of three documents: namely three (3) deeds all dated September 18. 2013 and signed by :Llobert Ripley, purporting to sign said deeds as President of IIBLVETIA ASSET

RECOVERY, INC., a Texas Corporation and the Grantor named in said deeds attached as Exhibits

A, B, and C. Exhibit A is recorded in Volume ~6354, Page 605; Exhibit Bis recorded iri Volume

16352, Page 1838; and Exhibit C is recorded in Volume 16411, Page 1610; all of said Exhibits

recorded at said voiwne and page numbers In the Deed and Plat J;teco.rds of Bexar County.

"a.. According to the Texas Secretary of State, Mr. Ripley was not the President of

HELVETIA A.SSET RECOVERY, INC. on September 18, 2013.

"2. Exhibits D, E, and F, Qttaoh9d to thic Affidi.vit ~d road9 a part heroofby referenoe,

are certified copies of three documents; namely three (3) deeds all dated October 28, 2013, and

signed by Rob.ert Ripley, purporting to sign said deeds as the President of HELVETIA ASSET

RECOVERY ... INC ... the Grantor named in said deeds attached. Exhibit Dis recorded in Volume

16411, Page 718; ExhibitEisrecorded in Volume 16411, Page 732; and Exhibit Fis recorded in

Volume 1641 t, Page 786, all ofsaid Exhibits recorded at said volume and page numbers in the Deed

and Plat Re(\:ords of Bexar County.

l

Exhibit I

According to the Texas Secretary of State. Mr. Ripley was not the President of "a.

. . '. HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY. INC. on October 28, 2013.

"3. I, BURTON KAHN, have been the President ofHELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, ; ..

INC ("Helvetia11) continuously since October23, 2009 to this present day. I have been registered with . . . r.

the Secretary of State as PresidentofHELVETIAASSET RECOVERY, lNC in the records of the

Texas Secretary of State since October 23 1 2009. The only time I was not shown on the records of

the Texas Secretary of State was from September27, 2013 until October4,2013, and this was based

on a fraudulent filing ofan Amendment with the Secretary of State by Robert Ripley. Attached as

Exhibit G and made a part hereof by referen~ is the certified copy of the management register Md

all docwnents register denotes, of the Secretary of State of Texas, showing my status as President of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. The fraudulent Amendment filed by Robert Ripley is .·.

included 03 part of Exhibit G. Also attached as Exhibit B and made a part hereof by reference is

the Texas Controllers statement showing my status as President of HELVETIA ASSET

RECOVERY, INC.

. . .

"4. . ,On September J6. 2013, Robert Ripley. posing as President ofHELVETI,A.ASSET

RECOVERY, INC., submitted to Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union ("Randolph Brooks"}, 50

pages of documentadon in an attempt to demonstrate that he was entitled to take over the bank

accounts HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Randolph Brooks refused to allow Ripley to take

ove~ .the corponite accounts and gave the documents to me as President of the company on September 23,. 2013 ..1 took possession of these docwnents submitted to me by Randolph Brooks

and reported ~s incident to City of Live Oak Police Department. Attached as Exhibit I and made a part hereof is a Certified Copy of the Police Report filed with the City of Live Oak Police uepartment~

"5. ~ncludcd in said 50 pages of documents was a Certificate purporting to show that

P~erto Verde, Inc. owns 1000 shares of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Attached as

fraudulent document because of the reasons stated hereinbelow. First, the Certificate is not in the • ~ c

form authorized by the Directors of HELVETIAASSETRECOVERY, INC. Attached as Exhibit

K ruid made a~part hereof by reference is form of the Stock Cemfi=te requir@d to transfer s:hare<i:

of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. to a purported owner of stock. Also attached as

Exhibit L a.Q.d made a part hereof by reference are the Minutes of an Organizational Meeting of The

Board of Directors ofHELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY. INC, which approved the form of stock

certificate to transfer shares (namely, Exhibit K)

"6.

...Said Minutes (Exhibit L), page 2, read in part: "Resolved that the foJDl of the share certificate presented to the meeting is adopted to represent shares of the business Corporation that

any issue certificates bear all legends and restrictions required by the Bylaws or resolution of the

Business corpora.non... ". E~tblt K is a copy oftlle blank cenlflcate auacbed lo lhose Mlnmes.

Ripley's fraudulent Certificate (Exhibit J) purports to have been signed on Monday, August 20,

2007, and the Organi2.ational minutes (Exhibit L) were signed on Friday, August 17, 2007. The

fo.D11 of Stock Ccrti:li<>a.t-o -wa:t not chane;cd by the IIBLVBTIA ASSET R.TICOVBRY, INO over tho

weekend ofAugust 17, 2007.

"7. .. . The fraudulent Stock Certificate pwports to bear the signature ofKenneth E. Moore

as President and Secretary. Known documents bearing Kenneth Moore's signature were sent to

Mr. Curtis Baggett, a document examiner and expert witness, to compare to the signatures of

3

~· . . .: .

Kenneth E. M~re :on the fraudulent Stock Transfer Certificate. Attached as Exhibit M and made . . . ! a part hereof by referenccjs Mr. Baggett's report concluding that Mr. Moore's signature is forgery a ;.· .

on the fraudhlent Certificate identified as Exhibit J, including both signatures on the certificate as

president and secretary on the fraudulent Certificate, identified as Q-1 in Ml'.· Baggett' s report. Mr. Baggett' s qwtlifications are also attached to Exhibit M.

"8. .further, the Organiz.ational Minutes otHELVET!AA:SSET .llliC..:UV bK y' INC..:, page

3, (Exhibit L) 'reads in part: "Resolved that the Business Corporation issuing shares of Business Corporation•s authorized shares of common stock (no par value) for price of $1.00 each .... Cu.uijill~wliun 1,;w;h." R~olv...<l tbAi upvu icwipt of (;01111idc.n~tion the; officer~ of the b~in~ii

Corporation are authorized to issue share certificates. No payment of $1000 was made to HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC .. prior to August 20, 2007, or any other time.

"9. Pill.Qlly, the il-amtnJP.nt t:P.rtifir.llte (F.Yl1ihit .1) Wll~ i~~nPA to Pnerto Verde;:Tnc.• hut

the organizational minutes refers to the issuance of shares to Puerto Verde, Ltd. on payment ofthe

required· purchase money. Page 3 of Organizational Minutes. Exhibit L. There is no Puerto Verde,

Iiic.reW.sterediwith the Texas Secretary of State. I further attest that the assertions contained in the accompanying motion are true and correct."

F~--- BURTON

SUBSCRIBBI) and SWORN TO before me, this 5th day ofNovember, 2013 '· ·.·._

~~~:i::-., SHlli!LEV MAE JONES /~-t\ Notocy Pubih;, Gtato of Toxqw \~~,·~l My Commission Expires 4 \.~~ff.~~.,.,. February 03, 2016

' Book 16354 Pag~·so5 3pgs Doc# 20130199236

WARRANTY DEED wiftt VE~DQR'o5 LIEN NOTiCli: OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE 'A NATURAL PERSON, VOU MAY IU!MOV.1£ OR S1'RIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FRO~ ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD JN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. Drite:'· S~l~ ',2013 .·. Gril)ltor: HELVETIA ASSET RECOVEIW, INC. 'Grantor's Mailing Address: 13123 Feather Poinb San Antonio. Bexar County. Texas 78233

Grantee: ACSBLDR; JNC dlbfa Stellar Homes Grantee's Mailing Address: 3910 Bogie Wav. Converse, Bexar Co1mtv. Texas 78109

Consideration: The sum of TEN AND NO/I 00 DOLLARS ($1 ~.00) and other good and valuable consid~ra!ion to lhe undersigned in hand paid by Grantee herein named, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and !he further consideralion of the execution 11nd dellvciy by Grantee of his/her/their one certain Promissory Note of even date herewith in the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SI)( 11!0USAND FNE HUNDRED SIXTY-NINE and NO/I 00 DOLLARS (Sl &6;569.00) payabl~ to the order of PLAl'NS CAPITAL BANK as therein provided and benrioa interest at the rate.~ therein specified, and providing for accelert1tion of maturity in event of defau I! and for allorney's fees, lhc payment of which note is secured by the Vendor's Lien herein retained, llnrl i!; RrfrliliMnlly ~eanmrl hy fl Dl\P.rl nfTMlQI nf.even tl~t..,hP.rr.with Ill nARRPr.I. n. AnAM~. Trustee. s,., •

J'rop,!rty (including any imprGvcrncnrs): : •:·, 1~ LOT 8, BLOCK 9, KEY LARGO SUBDIVISION, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDfNO TO MAP OR PLAT TIIEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUMB 9573, PAOE(S) 13, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; afso :.; ,mon:; oo>mmonl;r known t>~ 3?30 011~11 W"Y• ConYPr~.-, Tv><Ga ?810?

Reservations frnm nnd Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: .. '·This conveyance is made and accepted suliject'to the following matters, to the extent same are In em:c1 at mis llmo; ~11y and all rc:SJr!C\lo11s;lcovcaams, comllllons and eascm<:ms, Ir nny, relating to the herein above described properly, bul only lo the extent they arc still in effect, shown of record in the herein above mentioned County and Stale, and to all zoning laws, regulations and ordinances of municipal and/or other governmental authorities, if any, but only to the extent lhat they are still in effect, relating to lhe herein above described property.

JIY: ~ Dopuly Exhibit A \.._ ----·· ·- -·

···.. ·

· Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and Wl11T81lly, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with illl and si!lgular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anY, wise belonging, to have an"d hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor hereby binds Grantot and Grantor's heirs. executors.. administr:llt(lfll1 and successor~ to warrant and forever defend ell and singular the property !o Grantee and Granti;~·~·i1~irs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, against every person whomsoever la~(ully claiming or to cloim the same or any part thereof, except as'to lhc reservations from nnd exceptions to warranty, It is expressly agreed that the VENDOR'S UEN, as well as !he Superior Title in and to the above described premises, is retained against the .above described proporty, premises and improvements until the above described Note and all interest thereon are fully paid according to the .l'llce; 11.'Ilur! i;Cfecl isml u:111ll11~ lh\:rcur, al whh;'l1 llm~ ~lib 'oi;x:Q ~h"ll \i1;wu11;; ii\r.ivl11\o;, . l· • """I :• I ~

·.. l' PLAINS CAPITAL BANK C'Lendcr''~;at the instance jllld request of the Grantee herein, having. ~dv8Jlccd and paid in cash lo the Oranlor herein lhal portion of the purchase price of the herein described property as is evidenced by the Mreinabove describe<l Note, the vendor's Lien, togct~er with the Superior Title to said property, is retained herein for the benefit ofsaid Lender end the same are hereby TRANSFERRED AND ASSIGNED 10 said Lender, Its successors and assigns, without recourse a~ainst Grantor.

Wlicn the context requires; singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.

F.XF.ClJTF.n on !he d111e liMil 8hnve written_ •COVERY, INC.

STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BYTHBSB PRESENTS I 0:1• •o

COUNTY OF BEXAR, 1.\

0

::,. .·.i 7h1.! i:1 :or hc.,:i · ~1>n•I Wo.u"rtrf Dc.ed wl\1-. i'/~'.lds-1'n "" ,..,i..,~1...ig..d l:,,.f1>•• mo o · IZ,'2013 ,20Ja,byRobertR1 ,P fandon behalf of HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

----~-

·a·,r..o i!®l AIMNlli\GIBSONTIOMORe ·~ ,..::_.A; Notary Pii!JV~ • ~'' STATEOFTEXAS · f)] "rq~t1t1111.l•MlltJIZOt4 -~-~ ........ ...........................

~....,

'.'it '.Hi.'

AFTBR RECORDlNO RETURN TO: :i..

2 ' '

.CERTIFICATE Thr pDge 10 which this c•r11flcntc I• Dm~•d 111 ny h••·r bo•n nllercd lo r<0du<I confld•ntlnl personal lnfornanllon but 15 olherwrse11 f'utl,trur nncf cornod copynflho original on nl• nnd gf rctord In my office, 1\Trr;.>T.f:.D~. _ _ _ _ _.......,_ GERAnD C. RJCKHOFF COUNTY CLERK DEKAR COUNTY, TEXAS DY;~· 11>1.3\ .~ d Dc11uty Dole

' ' ~= '

Dae# 20130199236 #Pages 3 09/23/2013 11:27AM e-Filed &. e-Re<;ordeu In U1e Official ?ublic Records of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. R!CKHOFF COUNTY CLERK Fees$20.00

STATE OFTEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR This is to Certify that this document was e·FllED and e-RECORDED in the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texa$ on thi$ <!:Ito ond lime slampe<l lhorcon. 09123/2013 11:27AM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS

C~RTJFICATF: Th• pngc ro wl1lch this trrtlflcotc- fs omxcd mny l11>"c been 1lfcrcd lo rcdac:tco11Rdenrtol pol'50nol Jnronnallon bul Is olbon1·lso n ruil, lruc ~nd corrccl copy orlhe (lrfglnol on nit nnd orr.cord In my office. Arn:.sTtD:.____==-- GEMRD C RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNn', Tl!XAS Jo,3\.13 Deputy Dale ...

Gerard Rickhoff COUNTY CLERK

• BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOA.OSA, SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 BEXAR COUNTY

CERTIFICATE

STATE OF TEXAS§

COUNTY OF BEXAR§

I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ISA TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW IN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:

VOLUME f ~ -'O 5 tf PAGE ~ li),f)

. THIS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE GIVEN IN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON TIDS 31.st DAY OF O~+<>hft'- A.D., 20 =.t-=:3'----___;

. ·.

GERARD RICKHOFF COUNTI:" CLERK BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

ANY PROVISION HEREIN wmce RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL; OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN JS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

Book 16352Page1"838 3pgs Doc#20130198632

WARRA!'ffY DEED WITH YJ!iNDOR'S LIEN

NOT~CE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IFVOU ARE ANATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL:OF·.THE FOLLOWJNG INFORMATION F'RO.M ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS .FILED FOR RECORD JN !-HE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECt;JRITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.

mite: . , 2013

Gral'!tor: HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Gnn,1or>s Malling Address: 13123 F.eather. ~~i?t, ~Ill\ Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, 78233 .......

Grantee: ACSBLDR, lNC dlb/a Stellar H;~es .. Grantee's Malling Address: 3910 Bogie Wav. Converse. Bexar County. Teirns78!09

Consideration: The Sllll1 ofTEN AND NO/lOD DOLLARS ($10.00) and other 11ood and valuable consideration to the undersigned in hand paid by Grantee herein named, the receipt of which is hercby.acknowlcdgedt end the further consideration of the execution and delivery by Grantee of · · his/her/their one cenain Promissory Note of even •dale herewith in the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND ONE HUNORED 'FOUR and N0/100 DOLLARS ($120, 104.00) payable lo !he order of PLAJNS C~ITAL BANK as therein provided and bearing interest at the rates therein specified, and providing'for acceleration of maturity in event of default and for attorney's fees, the payment cfwhlch note·is secured by the Vendor's Lien herein retained, and ts aclditionally secured hy a Deed of Trus! of even date herewhh to DAruIBLL G. ADAMS, Tru.stee.

·: ... Property (lneluding any Improvements):

.; .LOT 14, BLOCK 7, KEY LARGO s.tJMnvtSION, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDBD IN VOLUME 9573, PAGE(S) 13, DBED AND PLATRECORDS·.OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; also moi~ (;Qmmonl7 known a~ 3954 Bogie Way, Convcroc, TcxP:> 78109;

Reservations from Rad Exceptions to Conveyance end Warrant)':

· . ·This conveyance is made nnd accep!ed subject lo the following matters, to the ex.lent same arc lq ~trcct at this time; any am;I all restrlcllons, ~ovcnants, conditions Bl1d casements, If any, relating to the herein above described property, but only to the ex lent they are still in c!Tcet, shown of rc~o~d in the herein above mentioned County and State, and lo all 20ning laws, regulations and ordinance.c of municip2I and/or other govemmental.auilldrities, .ifany, but onl~ to the extent that they am still in elfeel, relating ICI the herein above described property.

·• '1 ;·: •

J I-/'3 . Exhibit B ID-Dato Dopuly - ....--· ---· ...

'-- ~

,.

..,·. .~. !t.1~;·. t \:

: ~ . . t·;·.l~r·r . . .·. Grantor, for the consideration and sulU~c~ ,to the reservations from artd exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to' Grantee the property, together with all and singular t!ie rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging; I<! have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, adminislrators, successors, or nssisns forever. O~tor hereby binds Grantor and Oran tor's heirs. executors. adminislratots. nnd successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular lho property 10 Grantee and Gl'lllltcc·s heirs, exe~utors, 11dministutars1 successors, and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and ex~P.tipns to V:'ananty.

;._ •i\•• .. It is expressly agreed that the VENDOR'S ~JEN: as well' as the Superior Title in and to the .a.hove described premises, is retained against the above described property, premises and improvements until the above described Note and all Interest thereon ore fully paid according lo the fuc~,teour, eJTecl ;md reading !h~rcor, 11! whii;lt time !his Ot;t;d ;shcill b1:oomc 11b&ilu1c.

·. PLAINS CAPITAL BANK ("Lender'', at the instance and request of the Grantee herein, havhi'g advanced and paid in cash to the Grantor herein that portion of the purchase !)rice of the herein described property as i~ evidenced by the hcrcinabove described Note, the Vendor's Lien, together with the Superior Title to said prope.rl~i is rclain~ heroin for the benefit ofsaid Lender and the same are hereby TRANSFERRED AND AS~lfl.~~D to said Lender, its successors and assigns, wlthoul recourse against Granlor. · N~· ~ . · ·~ I

When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.

mrn:~UTED on the date first above written.

,,

~·l~A'fE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL. MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF BEXAR, §

AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:

2 .

'•• r''-

\· . ,,;.

I

CERTIFJCATE Tho png~ lo which this c•r11Rchlc Is offixod 01ny have bttll alltrvd lo ~dnct oonfidtnllol pm;onol Information hut b olhernbc u full, !rue smd ta1Ted copy af lhe nrfgf nnl on Olt nnd of rci:ard l11 my office.

nv, 0 >= Dcpuly

;' . ".

Doc# 20130198632 # Pages3 0912.012.013 3: 13PM e-f'il<:<d a o-flcc;ordcd in tho Official Public Records of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CLl::RK Fees $20.00

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY Uf BEXAR This is to 9erlify Iha! this document was e-FILED and a-RECORDED In the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas on mis aa1e ana ume stampea mereon. 09/2012013 3:13PM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS

CERTIF.lCAlE • Th• pngt to whl•b thl• ccrtlnentt b amxtd may havt b«n nltertd lo redact confidential ptrsonnl lnforinarlon hut l•.olhoN"l5r n full, !rut nnd corrod cop)' ofjhc arl~lnol on nit and oftttnrd In 111)' ol!lcf,

A1TF.5TF.D:_ _ _=-- GERARD C. RICIOfOFF COU!'<'T\' CLE!tK .BEXAR COUNTY, 'fEXAS

B\': le--'"

Drputy

Gerard Rickhoff COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOROSA, SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

CERTIFICATE

STATE OFTEXAS§

COUNTY OF BEXAR§

I, GERA'RD RICK.HOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTlFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECOJU>S 0.FREALPROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW JN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FJLED IN:

VOLUME lb 3 5~ PAGF. I«$~ . TIDS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE GIVEN JN THE ClTY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS 31.6± . DAY OF D~--\-p'b.m.- A.D., 20 z;J.?~--

GERARl> :RlCKllOFF COUNTY CLtRK BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

BY: ~ MCJerk &..- Dep~unty ~-»1 ANY PROVJSJON HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAl,, OR USE OF THE DESCRlHlW REAL PROPERTY HECAUSE OJI' RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

\

Book 16352Page 16103pgs Doe# 20i3019&589 I. ti

. \. WA.KKANTY DEl!:U WITH Yt;NUUK'.S LJ.l'.iN

NOTICE OF CONFIOENTIALlTY RJGIITS: IF YOU ARE ANATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OFT.HE FOLLOWING INFORMATION F,ROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANS~~~S AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE JT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN TIIE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER. Date: ~W 148, , 2013 Grantor: HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

... , Mailing AddreHl 13123 Fea1her Point. San Antonio. Bexar County, Texa:1: 781)3 Grantor's

Grantee: ACSBLDR, INC d/b/a Stellar Homes Grantee's Mailing Address: 3910 Bogie Way, Converse. Bexar County, Tex!lll 78109

Consideration: The sum ofTEN ANO NO/I 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consi~cration to the undersigned 'in hand paid by Grantee herein named, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged; and the further consideration oflhc execution and doll very by Grantee of his/her/their one ceraiin Promissory Nbte .or ev~11lil&ie here\vith In the principal sum of ONE HUNDIIBD EIOHTV-~TOHT TIIOUSA NJ)' and iJdftlfla DOLLARS (S 188.000.00) payable to the order of PLAINS CAPITAL BANK as tberein,.p~~idce ana tearing interest at the rates therein spci;ified, nnd providing for acceleration offuaturiiy'in event of default llJld for attorney's fees, the payment of which note is secured by ihc Vendor's Lien herein relained, lllld isaddltlonally secured ~y ":Dod. .,fT'l'UCt ,,r ovon d..to h•r,.with to DAP.RE:Lt. Q. ADAM~, Truct.•. Property (including any Improvements): ~: .;·: :~ .. LOT 22, DLOCK 9, J<.m' Lr'ill.00 SUDDIVIStON, omu.n COUNTY, 'l"OXAS, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF. RECORD8l) IN VOLUME 9573, PAGE(S) 13, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; also more commonly known as 395 I Bogie Way~ Converse, TX 78109:

Reservations from and E11ccptlons to Conveyance and W11rranty:

: ·This conveyance is made and aeccplcd subject to !he following matters, to the extent same 11re In .effect at this time; any and all restrictions, covenants, conditions and casements, if any, rel~ti11g to 1he herein above described property, but only 10 the extent they arc still Jn effect, shown of record in the herein above mentioned County and State, and to all zoning laws, regulations and ordinances of mlll\icipal andi'or other g(jv.emn1tntill autlitllities, ifany, but only 10 the extent that they are st1!1 in effect, relating to the herein above' des'crib'edipropeny.

.. ,\.:l.···· · Grantor for the considerati6n and subjeet to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance <Uid warranty, grants, sell~ and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and

•I "!

•. ; ,f.'l ;cERilFlCATE Th• pag• to ,.-blch lhls ct11mca1e 1~ •ffix•d may bavo b""n al(•l'cd lo rtdact confidcnlfaf pcrsqnnl ln(orm•11on but -!• o!h•m• ,, full, truo and <01Tr<:t copy or th~ nrJg_lnul on Jilc und ofrrcord It> my omt.,, :ATTESTED:_--=........,,..,....-- ~~ C. RICKUOFF COU1'TY CLERK D£.XAR COUNn', TEXAS

BY: ..)-./ JD·{)/. /3 Exhibit c Deputy Dntt '------ ·-·--·-- --··-- ·-- . -- -:--··

\

..

:;

singular !he rights and appurtenances thereto in an~·wi~e belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, eKccutors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor hereby binds Granier and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singtdar lhe property to Grantee and Granlec's heirs, executors, adminlstre(ors, successors, and assigns, agaimt every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the mervations from and ~x~eptions to WM"anty.

. It is expressly agreed that the ~NDOR'S~JJ;:N, os well as 1hcSuperiorTitlc in and to the nbovi;: de11nrihed premi~es, fa rettihi'~ ~lti~i 1 :ii.fi.~·li1io.,,~ described pr<iperty, premises and improv.einents until the above described Note arict.,iffii\ierest thereon arc fully paid according to the facr:,:.1~no~; efiect and r~ing there~f, at which tim1hhis Deed shall become absolute.

1

.l I

· · PLl\INS Cl\PITAL BANK ("Lender"), 111 the lns1ClJloe and rcquos1 of1he Gr11nteo herein, ha~frig advanced and paid in cash to the Grantor herein that portion of the purchase price of the hc;rein described proper1y as ls evidenced by the hcrcinabove acscribc:d Note, the Vendor's Lien, logelher with the Superior Title to said property, is retained herein for the benefit ofsaid LendCJ and the same are hereby TRANSFERRED AND ASSIGNED to said Lender, its successors and assigns, without recourse against Grantor. '

.. pronouns include the plural.

When the contcxtrcquires, singular nouns'iind

EXECUTED on the date first.above mitten.

VERY, INC.

''

STA TE OP TEXAS

COUNTY OF BEXAR,

Not~~:e;-:it Mycq!flllliSsion e;w;pires: - - - - - - - -

AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:

CERTifICATE . .The pog• lo whl<h 1hls ccr11ncal<" i. affixed mny hnv• b<•n alltr.-d to rtdact conOdtnllnl P•""°nal lnfonnallon bul 11othcnl'lsca11111, lrue and com:ct copy of the original on Ole nnd afrc<ord In my office. A.TTF.'\TF.Jli,_ _ _ __ GER.o\iU> C. RIC:KHOFF COUl\'TI' CLERK nµAR COUN1-Y, TEXAS

. nv~:...;· ...· -=-=-------- 10 ...3[.J~ : • .,:, nrpuiy Dalt

\

. ·~· ..

..

Doc# 20130198589 #Pages3 09/20/2013 2:54PM e-Filod & c-Rccordcd in the Official PubHc Records of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CL.ERK F~s$20.00

STATE OF Tl::XAS GOUNTY OF 61iXAR Thfi; is lo Certify that this document was e-Fl~ED and e-RECORDED in the Officlal Publfe Records of Bexar County, Texat. on this date and time stamped thereon. 09/20/2013 2:54PM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS

CERTIFICATE Tilt pngc lo wl1lch this ecnlf1C11le Is offi1cd n1ny hn,·c llw1 nlltrcd fl> l'tdncl Cohfldtntlnl p<rsonnl lnformoilan bu! h:othl'nt•l.u-: n full, true nnd cow-nd copyorUtC!i n.t'lgrunl an fllr rmJ afrc-c•rl-d fo my oms:c-,

ATIF.STEJ):._ _ _ __ GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK RF,ll Al~ COUNTY, T.li:XAS

BY: J-=:-'

JXputy

,. • I I

Gerard Rickhoff COUNTY CLERK • BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOROSA. SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

· CERTIFICATE

STAT.l!J OJi' TEXA~ § COUNTY OF BEXAR§

1, GERARD RJCKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. NOW IN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD Fl LED IN~

PAGE I U> 1'&.

THIS CO'.PY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL JNFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

lN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFJCJAL SEAL OF OFFICE GIVEN IN THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THJS .3 irl- DAY OF De.~bQL. . A.U., :ZO .L~. •

GERARD RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

~~=.:.=~r.Ju..,..~__i,,;,M~©-J)~a BY:

Dep~nty Clerk 1 i--

ANY PROVISION HERElN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL. OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, REL1GION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL S'l'ATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LA'Y!

Book 16411 Page 718 3pgs Doe# 20130225299

First American Title l Gf# ~"'kQfr~ · ~.nC'iot.;ONFIDENTIALITY RlGHTS: IF YOU AREA NATURAL PERSON, YOU MA,f JttMOVE OR S'r~ll(E ANY OR ALL OF rim FOLLOWJNG lNFORi'fATION FR.OM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN JNT.EREST IN REAi, PROPER'l'Y B:.t:FORt JT JS .FU.ti> FO.R RtCOR.l> J.N TB'.E PU.BLlC Rl:CORDS: YO\'JR socm:. SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER• .' '

FATCO·S~ WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN Oc1oberZ.~2013 ·Gratitorr HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

' . l. Griuitor's Mailing Address:

-~-m33 Grantee: ACSBLOR, .INC. db.1 STBl.LAR HOMES o_.ant4CiJ4 }'..f,..il:ng Acfdrc»I

~l~~Way Coiwcrs~, Tcxa$ 78 !09 Hex;ir CounlY

Co11sidcrntion: C:ish aud a note ofeven date c.~ccu1cd by Gmn!Ql and pay.iblc to the otdcrofBROADYWAY ~A;i'IONAL BANK in the principal Amount of ONE HUNDRED TWEN7Y SlX 'JiiOUSAND FOUR lil).NDRED ANIJ OU/.IOOTiiS DOLLARS ($126,400.00) which represen1spart paymentofthopurclw.c price Tlwnotcis sceu~b}•a first and superior vendor's lion and supcriortttlcrctained in this clt'.:4 <if the property. in f:h·orofBROADVWAV NATIONAL BANK and by a lirol·lleu dco:I ofousl ofeven dote from Gmn1ecto D'T,AYNE RHYNSBUROER, Trusu:e.

LOT g, BLOCK 7, KEY LARGO SUBDWIS!ON, BEXAR COUNTV, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO MAI' OR "P.LJ.!'lliEREOF RfCORPED IN VOLIJMa 9513, PAOE(S) J3, D!iBD AND PLAT RECORDS OF BE~ARCOUNTY. TEXAS .

. Rcs.crnlions rroni nml Exteptions lo Conveyance and Wnrrantyi

Validly c~bting casements, rights·oT·way, and prcscrlptlvc rights, whether rctord or no~ all or pre.scnuy rccordcO and va111:11y c.t1sling ins1rumcn1S, omcr tnan convey~es or 111esurt.1co ltc cst:llO, Ulat ama the Property; and tnxcs for 2013, which Grantee assumcnnd agrees to pay, nnd subsequent a.~sc.'ISmcnts for that Md prior years d~e 10 diangc in land usage, ownership, Qr beth, tho payment ofwflich Grantee assumes.

G'"'°ntot, ror "''"'~on;:ildw"'tion and aubjoot. to t\9 .rtv.J'il'l"'VQaiom r~m Ccnvoyiu10• o.nd tho i;,,"'ft:an~ to Convci·ancc aud Warranly, gmn1s,sells 1agd convoys 100ran1Cc: 1h~ Propcrty, 1ogc1bcr wid1all and singular Ille rigt11s and appurtenances 1hcr~10 in any way belonaing, to have nnd to hold it lo Gcan1cc and Gran1cc'5 heirs, successor~, and MSi8JIS forever. Grantor binds Granier nnd Grnntor's hcits and successors 10 warrant and WARRANTY PEED WITH V!;NDOR'S LIEN PAG£l OF2

cEJTIF.ICATE The~age to whlcll lhl~ ccrtlllcntc Is affixed moy bavc brcn Rlttrtd 10 rrdac! co110dr111lol pcrsonol lnformailon hul Is ol~cnrbc n rull, lr11c nnd corrcd copy of lhr orlghml on tilr nnd orncord flt my omcr. Arn:STEO:._ _ _ __ GERARD C. RICKirOFF' COUNTY CU1RK BEXA.U COU~Y. TEXAS

BY: k..'3 J/-l/-U Exhibit D 0.1>1•1y Date ·- .. -· ·- ·- -

' ..

forever dcforul all and singular the Pro~~ ta Grantee and Gra11t~s heirs, su~rs. and assign~ ag1insl every person wuoms~r 1awruuy c1aimins e>r 10 c1a1m 1n~ same or any p'111 1ncroor; except as 10 111~ Rc!iOl\l:llioll.!I from Comiey:tnce and tho R.~cepliom to Conveya11te and Wnnanty.

Tho vendor's Ue11 agairu1 and supcriorlitlete> the Propony~re retained until oacll note described is fully p111id ('Otor<G°I\& to I~ tot'lt'O, ait wl.Col! timo thi11 deK w\11 b•~JYt• oh.aol\11•.

.. BROADYWAV NATIONAL BANK, at Cirantt.e's request, has paid in cash toOrantorthatportionof Utt: purthil$c price of the J>ropcnytl1a1 iscvidc11ced by lhcnotc. The first and superior vendor's Jienapist end C11J\'!pnr 1il!e In the Prnpezty nrA rel2it!M fni lllo benefit ofRROAOYWAY NATIONAL BANX and arc 1~f~r1ed lo BROADYWAY NATIONAL BANK without recourse against Oranror.

Whon the context requires, slnp,ular noons and pronouns include tho plur:il.

STATE OFTEXAS ·

COUNTY OF BBXAR

------:"- ~GlllSONTIDMO!!E .

a

Notti, l'IJlllc STATEOFTEX~ MrCollm. f111.1111212D14 " ~·""

.. ~:;;:;;....;,:;;;;,;;:,;;;;:m,:;~;..;.;...11

(~ .

AFTER RECORDING RETURN TOi ACS:Sl.DR, JNC. dbA STELL~OMES 66~4 ~SoadxWlly31JC fDltJ( Conytt.t'l'0 1 T~xu,ilCIP

WARRANTY DEED Wi11l VENDOR'S LIEN PAOIHOF2

CERTIFICATE Tho p11gc to which this certtncolols affixed nony hDvt been Dltrred to ,..dnd conHd•r>tfal personal lnformnllon but is olbcrwisr o r..11, true nnd correct copy or !hr originnl on file ond or record In h•)' offi«, ATT~Tl1D• GERARD c.'""m=cKH=,_,o....F""li'-- COUNTv CLERK BEXAR COU.Nyj•'}f-XAS DVi L(':J I /-q-rJ Drpuly Dnte .,......

Doc# 20130225299 #Pages 3 10/30/2013 2:35PM "'-l=il<>d R. o-Fl..,,,ordod in lh<> Official Public Records of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. RICKHOFF COIJfllTV Cl FRK Fees$2o.oo

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF 6EXAR This is lo Certify that this document was e-FILED and e-RECORDED In the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas >)fl thl~ dole and limo; ~!otllj.l<:J lhcr<:i;in, 10/30/2013 2:35PM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS

CERTI.FlCAl'E Th• pag• to which thl• ccrtlnt11tt Is o!IDcod may hnv~ brcn "ltcn:d t<> redact confidentlal personal inronuollon but l• olh~nli~e a full, !rue 1111d torrtcl copy orlhf orfglnnl on Olr and af reeord in my office. ATTJ;.ST.ED1 _ _ _ __ GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTJ.iTIJXAS B\': _ _,_;lr;;.....~SJ.,,.______ /I- t..f-r_j Dc-puty Dale

Gerard Rickhoff COUNTY CLERK • BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOROSA, SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

CERTIFICATE

STATE OF TEXAS§

COUNTY OF BEXAR§

I, GERARD RlCKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW IN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED JN:

VOLUME J&,4 l I PAGE Q- L8:

"'l'HJS COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL QI; QFFJCE GJVEN IN T~ITY QFSAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS 4(1< »AY oF [Jjfj_Ye m !:&c. A.D., 20 I2 .

GERARD RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

nv: - '-'a~ ~e~pu~ty-c-ou-1~- - 'er" "'~. L. .<. >C12c~ .=L.-

ANY PROVISION HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS T.HE SALE, RRNTAL, OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, Sl!:X, HANDICAP, FAMILJAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW•.

,Book 16411 Page·732 3pgs . Doc# 20130225301 r11:;r iVTit5i~on Tiile . GF# \ Cft.cB33rrATCO-SA $ ~ .

. J\TOTIC~ OF CONFJDENTIAt.nv rue.ins, IFVOU All.EA NATtmA.t.l'lmSON, \'OU MAY ~MOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTER.EST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FlLED FOR RECORD IN TIIE l'lJBLlC RECORDS: YOUR SOClAL SECUl.U'l"ll ?-TUMllJ:n on 'iO\JJ.\ DIUVEn·s LlCENGl'HWMlnm. .

WARRANTY DEED WIIB VENDOR'S LIEN !Jate: uctoller~ ZUIJ •, Grantor: HBLVfil1A ASSET R.ECOVERV, INC.

Gr~titvT'> Mnl\11111 tularcn;

Gr~11tee:

-~ACSBLDR, INC. dba STELLAR HOMES

Grantet's Mailin2 Address:

.·. ~o~ 4 Wny Converse, Texas 78109 BcXllr County

~o~sider~tion: Cash and a note ofeven date c.~ceuted by Grantee arid pnyabl~to tlt~ordcrofBROADY\VA Y · NATIONAL BANK in the principal amouni of ONE HUNDRED FOR.TY 1WO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDR.EDANDOO/JOOTHSDOLLARS(Sl42,400.00}whichrcpmentspaltpa}mcntof~purchascpri~ . +£"th. -pfC.~rty, ilw, ~~W \D KWrM. lty C'o fu.ot llni 'l'IJ)Mf~t ..,C.ndcu1Q- L\'IJC'a Aftd. a.~po-nO'I' tiU. n.toiftcd. \~ i.hi:s d,...d, in mvorofBROADYWAY NATIONAL BANK lllld bya firsl·lien deed oftrvstof evcndateftomGrantcelo D'LAYNE RHYNSBURGER, Trusteo.

Pro11crtY Ontludinf. any imi>rovemtnls):

LOT 52, BLOCK 7, .KEY LARGO SUBDMSION, DEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDiNG TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9513, PAGE(S) 13, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUN1Y, TEXAS.

Resnv~!ions rrom and Emptions ti) Conveynnce nnd Warranty:

Validly CKisting casements, riS)lls-of·way, and prc.miptiw rigllls, whether of r~rd or not; all pt•.e.n1ly raeotdtd ~ftd '':tlicll~ •nios.:",g R-tetnm~itnt11, ~tho,1h~ oon~•i;uJ:t!Ov ol°th• C!\ir·H.o.ei f'H o~~ta, thstG.A'"~t tbc Proimty; and ta."<cs !Or 2013, which Grant~ assumes and aAf~s 10 pay, a11d subsequent amssmcn\5 for tbar and ~rior l'Oal'S due to change In land usage, ownership, or bolh, tho payment ofwhl~h Grantee assumes.

· · . Grantor, for the Consideration andsubj!ICt1othcRescrva1io11s from Convc)'3Jlce3/UI tbeE"<cei>tionsto . Conveyance and Warr;mly, grants, sdls, nnd canvcysloGran!~the i>iqierfy, l<>gctherwith all and singulaiihe rishtnnd ~pp11nenances 1hc1CT0 in any way belonging, to bave and to hold it to Grantee !llld Gfl!lllce's heirs, successor$, and assigns forever. Oranror binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs and su=sso~ lo warrant and WARRANN OEED WlT.H V£ND0R'S L!EW l"l\OJ: 1 or i.

CERTIFICATE Th• pag• to which this «rtlflcat~ Is affiXtd m~y have b••n Olt•red to l'<!dact confld~ntfal personal lnformn!lori hut Is olherwl~~ a full, !rue nnd corred C<lPY of the original on mi arid nfr~ord in my office. ATTESTED:_ _ _ __ GERARD C. RICKHO.FF COUNTY CLERK BEXARC~O ;4TEXAS BY: ·~J //- L/;1·~ Exhibit E eputy Date forever dtftnd all and singular ~Property lo Grantee wid Grani='s hchs, successors, and assigns against v'Yf>iy !"'"""' wh""'""'""' la.wtullr c;blmlng or lo ~lo.Im ~ sant; or ~ny pan lhcrwr, o;,;o;p1 "' 10 th• ReSer\lali~ frnm Co1111ey:mce and the Eicceptio!1$ IO Conveyance Md Warrt1nty, ·. · The ~dor'$ Iicn against and superior title to the Properly •re TClalned un1il cacb notcde$C:tl"bcd is fully p~id 11ourdi119 lb it< IOl'llU, 61 whi•ll bll'l6 thi• deed wlll l.eoom• ftboolute.

BROADYWAYNATIONALBANK,etGran1c.G'srr.qu=t,haspaidincoshtoG11111onhatponionof lhepur~~ priccoflhoPropcrtylhat ~ C\'id~ by thcllOfc. The lim 1111d supt;riorYGlldor'~ limapimtand siipmor title lo the Ptopcrty arc tttainr.d ror the bClle.lit cfBR.OADYWAV NATIONAL BANK and ~re 1mnsferred te> Bl1.0ADYWAY NATIONAL BANK without !'CCCIII~ asninst Granto:.

~n !he con1cx1 requires, sinsular noun$ and pronouns include tho plum!. ·

"L·

11$:

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNiY Oil f.lCXAR

AFTER RECORDJNC RETURN TO: ACSBLOR, INC. dba STEL~~~~~, l.. UJ.dKc1•SQ111blllay~/() ~\ CunviorK, Tcxu 7810~

wAJW.i.m' DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN J>AGR201't

CE~ruiCATE Tho paco 10 which this crrtlRc:itr ls affix..t moy hn"e b<<n allrttd 10 rrdn<t confldrntlnl ptrsonnl lnfonnAtlon but Is othe""'r•'n rull, lnir and rotttd ropr<>rth• <>rlglnol on Ill• ond <>f rctorll In my officr.

ATTFSTED: _ _~~­ GERAlID C RlClCl'!OFF COUNTI' CLERK JlExAR <:OVNTY, TEXAS B\': ~ JI- t/-t:J ~u!y ' Datr

Doc# 20130225301 #Pages 3 1013012013 2:35PM e•Fited & e-Recorded in the Official Public Reeords of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK Fees$20.00

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DEXAR Tliis is lo Certify that this document was e-FILEO and e-RECORDED In lhe Official Public Records of Bexar Countv. Texas on this dale and time .sfampcd !hereon. 10130/2013 2:35PM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNlY TEXA$

CERTIFlCAT£ Tiie pngr Co which this tt111Rcnte ls llffittd moy hll\'f hem ollmd to redact conRdtntfal pe!'lonnl fnfonnaflon but Is olhtrniSt' n full, tn.10 nnd ~nrttol copy of lh• orlglnnl on nl• nnd ~f ...cord In m)' om... A1i.ESTED:._ _ _ __ GERAJU> C, RJCJ<HOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR BY:

C:J>):· tc:_'2_ TEXAS

Deputy

' .

Gerard Rickhoff COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOROSA. SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

.- . "· CERTIFICATE

STATE OF TEXAS§

COUNTY OF BEXAR§ .

I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTYCLERKOF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ISA TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS. NOW IN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:

VOLUME Ila r..111 PAGE 1. ):)

THIS.COPY MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

_ IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL qi}5>!FlCE GlVEN 1N THE~TY OF SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS ~ - DAV OF -i tJ/1lk{J.,tJljb()r A.D., 20 /3 . •

GERARD RICKHOFF 1r"'"'1HfltJ1'

•• -•' ·- ti,,-<,. COUNTY CLERK ,«' ·;.~ 1. 0 1,,, . r~··~"). ._..,.9-. ••••.'1 0 /': ~.. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS : ," ......

J1'

·-.:~~;..\ :

/ .·o-·...• • J • <> ~ ~·~: -.·~i:

~ '5 -? 9'~.

. ,I~~ ~ -

:·n~ •

~;: '3. ;.: -· ':-

'j; ,.J. • I ,......_ .:

~ ~ .....

./... •• : r'

. ··... ...•..

":-;-,,,:~{,,.,. . - ... "·i~ ..--., ,~ ,, :./')....

';,, 1r, ·S ·~. \,\.'' .

'1,~ "'· I l,11 111 \I\\ \\~' ., . . .

ANY PROVISION HEREIN WIDCH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL, OR USE OF THE Ut;~t:lUl:UMJ REAL l"KOYJl.ilff:Y BECAU:Sl!i OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, :5l!'tX, HANDJCAr, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND lJNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

.. '· Book 16411 Page 786 3pgs Doc# 20'!30225306

First American Title GF# 12>~oa'11- ~FATco-sA $ NOTICE OF CONFJDENTlALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A Ni\TURAL PEKSUN, YOU MAY REMO\I.~ on STRIKE ANY OR. ALt mr Till: F()LLOMNG lN'FORMATION ·FROM ANY .INSTRUMENT 1'HATTMNSFERS AN lN'fEltEST lN REAL PROPERTY DEFOnE IT 1$ men 'FOR ll\l:COltD JN 'mt PUllUC RECORDS; VOU:R SOC1Al, SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER.

WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIBN OctobcrZf. zo l3 •

Grantor: HELVETIAASSETRECOVllRY,INC.

Gr~ntcc: ACS6LDR, INC., a Texas wrpora1ioq

1

C.,.n"too o M4"1:11g Add.-oPPot . . 8lJO~'t ~a4~Way Converse, Tox;is 7KI09 llcl!ar Countv

. Coiisidcrntion: cm and II note of even date ~llllUICd by GrllOIC¢ and payablo lo the order ofJEFFERSON · BAj-1.K in 100 principal nmaunt ofONE HUNDRED TWF.Nli' SBVBN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY AND 00/l OOTHSJ}QLLARS (S 127,440.00) which represents part paymcn1 oflhc purcbascprlce of 111011ropcr1y. ·me note is socurcd tly a11rst aJlCI superior vemlo(s lien ana supcrtortl!I~ rei.11noa in lllisacec tn favof'of JEFFERSON BANK and by a .first-lien dcoi of Irust of CVcn dato fro1n G!'lllllec tel DANNY B. BUTLER, irusttc.

LOTS, BLOCK 9, KEY LARGO SUBDlVISJON, BEXAR COUNTY, TEX/IS, ACCORDJNG TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLlJM1!957J, PAQP.(S) lJ, DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR ~OUNT'I'. 'l'EXAS. Ru,rvRtions rronl ~nd Exceptions to ConveyAnc~ aqd Warr:nlty:

Vo!ldly exiS1ing cascincnls, rlghts.Of·\\'3)', 3ruJ pructiptivc ri~hts, whether of n:eord or not; all prcscmry rci:oraell a11\I valldlycxl5llng ll1'Ullll1Cn1:<, mh<;r 1han cuuv~1••n1;'" ur1h~ ·~·r•w (l;o .,......., ll•w.nll\M th~ Property; and ta"cs for 2013, which Grantee assumes and agrees 10 pay, and subsequent assessments for that and prior ycius due lo chnnac in land usage, ownership, or bolh, Ille pa}'ITIClll ofwhieh Grantee mumcs.

Cl":t.nt~r 1 thr th@ t'tint;~rntion nrtd ruhj~rt tn tfw!. ~P.t'i9n1.Minnr: f'rnn1 ~nH~)r.'n~.I! nnd 1hr. E."(rJ".l\llMt: In Convey1mcu1111d Wiirflll•ty, gr,1111$, ~ell~, :u1d conveys 100r.11u~ thePropcr1y, wgclllcr with all MdsiJl811Llrthe rlghis and appurcennnccs thereto in any way belonging, ro h:ivc and to hold ii to Grantee and Grnn1ce's heirs, sueccxsors, nnd assigns forever. Grnn1or binds Granter and Grantor's bcin and successors 10 1Varram and WA!lRAN'l'Y DEED WTrn VENDOR'S L1£N ' PAGJl I 01'2

.; .. ...

CEllTpi!CATE Tlit jJng• to which lhb ccrt10m1• ls nffixed niny hove bctn nllcrcd to rcdllct co11Hdc11trAI pt1'!0onol lnformnllon but l~ 'nilltrwl•c n Ml, Irut nnd cotccct copy o£thc ortr,lnnl 011 nle 11nd of ~ccord In my olllce,

AITl"..'itf.01_ ___.,.._,..._ _ GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY cr.imK BEXAllCOU~T'.TEXAS . BY:· ~ Exhibit ·p uty ''--.- -~-~----··· •. ·~

forever defend all and &inllllar th11 l"rollerll' lo <Jr.1111~ and Oranlr;e's lioii$, su~sors, and assigns against every person wh~r la11.ful!y t:lainiing or to claim the SWllC or any part tl1crcof, oi;ccpt as ta the Res,cruntill!IS from Convc~'lU\CC nnd the Exceptions to Convcy-Jnce And Wnrranty.

The vondo~s lion asaillSI nnd superior title to tho l'roporty are retained untn each note di:Kribcd is full)• paid accoRllng to Its 1cnns, DT which tlmo lhls dcocl. 111ll bccomo ab50lmo.

JEFFERSON DANK, at Grmntcc11 request, bu paid ·in cnsh to Granier that ponion of the: purchosc price of the Property th~i is evidenced by lhc nOIC. The lim and ~upcrior YCndor's li=n against and sup:iiorti~c 101lio P•oporty ,... roc...lnod lbr1IU1 bonol\1 otJSl'l'BRSOl'J B/\NK and..,. """'~mod lo JSPl'SPJ>ON DANK · without rer.o1usc againsl Gnmtor.

·;, When the conlo~I rQq\liTC9, singular nouns and pronouns include Ille plural. !. .

.....

Us:

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF BEXAR

AF;TER RECORDING RETURN TO: ACSBLDR1!NC., a Tc.us to~~~ ~ 1 \cUJ.. B631JfoSe~tb.Wa.,.M1D~--- ~ --~:r9f~o. T..u, 78109

WM'RANTY l)EF.'OWl'l'fl VENDOR.'$ tlEN J>ACZ!l Of 7. •

CERTIFICATE Thf page lo wldch 1hL-; ccrtlRcalC' •~ anb::C!d rnC'l)' h"AV-t beC!n altered lo rC!dnd confkfentlnl personnl lnrormnUon but i~ oth~nrl'~ 1 full, lruc nnd cnrrcd copy nf lh~ orlglnnl on mi and of r~rd In my offirc.

ATTESTED:..----..,..,..~~- GERARD C. RICKBOFF

]):\'; _____________ COU.N1'YCL£RK llEXAU COU~NT ',TEXAS If <../-0 uty 'Dnlr

Doc# 20130225306 #Pages 3 10/3012013 2:36PM e·Flled & e-Recorded.in the- Official PubUc Records of BEXAR COUNTY GERARD C. RICKHOFF COUNTY CLl:RK Fees $20.00

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR This is lo Certify lhat this document was e·FILED and e-RECOROED in the Offl~lal Public Records of Beltar County, Texas on this dale and lime stamped thereon. 10/30/2013 2:36PM COUNTY CLERK, BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS

CERTlflCATE Thr pu11t to which this ~uilficn!r ts uffixtd mn)' havt brt11nllmd10 rtdna conOdrnllnl ptrsonnl lnfor111Cltlon but l,r i0lf,t'rn'bc- n fulJ 1 tru~ ttnd ~tu-red <'Op)-~ (\rtho (\rlglnul an m., 11nd (}rf"O'C't:ird In tn)• 4)ffi~e-.

A'Ji~:STEO: GERARD c.""'RI"':"':CKJ='l~O"'"n:.,---- COUi\'lY CJ.ERK n~co,r,\' Ti;:XAS

R\': u.5 Deputy JI- c.;-O Dute

Gerard Rickhoff .IH • £ "'

COUNTY CLERK · · BEXAR COUNTY

BEXAR COUNTY COURTHOUSE 100 DOLOROBA, SUITE 104 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205

CERTIFICATE

STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BEXAR§

I, GERARD RICKHOFF, COUNTY CLERK OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS ATRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF REAL PROPERTY OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, NOW JN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY AND POSSESSION AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD FILED IN:

VOLUME ! 1 .

Jin L/ I I '

PAGE'----'2-1--'£..,._...,,&_ THIS CC)PYMAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED TO REDACT CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 552.147.

JN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIALSEALOf'J~FICE GIVEN JN THE!!TY OF$AN ANTONIO, BEX,4.R COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THIS !:/I:- DAY OF &J_Verr7·{2§__ r A.D., 20 t..:L.. • GERARD RICKHOFF COUNTY CLERK BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

BY:-4-a~nm~~1~'1_..~a7~Qv~·ot,~_ Deputy County Clerk

·., .

ANY PROVISION HEREIN WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE, RENTAL, OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP,

e FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LA\Y.· ... •,

Corporntions Section John Steen P.0.Box 13697 SCl.:lC\acy of-State

• Austin. 'rexas 78711-3697.

Ihe undersign~~( as Secreia.ry of State ofTexas1 does hereby certify that the attached is a true and c.orred copy of.r~i:-h doc11ment on file in thf~ office :1.1: de~cribed below:

·~ Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. Filing Number: 800851624

~r.tificate of Formation August 01, 2007 TUK 'For::foituro h1.15'1ll"I 2~. 200!> Reinstatement November 02, 2009 ~ublic lnformati.on Report (PlR) December 31, 2009 Public Information Report (PlR) December 31. 2010 Public lnformati.on Report (PTR) December 3 t, 2011 Public lnforma'.tion Report (PTR) December 31, 20·12 ·Cliange ofRegister.ed Agent/Office September 16, 2013 Coe;1 lifi"'iiLoe; vf A.1111;;111.!w~:al~ i3eptem1Jta 27, 201J Certificate of Amendment October04, 2013

In testimony whereof, I have hereunto signed my name officially and caused to be impressed hereon the Seal of i'.State at my omce in Austin, rex:as on uctooer JU, :.::uu.

~ .

Tnhn St1um Secretary of State

Come visit us 011 the itttemet at ltftp:llwww.sos.stcrte.tx.us/ .

PhonP.'. (.51 ?.) 463•.'1<;5'5 D'.-..... '"''1\ .1..::::., .r..,nn Di21· 7-1-l £0.r~l~v SeL"t:focM: Prepared by: SOS·WEB Document: !i l 1S63800002 Exhibit G .. ..

.

i:~~~~~~1=:~~::~~-~==~:::~:=~=:~·~J ~--···-~···-··~ ·-··-·-·:::·~;···········--·-·--·-··-·"···· ~:::: ::~~-~===:~:=~::::~,:~:-~===:~===:~:\ \secretary of State " · ~. I' Filed in the Office of the . · . Box 13697 . ·· a.:n, TX 78711-3697 : . . !• Secretarv of State of Texas Filing#: 800851624 08/01/2007 1 l'AX~ 5121463-5709 " r Document#: 180560590002 I j · ;· Certificate of Formation I Image Generated ~lectronlcally : !Fi11no Fge: $300 ..::..::.;:..::..

:.,.::...~ :. For-Profit Oorpo.-ation ...."... -...-.-..--.........._,_.,........._ . . __ J. .. ____ ....................~~~.~~~ ~.~'.~~!... \:

..- - ._ _ _ _... _...,_..... .....--.....

"::..::,~::..::..::..:;~.:-~..:.~.::.,:.:";-,..t.,::..:.;.- ...._...~ ~ --'lfl. ,_. ._.. ,_. . . . . . .-...

l~eruina1!fai~~eina-rormia1s·aSarii-~,!!~-~;Me~~!~~iy is: t...c,~,---- J~... ·=,,~--~·-~~~"~"'~=~.1.· lHeivetia "ASSefReC:overy, inc:----~---~-------. ----- : •1,

:............................................ ·····-··· ................................... ····~···· ······-····-· ·-··~·············"

·-·----·---·--

:c.-

.... ,....... -··· ............ 1f

1

iThe name m1.1$t c:onleln the wvr11 "'90rporillon," "GOmpany," "lnoorporated," 11mlted," or an abbreY!allop:ot one of these lemt~. The nilme mll1t not : be the same liS. decepllveiv slmllar lo OI' slmllar to that of an existing corporate, limited llablllty company, or llmlled partl'lflrslllp name on file with I iU\IQ OC'-rc:ilary . , o\atc. A pre.um1nary""h~k r41'r ttn~mp eYGn111blH•~ f.a l'Goomm.e:ndt;;d. . . . {

o;_lL=·'""~J.LJ.11!1.11 .•..l l.,,.J!~!ll.Bl·.IJ.'11.ilbe!§if@;l~ll·IHliidJJ_li J .....~~·~-l,,". JlJLJ. L. U !I....F:A. ,,. ___ The il'!ltial registered agent Is an organl%etlon (cannot be corporation named above) by IM name ot. ! --------------·-------·---1 I OR \~e·. Tileitifli91 'reg\$tered agenfisanfudiViduai'"reSidenfofiiieSiatewhose nameTs~setforth "below:--·----·---!

I

i~E~.:~~~~~;,,~~~~!-~~~~~-:~~~~-~-:-~.~-~~-::.~:.: ·. :

~-~ ~ ~~-~~-~-~-~-~~-~~ ~ -~-:.~.~:-~ -:.: .~_:. ~ ~~-~-: ~-~.: .~:,.~ -~ ~.: :.~.~ i~-: !!1:~. ~~L~!S~~~~~~~.~fJ~J!~~~~. ~~~~..<1..m,~.~P~~. ~~~.~.~~~J~~==-=~·~'".,.. . ,..,.~..-· ·......... ·I· ;street Address: · :. :. . . :\.

1-.................,.............. ".................. "" ..................................... "...................................................................... ·1I I 1715 HaClbury Lane San Antonio TX 78248

If iiurriller.etdireci<>~'cons1ituuii'Q.itieTii1tiiii-iiaai·crc;1direciarn·aii~<r.ilename5'Blicfaddresses·orffie'jjerS:Onor on::> -uho oro to :>erv,o'o::> dlrc.:.toro until \he 1ir:il annual U1¥C\l11~ of ::>h1:1rct11:1~cr:i QI i,iulU \hc-h :.u~u1::> i1t c .......... t

f

)~!~~~-~~2::~~~~~ .~.~~1,~j~~~~;.~.:...::.::.:.:.::,:..:1.::.::.,-,.::.:;.~~::..::.,!:..l:,::."·'"i::.::.:.·~:..::.::.::.::..;:..::..::.:.::.:;..e-".!!.J:.:.",:;.".::..::.~.::.::.::..::..::.!:.;..~.:;.::.;:..;;~.. :l" j0lrec1or1: L19yd . Ge.9rge [ ! .i:..!:.'!.~....~_!.:'w::..!f,.'~ ,:•,.::.I~':,.:'.',!,::.,!!°.'!. ~~..=..·.:',.'!,!.".!.,:!,.U'.~..?J.~.!:J:.:-.:-.,.~;, : ..~ 1::,.-::..::..:.1.,:,:..:.-::~::..:.:..:;.:..::.~,::'~ ,~-;.~:.::.::..: .;:.,::..:;_.:.:...-...:.::.~.."::..!!o":!'-!.'.~.~..";. ,~.,:~..::.;:_,::..!!.::.,!'.~..'.!.,:!'..~... :I jAdd•o:- P. o~ lifo,K '1Q'09,07 s~n Antonio TX, USA 78246 ! Arlie le 4 - Aut11ori~ed Shares !nieTotainuinber of shares:the corporation lsauthorized to Issue andttle-parvalue of eaciiofSucfiSllares, Ori----- l~~*fi~!'J!~~~~~h-~-~1r·~·~ ~~~uMi~r~~~~i~ar~ci-~:1~;~1ihiri\"0Ta>-·---·-·-·-~:ciii"ss ____ i~e~es. . . . . . 1 ! · · I · !l \t_ l ... " .. ~..... - ........ "............... J ... - - .. - ... " .... " ................................ " .. - .... - .. - ................ - ... -..:t .. "...........!•.. - .......... .

!.~-~,:~.,-~~~. ·. ·~~,~~::.:.e~;JP~t~!;~;~:~~~::~:.~~.~~~"~-~~,-=k~~=-~-=~-··=~,.~~=J 1If !he sharGs ~re or . .,~~--~-~l.~..:-=.~~=-~:

to be divid ad Into clas11es, you must set fortfl \he designation Of each class, the NJmber shares or each olaw, and lhe par value !(orstatemert of no par value), of each cf1ss.1rshares of a class are to be lssuedln $erle$, you mll$1 provide lhe dcslyriaOon of HQll series. lhe · ipreferences, Dmltallons, ancl relat!v~ rlghls oJ ell(:h elm or serte.s ~)-~ .~~t~.!ll ll~f:l!.l!~~~J.<:!~rl..f2!:.~!!lm~!ll~ll.UQf9Jffi!!n!?!L ..... --· -···---·-· 1 : l lriWpurf)Oseror"'W'iiioii"ttte corporati0niSoroanized1SforffietransaeTi0nof any'anci'illaWrul businessforwhicil"-·-·~·1 Icorporations may be om.~n_l~!!d under the Texas Business Organizations Code.

::>upp1ementa1 Prov1swns 11ntom1at1on _ [· I ! .. . . l (TM attactted addendum, If any, (&Incorporated hereln by rererence.J ! .. :'. .

~~# :~ .. ''.

l j Effectiveness of F11lng I

-~;~!g~--?§§~~~~I.~~:§-~iii-~~~~¥.~F.~.~-~~~~~fi~.~~~ijj~~I~~-fi.f~~-.~;1~.--~~r~f~~i-~~~!~=-~~-.:~~-:=--~~~~=-~~~~~--:-~.~~-~--~li I . • "• Oft. !~a:TiliS.Cfoc~-~P-nlbaq9~~s effec11ve'9TSiaterdafe-;'Wtifct1is·n-01-rii<>r0-r11·0ii·n1ii6tYcso> days iroiii"ifle<iai8·0rtt5......~. lslgnlng. The dE!!ayed effeq"!ye date Is: August 2, 2007 .. - ...................... _••. ~-..-~- .. ·--""":':":1·-·":'!,,;.,..............., __ ...._ ...4 _ _ ........ _ .., _.... , , _ , . . . - . - -... _ .. _ _ _ _ _ ,_ . . _ _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . :---~----·· ............................... _ , . _ _ ..... _ _ _ _ _ ...... - .. - ....

I

.. "•

i··-----------------------------------·---~------·······----···---·····-·--·--·-·····---·- _l. ·I iThe name and address of the org~nlzer Is set forth below. 1 l r'rY George 1716 HadbilrY Lano, San Antonio, TX 78248 1·

.. __..;..;_.:.,_________.__...-=....:.;:;_,._____··-······-~...... .;...-.,•._,_____·-·---~--'--.:.::..~.::_,__.:..:.""":.---------1 i~~;;~~~r;~~j;~~:~~~1~~~:~::~~~-~:-~~:~-~~-~~.~-~~~'.~,e_:_~:~~~:~:~:~-~~~~~~~-:~:~~-~-~~~-:~~:~~~~~-~:~~~,-1· rTerry George : ~· · f ISignature of organizer ~;., , :.. . -. :. I· ~ .. ·,.~·•••e.,.,.,.,.,_,. • .,._,,_•••••••••··~-·..:::.·~...!.?::!!.'".:.:.!.!:~~.!-M .. •....._,.•--•• .. -••.. t""'"'•"'"'" .. •••.:,•~~·•••••••'"-""'_"_C"_"'"'"'••••• ..• .. ,.......,.,7•-,.•••-•-••••••••••••'"---•-:•; ...;_.

"ILIN(I Of'l'ICE C~py

: ~'.~:

·._-..-..

·~: .

i·= .,. 1. . \.::.'.

.. "•

C<>rp1.1mtious Section · Hope Andrade P.O.B~ 13697 Soo>-o1n"Y or St,,to AUstlll, leJi.11$ "/!fll l-3617

Forfeiture pursuant to Section 171.309 of the Texas Tax Code or Helvetia Asset Recovery~ Inc.

t'ile Number : -isuu~:>l62.4 ~ertiticate I cnarter torteited : August 28, 2009

The Secretary of State finds that:

L The Secretary has received certification from the Comptroller· ofPublic Accounts under Section 171.302 of the Texas Tax Code indicatinJl that there are J..rrowids for the forfeiture of the taxable entity's charter, certificate or registration; and 2. The Compttoller of Public Accounts has determined that the taxable.entity has not revived its forfeited privileges within 120 days after the date.that the privileges were forfeited.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 171.309 of the Texas Tax Code; the ·Secretary of State hereby forfeits the charter, certificate or registration of the taxable entity as of the date noted above and r~re!s this-notice oftorterture in the permanent files a11d records of the entity.

Hope Andrade !)ecretaiy of :State

~·: ..

Come visit us on the 'tntero.et@.hltp;/(www.ws.st!l.te.tx.\1s/ (5 !2) 463-5555 FAX (:512) 463-5709 'ITV1-l-1

. ;~- .

.. ..

. : ..~· omie or the Serretney of St!lte Filt!d in the Office.oft~ secretary ot ~tate of Texas Cnr;P~r.ation& Section Filing·#: &0085162411102/2009 PiLBox 13697 .Document #: 28206290D002 Atis~iii, Texas 78711-3697 _______ __ ________ ____. __ ______.. _________ ___ lmaae Generated Electronioallv (Form 801) for Web Filing ----··---.....-...-......-... ...,..._, :- ,.,., .... ..... , , ,_ ,"

APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT AND . REQUEST TO SET ASIDE REVOCATION OR FORFEITURE l-lamo oflintity:

Helvetia Asset Recoverv; Inc.

1'ilo Nurnbu: 900&S1624

The taxpayer identification number is: 32033458269

1. The entity named above .was forreited or its authority to tran.sact business in Texas was revoked on. OS/2812009 for the following reason:

to Failure file a. fi:anchise tax return and/or pay state franchise tax.

~:; : ..

• 3.

The e~tit~:has cO~~i~ted the· default and has paid all fees.. taxes, end penalties due.

· .. ':.:

·.. ,i

The entity appli~·s for reinstatement and requests that the Secretary of St.at~ set aside the forfeiture of the Texas entity or the revocation of the foreiun entity's authority, m transact business in Tex:as, as applicable.

By BURTON KAHN Pr~-'idcmt

FILING OFFICE C~ PY

:... :'

.i

·.. ·.

r . . ·····-·-". . ·-·---· , _____ . . .··---;)'"" . • : .

_ _ _ .... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .,,...,_,..,,,_ _ ~~·-·

T'E:)<lo.8 OOM•'Tl'tl;ll- .. t:?i ~.0.DQll l:l$28 1.1/ if>'Ubl.11;: Aor;olJ·~ 'i!;

• IU-'TOI: TK 71.1 t• I '-'8~~ .

PT"li

,I).,,.,.. • -

b:::.:~=••••l.l":..'~r·•·===•.. • _,, .. ,,,,<ll.._,,.,.,... "''·~=H ••••'"t••,..,.• •ttii;:._,niw•IW•-.--•':'::::~,~ " • f.f._~ .

~,!lj-;'2 ~·-

.. ..~ .. :• ..

WilUIJlf.l'IA ASOJllT RllC'O'\IERY, '.INC • 1'71~ :iii.DBiiRY LN S~ Ah."'I'a~1.0. ~~ 7R?.~R-2l0/

:-:o·! \:'exa.ii .9ecretu:y Qf St-:at.P.

Cor,po~atiCl!lg Se~t\oQ

it... I . ltEE.,VJn':l:.I\ AS~'S~ imeovmi.v. :r.m:i • T~~ver nllltll:ie~: 3203345~~r.~ F'lle nul!lh.or: 080065162<.

The ;i;~::-erence<I en;;;i-;y Nst> ;;;.:l .aJ.:., fc-CU1cll1ae !;;,,:... ;.:·(l;yui.rement:a (lml f.w ~l i\j.l.bl.e :o'.!'." :r.eim1tatem.l!!nt tbroua!. :May l,7 r 2010.

:t-lrCHJIEI, .i\L~ En1:·0.rce-.G11.:t;. - SllD l\r.ton:!.o NE .riekl Oper~t:i.f:lnl!l - ::?11:oi:cement l2l0)64(,HJ'.$~,

:•, ...

'1Yre reiosle:tfsm1nr 111w1 be mea with tile Tems Secretaty of State Pfl or 11,ram th~ txf'/tati«J date of lhls fetter. FOIUlS and itlSfl'/il:tbls for ~ln$tstemant can befoUnd at w11tiw.sos.stste.tx.US/c~1'orms_optiais.shtml or by calltng (512) 4fi3~5581. This tlDt ofearancs letter mut:t l'Je itttacf?M 10 ma Mmmrsmmzr tDims.

NOTE: ff i'he fltltlly falls to re/Jlsrere on or before me ta~ otear~cs oate indiGalBd Fn thrs terter, ttii<RlioJiar franahl~ rax· n11t111 ~nts ~t be met and a new rs(11Jesr for tax c,'eSTance must be i;ubmlfted prior lo tllflistatemrmt. · ·

·-.

., •a.

TEXAS FRANCHISE TAX PUBLIC INFORMATION ® ;:._C•R~.d ·~~~:-- 05-102 ,,,.....,1111•1 {Rev. 1·08/28) iTo be filed by Corporations and Limited Liability Companies (LL< This report MUST be filed to satisfy franchise ta• requrremer ... - • .. t<:Od~ ·•·.. 13196 • Taxpayer number : • Report year You have certain 13 I 2 I o \ .3 :13141 s I s 1 2 16 1 9 ll 2 l 0 l 0 19 l to review, request, Contact us at: (512 Taxpayernarne · HELVE'.f'IA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Mailing address 1715 HADBURY LN City ZlPCode Plus4 SANANTONIO I78248 12107 Q Blacken <:irde if there are currently no thanges or additions to the information displayed in Section Aof this rer:;

Entity's principal o.ffice 1706 ALPINE CIRCLE SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 78248 r•ndpal place of business '

• J. ,J... r/ Officer, director and member information is reported as of the date a Public Information 111/Jll 111111!.f!llJ Report is comf?leted. Th_e information is updated annually as part of ~he franc~ ise tax ~- · .... · report. There 1s no requirement or procedure for supplementing the information as .. officers, directors, or members change throughout the year.

e SECTION A Naine.,title and mailing address of each officer, director or member.

Nanie . . · · Title Direct<

BURTON !(AHN PRESIDENT @ y

Mailing ad.dress . City 1706 A.LPINE CIRCL.E SANANTONIO Name TI tie Direct< 0 y

Mailing address City

Name . Title Direct< ov Malling address City

Name Title Direct<

Q·Y Mailing address City

SECTION B Enter the Information required for each corporation or LLC, jf any, in which this reporting entity 0 1 A ·. .. ten percent (l 0%) or more. W 'Name of ~~ned (sub5idiary) corporation or limited liability company 'State of formation ~exa

'Name of owned (subsidiary) corporation or lrmited liability company 'State of formation fexa

SECTION C: Enter the information required for each corporation or LLC, if any, that owns an interest of ten per

... ·.

TEXAS F.RANCHISE TAX PUBLIC INFORMATION . .

(To be filed by Corporations and Limited Liability Companies (LL< This report MUST be filed to satisfy franchise tax requiremer

You have certain to review, request, Contact us at: (512 Taxpayet name HELVETIA.ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Malling address ·. 1706 ALPINE CIR City :: ..

~te SANANTONIO ZIP Code 78248 lPlus4 2104

Q Blac:t<en clr~le'if there are currently no changes or additions to the information displayed .in Section A of this rei:

'

!Entity's' pri~cipal offl~e

rincipal place of business

. · • 1 ,1, r/ bfficer, director and member information is reported as of the date a Publlc Information '''"'' '''" l!!_#M ~ep,ort is comeleted. lh_e {nformation is updated annuplly as part.of the franc~lse tax ~- ··...,. · report. There 1s no requirement or procedure for supplementing the Information as ·officers, directors, or members change throughout the year. ,_.

e SECnON A Nathe,· title.and mailing address of each officer, director or member.

Nam~ .·. BURTON KAHN . ·' ntle PRESIDENT Dfrectc

0 y

Mailing address City 1706 APLINE Cll~Cl,.E SANANTONIO •• '• l

Name 1itle Direct< ·-_;

BURTON "KAHN DIRECTOR ® y

Mailing address Cfty 1706APLINEORCLE SAN ANJ'ONIO Name· Title Direct< ov Mailing address ' City

Name Title Dlr~ctc :·. ::i.l y ..

0

Marling address .. City '"

SECTION B Enter the information required for each torporation or LLC; if any, in which this reporting entity 0 1 ~ ten percent {10%) or more. ~ rame of owned (subsidiary) corporation or limited liability company 'State of fornla,ion rexa rame of ()wned (~ul;isidiaryl corporation or limited liability copipany rtate of fomiatian ~exa

SECTION·C Enter the information required for each corporation or LLC, if any, that owns an interest of ten per

...

'• •,

T ~· ·~ljl'loO<f 05· l 02 TEXAS FRANCHISE TAX PUBLIC INFORMATION ~ CTo be filed by Corporations and Limited Liability Companies (LU s,.~,, "'·~~* .:·''"•'I'll (Rev. \-08/28)

Tc-odS? 13196 This report MUST b~ fil~d to 1atidy fran~hi~~ tax requiremer

e• '" rC.gtA •

Taxpayer number .. • Report year You have certain to review. request, f3{2foJ3J3(4lsfsj2\ 619112\01111 t Contact us at: (512 Taxpayer name . HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Mailing address· . 1706 ALPINE CIR City . ' !ZIP Code lPlus 4 SANANTONIO 178248 12104

Q Blacken cl rcle'if there are currently no changes or additions to the lnfom1ation displayed in Section A of th ls rei: lEntity's prrncrpaf office

irrinciparp!ace of business

~ • ' ,J Officer. director and member information is.reported as of the date a Publrc Information PlllJle '/Ill Vlf,111/ Rep:ort is completed. The information is updated annu?llY as p<Jrt of the franc:hise tax ----- ·· --:,. • report. There is no requirehJent or procedure for supplenientlng the Information as .. , officers, directors, or members change throughout the year.·

SECTION A Name~ title and mailing address of each officer,djrector or member.

A Name . . Title Direct(

• 8URTONKAHN DIRECTOR @ y

Mailing address City 1706.APLINE ..

CIRCLE .. ~ SAN ANTONIO Name. Title Direct< BURTON KAHN PRESIDENT Qv Mailing address City . 1706 APLINE CIRCLE SANANTONIO Name TI tie Direc:t< Ov Mailing address . :: . City

Name litle Direct< 0 y

Mailing address City

SECTION B Enter the information required for each corporation or LLC, if any, in which this reporting entity 01 a . ten percent (10%) or more. - rame ofowned (subsidiary) corporation or limited liability company. 'State of formation Fexa 'Nam~ of owned (subsidiary) corporation or limited liabili.ty company lState of formation. rexa SECTION C Enter the information required for eac:h corporation or LLC, if any, that owns an interest of ten per

.. ~ i .

•.. '· TEXAS FRANCHISE TAX PUBLIC INFORMATION @ '~Ill''"""-"' 05·102 11ll't1:"it- ~·.\'1tW11 (Rev: 1-08/28) {To be filed by Corporations and Limited liability Companies (LL< ~c<R•A Tcode 13196 Th is repon MUST be filed to satisfy franchise tax requiremer

e . Taxpay~·Pnumber •

• Report yeat You have certain 13 I ·~ 1, o 1313 J 41 s I s 1 2 1 6 19 11 t I. I I to review, request, Contact Ul at; (512 Taxpayet name . . HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. Mailing address 1706 ALP,INE CIR C" . . S~ ANTONIO ' ;., IZIPCode 78248 lPlus4 2104 •• 1•• ;

Q Blacken circle 'if there are currently no changes or additions to the Information displayed in Section Aof th ls rei: !Entity'~ principal offi~~ rincipal pl!'!Ce of business

, • LAI... , Officer, director and member information is reported as of the date~ Public Information f'llllll llllf #UIM't1 Re~ort is completed. The Information is updated annually as part of the franchise tax - -· - .... · report. There is no requirernentor proc:edur.efor supplementing the information as ·. ; , . officers, directors, or members change throughout the year. · SECTlON A Name, title and mailing address of each officer, director or member. Name ". Title Dfrect< e BURTON t<AHN DIRECTOR @·v Mailing adpress City 1706 APLlrtE CIRCLE SANANTONIO Name Title Direct< BURTON KAHN PRESIDENT @ y

Mailfng address City 1706 APLINE CIRCLE SANANTONIO Name:. Tttlc Direct< 0 y

Mailing addre55 City

Name lltle Direct<

y

0

.'

Mailing address City

SECTION. B Enter the information required for each corporation or llC, if any, in which this reporting entity 0 1

e rame · ;: ten ~rcent (10%) or more.

of ~wned (subsidiary) corporation or limited liability t:umpany rtate offormatlon lexa

'Name of owned ~Sl!bSidiary) corporation or limited liability company rtate of formation rexa

SECTION C Enter the information required for each corporation or LLC, if any, that owns an interest of ten pe1

.,··'

·. ..

·. ..

FIL.ING !3FFICI: COPY·

; '

.. j ~.

\. ·,

.·

. . 17/0,/20ll l.8 1 :!8 OH'!'•~ Deo C:.U:ol AQ~ !QT ~'l'D (+1 7B6 So4 03•2)

e 89/17/2913 El7 ·23 2lBSa7831S

·-..

Fonn424 ~sal05lll) ~lmnt JP. qlKatc tQ FILED In the Office of the 8e:emmJi ofStme Secn:llilry. or ~late of Texas l' () Bal( 13 69'1 Amtm. tt 7871lw3697 Certificate of Amendment SEP 2 7 2013 S'l2 463-SSSS 'J!A'Jr.. 3l21~1m Corporations Section 1'1llD Fee See lnlh'tU!danB

Ea.ti~ Information..

liml4 lllOJSilnla Of'lllO CAll!1 Nellmllll1;; ~ m lllon:ccrm of lh~ ~ O'l~ U:fll<I ~ Glw!BCS OIO:llllllK of'lhc auaiy, lkUI 0111: l!\4umullll mulia~ llll!llC ·

The films c:ntiw ia a· ~tlll: ~alley wc~iiw) ~F~~- CIPm~al~ ON~~ OWonaJ.Lhmti:d~comp~ D ~vc A~ CJ 'Prafl:u:lonal AlllOi;udmn 0 ~tedLntnUty~ 0~ J>atlllcnhlp

'the file 1111mber mewl ED the fitms entity by tho~ of 111ate 11: 0 f t!J 0 g's:'"! &2-c/ 1.'he da~of~on Qftht cntJ.ty 1! A~r ~/ 2-ao.7

1 Aalauled N«me ' ' :. (ICClm'PWP""~cd'*1i~uf"''''''lllbcntb 1111·...._ .,..._,.altfii::'~llly._.lba MIU>fl»s-...iJ .'11= mmn#ent ~ die cei;tifioa~ of fO?Dtlbon to olwl,gc mo a.rflcle or J1t0"1$1on the:t names the films Cllht1 ~ « p?V'/Ut1J1111 emen4ed. io ~•follows . . ;.. :'The . . . ·

n.e-.eote1t:.milym.tcoittta1um.~~or·~ di~ ar'11611:rm, •~lm1ilc.

l. Ant.ended· Registered Agentla~~ omcc Tbil ~ cbm:1ges lhe catifica1e of forrmdlon to dlange the sttlcte or ptoVi&lon atatl'Og the ilamo' O! the rr:81stmcl s.ge&rt mid lbC R,StStctCd o(6co alfdtW TJf the illhtg amty. ~ articfo or llt'0\'1B10D .. mnen!ltd. ta read as folloM

, r, .... ."

'• •, ' 7/09ll01J ~Bs28 CMT+2 g9 Cai:ol Ad11111s HAT LTD l+l 786 SO& 0342) p~~ +1 512 C63 5709

.Rol~AJtat ,/ (eov,plm aflhar A or·B, liattltit llotb .Ahia ee1BJ;11el8 C)

0 A 'I&e ~ agciat 11 aaorpmzab.OD. (-bollDll1r .-ed~)b,&enuie of

OK· .. 0 » '.Ihc~llplt as anmdlvldual ~atclent o!lb11-.~ r,w:a~~ MiMl'WJol,t_. 'if~. ,_e.il.Li . ~ . Tho pC:non eitecutmg thl111.Nlnlmmt idlinnd tbat thei ~ dC81pBtcd •.die new rcguktlSd Ajerit hU~mcl 1o icin-elll ~agcn\ _ _ ~ C. 'Tb.•'bamal a~ of'ibe~~ md th1uegt~!f ~ ~U! · l3tL3. lirM Mhlr (Hof' 0 BOllil • ftA'fltd. ~r $+i CIP~ TX l1ll,tJ 7G~ ?iP t"'*

:J.. OIUr Added, Alta:c~ m;o Veleted PrnfdOIUI'

Ollila-dmpl cirailo1lllcmli '6diooerl!ir.ate 0H:11malfmt 11J&11ic-Utn. l»IJllCll priJv!Wbclaw ltlht lplllll p:ovi.tcd Is ~mt.~ llu: lld4ltlotsl est 1'r;nw. . 1111.......,mrtrt t">fll.9·.tbml. llZea.,e hlll.d fJo lmtriiatlAJll to di.ls I .f'clim mz &rdlcrlllfllcmldtllil Ila~ '

-r--'... (TM~ ............ tr11117,fl~~- e ,;.,, k.'61!1 :Ad.d e.oh of tkc:i fi>llOWUl8 prcmaicma to tJie acxufitatc of:&mbat1cl! The idcntUicc.hcn 111:

tetilt'elll::e oft.be .&fidiinMs"iOI) lnld !ha f\11.1 feltt &ta U follMIVI

fH~~Nr lo~ut R,;J, · S ftfl bO 'Sflfi ~~ is ~Wll> ;;- ~;~:, l/.l(!E .~.o~i>I fl{et'I $GE:fl-1SetJ ,15/ .JA!.261 fbl9 #{ lfif6'11ti»7D~1· 1>•Cec."f<>1' ft,~ilf" ~--.· ~lt/2M:i (i~ tlll,.l 112 s;~~,,,,, OtJ"r 1.0d ~

··.·

J.A'

Stat.enu=nt of Applln'•I.

Tlt1: •• ~~~ to the oe:rtlticatc offuxm&tioll btwe beeis approwcl 111 ~c:i mahutteqwrcd by the · Ttim encmtii Otpnmllons Code a Wthe govemmg doa!:mentsotthc mttty.

:~· .

1

, ,. "

. . :"7/o,/ao13 19 48 CIKT-+2 De• c-.,01 ~d&lll!I HA~ ~ <•1 1aG so• oJ,a) Para• +1 s1a •6S 5709

2106379315 PAa:: e31aa

. ~·:

RECEIVED Sf:P 18 2013 .. :. . Effectiveness of Filing (Sa\eetddler,,\,B.bl'C.) .se~retary of State A 00 'I'his d.eC1ime:ot beoomcs cf&~wbcn.tbc do~ is filed by the JCC1'dar.Y of B1ate B .0 Tll1S ~ont beCu!m;S drcctlw ,.ta lateT date, whlOh ~ n~ J;11C10 'Ihm mncty (9'>) dayB 1n1m tht ·daf.c of ii~· Tfio delayed ~datefr C D This di)ciumil!:ftttlka effect upcm the 'ocautmt~ of• tw:UJ:e ~t or f(lct, other sban the p~ of'tlmi;. '.l'ho 90"'·d.cl;T a&r the date Of8'pmg IC . • .

I

EJtt.Otiftll Tlle U!l.d.ersigne'1 "&lgll$1h18 cJomrndllt Nl>Jeet co dl.e pcawucs smposed 'by 11.w fin the Sllbmls&zon of a tmteMUY. ihls.e m ftau.dolcat ~e)'lt md ccmfies under penalty 6!~ that me '\Uldemped is· ambcm:ed uaacr me l)fOVJ$SDna ofblw ~& ihe cntu,y to~~ the:filmg mstrunumi.

~. Jl;J::Jt;1$ .

lllmolt«~llllHDf~ Ai'icoiilliiiallllU)

. ~ ...

B

, .,

•.

Form424 This space ~ed far office use. (Revised OS/11) Subinit in dupl.icate to: Secretary of State P.O. Box 13697- Austin, TX 78711-3697 Certitiea te· of Amendment 512 463~5SSS FAX: 512/463-5709 Filiri F": See imtnidieoa

The name of the filing entity is:

·.

!fe41'e-TJI} l)SSEI TCE'k."[/R~G State Ille.name of the entity as Qlfll:lltly shown ill thr: rcoords of tJic ~ of state. lfthc amendment clumgcs the name of thecntitY,, State the old name~ not die MWnarne. · . The filing enti'-f ·is a: (Sdc.O. lhc 8PPn>Pl'illl: Clltily type below.) ~For11ro6t Corporation 0 PtofwlonAI Corporation 0 N!lD}ml~t Cprpotation 0 Professional Limited. Li.ability Company 0 CoO~e Association 0 JirofessitmAI Assoc!ation 0 Limited"Li11bility Company 0 Lhni~cd Pamitrship ~~·:ruen~~r~edtothefi~~gentityby~~erejUY_Qf~tei~;· ~p()'fs{&.hf The date of f~ation ~fthe entity is:

:

{)~IZ/22_ - ........I'-"'-=+,.&e:I--....-------~-----

7

Amendments l. AmendecrName (Ifthe pwposc' of~ ccrtificale of.mncncfmcnl is la d1ange ~name ofJhc Clllity. USC the followiDS stalt:mcnt)

The ~endment ~hanges the certificate- r;>f fonnation to change the article or provision tJu4,. OQles the filing entify. The.articlC? or provision is amended to read as follows:

The.riam~ ~f.~ filing entity is: (state the new.name of the entity belo"'.)·

The name or~ Clllity muslcontaiG an orpnbitional daignalioll m:j!CCCpU:d abblnilllion ofsudl term, a:1upplicable.

.•. ~ .

l. Amended Regiate~ kent/R~tered Office

The amendment changes the certificate o,f fo~on to change the article or provision stating the name of the . registered agent and the1iregjstered' ~fflce address of the filing entity. The article or provision is llinended to reatl as follows:f"'.. ·

··-~·......

.. .· .· I

Registered Agent (Complete ¢ither Aor B, but not both. Also complete C.)

0 A. The registered agent is an organization (c11nnot be cn1i1y named above) by the name of:

FlrJ1 Na~ ·· '. · J:tr,;;JiC M.f. , S11ffi~ The person executing this instrument affirms that the person designated as the new registered agent has conserited to sc:rvc: as regi:itl:rt:d agent. ·

C. The business address of the registered agent and tlte registered office address is:

1706 /ttft1ff[ Cf ~j,.z;; .$M J/-/J:f/(!MI 0 TX 7 g_?-lfP- $/N;t/ ;lc!Jrm /No P.O. Bo:c) City Stale Zip ('(}{ft

3. Of her Added, Altered, or Deleted Provisions Other changes or-udditlons 10 the ~ertificate of formation may be made in ihe space provided below. lf the spa~c pTDvided is insufficient, incorporau: the addi1iona1 tcic:t by providing an :ittnchmcnt 10 tltis form. Please read the lns1ruc1ions 10 this form for fllrth~r in formation on fonnat. 'fc.-.:t Ar~':l {'Ole ~tt:i~h.cll·nddcndum, ihny, 15 lncorporal~d lu:reln by rc(crcncc.).

provisions io 1he cettifici;ite of tormation. ~iden~ficatlon. ~ ~dd_.e11ch of. the following ofthe·,t:JvJ{Vvision and the tull text nre ns follows;,.. !Ji-If "p-~µ r· rcterence B t} en>//.. /'/ ~t:~ St:::&flUT/J-f2J/f 'Pl'&~-1'8 . . 1101P·lf~111e czrq.c; L.~ · . /t-f{/(t>f 1&,.· (Y 7R?- r:r .

· U A~ter·ench of the following provisions of the c·ertitkate of formation. The idenlitication or reference of.the .altered provision and th~ full text 9fthe provision as amended are as follows;

.·.·: :.': Statement of Approval

The ll\t\<!ndinel}is to the ccrtiti(;ate of formation h_ave been upproved in the manner required by the Texas Busi~.CS? Orgnniz:ition~ Code and by Lhe governing doc umcnts of the· entity.· f!nrm.u.1 7

.. ..

Effectiveness of Filing {Select dlllcr A, B. or C!.J .,

·A. !§-This docum~ becomes effective when the document is filed by the secretary of state. B~ [lThis document becomes effective at a lat~r date. which is not ~re 1h1tn ninety (90) days from · the date of i?~gning. The' delayed effective date is: · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C. 0 This 4Q~i,lment lakes effect upon the occurrence of a futl1re event or D.ct. other than the passage of~m~ The 90 day after .the date of signing is: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

111

E~ecution Tho undersigned signs thiS document subject to the penalties imposed ,bY law for the submission of a materially· false or fraudulent instrument and certifies under penalty of perjury that the. undersigned is authori7.ed under the provisions of law govemin_g the. entity to execute tliC filing· instrument.

Date: aazp!§ ··.· ' "~

........

.': .: .

.. :.

~3 IDtl'Cad)·- glentrail@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail ]ltlp;//w.ll1jj201.rnai1.yahoo.com/dc/Jaunch?.i:x=l &.re.nd-=lreipoo2c3h5 f

Herne Mall Mobile I Mero

~~~~~----

!JjBOX · COHTAeTS CALEN!IAR R\'l Pll)Tl!Cllt pa;tJnD Sllp for ks&I... l COtnpoR Ce Ietc Movi: Spam

lnbDX f31 Packln!J Slip for Seavlon : 103013QN3336 from TXSOS to you Drafts 1..- . - .......... - ..... ·-··- .... ····----·-· ~· 1 Attacllment I 2UKB Sp11m (9} Trash ·De;r SkfMadtm, rol.OC>lll - - - • -· • ·+' Tho SeCTetary of Stde'I: 01111e has f>!OCentd)'OI»' request. Please rind attGhedlhe paddn.11 sllp (oryo11r SCS$IC111: >OOtiSMinl 103013~3338 engineer consu!!Prmt II• bulk order IA$ been pla;i=d please' llHoaon al htte:l/lfi"Ktsos.stilleb.us Is rff1.Sf'l!"S Defm!S. Julie P£chres. i;

I Oftice cl lite Seor$ry of Stab! dfTl!Xlls KB !<tjbl.ai'go I

I

Paid ems (1) ~ Unit 3 8PPfCMlls ·. : .

II

Pia u'nll j In revlaYo (24) l"l'o~ldcnt !

RABI\ royal c:rUI ell)' SM.ESFirlal

e S/'WS TCEQ w1utled3 un11Ucd4 urdlfled5 un!lU~d6 '

M~En ' 'Me:· omrne Sign In lo Mes$1!nger.lo see\11111)~.onnne. RPUCN~NS --·-~ - ..-..

RlCCos·- AUachments Noil':pad

1 ofl 101301201_3 10:29 AM

hltps://direct.sos.state-.bc.usfacctlf!.Cct-bat.chasp?spagcabafch.view &nod...

TEXAS SECRETARY of STATE JOHN$TEEN 'UCCI Business organrzatlons [ Jrademarks I Notarv I Account I tlelpfFees I Briefcase I .l.:Qg!n BRIEFCASE SESSION ID: 1030130N3336 CONTACT NAME: Bi..rton Kahn SESSION STATUS; Processed DATE: 10/3012013 8:36:33 AM

O!ent Reference Qt>curnenf Number Documert Tyoe stalU.<: . Reeelyed Oat~ D:!cumert Eiw I NQNE l 51186~ corporations - Order Processed 10/30/2013 8:40:23 AM $32.00

TOTAL FEE: $32.00

PAYMENf DETAIL 9atcb Number Payment !Wmber Paymert Type .Reoetvesi Date

:rOTAL PAYMENT: S0.00 SESSION BALANCE: $32.00

IN=t:stis'llfri's~~€ic':hll

Instn.ptiors: ct. INST~l.CTIONS NEED WRITIEN FOR THIS SCREEN.

· .• ; l~ ... :

10130/2013 9:54 AM

' . t'jl1!1 ?-~(•>. E··~~.•_o11;~-._~~~~"!'**hic:ontouu.lcn I!!} ) er.~me Iools· .jl~hr',1 ~ AOOl6 "t:ielp .~ J ..

1

iJ:IJkiU!iU•lU#fu~lt.Mii•itiikf•Wfal AQi#Mi#dllf6$fflJld4if§i.-#iiBtilM?;~::,- - -------·- . lL !st,-, ,_, _ .. E.lle i;dl~ ~ew' Hlstorv. ~art<s· :Elois t:l!:!lp · .Q~l~~IZJ.!T~~.,'. [+J . •r

;1<f_. /a https:!(d~,;ct.sos.~te.tx.v;/:ap_!r-:'.Jl~/i:orp_il19Jl:y-enu1.y.~~ =cbcs&:~rrom~:S~!ln,;i~mber~-~ ~· c U.e.. •~~ ~d1. _ .. P] + '* 01'

(gEiplq-e ·0! SolOf!l~ piiG-Yatwl ~· 'Ol:i~:Vi~!~ t!}Bloo.t;)Blng 0 Dl~er BINJ 0 ~ D.~~ ~ M$N~lr.1fl'!.ent l'lll:·MSN. 5pcy:'\S ._ ~-M;oay ,. P• 1111. '~~Map Secich ~Map'LIJ"t.s OTrafflc _iii.Yellew'-P• ..ilf. Tool$ iDFa:etx>&C~X~~........Mt • flib"e·· . ff;ime: tfelvetia ASsel Re:i'muy, Inc, . • -- r,....~ ! Add1ess! • t : ·~@ 11 1706Al..PINE CIR San Antonio, 1X 76248-210.C Us.e.

··"· ·· • d1 ·p.N<rusfmy ··- :.._:1 ;; !'fWjri•·· · ··JI • ljWLtl§jtj@t t'" ,..~.;11 · ....• .......Aifhfil@i&·~ ... g;!.;;m ~1~·:.+.'<:.1=-:•:ii;r_ 1-:•.o:~~.;J-;r.c:

1

« ~ · "•

.....

. !~wlma11& •oaaiment ' · ' • · j '~" 11ilmber 1FWna!n>o , 1FDna~"'~--- ·;ftredlVeO:it• 'l!!."ccnd .....,~.ioecoum ~~

1

....

' ? ... ,,......H ··-· -= ~ .... • ·1 1~·~· '

~.;,:.,= ;-~-- r.,, 'if'Y '- '\..

-1111:~

- I . ·-· J_,.,.,.... · , - ·.,_ n _ , .. : -- : ~~~:!012 ~·:?12 :=JNo ' ~ .. .... ~ II 11\U ~'l1~T..'Ql0'2 ~Ot'RUllttCll~m;.o ·~1B,:lOl3 :~rt&,21113 l~M>ber27,2'13 !.Nii. !rz 'i -• ·- ..

~ . . . . . . . . . . . . _... . . _..___=!"~.['~-___,~---1w~,!J jSIJllember21;3313 INo 3 · ·· -. r I

_fO'idiiil fRSiUm"b':'s~]

.

JnsJCUC1jDD~:

e Ta placo an order !or add~ionat nformelion about .a fi~ng PJ8SS the 'Orde1' button.

~ ,o Firefox al..llQmatt~lly sen:1s ·~me ®"to M;;iu;;-;;-fr.lat we cm1mp-ove-you- e>p.ef'ltne. . · ~Q'loose:whaEl.stki;r::J '"· iYst'ai-tl fmP&Lice R.eP'.. Jl~.--i>aµC""r~rt:~ · .--1r.~.·orag-o~a·r'--"~ ..-J~skyp;~H: E1s1 ... IJ~e&si&i:ss~;:-;f .I~ O.!l.~.:..?J19;_~ 1

.· ~ e e e

"https:f/ouro'ftil.Cpa.staw.tx.uslcoa/s~i~t1cpa.epp.coa.~aOfficer

• WmdowonSta.reGovernment Susan C'Dmbs Ttlt1t Comptroller of Publlc.Aaou1n:s

Taxable Entitv Search Results Taxable Entity Search

. Officers and Ditectors BELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

Report Year: 2012

&tum ID: ISX!lblc Ertilv Search &sults

Officer end .!fircctor information on this site is obtained from the mostreceniPubl\c Information Report (PJR) proocssed by-tho Secretary of Slate (SOS). PlRs filed with annual framhisc taxreporta Bre forwarded to tho SO.S. After ·_:, propessing,·the SOS sends the Cnmptrolleran electronic copy of the inlbnnation, which is: displayed on this web &it.a. Tho infonnalion will be updated 11$ <:hanees arc rc<:civcd from the SOS. · ·: You may order e .copy of a Puhlfo Jnformation Report from gpm,r~s@cpa.s1ate.tx.us or Comptroller of Public Accoum, Open Govemncnt Division, PO Box 13528; A~tin. TeXBs 78711.

:,, TItie Name and Address SECRETARY BURTON KAHN ~I:•• · 1706' ALPINE CIRCLE SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248 PRESIDENT BURTON KAHN 1706 ALPINE CIRCLE SAN ANTONIO. 1X 78248 DIRECTOR BURTON.KAHN 1706 ALPINE CIRCLE ,·:

SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248

texas.gov I Statewide Search from the Texas state Library I State link Polley I Texas Homeland Security Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller • Window on State Government • Contact Us Privacy and .S~urlty PolleyI AccesslbllltY Polley I Unk POiiey I PUbllc Information Act I Compact with Texans

l ofl '· Exhibit H 11/l/2013 5:09 AM . .i;ait Ff.llllChisc .

A:ccount Sl:atus .llltps://ourcpa.cpa.s!a!ll.tx.uslcoafserv Jc11cpa.app.coa.COll(JetTp7Pg=lpid...

: ,,;,.

Franchise Tax Account St~tus As of: 11/0112013 05:09:23 AM

This Page.is Not Sufficient for Filings·'with the Secretary of State

HELVETIA. ASsET RECOVERY, INC.

Tex.as Thxpayer Number 32033458269 Mailing Address 1706 ALPINE CIR ... SAN ANTONIO,. 'IX 78248-2104 Right tQ 1ransact Busfuess ACTIVE • ELIGIBLE FbR TER..VIINATiONIWD· in Texas ·~St~teofFonnation TX ·. Effectiy~ ·SoS Registration 08/02/2007 " " ~·~. ;.."{_.. .oa~

Texas SOS File Number 0800851624 Registered Agent Name BURTON KAHN ....

Registered Offi.ce Street 1706 ALPINE CIRCLE A.ddre:is SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248

:·• ..

1.ofl 11(1/2013 5:09 AM ·STATE OF TEXAS § § . COUNTY OF BEXAR §

Alt"'FIDAVlT

. B~FORE MB the W\dersigned authority, on this day personally appeared -r-~..=:.:.....................'-'-1~'""'""'~-who by me being duly swom deposes as follows:

:My ruune 1s el 1 am over 21 ·years of age. of sound mind, capable of making this affidavi and personally acquainted with the facts herein stated:

I am employed by the CITY OF L,IVE OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT, and as such I am the custodian of records of the said Police Department. Attached hereto are c>2 pages reported of the incident of t."5Cf?-O 7 ( 5 from the Live Oak Poli"c Ocpmtmcnt.

I have attached as put of this Affidavit a true and correct copy of the original ·record now in the lawful custody and posscs.gon of the RECORDS SECTION of the CITY OF LIVE OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT, 8022 Shin Oak. Live 0814 TX 78233 . •Thc .......d r=tdsarekept by me intbe"'~71ofbu~- . ,?

(4111.t&L .dau_

oflice.

Co~i~ion Expires: ~I r 21Jli.o I? I

Exhibit I

10/31/13 Live Oak Police Department 368 10:59 Public ~nformation Report Page! 1

Incident Number: 1309-0715 Nature: C~vil Matter case Numbers:

Addr: 8022 SHIN OAK DR; LIVE OAK PD Area: B ZONE B City: Live Oak St: TX Zip: 78233 Contact: BURTON !<AHN Complainant: .142570 Lst: Kahn !!'st: Burton Mid: Maurice DOB~ 08/18/33 SSN: Adr: 1706 Alpine Circle Rae: W Sx: M Tel: (210)210-4089 Cty: San Antonio St: 1X Zip: 7B248

Reported: CVLM civil Matter Observed: CVLM Civil Matter Offense Codes: CVLM Civil Matter Circumstances: ,1T02 Bank or Savings and Loan Responding Officers: c Johnson 2603 B.spnsbl 01.'ficer: C Johu~on Agency; LOPD Received By: J Perna Last RadLog: 10:54:24 09/23/13 CMPLT How Received: T Phone Clearance: RT Report Taken When Reported; 10;06:27 09/23/13· Disposition: CLO Disp Date: 09/23/13

Occurrd between: .. 10:05:23 09/23/13 Judicial Sts:

and: . 10:05:23 09/23/13 Misc Entry:

Modus Operandi:

Factor Description Method INVOLVEMEN'l'S: Date Description Relationship 09/23/13. Kahn, Burton Maurice Complainant 09/23/13 10:06:27 09/23/13 Civil Matter :rnitiating Call 10/16/13 Book 0 · Property 10/31/13 Live Oak Poliee Department 388 10:59 Public Information Report · Page: 2 Narrative Section Civil Matte.r on Mon4ay, 09/23/2013 at 1006 hours, an officer was dispatched to the Livg Oak Police Department lobby for a .. civil matter report. I arrived at the location and contacted the complainant who infoi::med me that two of his business partners had tried to do an account take over on his separate business account at Randolph Brooks FCU which is separate from the businesses he shares with his two business partners_ ThQ two business partners did not have proper documentation and they did not succeed in any transfer of funds. Chester E. Johnson Jr. 12603 1309-0715 09/23/2013

Responsible LEO:

'

-------------------------------------------- Approved by:

Date

.. ~

'·

Th~ -~narc!' represenlcd by 1,hj) certificate have not been registered under lhc Securities Act of 1933.. ns aroondc.d. or any 11pplicabl~ i:ttt~ i:tturiti~s laws... and may not be tmns.fcrrcd. sold or 2~!:ig~d unl~:;...; ~o r~gistered ,;r tinll'.'s~ ~n cxcmf)cjon from s.uch reglc;tration is available.

Cc:rlificatc NumbcrOOJ l. 000 Sh:ircs

.. lNCORPOR.ATt:.D UNDER THE Ll·WS OF'l'EXAS

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVE.R.Y.JNC.

This ~fies tho.r l'ul"rto Vl~-- a\'rns J.000 shi\r(·!i ur~O.OU 1rnr value comm11n ::.10\':~ of Hch,.ctia A~~t Recovery Inc .. transferable anlv on the: books 1)rth~ Clirporation by· 1~' lm14.::rof this ccrtincalc in person, or by authorized a1:'\:~I, upon /itirr~kr 1'f ihi~ c~:t1Hiclltc, propeiiy endorsed.

ln witness <lf the above, lhc corporation has calficd this ~~r1i fit'll~c 10 be ~igntd hy .it'i au!horizcd officcn on Augusl 20. 2007

-~-~.· . ·"&)1~~ .

~·,~pr--~ Kenne.th E. Moore. Pr.esid~n\ .Kenn.:-1h'E. Moore. SccreUtry

for \o~lue r~~~ilfoo. I... -.. tr.i.nsfcr to the sh~s rc~'!lct1ioo by thi!' c1:rtilic~~~~;~~;{instruct ih~ corporalc Socl\."tary to record this Irani: fer on chc b.1)~1k:; e>(thc "'""J?Pration. Tran;;frr t•'!.1rictions. if any. nrc s!town abo\'c-..

Dcucd th~

Exhibit J

r---------~-------------------------------1

COMMON·STOCK CERTIFICATE

L

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

ISTHE OWNER OF FULLY PAID 1000 SHARES AUTHORIZED Or COMMON STOCK IN REGARDING

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC. ~ .µ ·rl THE CORPORATION IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF TE~S ,Q ·r-l ~ IU

O.AT.ED. _ _ _ _ _ __ AT SAN ANTONl.O~ TEXAS

· ·PRESIDENTS.IGNATURE ',. DIRECTORSl.GNATURE...___ _ __ :r, ...

MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

A FOR~l'ROFIT CORPORATION

I .

The Qrganizational meeting of the Board of Directors of Helvetia A~set 'Recovery, Tnc., a Texa.c; business corporation (hereinafter "Business Corporation"}. was held at 1715 Hadbnry Lane, San Antonio, Texas 78248, on August 8, 2007. ·

The 1.lndersigned, being the sole member of the initial Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset Recovery, Joe. named in the Business Corporation's Certificate of Fonnation filed with the Secre\al)' of State of Texas, was present. Tue undersigned waived notice ofth.e meeting as evide~oed hy the attached Waiver of Notice signed and appended hereto .

.Lloyd George was appointed Chairman of the meeting and Lloyd George was appointed Secretary of the meeting.

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

The Secretary then presented end read to the meeting a copy of the Certificate of Formation and reported that the original thereof was filed in the office of the Secretary of Stale of the State of on Texas August 1, 2007, and that the Secretary of State issued a fonnal Acknowledgment of Filing to the Business Corporation on that date. The Secretary pr~ented the Acknowledgment of Filing annexed to an approved duplicate of the Certificate of Formatioµ as filed and it was ordered inserted into the corporate record book.

BYLAWS ' .

The Secretary then presented a proposed fonn of bylaws. The proposed bylaws were read to the meetirig, considered and upon motion duly r.nade, seconded and carried, were adopted as and for the Bylaws of the Business Corporation and ordered signed.and inserted into the corporate record book. The Secretary of the Business Corporation was instructed to maintain a copy of the Bylaws at the principal office of the Business Corporation availab1Cil .fQr inspection by the $hru:eholderg of the Business Corporation.

PRINCIPAL OFFICE ,· 1.

Upon motfon duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation's principal office be located and maintained at 1715 Hadbury Lane, San Antonio, Texas, 7&248 and that meetings of the Board of Directors from time. to time may be held either at the principal office or at such other place as the board of direct(?rS shall from time to time order.

.·.: ·'

-------------

Exhibit L

~-------···~

MINUTE BOOK AND COltPORATE RECORDS

The Secretary submitted to the meeting the corporate record book for maintenance of the Business Corporation's records. Upon motion duly made, seconded and calried, it was

.. ~~OLVED, that the corporate record book is adopted as the record book of the \X)tporatio~, and further,

RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation maintain appropriate co.rporate reuonh in the C!>i;?Otate record book, including but not limitoo to original.s9 copies or certified copies of the Business Corporation's original and any amended, corrected or restated, Acknowledgment of Filing, Certificate of Fonnation. ByJaws, minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors, and written consents of shareholders and directors. .

OFFICERS '

The Chairman of the meeting then called for the election of officers of the Business Corporation. The following persons were nominated ~o the office preceding their name: ·

Office Name President Kenneth E. Moore Secretary Kenneth E. Modre · Tre0.l!urer · Kenneth E. Moore.

No further nominations being made the nominat[ons were closed and the directors proceeded to vote on the nominees. The Chainnan announced that the foregoing nominees were elected to 1he offices-set before their respective names to serve as such at the pleasure of the Board of Directors or pursuant to the terms of any written employment agreement executed by the Business Corporation·and :. ; ....

the respective officer.

SHARE CERTIFICATES : ~ .'

The Secretmy submitted to the meeting a specimen share certificate proposed for use as the corporate certificate for shares. Upon motion duly made, seconded and earned. it was

RESOLVED, that the form of the share certificate presented to meeting is adopted to represent-shares of the Business Corporation; that any issued certificates bear all legends and n:strktions requiied by the Bylaws or resolution of the Business Corporation, contract or by law; that any issued certificates comply with any requirements of the Bylaws or resolution of the Business Corporation. contract or appli~able law; and that the Secretary of the Business Corpoi;ation insert a sp&:imen copy of said share certificate in the minute book of the Business Corporation.

2

-··-·-·"'. _____ __ ,,, ---··. --· --------···---·· . ·--- . - . ------

.. '.\.

ISSUANCE OF SHARES

Upon motion duly made, seconde.d and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation issue 1000 shares of the Business Co?JJoT!i~ion's authori:7.ed shares of common stock (no par value), for a purchase price of $1.00, each, as f ci~lows:

~ No. of Shares Consideration Value Puerto Verde, Ltd. l,000 Cash $1,000.

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

:. RESOLVED, that upon receipt of the consideration. the officers of the Business Corporation are authori:zed to issue share certificates to the persons named above and to obtain, if advisable; representations from any purchaser that the shares are being acquired for investment purposes and m:it for distribution, an~ further

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Business Corporation may upon such terms as the Board of Directors in its discretion may dctennine, issue authorized shares of the Business Corporation for consideration consisting ()f any tangible or intangible benefit to the Business Corporation or other property of any kind or nature, incll!ding cash, promissory notes, services perfonned, contracts for services to be performed, other securities.ofthe Business Corporation, or securities of any other corporation, domestic or foreign, or other entity.

BANK ACCOUNT

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried. it was

RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation establish in its name one or more accounts with one or more fmancial institutions on such tenns and conditions as may be agreed with said finanoial inst!rutlons, and that the officers of the Business Corporation are aulhorized to execute any resolutions required by said financial institutions for such accounts and to designate the person or persons authorized to write checks on such accounts on behalf of the Business Col')lomtion'.

ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS

Upon'~o~ion <;lulY, made, seconded and carried, it was RESOLVED, 1hat the attorney's fees, filing fees and other expenses and charges incurred and that m~y he incurred by the Business Corporation. or persons acting on behalf of the Bu~iness Corp.oration in connection with the fonnation of the Business Corporation are reasonable and shall be p~d or reimbursed by the Business Corporation.

;.

3

-

·~-·-·-··

FISCAL YEAR

Upon motfon duly made. seconded and carried, it was RESOLVED, that the fiscal year ofthe Business Corporation shall begin on January 1 and enq o~.December 31, provided that the initial fiscal year of the Business Corporation shatl begin as of the date hereof. ·

TAXES

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation obtain infonnation and iµstructio~ from the Internal Revenue Service, Comptroller of the State of Texas and other app1icable taxing authorities regarding withholding and other taxes.

LICENSES AND PERMITS

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RE~OLVED, that the officers of the Busin~ Corporation are authorized to obtain on behalf of the Business Corporation all licenses and pennits that may be required for the Business Corporatfon to cauy out its lawful business IUl:d activities, and further, ....-.

. .. : ~OLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to do all things and take all action necessary to qualify the Business Corporation to carry out its lawful business and acti.yi~~ in compliance· with applicable federal. state and local Jaws, _orwnances and regulatio~.

, . ,,t···_.,' .

·QUALIFICATION IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

' RESOLVED> that for the pmpose of authorizing the Business Corporation to do business ·in any sta~, territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or expedient for the Business Corporation to transact business, the proper officers of the Dusfoess Corporation aro hereby iiuthorizcd to appoint and :sub~itute all nc;ccssary agents or attorneys ·ror service of process, to designate and change the location of all necessary st.ttutory offices and 't.o make and file all necessary certificates. reports, powers of attomey and other instruments as may be required by the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to authorize the Business Corporation to transact business therein.

FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS TO OFJ!'ICERS

,-..., Upon tiiotion duly made, seconded and carried, it was '

.. ~

4

: .·-;,.,.

.· "

~ ..

RF~c;;OLVEO, that 1he officers of the Busines!: Corporation are authori'l".ed to do all thingi;:

and take all action necessary and helpful to carry out the above resolutions and al I acts of the "Officers arid any persons acting for the Business Corporation which are consistent with the above resolutions are ratified and adopted as the acts· of the Business Corporation. ·

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

• RESOLVED that the signina of these minutes shall constitute full ratification thereof and waiv~rofnotice of1he meeting by the signatories.

.. .

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

· RESOLVED that Lloyd George resigned as an office and director of the Business Corporation, and 1hat resignation was accepted."

The Chainnan asked whe1her there was any further business to come before the Direclors al this meeting, Bnd 1here being no response, 1he meeting was adjourned.

DATE: August 17, 2007.

WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT

RESOLVED, that the UDdersigned, being the sole member of the inltial Bo:itd of Direetors:PfHelvetia Asset Recovery-, Inc. named in the Business CoJPOration's Certificate of F o~_ati.Qn filed with. the Secretary of State of Texas, by approving the Minutes of the Organizational Meeting of the Directors, and by this resolution, does hereby waive notice of the time ~d,place of the meeting, consents to the meeting and approves the contents of the Minutes ofthe.Organiz.ational Meeling of the Directors.

Lloyd~ Date signed: Augyst 17. 2007

5

.~. . '

.. '/'._·,,

Curtis Baggett Expert Document Examiner 908 Audelia Road, Suite 200-245, Ricllard£Ot\, Texas 750Q1 Phone: 972.644.0285 *Fax: 972.644.5233 S!O~.&Llltt@P!.m.ctim ~~~~tl:ixsinin£!:&Q!Il - - · - - - -Questioned · - -Document - · ·----·--·-------

Examiner Letter

Subject: K~nneth E. Moore Date: September 27,20lp

I have exami~~4 three (3) documents with the known signatures of Kenneth E. Moore. For the pw pose of lhls· examluation I have labeled these e.xhibits "K 1•' and "K2".

Today I have compared the signatures ofKenneth E. Moore on the "K" documents to the Kenneth E. Moore signatures on the questioned document, identified herein ss "Q l" to detennine if the author of the Kenneth E. Moore signatures on tb.e "K" documents was the same .,, . person who. aµthored the name of Kenneth E. Moore on the questioned document: A certificate · for 1000 shares for Helvetia Asset Reeovecy Ine. dat.ed August 20, 2007 and purportedly signed by Kenneth E.Moore.

An examination of handwriting includes establisl1ing patterns of writing habits to help identify the author. Handwri'fing i!.l formed by repeated habits of writing by the author, which are created by neuro-pathways established in the brain. These nellfO.pathways control muscular and nerve movement for wriung whether the wTiting is executed by the hand, foot, or mouth. ..

In support of my opinion, I ba:ve included an exceipt from Handwriting Iderztjflcation, Facts and Fundamentals by 'Roy A. Huber and AM. Headrick (CRC Press LLC.1999, pp S0-51) wherein the l~ing forefathers of document examination in the USA agree that one significant difference in the fundamental structure of a wtl1ing compared to an.other is enough to preclude comnton authOrship:

[Ordway] Hilton stated: C<Jt is a basic axiom ofidentificati-0n in document problems that a limi~d number of basic differences, even in the face of numerous strong Similarities, . are con~olling and.accurately estabHsh nonidentity."

{Wi·l:so}.\:R.] I:Iamoon made similar comt'n&\ts: '' ... the fundamental rule which admits of no exc~ption wben handwritings are being compared.. .is simple -whatever features two specim~s of handwriting may have in common, tlley cannot be considered t.o ~~ of CQmniOO. authorship if they display but a single c00sistent dissimilarity in any ~eature which .is fundamental to the structure of the handwriting, and- whose presence is not ~able of reasenable explana1ion."

Exhibit M

..

IJames VJ>.} Conway expressed the same theme when he wrote: «A series of fundamental agreements ~ jdentifying individualities is requisite to the concluSioa that two writings were \•author«J by the same. person, whereas a &ingle iimdomental difference in. an. identify.Qlg indhiiduality between two writings precludes the conclusion that they were exeeu.ieiJ. by the same,p~on." ·· · t .,.

and finally;'·

[A1bert S.] Osbdm and others have generally·agrecd that despite numerous- similarities in two sets.·of wi'itings, a conclusi9n of identity cannot be made if there is 0ne or mo~ differences in fundamental features of the writi11gs.

Based upon thorough analysis of these items and' from an application of accepted forensic do~ument examination tool!;, principles and..techniques, it is my professi.ona! expert opinion that a different person authored 1he name of Kenneth E. Moore on the questioned document. Someone did indeed fo~e the signature of' Kenneth E. Moore on the gueslioned document, "Q1:·.

·· · · I am .willing to ·testify to this fact fo a court of law and r will. ,Provide exbibits to the Court showing that J ·had sufficient data .and that .my opinion is correct. My Curriculum Vitae is attached and ini:.orpoxated herein by reference.

Respectfully subinitted,

~wJ'8..,,c. Curt Baggett.. ,'· ,

State ofTex:as. §.

§ CoUl'lty ofDallaS §

l'h~ above .LP~er of Opinion was swom to and subs~ribed before me by Curt Baggett thisJ...1 day ;0f Septem~er 2013 .

..... '

~(·.

·"!~ ~~-~:· ~-:

• EXBIBITl 1: · .: Ac~~fr:oGM~~o~REqE1ProF$~~~tr:!fA~;Nr:: . J . BQY,-!ir. Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc, sener: Maple.au&h Holdings, Ui;t.

S'ettfament Agent: Nnrth American Tltte Company (210)4S4-0092 Placa·of~emement: 12wu sant>atiro Avenue,.su1te 406 · . . Sa1tAnton!c1 TI< 78216 SeWerneltl J;>afe: 1"wember 19, 2007 .....

Property looatfon: 215 Vimartt L!lls Key Largo SubdMslon Sa11. Aatonio, n<.00000 Bexar COUnty, T~xas 215 Vacant l.ots, Key Largo SUbdfV!sl;on, San AolDnlO', Beimr Coul'l!y, TeJ!all

I hava c:erel\.rlly rav~ .the Hl,10..1 ~ettJement Statemeo1 end to 1he best of 01y ~ and t>ellef, It.is a true and a~rale etalel\'\i!Jfll'.tif ~II raoelpbs and dlsbUrsements tnade·Dll my ao::ounl or by rM IQ fhls tra11S&cllon. I further certify that I have rerelv.e~ a ~py·ot'the HU0··1 Sel\lement Statemenl.

- ........ ·"· .

•Helvetia AIP.)l~~ry In~ Maple auSh Hold!n9s, Ud.

~l ~~__, BY:

_... -.

'.i·

,'· •.

.··;.

QDE EXHIBIT

~\

. /

EXHIBITl accounts with ona or more tinaneial instill.ltions on suc;h t.ettns anti ~ohdmone as mey be agreed Wllh -said financial lnstitullons. and 1J'lat the (lfficers of the a®tne~s Corporatiari am authoriz.ed a execute any ms.ofutlons ~llired- by .said financial .institutions for such accounts and to deeignate the person or petsons authorized to wri1e cheeiks on such acx:ounts on.behalf of1he Business Coipora:tion,

FURTffe~ INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFICERS

Upon motion duty made, ~nded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, tftat fue e officers of t~ Business Corporatkln are authorized to do .all things and~ .all aclion necessary and helpful to carry out the above resolutions a.nd all acts of tile officers :and any persons acting for !he Business Corparation which ara consistent With the above resolution~ are_ratffled and ooQPted as lhe acts of too Business Cotporatiart.

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was RESOLVED, Iha'- the signi~ of these minutes shall constifute run tatifkatior.i thetrof anil wahrcrof notice oft'he meeting by rtic signatories.

Upon motion !iiJly nr.Jde, aecan.ded and carried, it was

RCSOLVl:D that K~neth e. Moore resigned as a11 officer and director of the Business Corpora1ion ;rnd 1hat reslgnatton was accepted. ·

The Chairman a·sked whether there was any fwttier business to come before the .

Olrectors attlli.s:~~ncl. thete being no response, t1'te meeting WfiS ~djo~51d. l,)~TE: Qcltlber23,2009.~&\r(, ti~ Kenn&th 'E. Moore·

WAIVER Of; NOTICE AND CONSENT RESOJ...\IED, lhat the undersigned, beirtg 1he sole trlember of the B<>Eird of Oirectors ofHetvetia A!i!et Rcr:ovcry. me. namod in theBwi~ Coq1Qtalion's Certificate of Formmion, flied with the Secietar;y of State of Texas, by ~p?fovlng tfle Minute~ 6f the Oqjani.mtiomil Meeting gf the Directors, and by th~ m.$0lution, does hereby waive notice of the tim& $nd place of the meatfng, comenls 1o the 111eeti119 and approves the contem.s of the Minutes of the Meetin9.of1he Olfa~.

· ,..__,..... ...... -~!~i;igned P~o9er 23. 2009.

.. ... : ~~~(~ Kenneth a, Moore

./

•..

.EXHl'BIT3 ··,· ;• ...

-· The snare~ represented by tbis ccrtiticaro hsYe not i><.'Ctl registered under 1hc Securities Acr bf 1933. as ~ndc9. or any applicablt state securities taws. and may not he transferred. sokl or assig~P unll$S so regisccrcd or unlcs.s an exempdoo froin such reglc;tratioD is availabfc.

Ccrli ficarc Nwntx:rOO1 1,000 Sh.arcs ....

iNCORPORATfiD UNDER THE Lt. ws o~~h·e~AS ... - ...

HELVETIA ASSET. RECOVE.lt~(L:~C.

This. t¢rUfies that Pu~rto V1mJ~ Inc. _ DWJlS 1.000 shftt'l:·Ji uf SOJ.lO par value CQnHl'n'in st-ock Df Holvctii\ Ali~ ~ovcry l ttc.~ tmnsfcrrsbfo-only <m th~ b<lok.!i of \i\\~ cor(JOrati~ by':~. hol4~"'of thfa ccrtif~te in pcrso11~ ot by 111'Jfhori1£d agt.m(1 upon :ltlrr~for 1'f thi:;. c®fli:atc, properly r:ndorscd.. · . .

ln-'9rilnc~s of the- i'OOYC 1 lhc COI~'lOration h115 ccn~ed.lhi'i Cct1i fiOO!C 10 be~igotd hy llS audioriz.ed

- officers tln Aogus~ 2:.l. 2007 .

~.J.~·:, __o)l·~~ ,o~~~ ~ ;;·~··...

./";P- ~-., ~ .

K~~ 'E. M~c. President

for vnhtc. 1·ccr;:i,•.CC. L ·. 1.r.ms(er to the shares '

r<:pr~i.~m~-d u;- [;,·-'.~~.rJii~;,;;;d)~l!.truc1 lhc co!l)i)ralc s~~ary 10fl."'Cordthis1ra,nsf\lr on_tflc b))~k~ ar the i::lli~ration. Tnmsfi:r rc~rictions. if any. Ql't' shown .above.

Daccd . th.k-._:.:~~-~ . . ·.·. day of-···--.....,;---·---

'

- ."

CURTIS BAGGETT Expert Document Examiner 533 Park Lane, Richardson, 'IX 75081 Phone: 972.644.0285 - Fax: 972.644.52.33 Curl®ExpertDocumentExaminer@msn.com www.ExJ:ZertDocumentExaminer.com

'

Curtis Baggett is adocmnent examiner and expert witness. He is also a skilled authority in handwriting identification.~nd completed over 3,SOO cases. Mr. Baggett has examined documents and/or t~tified in 1:oud c~ :rn.·:i handwriting export in all 50 states, WMhington, D.C., the Bahamas, Brazil, Canada, Chile, England, Ireland, Mexico., Pakistan. Puerto Rico, Thailand and New Zealand, Korea, China. Australia and Demnark.

He has been retained by the U.S. Department of Justice, the State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, the State of California, and the State of Texas. Mr. Baggett has appearr,<l as a handwriting expert on WOLF· BiITZER-cNN; CHARLES GIBSON~ABC, lNSIDE EDIDON, GBS Network Radio, CBS, CNBq CNN, FOX, JU])GB ALEX, TEXAS JUSTICE and GOOD MORNING TEXAS and was a consultant as a forensic docwnent examiner for a. number one television sh~w; "CSI: Crime. Scene Investigation". Mr. Baggett is the co-author of"The Handwriting Certification H0111c Study Course" and has been a guest on various other television and ndio programs discussing handwriting and forensic document ~xaminatlon.

Mr. Baggett once held the position as Dean of the School of For~ic Document Examination at Handwriting University. In addition to lecturing and teaching document examination, 1Vlr. Baggeltt has a.t:t!llyz.cd handwriting fur ~r 30 yc.irs. He l1as bc;cn qualified as au ~pert willies~ in Justice of the Peace, Municipal, District, State, U. S; District, and FedcralBankruptcy Courts.

His education and training in docwnent examination and psychology include: U.S. Anny, Military Police Officer's School; B.A. and M.Ed.> McNeesc State University, Lake Charles, Louisiana; and post-grad\lllte studies at.the University of Houston, Houston, Texas. Curt Baggett's library is extensive and incfodes literature on questioned doewnent examination, forensic handwriting analysis, behavior profiling, and statement analysis.

Laboratory· equiJ)incnt used for examination consists of a Stereo Star Zoom American Optical 7'17. -'- 30x twin mieroBcope; Micronta illuminated 30x mioroscope; stereo microaeope S/ST series; universal DigiScop:ing adapter; numerous magnifying devices; protractor and metric measuring diwices; Pentax !vffi camera; Pentax macro 1.4, 50nun flat copy lens; ovfilh.ead projector; light table, and transparencies.

Cu:rt B~ge1i'is Educ1atluq and Training i11 Handwriting and Document Exlll1llnatlon Include:

An ·in-person, two-year apprenticeship with Dr. Ray Walker a.s a handwriting expert and questioned document examiner. Dr. Walker's qualifications have been affirmed in the Cowt of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, and had historical .r:ulings in his favor. A leading authority :in the field of handwriting analysis and document examination, Dr. Walker is the author of The Questioned Document Examiner and the Justice System.

Mr. Baggett is certified by ~e American Bureau of Docvment Examiners. He also has a certifii:ate of completion :from the American Institute of Applied Science.

Rev l l/1113

·.,,·.-· ;\·

,": -~ ···...

'·

Lectu~es. "conferences, and Classes Attended; 2004 School of Forensic Document Examination's Annual Conference, Dallas, Teicas _ Att~ded cl.as&es taught by Reed Hayes, QDE, Katherine Kcppenhaver, QDE, Bill Kopp~aver, qnE.

of 2004 School Forensic Document Examination's Teleclass Cumculum · En~ation of Anonymous Writing by Reed Hayes. QDE Dncuinent Examination Tenninology by Don Lehew, QDE Notary Public by Don Lehew, QDE AdviU,tced Forgery Identification by Don Lehew, QDE JnstiuCtor 2005 School of Forensic Doc1llltent Examination's Annual Confe'r<lnce, Dall;ts, Texas Attended the foUowing lectures, in addition to genera) sessions: Tremo~ and line Quality taught by Reed Rayes, QDE Demonslrative Evidence taught by Katherine Koppenhaver, QDE,, Bill Koppenhaver, QDE Photography through microscopes by David Babb, QDE Papcr_and Watennarks by JolmMcGuire, QDE LectUrer

2005 Schqol ofFortmaic Document Examination's Teleclasses Natural Variation taught by Reed Hayes, QDE The Diai;;rimination ofIIandwrlting by Don Lohcw, QDE PrOcedures for Examining Signatures by Don Lehew, QDE Courtrooll\ Procedures and Roles by Don Lehew, QDE Instructor 2006 School of Forensic Docwncnt Examination~s Annua1 Conferen!!C, Dallas~ Texas Attended the following lectures, in addition to general sessions: I;>~ition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazior, QDE Medical Problelllll Affecting handwriting by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE Legathsues for Document Examiners by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE ~eposition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE Heal'-'1 Factors Affecting Handwriting by Dr. Joe Aloxand«, QDE PrcsCnption Forgery and Medical Crimes by Diane King Lecturer

2007 l~ndwr.iting University Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas T1ainer and Instructor

2007 School;ofForemic Document Examination's Teleclasses Instructor - Handwriting Basics and Exemplars Instructor - Multiple Classes on C118() Studies and Examinations

2008 Handwritine Univei-Sity Annual Conference,. Lag Vegai:, Nevada Trainer and Instiuctor

2009 &:hoot.of Forensic Document Examination's Live Teleclasses Attended a varii;ty of cla55c;s taught uy Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor

2009 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Las Vega~ Nevada :Critjcal Incident Stress: Statement Analysis and Intervjew v. Interrogation by Faith Wood

Rev 1111113 ,,, 4, ,

F~~ic Document Examination Application by Robert Baier,.QDE, Police Instructor T~~in,~r,and Instrllctor for Introduction to Forensic DbcumentBxatnination . ).':.

20 l<l Handwriting Uni'1ersity Annual Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada M:vanc.ed Statement Analysis by Faith Wood, Iq~~~ty Theft and Prevention by Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor Tr.ain~r and Instruci:or for Introdu<:.tion to Fmensic Document.Examination ; i :~

2010 Iru:~otor, Clear Lake High School Introduction to.Forensic Document Examination

2011 Lei,miter and In~tnictor, "How to Spot a Forgery", ;Denver Elections Division, Denvor, Colorado

1012 LecturCi! and Jnstnictor, "How to Spot a Forgery", Denver Elections.Division, Denver, Colorado

2012 Speaker- How' to Avoi'd a Forgery, Military Otder of Pwpte Hearts Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas

1013 Speaker and Appointed as guest \etl\lrer and coruultant by StefaniePage. Instructor. Forensic Science Department, Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas

Current Memberships

· Ametican·College of Forensic Examiners International American Legion ·Center· offorensic Profiling .Forensic Expert Witness Association IMS' Expert Services Military Order of World Wais National Questioned Document Association , Sheriff's Association of Texas Texas Police As&ociation Veterans ofForeign Wars ·World FederatiM of Handwriting Ei<pert.o;

Published.Artie!~ and Books

Bthi~ for Experts Handwriting ~ertilicalion Cowse How to Help Attorneys With Your Case How. to SpOt a ~gery Taking the Wi'lllCSS Stand

···;.. ::

··:-;.;,=·.-·.·,_ ~· ....

. :··· Rev 11/1/13

EXHIBIT 2 . . \ ' ....

!• EXHIBIT 2013-CI-18394 fl--. 22l™ .IDtclll. DlSTRJCT cnRt ~---- PARlE Kl.IX.TIA R&:T ~y DC us !!! . .JBT£ .FILED: t t/a5Qm3 IN RB: A PORPORTBD I § Ltm{ OR CLAlM AGAfNS'r §

f

~HELVETIA ASSET RBCoVBRY, INC. § l':ropcrty~ §

JtJJ>lCIAL n:NiHNG ·or J.'ACl'S AND CONCLlJSIONS OJ LAW ~ad!....

.JtEGAJlDING.ADOWMENTOR INS'riwMENt '1J)tPORTING ro·CUA.n A LIEN OR. ttAIM

OittlM·~ day or Novem1Jw, 1013. ·in 1he ahow wtitled aad numblnd QSUM, thie

Court reviewed a moti~ wrified by .mdavit of BUR.TON KAHN and the docunwttarf9n

attacbc:d thereto. Additiomlly, the Comt micwcd die six ~w111111ty Deeds with Vaidor'1 Li.cm,. tttaclied Leretn an11Mu1lib A. B, C, 0. R It P. No teltirnoriy wac ~ ~any pitty.

nor wu lbere any notice ofthc.COW't'a imew. dae Cowl bivina bJlde the detaminati.on thM a decdioa could be made::iOleJy on review of the doc:umeotation wider 1he aulbority VesltJd Jn 1be

Cc>mt under S~ J. CbllJCcl' SI Dflbc TCXll Govemmczt'Code.

The Coillt fiDdl as. folloWI:· Tue a Wmanty Deeds attached bmCD aa Exhibits A, B, C,

D, Ea. F, z.apectivcty, '1'C NOT c:rcaled by implied or cxpras s:oment or aar=ncnt of the

obli&or, debtor, or~ owner of the maJ praperty or by implied or expl'9ll ~or l&lT.emeut :of an l8flDl, ~.or othei' ~·of that~ 1111:ldoc;WDCQll 'Mlle prClleDlc4 raiaina ilsUH u to 'Whether corporate documents ware forsed. The Wmnnt)' Deeds with

h~ 1M21 P••• 2107 2lpp

..,

i:ounty i:lesk lhalJ ·ftlt dli1 findlpg offa:t aad conduaion of law md\C umo '1m ofncxml& &1 ihe subject documentitioa or inltrume:ntl··Wf:l't oriainally filed,·IDCI the court di"rec1:1.6iidtiltf.,et~ '1k:ik lo iodox it uing Ibo MmC nunoa that Wllftl llled tn IOdcxlng lhc 1ub.joGt doll~~!Ugf~QI;.......:.; inmumcnt.

·Sipccl on dris _.£_day of.November. 2013.

2

Document Type: JUDICIAL flHDINGS OF FACT8·AHD CONCLUSIONs OF 1../1.W Pa,e2of2t

·•

CERTl'IE!> COPY~TE STATE OF TEXAS I, DONNot; KAY M'KINtEv, DEMR-COVNTY DIQTRlcT CU:RK, t:CRTIP( ffl,tff lHE FOREOOING IS ATRLE At«J CORRECT~ OF TIE ORiGIW. ~ECORDAS INDICATEPB'fll£ VOlUME. PAGE AND.COURT Off IAID DOCUtefT. WITNESSED MY OFFICIAL HAND .llNDSEAl..Of'OFFICEON THIS:

November 05, 2013 DONNA KAY Mf<KINNEY BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

tllV DS 2013

C... Nurm.: 2013Cl18$4 Document T~: JUDICIAL FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Pqe:ll of11 .. '\

....

2013-CI-18394 22.tlll .J.Oielll. DISJRJCT tnRt EX PfilE m.ocnA lmT R£attRY Vt us . ....001r .r1111l : 1118SL2e.ta

f

§ ueN OR CLAlM AGAINST § § HELVETIA ASSB'J' RBCoVBRY, INC. § Propa17 Owner t JUJ)JCL\L 11Ni>f11C OF F.ACl'S AND COMCL]J8IONS OJl'LAW ~~'SP'

ltEGAHDING A DOCl1MENT OR ll'fS'l1llJMEN'J; Pmh'ORTINC TO CD.A.TIA LIDI OR CUJM

On.thiti~ day or No~'*' 2013, ·in 1he abov. ..,titled and.numblnd--. this Court reviewed a motl~ verified by aflidaw ofBUR.TON KAHN and tbe documentation.

lt'8Chc:d tbcrdo• .AdditiOmlly, the Court nMcv9'Clli the six "\Vmnnty Deeds with Vendor's Li.ens11 atbched hereto as as Exlu'\lits A. B. C, D, R It. F. No testimony was t1km &om any ]*'tY.

norwu lbcrc any nodc:e ofthc.COUrt'a review, Ibo COUrt hlvina rmde the detaminstion Ma

dC:ciiion eould be ~.:iolely on.review of the doownmtatiozi under· 1b 8Ulbority vested In the

COm1 under Subchapccr J. CbaPW' n oftbo Texas Govcm.rnent Code.

The Com findS IS follow.: The six Warranty Deeds .uacbed heretO .. Exhibits A. B, c, D, E .t F, rcspectivc\y, arc NOT c:mted by implied or expraa ament or lgltCinaJI of the

obli&ot. ~or the owner of tbc ml property or by ililplied or expns11 comcot or qiammt of an agent, 6duciary. ~ othcl' ~'~fthatJICl'IOO, ~·doc:umaila were pcCllCDled

ISveK 11421 Pa•• 2107 21pp

' ..

county c;lerk _.I ·ftlo this fin&IQls of &ct aacl canclusi~ of law in the tame clan of ncotd& M

the lllbjccit docwnmli1ion or insttumena·wae orlainallY filed,·IDd the court di"reclJ~Q~~ clcfk &o iadox it ming U.C MD10 ..mos that were u..t 1n fudQlng dlC 1ubje0t doJj~wtill.isl~~L-_; instrumc:m.

Sipod on this ...5:_ day of:Novcmbcr, 2013.

2

Ool;unwint Type; JUDICIM.. FlMDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIOHs Of LAW Pagoe 2 of 21 ,...

·•

camFIED COP'YCERTIFIOATE Sl"ATE OF TEAAS I, DoNN4 KAY MCK..1'£\t, IJCxt.R-COUNTY PIBTRloT CLERlt, CERTIA' THAT 1tte FOREGOINQ IS·A "f K\k AN> COAAECT cf>Fv OF TI£ OIOOINAL ~ECORD AS INl)ICATEDSY THe YOlUME, pAGJ: AHo.~roH IJAIO OOCLM:NT. 'MTNESSED l,fY OFFICIAL HAND AND 8EA1. OF OFFICE ON n.5;

November 05, 2013 DONNA KAY MCKINNEY. BnAR COUNTY, TEXAS

tllV 05 2013

'

C... Numbw: 2013Cl18394 Document Type: JUDICIAl. FINDINGS OF FAcTS AND CONCl.USIONS OF LAW .Pqe 21 of2 l

EXHIBITC

. . -llll J.~~~Mlrllf·, i 20llCI18394 -0224 · '------

CAUSE NO. 2013-CI-18394

IN RE; A PURPORTED § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § LIEN OR CLAIM AGAINST § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS § HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. § 224m JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS

On March 3 and 4, 2014 came to be heard the First Amended Motion for Sanctions filed

by Movants Puerto Verde, Ltd. e'Puerto Verde") and Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. (collectively,

"Helvetia") against Respondents Burton Kahn e'Mr. Kahn") and his attorney L. Terry George

("Mr. George") (the "Sanctions Motion"). Mr. Kahn represented himself pro se at this

evidentiary hearing. Mr. George did not appear. 1

The Court, having reviewed the Sanctions Motion, Mr. Kahn's response, testimony and

other evidence presented, including the Temporary Injunction record in Cause

No. 2013-CI-18355, argument from counsel and Mr. Kahn, and having taken judicial notice of

the parties' pleadings and filings in related litigation Cause No. 20 l 3-CI-18355, enters the

following Final Judgment and Order of Sanctions:2

I.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSlONS

A. Back2round.

1. Helvetia seeks sanctions under ( l) Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure;

(2) Chapter 10 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, Section 51.903 of the Texas

Government Code; and (3) through the Court's inherent power to sanction litigants and their

p G 1 Reporter's Record. Volume 1 (RR-1). pp. I-Lt 1 RR-2, p. 55.

~-- - ·- -~--, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS I Document ~ Pagel of29 [ scanned_ as filed. J counsel.3 Section 51.903 pennits, inter alia, an owner of real property to appear before a court

and have the co mt declare as fraudulent an instrument filed of record creating or purporting to

create an interest in real property owned by the movant. The owner/movant "mai' appear ex

4

parte. The reviewing court may not consider testimony or make findings on the merits.

2. The offending pleading that is the subject of the Sanctions Motiuu i!i uu ex ptArle

motion (the "Ex Parte Motion") filed on November 5, 2013 by Mr. Kahn in the name of

Helvetia. 5 This Ex Parle Motion was filed pursuant to Section 51.903 of the Texas Govemment

Code. Mr. George was designated as Mr. Kahn's lead counsel on the Ex Parte Motion. 6 Newly-

retained Jay Petterson in San Antonio ("Mr. Petterson") was designated as "associate attorney,"

and signed the document for Mr. George, who resides in Fort Worth, Texas. 7

3. As described in more detail in this Judgment and Order, the Court finds that

Mr. Kahn and Mr. George committed a fraud on the court and on the Movants for the malicious

purposes of claiming ownership by Kahn of Helvetia, and of clouding legal title to land owned

by Helvetia and sold by Helvetia to a bono fide purchaser for value. One day before the

Respondents filed and presented the Ex Parle Motion, Helvetia had :fi]ed a Petition and

Application for Temporary Restraining Order in Cause No. 2013-CI-18355 seeking to enjoin

Mr. Kahn from interfering with Helvetia's business or holding himself out as an authorized

representative of Helvetia.

3 First Amended Motion for Sanctions, filed January 15, 2014, pp. 5; See also, In re Bennett, 960 S.W.2d 35, 40 (Tex. 1997). 4 TEX. GOV'TCODE §§ 51.901, 51.903.

~See Exhibit I. The pleading was ft1ed in the name of"Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc." The pleading was captioned "Motion for Judicial Review ofDocumentatiotl or Instrument purporting to Create a Lien or Claim." 6 Exhihit 1, p. li; RR-4, p. 57.

'id.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 2 of29

4. While Helvetia' s counsel was negotiating with Respondents to secure a hearing

on Helvetia's Application for Temporary Restraining Order, the Respondents secretly filed and

presented the Ex Parte Motion to a Bexar County judge and secured an order (the "Ex Parle

Order") that was then filed in the Bexar County deed records to slander Helvetia's title and cloud

its buyer's title. g Mr. Kal111 had no authority to file a motion on behalf of, or in the name of

Helvetia, and his motion was a totally fictitious pleading filed for the purpose of causing hann to

others. 9

5. Jay Petterson, Mr. George's co-counsel who signed the motion on behalf of

Mr. Kahn and Mr. George, later signed a: Rule 11 Agreement whereby Mr. Kahn promised to

petition the court to set aside the Ex Parte Order. 10 Mr. Kahn later disavowed the Rule 11

agreement, forcing Helvetia to try a lengthy temporary injunction hearing that resulted in a

temporary injunction against Mr. Kahn and an order setting aside the Ex Parte Order, in other

words, accomplishing at great cost what Mr. Kahn had ear1ier promised to do in his Rule 11

agreement. 11

~ I 6. Helvetia was incorporated by Puerto Verde in August 2007. Puerto Verde is a

0 Bahamian corporation and is owned by Robert Ripley ("Mr. Ripley"). 12 Puerto Verde 2 I contributed approximately $1.2 million in cash to capitalize Helvetia in 2007, using the funds to ~ buy Helvetia's 1,000 shares of stock at $1 per share. 13 These 1,000 shares represented the total ~ v0 L s Exhibits I, 2, 15·18; RR-3, pp. 23·27. 4 9 RR-4, p. 32-37; RR-3, p. 27, 101-104.

2 10 0 Rule 11 Agreement, attached as Exhibit B to Motion to Strike Jury Demand, filed January 10, 2014 in Cause No. 1 2013-Cl-18355, a filing of which the Court has taken judicial notice; RR-2, p. 55; RR-4, p. 57.

11 RR-3, pp. 100-105; Exhibit 3.

h 12

13 Defendant's Exhibit 9': See Tcmporory Injunction Reporter's Record, Vol. 2 (T1-RR·2), at pp. 6·8.

3 Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl·RR·2, pp. 9-20.

~ 0 FINA I, JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 3 of29

14

number of shares authorized by Helvetia's charter and incorporation documents. Helvetia used

this capital contribution in 2007 to acquire 215 real estate lots in the Key Largo subdivision in

San Antonio. 1s Helvetia has already sold many of the lots to homebuilders. 16 Sales of lots began

in 2010, and have increased in subsequent years. 17

7. Hd veti" uppuinleu Mr. Kiihn in 2009 Lo oversee ils lot sales and closings> for

which he received a 3% commission. 18 Mr. Kahn was the company's director and president

from 2009 until Helvetia terminated him in August, 2013. 19 Prior to 2009, Kenneth Moore

served as president and director of Helvetia. 20 Unhappy with his termination, Mr. Kahn set about

to get even. He emptied Helvetia's bank accounts, transferring approximately $300,00021 into

other bank accounts personally owned by Mr. Kahn or his companies.22 He then issued to

himself on September?, 2013. a stock certificate for 1,000 share$ of Helvetia common stock a11d

purported to cancel Helvetia's 2007 offer to sell its stock to Puerto Verde. 23 Next Mr. Kahn

signed and filed a warranty deed in the name of Helvetia that purported to convey the entire Key

'Largo subdivision to Patadiv Corporation ("Paradiv"), a corporation newly formed by

0 ·4 I ~ I 14 See Exhibit G attached to Exhibit I {Helvetia Certificate of Fonnation For-Profit Corporation); Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, p. 33, 34.

2 0 15 Exhibits 20-22, Defendant'~ Exhibit 9: TI-RR-2, pp. 10-20.

a 16

17 Defendant's Exhibit 9:Tl-RR-3, pp. 57-58. Defendant's ExhiDlt !l: TJ-RR-3, 56-57.

v 18 Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-Excerpts, pp. 63-68; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, p. 123-124; Defendant's ~ Exhibit 9: TI-RR-3, pp. 57, 6 L 19 Defendant's Exhibit 9: TJ-RR-4, p. 17; TJ-RR-3, p. 43.

4 a 1 :o Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR·2, pp. 20-26, 33-35; Exhibit 8: 11-RR-4, p, 17. 21 Mr. Kohn testified that "JOO some odd thousand do1Jars" was transferred from Helvetia to his accounts. The Court's finding is based on this testimony and is not intended to foreclose Helvetia from demonstrating at trial i11 p Cause no. 2013-Cl-18355 that more was in fact transferred into his accounts. RR-3, pp. 43-45. G 22 Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-Rfl-4, pp. 38-42; Defenaant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 41-53, RR-3, pp. 38-50.

:i· 23 Defendant's .Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 42-46; Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 18-19; Exhibit 4.

,;I )

f FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 4 of29

Mr. Kahn. 24 Paradiv paid nothing for Key Largo, and the conveyance included all lots

previously sold by Helvetia to others - lncluding lots which Mr. Kahn had personally clo:.ed a.ud

for which he had received his 3% commission.25 After the conveyance to Paradiv, Mr. Kahn

filed his Ex Parle Motion to invalidate six recent sales made by Helvetia to a builder that

Mr. Kahn also recently sued in a separate lawsuit in Dexar County.26

B. Mr. Kahn's Sophistication.

27

8. Mr. Kahn is well educated, graduating with an engineering degree from M.LT.

He is employed us an engineer, and has owned and op~ated $Cveral engineering companies. 28

9. Mr. Kahn has represented himself pro se in numerous matters, both in district

court and at the appellate level. 29 His "practice" before the courts spans over twenty years,

including multiple cases in Houston and San Antonio. 30 Mr. Kahn is knowledgeable about liens

and the sale ofproperty.31 He knows how to cloud title to property and chill financing needed by

builders. 32 Mr. Kahn studies the law, performs legal research using Loislaw and O'Conner's,

and is adept in using the internet. 33 Mr. Kahn's son is a litigation attorney practicing in

0 4 ., 24 Exhibits 7 and 8; Defendant's Exhibit 9: TI-RR-3. pp. 43-46, 55-56; Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, pp. 46-47• 6 52-53.

~ 2 sDefendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-Excerpts, pp. 47-48, 63-68; Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, p. 52-53, 123-124;

-~ Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-3, pp. 59-61.

26

~4 Defendant's Exhibit 8: TJ-RR-Excerpts, pp. 63-68.

27 RR-3, pp. 28-30; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, p. 43.

26 Detendant's Exhibit 9: Tl·RR-4, p. 92-93; Exhibit 25, Exhibit 26 (Gillett); Exhibit 6 {Contour). Defendant's v Exhibit 9: TI-RR-4, pp. 64-65 (Contour). 0 29 RR-3, pp. 28-33, 60-66, 74· 77, 79.

L 30 fd.

4 3 2 ' Id; see also RR-3, pp. 38; RR-4, pp. 57-62; Exhibits 26 and 27.

~ 32 Id., :sec 11.lsu, RR.-3, p. 27.

33 RR-3, p. 28-29. Justice Michol O'Connor is a respected author of a series of books relating to litigati<Jn in Texas p and federal court, including O'Connor's Texas Rules *Civil Trials and O'Connor's Texas Causes ofAction. G The transcript does not Teflec;;t MT. Kahn's reference to Loislaw; however, Helvetia counsel recalls this testimony.

i G Loi slaw is a subscription internet research service similar to Lexis or Westlaw. See www.loislaw.com.

2 FJNAL .I UDGMENT A.ND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 5 of29

Houston. 34 Mr. Kahn has demonstrated in this case knowledge of legal tenns and concepts used

in and applicable to these proceedings. 35

C. Mr. Kahn's Claims.

10. Mr. Kahn and Mr. George filed a fictitious pleading in the name of Helvetia by

17

filing the November 5, 2013 Ex farte Motion.36 Neither had authuri1y tu file the pleading.

Helvetia had fired Mr. Kahn in August 2013 and relieved him of duties long before Mr. Kahn

filed the Ex Parte Motion. 38 His claim to authority stems from an alleged purchase of Helvetia's

stock on September 7, 2013, but this claim is groundless.39

11. Mr. Kahn alleges that Helvetia's stock was available for him to purchase just days after he was fired in 2013 because Helvetia's stock had allegedly never been purchased by

Puerto Verde, or anyone, since Helvetia's formation in 2007.40 Mr. Kahn claims that an

allegedly forged signature of Kenneth Moore, the then-president of Helvetia, on the 2007 stock

certificate Helvetia delivered to Puerto Verde nullified Puerto Verde's 'rights to Helvetia' s stock,

and somehow implausibly caused Puerto Verde to forfeit its $1.2 million investment. 41

~ Mr. Kahn also advances the novel legal argument of stock forfeiture by typographical error. 42

~I Notwithstanding Puerto Verde's payment of over $1.2 million to Helvetia in 2007, Puerto Verde,

·' according to Mr. Kahn. owns nothing because the stock certificate was issued in the name of

t4 34

3 Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, p. 43.

~See, e.g., RR-4, pp. 64-66, 68.

v e J 37 6 Defendant'$ Exhibit 9: Exhibit 1.

Defendant'5 Exhibit 8; Tl-RR-4, p. 19. Mr. Kahn testified that Mr. Penerson did not have amhoricy to sign the Rule 11 Agreement, "giving away everything we had worked very, very hard on this-·- in rem case." RR-4, p. 38.

4 2 3 s Tl-RR-3, pp. 38-41.

0 l J? RR-3, pp. 45-46.

40 p RR-3, pp. 45-56; f:xhibits 5 and 6. G 41 Sue Exh[bits: I, 4, 5; RR-3, pp. 90-94.

42 3 Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR·3, pp. 29-30, 92-94; Defendant's Exhibit 2. 2 6 3 FlNAI., JUDGMENT AND 0RDl:R Ol' SANCTIONS Page 6 of29

---··-·--- ·--·

~'Puerto Verde, Inc.," not "Puerto Verde Ltd.," Puerto Verde's proper name. 43 Finally, Mr. Kahn

claims the infusion of $1.2 million by Puerto Verde was a loan, not a capiral contribmion, even

· though there is no note or deed of trust, and even though his position is contrary to his own

44

sworn tax return for Helvetia for the year ending 2012, which shows no such liability.

12. Mr. Kahn's legal position as co his stock ownership is groundless. Texas has

adopted Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which governs the creation and transfer of

corporate securities. Under Article 8 complete ownership of a stock may exist without either the

issuance or delivery of a stock certificate. Texas common law is the same. For at least l 00

45

years, Texas has not required a stock certificate as the sine qua non of ownership. What

controls the issue of ownership is whether stock was lawfully issued for purchase by the

shareholder and whether the shareholder in fact purchased the stock. The evidence here showed

that Helvetia issued its stock for purchase to Puerto Verde, and that Puerto Verde purchased the

stock. 46

13. Mr. Kahn knew Puerto Verde purchased Helvetia's stock in 2007, and he knew

that Puerto Verde's capita] contribution enabled Helvetia to·acquire the Key Largo subdivision.

Both Mr. Kahn and Mr. George had personal knowledge that Helvetia issued its stock to Puerto

Verde in 2007. They both actively participated in HeJvetia's incorpmation.47 Helvetia hired

43 Id. 44 v Exhibit 6; see Schedule L, liabilities (lines 16-21); RR-4, p. 40-43, 48. 0 4 ~ See Jn re Seminole Walls & Ceiilngs Corp., 446 B.R. 572, 585·86 (M.D. Fla. 2011 (applying Texas law); Yeoman L v. Galveston City Co., 106 Tex. 389, 167 S. W. 710, 720 (TelC. 1914).

46 4,> Exhibits 4, 5, 21, and 22. "(A] corporation may issue shares for consideration if authorized by the board of directors of the corporation." TEX. BUS. OROS. Code§ 21. J 57(a); see also, § 21.160. Shares may be issued by 0 ca>h consideration. ld., at§ 21.159(2). When tbe consideration is paid, the shares; are considered to be b5ucd, ll.fld J. are fully paid and nonassessable. Id., § 21.157. The judgment of either the board of directors, or the shareholder is conclusive in determining the value and sufficiency of the consideration received for the shares. Jd., § 21.162.

p (emphasis added). G 47 Defendant's Exhibit 5, including Exhibit 1 attached thereto (Robert Ripley's Affidavit), and Exhibit D attached

i thereto; Exhibit 19, 20; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-S, pp. 4-6, 8, 18, 21-22. ·

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER Or SANCTION$ Page 7 of29

Mr. George, who was Mr. Kahn'~ neighbor, to act as incorporator.48 Mr. George prepared

Helvetia's 2007 organizational minutes, which showed that Helvetia issued itsl ,000 shares of

stock to Pue.rto Verde at $1 per share. 49 Puerto Verde wired approximately $1.2 million in cash

in 2007 to capitalize Helvetia in exchange for all its shares, thus enabling Helvetia to purchase

l.hl:.:: Ki,;;y Lfilgu :sub<livisi~n. 50 Mr. Kahn personally monitored and confirmed the 2007 wire

transaction and the closing on Key Largo. 51

14. The organizational minutes, wiring instructions and confinnations, Helvetia's

2012 tax return signed by Mr. Kahn, the stock ce1tificate itself, and Mr. Kalm's own

communications between 2007 and September 2013 establish that Mr. Kahn knew his claim of

ownership through a stock purchase in 2013 was groundless. 5 ~

15. With regard to Mr. Kahn's claims that Mr. Moore's signature on the Puerto Verde

stock certificate was forged, the Court finds this claim factual1y baseless and Mr. Kahn's conduct

contrary to any reasonab]e investigation that should have been undertaken to ascertain the

validity of a signature by an <?fficer of a corporation. Mr. Moore confirmed his signature at the

temporary injunction hearing. 53 Mr. Kahn failed to contact Mr. Moore who, like Mr. Kahn, lives

in San Antonio, to ask him if his signature was valid. 54 Instead, Mr. Kahn used the internet to

locate ~nd interview a handwriting expert, Curtis Baggett ("Mr. Baggett"). 55 Mr. Kahn secured

and attached a report by Mr. Baggett to the Ex Parte Motion opining that Mr. Moore's signature

18 ' Defendant's Exhibit 8: TI-RR-4, pp. 43-45; Defendant's Exhibit 9: TI-RR-3, pp. 54-55. 49 Exhibit 19, 20.

so Exhib[t 19, 21, 22. 51 Exhibit I9.

2 ~ RR-4, pp. 38-48; Defendant's Exhibit 9: Tl-RR-2, pp. 26-33; Exhibits 6, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25. 53 Defendant's Exhibit 8: T!-RR-4, pp. 129, 14H52.

54 RR-3, pp. 90-92.

SS RR-2, p. 38; RR-3, p. 84.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 8 of29 had been "forged.'' 56 Mr. Kahn conceded he did not investigate Mr. Baggett, and appeared more

remorseful that he had paid Mr. Baggett, rather than failing to recognize that Mr. Baggett was "bad," as one of his lawyers described him to Mr. Kahn. 57

16. Mr. Baggett has been deemed incompetent to testify as a handwriting expert in

58

numerous published court opinjons, and branded a charlatan by the Dallas Court of Appeals.

Multiple lega] opinions available in the public record before Mr. Kahn and his lawyers filed their

Ex Parte Motion demonstrate that Mr. Baggett's affidavit would not be admissible to support

Mr. Kahn's forgery allegatiuns in this ~e under any theory he may claim. Judge Xavier

Rodriguez, of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio

Division, recently excluded Mr. Baggett in· Routh v. Bank of Am;, N.A .. SA-12-CV-244-XR,

2013 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2013). 59 In Routh, involving property documents recorded in the Bexar

County records. Mr. Baggett used language identical to the report he provided to Mr. Kahn,

changing only the name of the person whose name had purportedly been forged:

Based upon thorough analysis of these items and from an application of accepted forensic document examination tools, principles and techniques, it Q is my professional expert opinion that a different person authored the name

' 8 72 of [Kenneth E. Moore/Jennifer Baker] on the questioned document. Someone did indeed forge the signature of [Kenneth E. Moore/Jennifer Baker} on the questioned document.

(emphasis added). Judge Rodriguez cited a number of cases where other courts had struck

i Mr_ Baggett from testifying as a handwriting expert witness after finding multiple severe

deficiencies with his expertise and analysis. 60

56 See Exhibit M to Exhibit I.

57 RR-2, pp. 38-39; RR-3, pp. 84-86.

8 ' See 81·own v. State of Texas, No. 05-97-00289-CR. 1999 WL 61858, at *8 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 9, I 999). 59 Exhibit 11, 12.

60 See also, Pi·imerica Life Ins. Co. v. Atkinson, 2012 WL 6057888, at •4 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 6, 2012) (finding that Mr. Baggett's letter of opinion "provides no facts, reasoning, or analysis;) Brown v. Primerica life Ins. Ca., No. 02·

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OJ' SANCTIONS Page 9 of29

17. For example, in Dracz v. American General Life, 426 F.Supp.2d 1373 (M.D. Ga.

2006), the court struck Mr. Baggett as an expert witness finding his testimony unreliable and his

qualifications "paltry" and not qualified to testify as an expert in the field of handwriting

analysis. 61 In a bench trial in U.S. v. Revels, 1:10-CR-110-l (E.D. TN., May 9, 2012), the court

similarly excluded Mr. Baggett pointing to his "evident deficiencies" as a handwriting expert,

and referred to the Dallas Court of Appeals opinion that embraced a prosecutor's use of the tenn

''charlatan" in reference to Mr. Baggett, which the court defined as a "pretender to medical

62

knowledge: a quack." See Brown v. State of Texas, No. 05w97-00289-CR, 1999 WL 61858, at

"'8 (Tex. Crim. App. App. Feb. 9, 1999). The court in Revels also noted that Mr. Baggett had

received felony convictions for theft and aggravated assault, and a deferred adjudication after

pleading guilty to Tampedng with a Government Record, which stemmed from his failure to

truthfully disclose his criminal history on a government form. Mr. Kahn acknowledged that

legal opinions about Mr. Baggett were publicly available before he filed the Ex Parte Motion,

but he took no steps to investigate Mr. Baggett or his background. 63

18. For these factual and legal reasons, and others already stated, the Court gives no

weight to Mr. Kahn,s persistence that forged or fraudulent documents allowed him to buy

Helvetia's stock. Mr. Kahn's additional complaints about the incorporation of Helvetia in 2007

that he claims entitled him to buy its stock in 2013 also fail, as foJlows.

v -0 C-8175, USDC, N.D. Illinois, April 29, 2006 (court struck Mr. Baggett's affidavit and excluded his testimony, L finding his affidavit ··unquestionably inaci,equate to underlie expert testimony; ) Wheelei· v. Olympia Sports Ctr., 4 Inc., No. 03-265-P-H, 2004 WL 2287759 (D. Me. Oct. 12, · 2004) (cour1 excluded Mr. Baggett noting that 114 COmparing' the handwriting on several documents ... is insufftcient. .. Any individual, with no training or 5 1 experience whatsoever, could 'compare' the handwriting on different documentt llnrl r!';ich :1 cC1ndusion;") Abdin v. Abdin. 94 Ark. App. 12, 223 S.W.3d 60, 65 (2006). 61

g 62 Exhibit 13. Exhibit 14.

63 3 RR-3, pp. 87-92; RR-4, p. 94. 2

' FINAL J Uf)GMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 10 of29

19, Mr. Kahn's claim that Puerto Verde did not pay $1,000 to buy the l,000 shares of

HeJvetia's stock is meritJess. 64 A company that pays $1.2 million to capitalize a corporation has

by definition used the first $1,000 of the investment to buy the capital stock, as expressly provided for by HeJvetia's organizational minutes. 65 In HeJvetia's 2012 tax return, signed by

Mr. Kahn, Fuerto Verde's investment is accounted for as purchasing Helvetia's capital stock for

$1,000, with the remainder of the investment treated by Helvetia as additional paid in capital. 66

Bearing on Mr. Kahn's credibility, Mr. Kahn claimed in Helvetia's 2012 tax: return to own alJ of

Helvetia's stock as ea1·ly as 2012, even though he swore before this Court that he purchased the

67

stock in September 2013, and that nobody owned Helvetia's stock before that time.

20. Mr. Kahn's alternative claim that Puerto Verde's $1.2 million investment was a

"Joan," and not capitalization of Helvetia, ]s baseless. Helvetia's tax return shows that Helvetia

owes no loan or liabi1ity of any nature. 68 Further, Mr. Kahn could not identify any promissory

69

note, deed of trust, or any other typical indicia of indebtedness to support his allegation. In

fact, closing documents on Helvetia's purchase of the Key Largo rea] estate reflect there was no

~I debt. 70

0 21. When the Ex Parte Motion was filed on November 5, 2013, Mr. Kahn was ~2 represented hy legal counsel, including Mr. George. 71 Mr_ Kahn drafted the E."¥: Parle Motion

9. 4 v 64

p 6 } RR-4, p. 93; RR-3, p. 12. Exhibit 5.

66

q 67 Exhibit 6; see Schedule L, capital stock account, and additional paid-in capital account (lines 22 and 23). Id.; RR-3, pp. 48-56; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 41-43.

0 68 1 £xhibit 6; see Schedule L, liabilities (lines 16-21); RR-4, p. 40-43, 48.

69 p Id, see also RR-4, p. 4&. G 71 >Exhibit 22. 71 3 Exhibit I; RR-4, pp. 55-57; RR-3, pp. 63, 69, 81-82; Defendant's Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-3, pp. 61-62.

~ 8 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 11 of 29 and directed his lawyers to file it. 72 Without any authority, Mr. Kahn filed the pleading in the

name of Helvetia, and falsely assened his ownership of Helvetia throughout the filing, which he

reiterated in his supporting affidavit. 73 Mr. Kahn's affidavit, containing his allegations of fraud

and forgery against Puerto Verde, was ]ater "massaged" by Mr. Petterson, who Mr. Kahn

retained just days before he filed the Ex Parte Motion. 74

22. In the Ex Parte Motion, Mr. Kahn sought to have six warranty deeds executed by

Helvetia declared invalid. 75 The s~x warranty deeds represented Helvetia' s six sales of lots to a

ho1m::builder in September and October 2013, after it had terminated Mr. Kahn. 76 Mr. Kahn

claimed that because he bought Helvetia's stock on September 7, 2013, after he was terminated,

only he, and not the person signing the deeds, had the authority to sell Helvetia's Jots. 77

23. Mr. Kahn and his attorneys lrnew or should have known that Section 51 of the

Texas Government Code on1y affords the extraordinary remedy of ex parfe relief to "owners" of

real property. 78 Mr. Kahn did not meet this requirement. 79 He did not personally own any of the

six lots, he did not own Helveti~ and he had no relationship with Helvetia at the time the Ex

Parte Motion was filed. 80

71 Id.; RR-4, pp. 55-57; Defendant's E?Chibit I (Attorney Employment Agreement with Mr. Petterson, dated November I I, 2013, effective November I, 2013). 73 Exhibit I~ .r"" also, Mr. Kahn's Affidavii attached as Exhibit I to the Ex Partt1 Motion.

v0 74 RR-4, pp. 55-57; Defendant's Exhibit I., 75 Exhibit 1, pp. 2-4, §JV.

L 76 Id., s2e also, Exhibits A-F attached to Exhibit I.

4 77

~ Exhibit l; Mr. Kahn's affidavit attad1ed as Exhibit l to Exhibit I.

18 &e Tex. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 51.903. An ubligur or debtor of \he real properly may also bring an action under these proceedings, but Mr. Kahn sought relief only as an "owner." Mr. Kahn makes no claim that he is either an p obligor or debtor of the six lots at issue. G 79 RR-4, pp. 43-46; Exhibits 23 and 24.

sold.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 12 of29

24. Section 51.903 also limits the Court's determination to whether the six warranty

deeds are fraudulent as defined by $ection 51.901, and does not provide for findings by the Court

on the parties' underlying dispute. See TEX. Gov•T CODE ANN. § 51.903(a), (g). See In re

Purported Liens or Claims Against Samshi Homes, L.L.C., 321 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex.App.-

Houston [14th Dist] 2010, no pet.); Becker v. Tropic Isles Ass 'n, No. 13-08-00559-CV, 2010

WL 877569, at *3 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Mar. 11, 2010, pet. denied) (mem. op.); In re Hart,

No. 07-98-0292-CV, 1999 WL 225956, at *2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Apr. 1S, 1999, no pet.). 81 This

statute was enacted after the Republic of Texas filed hundreds of frivolous Hens against

government officials. 82

25. Due to the extraordinary ex parte nature of the proceedings, Section 51.903 (a) of

the Texas Government Code requires the verified motion recite that the movant is aware that

sanctions will be imposed for a frivolous filing. The Ex Parte Motion contained this recitation. 83

81 Section 5 l.903 was enacted as part of House Bill 1185, passed in 1997. See Act of May 10, 1997, 15th Leg., R.S., Ch. 189, § 14, sec. 51.903, 1997 TEX. SESS. LAW. SERV. 1045, 1053 (current version at TEX. GOVT. CODE ANN. § 51.903 (Vernon 2005)).

The Senate's Bill Analysis explains the impetus behind the passage of Bill I I 85, as follows:

Currently, individuals and organizations have begun to take action based on their refusal to recognize the authority and sovereignty of the government of the State of Texas. These entities have filed fraudulent judgment liens issued by so-called "common law courts" and fraudulent documents purporting to create liens or claims on personal and real property with the secretary of state and many county and district court clerks throughout the state. Many of the filings have been against the State of Texas and public officers and employees, as well as private individuals. These filings have clogged the channels of commerce and have amounte-d to harassment and intimidation of both public officials and ordinary citizens. This bill provides both civil and criminal remedies for 1hose agafns1 whom such rraudulent filings have been made.... This bill creates an expedited judicial process that permits someone aggrieved by the fraudulent filing to obtain an expedited legal process to obtain a court order declaring the filing to be fraudulent. ...

S.ENATE;RESEARCli CTR., BILL ANALYSIS, TF.X. H.B. 1185, 75""' LEG., R.E. (1997) (emphasis added). Thus, llle bill analysis supports the view that the statule was not created to detennine the legitimacy and validity of the claimed interest in the property. 82 Texas Attorney General's summary: htU,3://www.tcxa~altomeygcneral.gov/alcrts/alens ykw.j,Jh~?id-114& 3 ~ Exhibit I, p. 5.

FINAL JUDGMENT' AND ORDER OF SANCJ"IONS Page 13 of29 .· into and filed of record their Rule i 11 agreement. 35 The Rule 11 Agreement provided~ among

other things, to set aside the Ex Parte Order by submitting an agreed order to that effect \vithin

seven days. 86

28. On November 22, 2013, Mr. Kahn fired Mr. Petterson and Ms. Goodman and

substituted himself as counsel pro se.e7 Mr. Kahn refused to execute the documents prepared by

Helvetia to effectuate the Rule 11 agreement Mr. Kahn has since asserted in pleadings and

testimony that Helvetia's lawyers either bribed or coerced his lawyers into signing the Rule 11

Agreement. 88 . Though Mr. Kahn claims he did not expressly authorize the signing of the Rule 11

Agreement, the. Court finds no evidence that his attorneys lacked implied or apparent authority to

sign the Rule 11 agreement. The Court finds no evidence to support the claim that opposing

counsel bribed or coerced Mr. Kahn's counsel into signing the Rule 11 agreement.

29. Mr. Kahn created additional delay when he appeared at the resetting of Helvetia' s

Emergency Motion, and its Motion to Enforce Rule 11 Agreement, on November 26, 2013 with

two new 1awyers, seeking a continuance. Judge Peter Sakai granted a continuance, but also

entered a TRO restraining Mr. Kahn from taking any actions on behalf of either Helvetia or Paradiv, and setting the hearing on the temporary injunction for December 6, 2013. Judge Sakai

found in the TRO that further attempts by Mr. Kahn to claim title to Hclvctin's properties and

85 Defendant's Exhibit&: TT-RR-4, pp. 75, 77, 83-85, 87-90.

86 Pertinent language of the Rule 11 Agreement states:

2. The panies shall execute documents within the next 7 days sufficient to implement the following: a. Agreed Order setting aside the judgment of November 5, 2013, in cause 18384.

4 t i 7 b. A complete re/ease and hold harmless by Burton Kahn ... of any claim of ownership or title to tbe 6 Jors at issue in Cause No. 18394.

Court records do not show that Mr. George was ever discharged from his representation of Mr. Kahn in either this case or Cause No. J 8355, although the Court discharged him in an least one related action, Cause No. l 7016, with Mr. Kahn':s llpprovnl. 88 RR-2, p. 53; RR-3, p. 30.

f!NAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 15 of29

Court had fully adjudicated Helvetia's temporary injunction, its sanctions request, and its request

lo t:nfo1ce the Rule 11 Agreement. Judge Canales declined at that time to make any contempt

findings, but expressly recognized in his order that Mr. Kahn had violated Judge Sakai's TRO,

that he had refused to implement the November 15, 2013 Rule 11 Agreement, and that he and

Mr. George had faik:d tu produce documents or appear for depositions as Judge Sakai had

ordered. Helvetia deposed Mr. Kahn on December 6; Mr. George did not appear for his

deposition though ordered to do so.92

32. Mr. Wachsmuth anQ. Mr. Fanucci represented Mr. Kahn during the three-day

evidentiary hearing that culminated on December 11, 2013 with Judge Karen Pozza granting

Helvetia's application for a Temporary lnjunction enjoining Mr. Kahn from taking further

actions on behalf of Helvetia and Paradiv. 93 Judge Pozza a]so set aside the Ex Parte Order. 94

Mr. Kahn then fired Mr. Wachsmuth and Mr. Fanucci on December 13, 2013, and has since been

prose.

33_ Helvetia set its First Amended Motion for Sanctions for hearing on January 21,

0 2014. Both Mr. Kahn and Mr. George appeared at the Courthouse on January 21 for the 4 I

~/ sanctions hearing. The presiding court assigned all of the parties' pending matters pending in

Cause Nos. 18394 :md 18355 to the Monitoring Court, and all counsel and Mr. Kahn met with t. 0 the Monitoring Court Clerk about scheduling and resetting the hearings to March 3, 2014.95 a v 0 L 4 2 92 Id. 0 l 93 Id.; an Amended and Supplementary Temporary Injunction was entered by Judge Pou.a on December 18, 2013 p that expressly permitted Helvetia to continue selling its lots.

94 G Ei.:hibit 3.

95 Id.

3 2 ~ FINAL JUOOMENT ANI) ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 17 of29

II.

ORDER OF SANCTIONS

34. Helvetia has provided evidence that overcomes the general pres\lmption by courts

that pleadings and other papers are filed in good fai1h.

35. As discussed herein, the conduct by Mr. Kahn and Mr. George in failing to

conduct appropriate investigation and due diligence -before filing the Ex Parte Motion, in

delaying efforts by Helvetia to set 1t aside, and in refusing to comply with the Rule 11

Agreement, show that their pleading and their conduct has been groundless, that the pleading

was filed in bad faith and for harassment, that it was filed for an improper purpose> that it lacked

in factual oc legal basis, and was not supported by evidence. These findings are incorporated into the Court's findings that sanctions are appropriate under Rule 13, Chapter I 0, § 51,903, and

under the Court's inherent power, as described in this order and judgment.

A. Ruth 13, Texas Ru Jes of Civil Procedure

36. Ru1e 13 gives the Court . I the option of imposing sanctions on both a party and

counsel for filing a groundless pleading that is either brought in bad faith or brought for the 0 4 purpose of harassment. TEX. R. CJV. P. 13; In re C.M V.• 136 S.W.3d 280, 284 (Tex. App. - San

~-, Antonio 200, no pet.) The rule defines "groundless" as having "no basis in law or fact and not

1 warranted by good faith argument for the extension, modification. or reversal of existing Jaw,"

and thn~ tnrns on the legal merits of a claim. Id.; Robson v. Gilbreath, 267 S.W.3d 401, 405

~L (Tex. App.-Austin 2008, pet. denied). "Bad faith" requires the conscious doing of a wrong for a

dishonest, discriminatory, or malicious purpose. Id., at 407. Improper motive is an essential .~ 2 Q element of had faith. Elkins v. Stotls-Bnmm, 103 S.W.3d 664, 669 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2003, 110

l. p pet.). Rule 13 also provides, "[S]a:nctions wider this rule may not be imposed except for good G 3 ?

'5 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 18 of29 cause, the particulars of which must be stated in the sanction order. 1) See Low v. Remy, 221

S.W.3d 609, 614 (Tex. 2007).

37. Rule 13 pennits the trial court to impose sanctions on attorneys or parties who file

a "fictitious pleading" or "make statements in pleading which they know to be groundless and

false." After notice aud hei:tfing, llu::: Lrial courl "shall impose an appropriate sanction" available

under Rule 215. TEX. R Crv. P. 13.

38. Sanctions available under Rule 215.2(b) include attorney's fees. See TEX. R. Civ.

P. 13, 2 l 5.2(b). Sanctions awarded as attorney's fees fall within the sound discretion of the

Court. Olibas v. Gomez, 242 S.W.3d 527, 535 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2007, pet. denied); Glass v.

Glass, 826 S.W.2d 683, 688 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 1992, writ denied) (citjng Brantley v. Etter,

677 S.W.2d 503, 504 (Tex. 1984)).

39. In detennining whether sanctions are appropriate, the trial court examines the

facts availabJe to the litigant and the circumstances existing when the litigant filed the pleading.

Alejandro v. Bell, 84 S.W.3d 3&3, 392 (Corpus Christi 2002, no pet. h.); Home Owners Funding

Corp. of Am. v. Schepple1', 815 S.W.2d 884, 889 (Tex. App. - Corpus Christi 1991, no writ).

The Court aJso considers the acts or omissions of the represented party or counsel, not merely the

legal merit of a plei:iding OT motion. Griffin Indus. V G1·imes, No. 04-02-00430-CV, 2003 WL

1911993, *4 (San Antonio Apr. 23, 2003, no pet.) (citing New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v.

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 856 S.W.2d 194, 205 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1993, no writ.).

40. In addition, the Court is entitled to evaluate the credibility of the testimony :md

detennine what weight to give it. Wein v. Sherman, 03-10-00499-CV, 2013 Tex. App. Lexis

10666. at *24 (Tex.App.-Austin Aug. 23, 2013, n.p.h.) (mem. op.) (citing Alpert v. Crain, Caton

& James, P.C., 178 S.W.Jd 398. 412 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied)).

FINAL JUDGMENT Al>iD ORDER 01' SANCTIONS Page 19 of29

41. The Court has mad~ the necessary factual determinations about the motives and

credibility of Mr. Kahn. The Court finds that sanctions against Mr. Kahn are appropriate under

Rule 13. The Court is precluded from sanctioning Mr. George under a literal reading of this

Rule because his associate attorney, not Mr. George, signed the Ex Parte Motion. Yuen v.

Gerson, 342 S.W.3J 824 (Tt:x. App. - Hou:ston [141h Dist.] 2011, pet. denied).

42. Helvetia has not sought sanctions against the associate attorney, Mr. Petterson.

Although Mr. Petterson signed the offending pleading, Mr. Petterson attempted to rectify the

error within ten days by entering into the Rule 11 Agreemt:nt.

B. The Ex Parle Motion Wa..11 a Fictitious Pleading And is Groundless.

43. The Court finds that the Ex Parle Motion was a fictitious pleading and

groundless, and that it was brought both in bad faith and for harassment. The Ex Parle Motion

has no basis in law or fact, and is not warranted by good faith argument for the extension,

i

modification, or reversal of existing la~.!f6 Mr. Kahn filed the pleading maliciously without any

basjs in fact or law. 97 Mr. Kahn also filed it as an experiment to obtain an opinion of Helvetia

ownership that he could then use to bolster his egregious ownership arguments in this matter.

44. The Court has assessed Mr. Kahn's credibility along with the evidence presented,

and find~ there is not a scintilla of evidence that Mr. Kahn owns Helvetia's stock, and thus finds

the Ex Parte Motion meritless. The Court finds that Mr. Kahn has used this false allegation for

improper purposes, and thus finds good cause in assessing sanctions as further particularized

herein. His wrongful cli!ims nf ownerships were a.t the genesis of all of the proceedings herein,

and spawned the litigation between the parties, unnecessarily causing Helvetia to incur .1

substantial fees and expenses.

96 RR<l, p. 93-95. 97 RR-3, pp. JOI.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF Sl\NCTIONS Page 20 of29

45. By claiming Mr. Kahn owned the property owner, and thus had standing to bring

an action under § 51.903 of the Texas Government Code, Mr. Kahn and Mr. George made

factual contentions that lacked any legal or evidentiary support. The claim of a forged stock

certificate was factually bogus and legally irrelevant.

46. Tht: fu Purle Motidn alsu exceeded lhe ~cope of§§ 51.901 and 51.903 of the

Texas Government Code by seeking and obtaining extraneous findings as discussed herein.

47. Mr. Kahn appears to challenge the Court's findings based on either the United

States Constitution or the Texais Con:stitution. Although not clearly articulated, his challenges

are not relevant here because the Court has based its findings on non-constitutional grounds. 98

C. The Ex Parte Motion was Filed In Bad Faith and for Harassment.

48. The Court finds that bad faith was demonstrated in that there was a conscious

dojng of a wrong for a dishonest or malicious purpose. The Ex Parte Motion constituted

harassment in that it was intended to annoy, alarm, and abuse another person. The Court finds :·

that the .Ex Parle Motion was filed:'

a. To avoid the probable and imminent entry of a TRO against Mr. Kahn;

b. To maHciously '"cloud the title>' of the six lots, and thus to i11terfere and harm

Helvetia's business by Mr. Kahn's c1aim that he owned property that Helvetia had

already sold to builders;

c. To chill Helvetia's future sales of property, as Mr. Kahn acknowledged he knew v 0 L the litigation wonld m::ike huilclers, lenders and title companies reluctant to close

q 0 l 98 See in re Hart, No. 07-98-0292-CV, 1999 WL 225956, at *2 (Tex. App.-Amarillo Apr. 15, 1999, no pet) (Court ~ declined to address Harts' complaint that§ 51.903 of the Texas Government Code was unconstitutional. citing San Antonia Gen. Drivers v. Thornton, 156 Tex. 641, 647, 299 S. W.2d 911, 915 (1957), which directs a court not to pass upon the constitutionality ofa statute if the particular case can be decided upon non-constitutional grounds).

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCl'IONS Page21 of29

on property sales by Helvetia if they thought Mr. Kallll would record adverse

ownership claims to the property;

d. To attempt to extort revenues earned by Helvetia after it had terminated

Mr. Kahn's employment;

e. To retaliate or .. get even" against his fonner employer.

49. Mr. Kahn acted with duplicity, defrauding the Court as shown herein, and

defrauding HeJvetia.99

50. The timing of Mr. Kahn's filing of the Ex Parte Motion also shows bad faith and

filing for an improper purpose. : Email exchanges show that Helvetia sued Mr. Kahn on

November 4, 2013 for various torts and injunctive relief, and were attempting to coordinate with

Mr. George a time to present to the Court Helvetia's application for a. temporary restraining

order. 100 These types of games with the Court and opposing counsel go to the Court's core

functions, and subject Mr. Kahn and Mr. George to sanctions under the Court's inherent power

to control litigants.

51. Mr. Kahn's pleadings and conduct demonstrate delay when he avoided the

hearing to set aside the Ex Parte Order by agreeing to, and later reneging, on the Rule 11

99 Defondant's: Exhibit 8: Tl-RR-4, pp. 82-83 ("Paradiv doesn't own (the six lots), it is Helvetia. At1d P11radiv was only- the only reason why I made that transaction (the Ex Parte Motion], was to try to prevent Robert Ripley frorn - he sold six lots when he wasn't even ... pre~ident of the company.") 100 RR-3. pp. 95-10 l; Rxhibits l 5-18.

Helvetia Asset Recoveiy, Inc. v. Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation, filed on November 4, 2013, in the 4071h Judicial District, Bexar County, Texas. On November 4, 2013, counsel for Helvetia emalled Mr. Kahn's lawyer, Mr. George, a newly tiled petilion and application for injunctive relief seeking to enjoin Mr. Kabn from taking funher action on behalf of Helvetia, referri11g to his attempts to convey Helvetia's property to Paradiv. The email requested that Mr. George provide a convenient time for a court appearance on November 5 if he intended to conrest Helvetia's request for a temporary restraining order. Mr. George offered no specifics but noted that Mr. Kahn had engaged a San Antonio attorney, Jay Petterson, as associate counsel.

FINAL JUDGMENT ANO 0ROER OF SANCTIONS Page 22 of29

Agreement. 101 Further delay occurred on November 26, 2013 when Mr. Kahn and new counsel

dejour sought and obtained a continuance, falsely claiming the new counsel needed to get up to

speed. Mr. Kahn fired those lawyers the same day, showing grounds for the continuance were a

pretext for simply more delay. The refusal by Mr. Kahn and Mr. George to comply with

Ht:lvetia's deposition notices on November 12, 2013, and their outright violation of Judge

Sakai's orders for the same, demonstrate further delay. Mr. Kahn's voluminous pleadings on December 2, 2013 constitute further materially bad faith conduct and harassment when they set

numerous substantive motions for hearing on the day Judge Sakai set Helvefo1.'s temporary

injunction for hearing. Their continued refusal to present themselves for deposition caused

further delay and unnecessary expense, leading to Judge Canales' December 5, 2013 order to

appear, in which he also expressly stated Mr. Kahn was already in violation of the TRO by his

acts purporting to be on behalf of Helvetia.

52. Mr. Kahn's attempt to trivialize his conduct is not creditable given the unrelenting

efforts he took to keep his fraudulent claim intact on the six lots, through the date Judge Pozza

set it aside on December 8, 2013. Moreover, by failing to release the fraudulent lien after

demand was made by Helvetia, the Court may presume Mr. Kahn had the intent to harm and

defraud Helvetia and others. Mr. Kahn claims he rightfully reneged on the Rule 11 Agreement,

but by doing so he refused Helvetia's demand to release the lien, thus giving rise to such a

presumption of intent. rn 2 v 0 l 4

~ 101

102 RR-3, pp. 101-104.

·.

See Florance v. State, No. 05-08-00984:.CR (Tex. App. - Dallas, Aug. 28, 2009). The Florance Court affirmed a p judgment that Florance was guilty, after jury trial, and afti1med his sentence of six months in jail for Florance'~ G failure to release a lien that was ftauduieilt under § 51.901, Tex. Gov't Code, in violation of Tex. Penal Code § 32.49.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 01' SANC'l'[ONS Page 23 of29

53. Mr. Kahn and Mr. George filed the Ex Parle Motion in bad faith, as it

demonstrated a conscious doing of a wrcing for a dishonest and malicious purpose. Their actions were taken in part to slander title, and to ·make it difficult or impossible for He1vytia to continue

its sales of lots. Their intent to harm Helvetia in this manner showed an improper motive.

Mr. Kahn's testimony demonstrated his subjective state of mind: he knew, and Intended) for the

filing to stop Helvetia from further aot sales. 103

54. Mr. Kahn has openl~ admitted his motivation in filing the Ex Parle Motion was to

interfen:: with Helvetia and to stop further sales of lots. Mr. Kahn is knowledgeable about title

companies and title searches, and ·intended his conduct to chill Helvetia's future sales of its

property. to4

55, Mr. Kahn knew or should have known, by proper investigation, that Mr. Moore's

signature was not forged, and that Mr. Baggett was not reputable and could not reasonably

provide an opinion contrary to Mr. Moore's own testimony.

56. The Court can infer Mr. Kahn was additionally motivated by retaliation or

~ vindication, or part of a strategy to cause Helvetia to expend more fees and costs and drive it to

~ , I

/ the settlement table.

57. Mr. Kahn was moti~ated to claim ownership of Helvetia because after he was 2 0 1 fired, his direct access to all revenues earned by Helvetia from lot sales was cut off. 4 v D. Chapter 10, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code, and § 51.903, Texas Government Code. 0 l 58. Chapter lO authorizes a court to impose sanctions upon a person, or a party

q represented by the person, where an attorney files a groundless pleading or files a pleading for an a 1 improper purpose, including to harass. TBX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 10.001(1-3), p 103 G RR-3, p. 27.

104 Id.; see also, RR-3, pp. 38; RR-4, pp. 57-62; Exhibit 26 and 27.

f FINAL JUDG\1ENT AND 0RDl~R Of' SANCl'IONS Page 24of29 10.004(a). Each allegation and facti.ial contention in a pleading or motion must have, or be likely

·to l1a.ve, evidi;ntiary support aft..-:r a reasum1bk invi::stigaliun. Id., ;n::e also, Bruvenec v. Flores,

No. 04-11-00444-CV, San Antonio, Mar. 20, 2013, citing Low v. Henry, 221 S.W.3d 609, 614-

15 (Tex. 2007). "A trial court may impose sanctions against a party if the court finds that the

party has failed to comply with this requirement." Bravenec, citing Nolte v. Flournoy, 348

S.W.3d 262, 269 (Tex. App. -Texarkana 201 t, pet. denied).

59. Chapter 10 thus pennits the Court to sanction a party or an attorney for filing

pleadings that lack a reasonable basis in law or fact. See TEX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE §

10.001-.006; Low, 221 S.W.3d at 614. The Court may impose sanctions if the Court finds that

the party has failed to comply 1vith any one of the requirements of Section 10.001 of the Texas

Civil Practices & Remedies Code. TEX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 10.004(a); Nolte, 348

S.W.3d at 269.

60. For reasons previously described, and incorporated by reference, sanctions may

be imposed against Mr. Kahn under Chapter 10 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code.

~ The evidence shows that Mr. Kahn and Mr. George are both culpable and that both should be

6 sanctioned for their conduct but as with Rule 13 the Court is precluded from assessing sanctions 7 against Mr. George. q 61. More particularly, the Ex Parle Motion was filed for an improper purpose, and it 4 Jacks any evidentiary support as shown herein. Section 51. 903 builds in an award of sanctions if v 0 L a party seeks a finding not in compliance with the statute; Mr. Kahn and Mr. George orchestrated

~ the hearing to be ex parte despite Helvetia's contemporaneous attempts to secure a hearing on a

~ TRO that would have precluded Mr. Kahn's filing; Mr. Kahn filed the pleading without any p G authority; and his ownership claims are neither factually or legally supported.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCTIONS Page 25 of29

E. Court's Inherent Power to Sanctions

62. The Court has inherent power to impose sanctions. Assessing sanctions under

this inherent power involves a two-step process: (1) the Court should rely upon the rules and

statutes expressly authorizing sanctions whenever possible, and (2) the Court, applying its

inherent power to impose sanctions, must make factual findings, based on evidence, that the

conduct complained of significantly interfered with the Court's legitimate exerdse of its core

functions. Inherent power to sanction exists where necessary to deter, alleviate, and counteract

bad faith abuse of the judicial process, such as any significant intcrforcncc with the traditional

core functions of the Court. Core functions include hearing evidence, deciding issues of fact

raised by the pleadings, deciding questions of law, rendering final judgments and enforcing

judgments. Core functions also include management of its docket and the issuance and

enforcement of its orders. The CoUrt "may issue orders and, when it deems appropriate, vacate,

rescind, or modify those orders. Lawyers and the litigants do not have such authority." 105 By

doing so they effectively usurp the Court's role and displace the Court as the decision-maker, -'

thus interfering with a core functiort of the Court.

63. For reasons and findings previously discussed, sanctions are appropriate against

both Defendants under this Court~s inherent powers. Their Ex Parte Motion and ex parte hearing

interfered with most of the Court's core functions. They submitted evidence not allowed by §

51.903; they made arguments and submitted an improper order under§ 51.903 that affected the

Court's decision-making; and they omitted &,_closing to the Court prior proceedings detrimental

to their legal position. Mr. Kahn also ignored the Court's setting aside of the Ex Parte Order,

10 ~ Basaldua v. Forest Woods Subdivision, No. 04-11-00716-CV (Tex. App. San Antonio, July 5, 2012 (citing In re K.A.R., 171S.W.3d705, 715 (Tex. App. - Houston (14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.).

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER or SANCTIO,NS Page 26 of29 thus attempting to usurp the Court's role, by continuing to assert the same grounds that were

1.:unlained in the order that had been set aside.

64. Both Mr. Kahn and Mr. George are culpable for the groundless Ex Parle Motion,

and their allegations that Mr. Kahn reasonably could have purchased any asset valued over

$1,000,000 for $1,000. The pleading i:s based i;olely un Mr. Kahn'~ alleg'1tiou:s lhat Helvetia had

never issued its stock to Puerto Verde, thereby al1owing him to buy the company, worth over $1

million, for $1,000, and only days after the company had tenninatcd him for misconduct. Both

Mr. Kahn and Mr. George participated in the 2007 incorporation of Helvetia, and Mr; Kahn

additionally participated in the transaction by which Puerto Verde wired $1.2 million in cash to

capitalize Helvetia. Mr. George was the incorporator for Helvetia and prepared its 2007

organizational minutes showing that Puerto Verde would be issued all 1000 shares of Helvetia's

stock at $1 per share. Mr. Kahn testified that he was knowledgeable about property sa]es, and

knew that a cloud on a title generally would preclude a sale of that parcel. He intended for the

F.x Parte Motion to harm Helvetia's sales, which he believed would return the p~rties to "status

0 quo.'' Mr. Kahn drafted the pleading and his affidavit, and ]ocated and hired a handwriting 4 6 expert. At the time that the Ex Parle Motion was filed, Mr. Kahn provided the factual basis for

·~ the claims, and der.ided what legal claims to anert, and the manner in which to assert them, vfa

the Texas Government Code. As ~art of his claim that he owned Helvetia, Mr. Kahn created the 4 new corporation Paradiv. to which he had tried to convey all of Helvetia is property in Key Largo v 0 only days and weeks before he filed the Ex Parle Motion that sought to invalidate legitimate t 4 sales closed by Helvetia after it had terminated Mr. Kahn.

~ 65. Mr. George did not sign the Ex Parle Motion, but delegated that task to the newly

retained local counsel Mr. Petterson. Emails on November 4 and 5. 2013 show that Helvetia's

FrNAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER Of SANCTIONS Page 27 of29 counsel was unaware of Mr. Petterson's representation until the day the Ex Parte Motion was

filed, November 5. After ignoring orders by Judge Sakai and Judge Canales to appear for his

deposition, Mr. George voluntarilyiappeared at the December 2013 hearing before Judge Pozza

to provide testimony during Mr. Kahn's presentation of his case. Nothing in the evidence shows

that Mr. Ot:urge disavowed the Pane Motion.

66. Mr. George had notice of the sanctions motion and hearing set for March 3, 2014.

He appeared on January 21, 2014, a previous setting, and participated in the monitoring court's

reset of the hearing to March 3, 2014.io6

F. Sanctions are Just and Not Excessive

67. The Court has carefully examined the two-part test adopted by the Texas Supreme

Court in finding that the sanctions assessed arc just. First, there is a direct nexus among the

offensive conduct, the offender, and the sanction imposed, in that the sanction is directed against

the abuse and toward remedying th~ prejudice caused the innocent party.

68. Second, the sanction is not excessive because it is no more severe than necessary

0 to satisfy its legitimate purposes, here, namely, to deter other litigants from simi]ar misconduct 4 62 and punish violators. 107

'! Accordingly, it is herehy ORDERED, ADJUSTED AND DECREED as foJlows:

~ (l) Sanctions be and hereby are awarded against Burton Kahn and Terry George,

jointly and severally, in the amount of $253,416.00, for which let execution issue. Of this sum,

the Court finds $153.416.00 to be rea~onahle attorneys' fees incurred by Movants as a direct and

proximate result of the fictitious filings and the attempted withdrawal of the Rule 11 agreement.

106 RR-4, pp. 54-55.

107 £xhibits 29 and 30.

3, 2 8 5 FINAL JUDGMENT AND 0RDl:R OF' SANC1'10NS Page 28 of29

The remaining $100,000.00 is imposed as sanctions for lack of diligence into the facts and the

law.

(2) All other relief not expressly granted hereby is denied. The Court's intent is that

this instrument be in all things a Final Judgment and Order.

SIGNED, ORDERED, and ENTERED this/ .t_;da f ~ , 2014.

~

Submitted by:

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

Isl Werner A. Powers Werner A. Powers ,. a State Bar No. 16218800 Natalie DuBosc State Bar No. 24077481 -~ 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 I Dallas, Texas 75219 bl Telephone: (214) 651-5000 Telecopier: (214) 651-5940 ll

~ Lisa S. Barkley L State Bar No. 17851450 112 E. Pecan, Suite 1200 4 San Antonio, Texas 78205 2 Telephone No.: (210) 978-7427 0 1 Telecopier No.: (210) 554-0427 p ATTORNEYSFO:R G HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

3 ~ 8 G F!NALJUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SANCrlONS Page29of29

EXHIBITD ~: iAtt~J'r.ie'j_ ;,E.r!l~.1.oyni~11~·!J.9.r!lernent, ir9;ri\ i\i'h!i,~~·;si!l\i.!!'tl~ncttl,i;)•pu:'.':1·!_!11.1t~· o, . .t.t<io,);s:1 PtA "' ·'·· l .PraftS' · ·-··-"· .... --.~----~-~------··----·-·i· ·$~nt{ '"': # {AttacilrnElf!t _ ·-f6iKB-

. .

«I

!loitlin ~!,,: ...J'.~~.,..,~ I1· ftpam_fi) EliIW!i!!EI /, f1asti;~4f 1-Aito.me,r.

Ijnt Errployi:nG -

! !.

I· [;

'+'Fi:J~s ··--· - ...... +· ··· i A;t>~';~JMni{ save,,,. F .... ................. ................. .....................-+1• · .~hQih~~i~on§.9!i#nt: i

. 'ig'.ri\¥Sf\1l)!S;~e'rhih'i Eiu~op;

,JUiJ:~.f!i'ct&~.~ . ~ p~t-:'Q.ur re,.qile~tfJt!}\i!! •a)ti:idteC! ll:ie•Attt'i.rniiY.Em~ ~rifontAgre ement.bet.Ween•Jafair~ yo~fselt lf ram be <lf arr{rorti:ier,_a$sisfr~hce_pJoos~ actl\!Se .

'.~t~~l.La{g~.{~}· <~~r];="

~ F;r~!~ a.111.~;(~) tj :Pia~ynRa·~1*cv~fo;· HdoteS, Te;cas 78023 · .~J~t.Qn11:3J~ ~el{fo_w Qffice: 0 21o~fi9Ed:i1ft Fi,~::210;69s;·~ 19)

;p~si~i;iht amv@lrplaw.net 8fi.;8P.;-: 'r~yaicr~sfd11· s).tES:F!iiai'· t{(:):-1~~ At~o.rri~y.J:l)e.nLP1iyi!egepfCyn~deriJiaJ lilformatJ~ri maybe contain=?.iri th!s)n~ss~ge. lfyou are nct;thg ?(\d~s-~ee i11~fcate;din Uifs ms sage: for 1e$ponsib!e ::.,>;:~:::,._ for deliieryofthe rnessiige:lolhe addtessee),y9u· may . fioi:c<JP'/ or :OelivarthiS rhess~geto·anyorie_ In such ca.se~. yonshould.destroy this !n'lssli~eandJJndly . nci~ify

"·"'"·"'·"•""'··~'-- ....

C: 0 ')

··-...,..J/

~~ ' ..."\ .

'

~

Jay R. Petter~on rtf Attornt:y at Law_· -------------------~-_..;:;,..-

12.274 eanciera R.a., Ste. no Helotes, TX. 78023.

(210} 695-6111 'Fax: (210) 695c6101 E;mail:.attomey@lrPlaw.riet Website: www.jrplaw.net

Novem he1' 1.1, ?~d t3

DURTONKAHN, individually~ and as President oflIELVE'rIAASsEt RECOVERY,lNC; and asP~id~nt of~~~V G0mlQRATl01't . .. . .

·Re: --Cont~~ed own,~r~~ip Qf)I¢lvefut. AssefReco:v.~ey; Inc.

'",;(;ontested ·9wn:er$hiP; ~fJoeperfJ)eveiQpmenJ: c.~~pa:11y -Paradiv Corporation am) H~lvetia_,.i\._sset ;R..ecoveryjlnc~· v. ABCSBLDR,.JNC.. ·and Robert ;Ripley, Cause No. 2013-CI-l7889 -BurtonKahn:;v~Joabert~Development CQmpany an<l John Ripley, cause No. 2013 CI i7oi2, · --Cause No. 2ot3..c1'.~1s3·9~, Purported Claim against lle,lv;etia Asse* Recoye"ry;.Illc~, :filed by Burt6n Kahn.

() -£~use N~. 2oh-b-i75i6, Purported .Cl!lini 5lg~inst Helveti~ Asset Recovecy~. Iilc~,:-Dl~d-by:Robert:Ripley

This :r~e~in,cr:agre«?mcn~ is: f;l:itectiv~'M Qf:Nov¢mber l, 20i3·when you directed ine as yow: attorneyfo-ftle,a Motio-q relatiJlg,fo·tbe validity ofd¢eds tO·AllCSBLDR, INC. in Cause No. 2013;.Clw17889.

Dear Mr. Kahn!'

This letteds written to confirni the terms on whic}lyouhave agreed to employ this firm to t~presentyouin the tesolutioii of.:the above matter. While tbj~ letter111ay seem overly Jonna!, it is nec:essazy to· propeily setfortl1our undetstandillg of the terms ofour representation.

OQt services wilLconsisN>r advice and consultation, appearances athearings) trials;

mecH~tic;m, if req\1ired by tJ::r~c.cmtrt, telepliqµe ·~qnferenc¢s, travel, investigative. work, legal resear~h, r~view:of material receivea ftom a,U ScrQtces, drafting of pieadings::(necessary court ·documep.ts) and co\lrl proceedii1gs and.roi;inal disco.very, attendance at depositions~ subpoenas, n:nd:othcr n9Ccss.acy pre.pfll'21.ti~n ari:d ~~tiOns'to resolvc:i,Youi claiiu:s wiU1:re~pt:l;L tu ownership of ·corporations and ei;iti~ieS relatingto d~velqpment and-holding ofrefil estate and o'Wnership ofreal estate, including but not liµi:ited to Roperl).Qpley,-John Ripley; Puerte Verde, Ltd., ACSBLDR, INC., Joabert Development Company; an4 any other person. or entitytelati.rig·to the issues .relating to ei:nployrnent ofa'ttoi:ney, · : i \..__j

BurtonJ<.ahn:atl:omey employmeI).ta:greement""' page I

T}iiS· cigreement.does·not include presentatiOn· ofthis case tociny appellate court or pr.eprira#o.n: of111oiio"';J$ qncm¢ry to "ihi~·~¢pf'esei1tatio11' ff qppeai is necessaty, clicfrit and attot::neywill c.ons.idef. th~ qppeq{@ cf separate ati'd·distiilct catiie .<jfaction fequirihgti newfee arrarigem_ent:

,You have paidthis firm-1he·s.u~n:qf$3.S.0.0; '$1;,500 ofwhlch..was.p~d in your behalf by K.athi~en Cassidy Goodman, attorney, on'N().v~m.ber·~. 2Ql 3', 1U),d $2,000 paid on.November 5, 2013, directly byyoti. Fees:were biiloo thro~ghNoveml;l~,r ~. 2013at $~2-5 p~ b,our. Attorneys fees ·ap.d :CO$ts have'been 'incurted hl:excess o±'said $2;·500. You have agreed·~o pay thjs ·firm an additioim.l. $7;500 iri-patda.1·¢onsideratioii. otfuy aceeptan:ee:ofrepresentation ofyou in the above .d¢Scdbed ¢laim and IiO~atfon, to be pfil'dpnofto..co.i:rtitiencemerit-of work onyooc case;

First agfilrtstthis r¢tained sha.11 bill $150.00fh.Our for my ti.rile, and in: addition, I shall ,bill for.any·expens:~sin,cµrreti. lfa la:wstiit is..filed,, Iwfii require payment of the.filing fee5 mid costs o:f servmg tllelaVfsµitpaya]:>le:yrfor tQ :$.lingJii'elawsul~ furihe~, I may require an ru;klitiorial retainer; 1will bill, y9u on a ~(>n~h;J.y:9r 91:het pcdodio, ha.sis ·an:d in the eventth.at I require an additiorialretainer,. lwill, a,dvj§eyqu~:1fJ,:9wever., aJrial pfthismatter is t~tii.i:ed,I may require an adtiltio.rial 'retainer which shall ~e. pai4 a~ l~cwt ten'd~ys prior ~Q fyio:l.

You liave retained Kathleen Cassidy Goodman as yo.uraflorneyprior /() retai1iing me, .and. it is.: 1t1iiit:rsto.fldthflt'.M$; <it>.odnuzn:aitd fmay, a.ssociate as co-cf!~nsel on the issues Jo.r · which you·are reta._it#,,.gnre. iY~li. ac:kiit>.w#!age titatMs. GoO.dnian.referredyQuto mewitlz respect (o my r~present(l0t>IZ ofy~u., f()u':h?i~~$ignii,d,ti.separate attorney employment agreement wiJ/i Ms. GooiJinan and und~rstan.ds.he»f!illbe bi/iliigyou sepatdtely. You 0 ·tiilthorize tlie associa'tion, ofMs. Gt?o.lfman and mys¢/ft1$· co;.cou.nsel 01i ih,e matters·c:overed by ,this 'iittorney agreement ·.·

F'.ilrt.lier,yQ.µ. authtn·izf!:.ine'tinissociO.te another.attorney or (lftorneys as! deem approprJa_te,,anil-advlsable'tn)iourtef!r.esentation..

Yol+ pave,als() to G.OIDP,lY'~th ?11 of the-firm's reasonable requests in connection with the prep;;i.ratlo}'.\ and presen,ti\tj.Qn ofyoµr cas¢.

While your concem fol' the cos~s iuvdlved'°is v.ertainly ii:lPpreciated you must understand that iris impossible to predict acclI(at~ly all ~at will b<fteqµU;ed fo r~present your legal interests in this .mauet, both present:and:future. ThusJt i:> impo;:;i:iil;Jle to pri:di ef~ately the 1:otalamount of the· foe for·J>rofessionafserVices or'other costs tP&t.111~Y be fo.volv~d i:i;i. repre.se)lting your interests. In this regard, it.is fa.itthat you be cautioned at the outset t}iat.so111etim~s (and 11ot infrequently). complexities develop hi.areas where they are not expected ~ya·client. Sometimes becaus¢ of extrem¢ bitterness aridhurt..feelirtgs~.·or because ofsubstantial properly interests, family law ~a:ses· become unreasonably time-eonsummg-. this :fitm 'ha.:i made no ·express odmplied repr_esematio.ns or guarante·es con~erning:th~ outcome of your .case or hc;>w :tong your case wm take to complete~

1 do n,ot nicke,l'~cl..Qime·,a.:file for expenses, and as: such l do not bill forlong,.distance calls, ·copying "~ if :unde~ 50 copi~$"per task; basic postage .(this excludes expedited postage \_ ) services or bu1kpostage) 1 or ni,ii~ape orpar'ldng.

Burton Kahn attorney .en1pioymen1: agrt;t::1Ilent..., .page Z

,..

. ~·, ·~·

,..-".I (. Just as yo:U:m-e:·de_p~n&ng on my'cxpcrusc 'aiid professioiuilism, TWill "ciepel.ld on you to k~ep fa;ith Witli m.~ if::c.ornpl~xHi~!1 d¢y~fop jrt y_oi1i'.ifa$8. °i:Vhere'yoi.1 di~.f botexpecnhem. Yn1rr contip.u,in,gJai~h.m this,fi+m. 4u.tii1g;what roi:gh.t :b~come-'a profouged'.:petiod is vitaily.irhportantto 'the maintinan~ ~fyoµr 1~~~ ,rigiitstits: h1iporian~e simply· ca,rillotbe;·over.:ern.phasized~

Conversatiop~ 1Je!wee.n,. ~ ~tto_111ey Md. cUAAtare·prntectedby law and by the disciplinary rules to·which attorneys' are. StlbJ~~t. TJ:ie reaso:i;i: {Qr t}tls·confi'qentiaHty pr()tection.is that .th~ experience ofriia.ny:hundreds of.years. lla.s ,p:r~ve4·~t the in~er~ts o(the ¢.lleht.are be~st se:rve4 when the client's attorneys are f\lllyifuformed of'. all't\l~,facts· w~llin advance _of any p_ossib1e contest Your candor w:fiLassistmetremendously:in repres.entin,gyoµ;.Jt is (foubJY p~teeted by lEJ.W a,n4 tb,e discipillittry' f.l.lies and..is V.efy:muoh en:cotiro:ged. You can .rely o~ me· to be ~c;l~d, \Yi.th you, asweiL lwitl 00. my·"Qest-fu. k~pyouJ~dvised on lioYi"fhe·ease seems tO be progressing; based on in.formation.I repeiye ti,"o:tn tt,l~ :~ourt, :from tl;ib othc:r side, and from you. I \vill send you ,(;opies of all,pleadiqgs foi: y9w::iD;f9rm.ation.

I will do-evefything possit;Jl~to ~xp~dite th~ ~pprop,ri~te disposition of your case consistent with the tillie limitations iniposed by law and tJ:ie pro't~tion of.ym.rrpresent and. future legal i:nt.e:r~~ts. There<may Welfbe soine.di:fficult deci§ioru; fol' yoµ to mak,e.Jt is·~ attol'.lley's responsibility to hlivis~ryoti on the legal tafuiflcations, of~. d~cisicms, bµt you must mak~ the actual deeisions;

Y o:u.will be billed penodica1ly hy'.stateinentS:from this office~ lwillrequ~stthatyou pay for ~eitajp, anticipated. cQsts:as l"sha1Lrequestinwritin,g, in advance.ofincurring such costs, a.s ·c:t condition ofinc1~rrin~·su;c):i..oo.sts _,_ andJ{I <leein such: coSts itecessw:y to proper. r~presentation of you, I shall infopn:you of the san1e in wrft:i11g and you shWJ make such payments as a condition of my.continued representatjon of: you, You ha,ye agreed that y<i:ur :failu:re to make p,ayment timely or to otherwi8e·perform y1;>.ur 0 bligaiiqrunindcx: 9ur agrccrrient wfll be grounds- for ihe firm·~ withdrawafftom youfrepresentation. We. ~ve:,~gi;eed~ ¢at :tqese provisfons are: fair because our effort; to be;successfcif,;must be the product ofour teamwork

0

The Texas S.upreme·CcJurt:filid Colirls ofAppeaj~- }lave .adopt~ the Texas tawyer's Creed as: a triai:tdate' to the legal ptofessiOn"ln texas~ The creedl'equires o:ur firm to advise: you ofthe ~ontents of the .cr~ed Wheri, Jlndertak:irtg to· represe'ilt')iou;. A copy of :th~ Texas Lawyer's Creed· is attached to this.'ernpl9ym~t agre¢ment for your teview.

The T~xas Goverom:ent Coae::requires:that you be adv!sedthat the State Sar ofT~)Cas investigates·an4 prose«~Ut~s prof¢ssfonfil :misconductco:romitted by Texas attorneys. Althoµghnot ~very complaint ~g~ix:isfonli~pU:ie ~Ut:a fay;;y~ .hi.volves,.ptofess.ional.fuiScoriduct,. the State Bar will provide yow with infpr;m~o.nif you ~all 1-800-932~19.00.

You hereby agree that; lfyqu shou.ld at a.nytim~ qecorne displeased or dissatisfied With any aspectwhatSoever ·ofthis fiinl's:legal r()pi:eseri.tati~n,. orifyou should at any time have any serious question concerning that•repres~µtation, yot;t·Will immed~at~ly notifY me of that fact in i , Writing_ by certified mail; return r.eceip(re.qu~sted,. · '~/

Burton Kahn.attorney e111ployme1it·agrwment-. page 3

• ,..

You. ~gr~~ ·th~t.~s f?.rm. i.:¢sette~'~e#ghU<Yt~.¢ilili:!.te the''ntto:fil!,}y-olichtrcfationship and w!thdrawftom·y9ur further r~pre~ent~#,<,>n for: ~yofH1e ~<;)ilowip:g re!)SQns:

1. Your:fai1urdo. cooperat~ auilcomply fLillY··~tli any·rt;asona'ble requestofihis ftnrt's about your ca.Se; ·

;4, Yotll':engaging:in conduct or making statefueiitS that render itunreaspnably· d,iff'ic;;\llt for tlils, ~ fo :cartJ;9:ut ih~.p:tupos¢s of its,,empfoyment;:

.~. Your in:sistin1nllli!ftbls'fiffil. ®g~gein cond\ictthatts contrary to my judgment anQ advic.c;

4. Y Qur failure to .pay;fe~s iµid costs ~ ptqv~ded in this -agreenieht.

5. Jfi.il my-discretion;J deem. it:appropriqt<:l to withdtfl.w fi'.omyotir:representation iri favor of:substitute couhsel. ' '

This fuiu is privilc;ged tq: hav~: thfa opportunity to be of ser\iice tc> you. I appreciate your trust and-confi9.ence;.as ·well as:yout business;; lfyou climpfotely approve this agreement, please dat.e and sign the otigitlaj of~: letj:~t wh¢r¢ indicate~ retili'ri it .to this: office; and retain·ihe enclosed copy'for your file;

CJ

fi· ACCEPTED AND AGREEDTO EFFECTIVE'""''U'I')..-.... .1.u.in

. .. ' .·. - ' . . /'M:-'V.··.·."/'.J

. , ·.TON '.KAHN;; 1~dividually ~d as Qqrporiition and Presid~IJ,t ofJ.>aiaqiv Helvetia Asset Recovery•. Inq~

Burt<.>li Ka.bii attorney· employment l;lgr~ement-pag~ 4

EXHIBIT E

Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=:tvl

Texas Statutes ---------------------------------------------·--------···-·

CJ Texas Statutes

CJ GOVERNMENT CODE

0 TITLE 2. JUDICIAL BRANCH CJ SUBTITLE D. JUDICIAL PERSONNEL AND OFFICIALS

CJ CHAPTER 51. CLERKS

CJ SUBCHAPTER J. CERTAIN FRAUDULENT RECORDS OR DOCUMENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----···-··-··················.

? 51.903 GOV'T. Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property

(a) A person who is the purport~d debtor or obliger or who owns real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property and who has reason to believe that the document purporting to create a lien or a claim against the real or personal property or an interest in the real or personal property previously filed or submitted for filing and recording is fraudulent may complete and file with the district clerk a motion, verified by affidavit by a completed form for ordinary certificate of acknowledgment, of the same type described by Section 121.007, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, that contains, at a minimum, the information in the following suggested form:

MISC. DOCKET NO. In the Judicial District In Re: A Purported In and For Lien or Claim Against County, Texas (Name of Purported Debtor)

Motion for Judicial Review of Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim

Now Comes (nam.e) and file.5 this motion requesting a judicial determination of the status of documentation or an instrument purporting to create an interest in real or personal property or ? lien or claim on real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property filed in the office of the Clerk of (county name) County, Texas, and in support of the motion would show the court as follows:

I.

(Name), movant herein, is the ·purported obligor or debtor or person who owns the real or personal property or the interest in real or personal property described in the documentation or instrument.

I I.

On (date), in the exercise of the county clerk's official duties as County Clerk of (county name) County, Texas, the county clerk received and filed and recorded the ctocumentation or in~trument attached hereto

l of S 4/10/2014 1047 AlVf

Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M

and containing (number) pages. Said documentation or instrument purports to have created a lien on real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property against one (name of purported debtor) .

III.

Movant alleges that the documentation or instrument attached hereto is fraudulent, as defined by Section 51.901 (c) (2), Government Code, and that the documentation or instrument should therefore not be accorded lien status.

IV.

Movant attests that assertions herein are true and correct.

v.

Movant does not request the court to make a finding as to any underlying claim of the parties involved and acknowledges that this motion does not seek to invalidate a legitimate lien. Movant further acknowledges that movant may be ~ubject to sanctions, as provided by Chapter 10, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, if this motion is determined to be frivolous.

PRAYER

Movant requests the court to review the attached documentation or instrument and enter an order determining whether it should be accorded lien status, together with such other orders as the court deems appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

(Signature and typed name and address)

(b) The completed form for ordinary certificate of acknowledgment, of the same type described by Section 121.007, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, must be as follows:

AFFIDAVIT

THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , who, being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows:

"My name is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I am over 21 years of age, of sound mind, with personal knowledge of the following facts, and fully competent to testify.

I further attest that the assertions contained in the accompanying motion are true and correct."

Further affiant sayeth not.

2 of S 4/10/2014 10:47 AM

Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com httP://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M

SUBSCRIBED and SWORN TO before me, this ___ day of ----'----

NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Texas

Nota,ry's printed name:

My commission expires:

(c) A motion under this section i:nay be ruled on by a district judge having jurisdiction over real property matters in the county where the subject documen,t was filed. The court's finding may be made solely on a review of the documentation or instrument attached to the motion and without hearing any testimonial evidence. The court's review may be made ex parte without delay or notice of any kind. An appellate court shall expedite review of a court's finding under this section.

(d) The district clerk may not ~ollect a filing fee for filing a motion under this section,

(e) After reviewing the documentation or instrument attached to a motion under this section, the district judge shall enter an appropriate finding of fact and conclusion of law, which must be filed and indexed in the same class of records in which the Subject documentation or instrument was originally filed. A copy of the finding of fact and conclusion of law shall be sent, by first class mail, to the movant and to the person who filed the fraudulent lien or claim at the last known address of each person within seven days of the date that the finding of fact and conciusion of law is issued by the judge.

(f) The county clerk may not collect a fee for filing a district judge's finding of fact and conclusion of law under this section.

(g) A suggested form order appropriate to comply with this section is as follows:

MISC. DOCKET NO. In the Judicial District In Re: A Purported In and For _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lien or Claim Against County, Texas (Name of Purported Debtor)

Judicial Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law Regarding a Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim

On the (number) day of (month), (year) , in the above entitled and numbered cause, this court reviewed a motion, verified by affidavit, of (name) and the documentation or instrument attached thereto. No testimony was taken from any party, nor was there any notice of the court's review, the court having made the determination that a decision could be made solely on review of the documentation or instrument under the authority vested in the court under Subchapter J~ Chapter 51, Government Code.

The court finds as follows (only an item checked and initialed is a valid court ruling):

3 of 5 4/10/2014 10:47 Al\!f

Documents provided by www.Loislaw.com http://estore.loislaw.com/LLdocmanager.aspx?action=M

The documentation or instrument attached to the motion herein IS asserted against real or personal property or an interest in real or personal property and:

(1) IS provided for by specific state or federal statutes or constitutional provisions;

(2) IS created by implied or express cohsent or agre~ment of the obligor, debtor, or the owner of the real or personal property or an interest in the real or personal property, if required under the laws of this state, or by consent of an agent, fiduciary, or other representative of that person; or

(3) IS an equitable, constructive, or other li~n imposed by a court of competent jurisdiction created or established under the constitution or laws of this state or of the United States.

The documentation or instrument attached to the motion herein:

(1) IS NOT provided for by specific state or federal statutes or constitutional provisions;

(2) IS NOT created by implied or express consent or agreement of the obligor, debtor, or the owner of the real or personal property or an interest in the real or personal property, if required under the law of this state or by imp.lied or express consent or agreement of an agent, fiduciary, or other representative of that person;

(3) IS NOT an equitable, constructive, or other lien imposed by a court of competent jurisdiction created by or e~tablished under the constitution or laws of this state or the United States; or

(4) IS NOT asserted against re~l or personal property or an interest in real or personal property. There is no valid lien or claim created by this documentation or instrument.

This court makes no finding as to any und~rlying claims of the parties involved, and expressly limits its finding of fact and conclusion of law to the review of a ministerial act. The county clerk shall file this finding of fact and conclusion of law in the same class of records as the subject documentation or instrument was originally filed, and the court directs the county clerk to index it tising the same names that were used in indexing the subject documentation or instrument.

SIGNED ON THIS THE DAY OF

DISTRICT JUDGE JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY, TEXAS

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, 14, eff. May 21, 1997.

Copyright? 2013 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates

4 of 5 4/10/2014 10:47 Alv[

EXHIBITF

IEXHIBITT

.)

~ ~ 1iUe of San J\rar,,run, Inc.

306 w. SUnset. Sliite 115 San Antonio, iX 78209 Phone210-198-l643 Fax21o--7ll8-164S

Wt~NG INSTRUCTIONS Augt.1$l 21 •.2007

I

"'\: = RE: Order No.: 1210001428 BuyerJBouower(s): Helvetia Asset Recovery Inc. 3i::l!m(&); M~fi: Duith Holding LTD, Property AW:Jress: .,TX

• In conriection with the refeteru;eQ tr~n, please w~ ful'ld3 to Os in this manner:

WIREIAANSFER INSTRUCTIONS for Wiring to Settlement Agent

Sank Name: Compass Bank (Sunset Office} Bank Location: P.O. Box 4444, Houston, 'TX 77210~4444 -\ ASA Number: 113010547 __ / !

ACCount Number: 13880050 Account Name: Escrow Account LandAmerica lawyers Title of San Antonio 306 W. Sunset, Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78209 210-826-1504 Re: Gf #1218001426

-Ottler No. lt1S00142!1 'ffrir>g lti!drulllrotJS

(_)

Exhibit~

•

EXHIBITG . ' . .. . ..· .. •4, '

•. : .

• ••• ._. •.

\ . .....

. ~ ~ . \..

. :·.. ···J . \ .. ·.. ::: ·.''. . ~~ ..-- :.~ :'·;·:_.;.>... ··."·.:..

...... _.·.:. ·. ·.: '. '-.: .. ··.: .: .. ::·,·.i·-."·· ·- .... ___ . --- -,___ .. ___ ,. __ .... •..... J -- ·-· ...--1 EXHIBIT"C"

-t~~ i1 --""-·-"~~'-----

i.-------

EXHIBITH

I n====·=·====================================n' I I II . 11, I I. II I!. I I 1'

II II COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE II I II I I II II I I II II· I I :: THIS CERTIFIES THAT :: I I· 1·11· ~ ~ 11,

I

I I I II I I I! . II I l I II ISTHE OWNER OF FULLY PAID 1000 SHARES AUTHORIZED OF COMMON STOCK IN REGARDING II I I 11 11. I I I ll I I II II :. II II HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY INC. -------------------------------

Ii::

H

: . II THE CORPORATION IS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF TEXAS 11 : I II II I I I II I I II I I AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS II l : II //. ~/ . II : I II PRESIDENT SIGNATURE _,. . DIRECTOR SIGNATURE / /~ II, I I II $t1/2r~ ?::i:J~ ~~ 'ii#,(/ 11 • I I 11 f II l ~======================================~ . l I I L-------------------------~---------------~ i l ·. . LJ /~., ( (

EXHIBIT J • _il \J& ~faT CJi· r1 t~~· ~. T· r 1~\_~· · ·

fJ(/ lJ~Q]'" 1lt· f. 11 /(i'i? ~z;rl~~'.~[;yi' /' ~- r·

..

;

·! .j

t

l

l

I) ·i

I

I

.I .\

l \

·)

.. :: ..· ..

}/~ • / .·· '',,:

··-_;.:..

:.··

/~--.

t~·<...:.~·:/"

l . .' i ~. ~ .

•

...~ ~ .- ;z

. - -',., -.-· . .. , ,., . . .. . · · , _ ~i August B, 2-001 ~JrH?: . :~ I

,~(:~ir~ :··( ~)':;:;~ .

·.

• : ~ ;·· ~~ ·, +

~: ·1.; .~; ~:f . :·.'•i ,; 'i;.· ..·, :: "''.'l .' ~-~ )' ~ EhclO~cl;~~t,b.e;_i~~p~e~l;:I!yla,w$ of:t&;GQrpqra.tiqn,. -~~ca~of J;l<;>rqi~tlonis. -~R

<:>"'-peetecl~~,_ •'th.~ '$,c!;:rd:k;y O:f:~ ~f~:::L'

··,... '.•:

P1¢a!ierevicw t'lwsed®um~fil't$!~fully~ and:call me:iinmediately: ify.ouha.veany qv.esuo:r;is,.addiiions.. deil?t!ons,.or ~~;, •Mttir mi; ~~'Wh~sfu.Jv:etm~reVicwect a:mf approved, plemi~·qtll.m~:to; ~tu:p.ii;tiP.ieto ,~e~ m~ pdgi~lsL

•• .th~.·s~=:~ia:a:~i:~~~::ac~!:J::.!'r~:~:s:~:!i:~~~~red.by;. Certificate ()f F!lnriati!'i1l. estaJiU-sµ~-~ Qqrp~~·~,~~; qut its ~~()11mt:sb:µcture; (P:riQr fu: the'·t~xa~ I.Jcisfue~Oi:ganizatl9ns·Code:whi:ch b~ame·effective on January J. 2006, the -Ccrti:fica~ '<;lfFor~ati<fil. was:.re~erie&ttnlS. tlit '1AtuCies: of moorporation.~ ·

.Byla~:;:~h~;:;t::~:;;:~;~u:~~~~~~;:t~=:a~~~~:~;d:~o· filmiliatizeyoursett\vithbQw.the Co:IMta.tieu$horild,® o~tcCl.: 'rlw:~yl~ws Mw:µ14·~. '.;;~:~:r:~:d:~fu)ii::::~·t~.~~-tµi~fo11; OtiQ~ app~!>,v~d~ ~ By~awa•nmy be

I.hav~ prepa:t~d ~ enc!Qs_ed.~s .based upon info~on anii·,instrup'l:fon.<> you am• fl).'0'.\r,ld~L 1 n.tftm:iq.:;fiaye;p,t)~ ~e~t.ei:iW h@l4.;rn:Y,$.rl{~9q! tQ ~e ~ lfiX e~~ ·r:91,1 sA-0~ beg.w~e·~. .(()r,tllmll)ll;;Q.fthis,COtpQia~Qn•may affectyour fufure·tax.~obligations. You: should ~ar=~:.~1Z:h!1tii:~r!~it~~~~ ~:::wit~·yo11r:Hr#~11nfant,p:iy}nesv~eial ~ttAoonn

::!~===~~==r:y on rnrpornt~. 1'nt';i:1m'1;. Rl~d~nn of Snhilmpt~i S si:J:1fm::: is. mHoe:hy. illing. 11:orm 7.S5~ with th~ 1t1terruil Revenue service-: F~mf2:S5J'liltiStbeJi1ed ·within sewufy--.five:(-75}days nfthe .

',.:

rr;·-.~:

·E-::~-i~~~:::::::::=.t:~~~ "~~1~ '.:" ; : : ;, ''.~ y'

. ~'

f~~~,~~1- . ......~:. ... ! ;

~.1.:1 •••• k~

•

:~r;-.;~·:1 . ';· ;l~~-~~ . . :...~.' : :i:t?~·~d.

~:~:~~'

·.:·.::;:~~ \:• ••,·.< :&mpl~Y:erld.entrn~ti:t.in, Nlt~b:er, ltth~:C.rupora.tionwillb¢J'~fingwages to · t,-'1 •• .,,,_:

employ®~J'Ol-1, m.tts.t ~pplyto-1l'w ~al R:e,y~ue;:S.~rv~ 011 F.onn SS'-4 for an El,nployer Irus,ntifioa~nNUnihev; ·· · ·

Liability &r::Nbnpilym~t l)f.FrCATttii'.es an:a.FmtalW."lthhoiilfugTaxes~ Ji·the · .df1;:~ ::S~ii~~~~~::ant~~~~~~=~:~:; :r:~~~e~l!~J:f~~~~te 6 1

pa.~~f Qfsu.~l:lw~ 1ll~Y -~!} f~lllld,:'.li~b,l~i, · Fr~nchi~c Tu. Withiitnited extieptions/t'~xascorporatiohl! are·silhject tothe:Texas-

~~!~~~::Opl<HfiscusS:the fnfii.chise tax @.rJ pi)ssibli:n1ietliodsf0Hrtinimizi:ngthts tax '·

·aE~a~~;;z~~1;~:t:

.,,..::•

~' ... )

~ "· ·e1a~~t~=1:-==if -Formation

~t=~~:~1~j BalikAaj;ut;. A rii¢<wb.~:ll-'®~~t;sh.:pU11{ bo. oµ¢tWtlin tht.'i~~of the durpoi:utJ.iJp, 'fbis -transooiion.Sh®ldbe:accompfislled<~ily by w.mpl•g·a,r¢solution·wweh authorizes the tompat,1y-tq,l)p~·abtµtk~:e.q'J$.~m.~h~sJl!~~ye·t11~kowµf.o~n.(~1111,¢)·1::solu,tionfuat i:hA c.orpn~ti:on. can u~~;.

2

: '•

•

,l .• •· . •

:?;i~f1:~ .• ~~ ... ~ - ... ,.::.·; -

; . • '. . .'.• ~ _;::.~ •.·.:,; ••• :.. •• ;.. ···~ .·.- .... ~·.• I • .,;.:.,:., ·.. , ..

. .. ·.• ................... ~;.··~:-.:~~ ..

_E~:tµtgY,;t;tl~•.. A;J:IY;ex;fS#tJg J~~~ltyo~fPave ~~:'jh'f}iie ~e£$~how4 b.t?• trawferred tp-an.d ~sumed.by·the ~rpo11ifi9n when f:tlld iliyoµr acoo~.detennines:tb,at.110 ~verii:~ fax_ i::o~¢ql.):~~~Wili:i;~tib:'ftQt.4:~·~~pti6.iii~l~biUty;

lf·yoµ te.quit'e ·~¥~~sistM.~~ l.wquJ4•~eiil1apptto hel_p)ro\l:_!lpc~~t.av;y of:th~ ;ili~ve.

:A~i:o;pntin_g ..

.==:=~=ii!~=r ~ .: ;·~·-!

.,.t: ,: :··::<···.

••• ·1

Corporation's busmesseactim'ties.~ .. . ' .

Comp~nslltioo ~:Sflitr-dt:~tders•. 1~ ~iitehtildefu imd the dlfuct9i:karo n:ot otd!nur.ily

~fu:~=:a;:;r:=~sEe::~:· tbr shar~bold~.:~-0.t.ors, pflie$t$, ~pJ¢~$ shQ:uIQ,;~e·~ubmitted fOtapprovru .as wi111any ~:~ t:i..,, ~ other im~ttransactfun,, {: 7

C~nCll.t~1ttg _ ·. Jl\~:rt~iij;i fo'_t~eNfl:.:)n._ifc;!1-f.:_~t'.l';f~t.)i!~fi~):I:, ,!t l.·5_Y~ i_r®i:.u:t-1mt:Jh.·at;il1 ~sflry ~prmruitie$ °QttfoJlqwed iil-tltQ,ef m JbaihwJi t,lie ekis.terice· am! actMties {)f th~

~~ \ :•;.

5;~~:r~=~~:~\;~::a7 ··, '>• 3 ..,c.

::: ::'~.

-i. --~.;; . ;·

... ... : :

•• ;

~ 'IC

•

----- - -

i ( '% :th~:::shat:eholc;I~~s 1'.1'.1µ$1:wtbe~owm~ ~{tll¢(p,(Qpycy,oft;b,e CqrPQratiQn. 'Yoµ~hoold:at , atLtimes'd~ htismess'tmdet,the Cotpnm'fion:name cxaclly'rurspecrued ilitheArticles of .(jl'~~tifoi.ii.nd. :ru:it.:~vi~te~~lrottijful~~::an.aj:!-pw~a-i~Um4i:l'ti~:¢erti:ficate·hrui been filed. .., ·~ .; .. ·.! ....::~~ t

l)~~k:A~~"-~i'.l~ iin_4'4~~~~ Xo'!l:lt~"~ 9h~~AA>¥<:~6 &'J,(:itjl'<iJ.<~l~ti 1'd1>?otyct1r compLu.iy;niµn.e, ~ylq~ l){~~~~tiYiti~~shpµt!f ·~~,cpn¢u9te9- ~th~ cQ111p~y$mut'1¢.;

~~tr:;:;;~~v:t~~~et~·_:Eilleti;i~4i!i~~~~u~~~~:!~~::!1~~:~~~fue petsonally} }'-Oii shoUld havectlieab~v.e,acti-Oh'app~dv~Efhy .~Board ~£Directors ~d :refle~t the .

~~~:ft!~i}D+J1pvroprfaie1;y draftedr~solutlon wh1~h'1s ~Gn~cl !utojh¢. co1UPanfs triinute,bQok :'-

.add Signafur,,es,.. Whei;tevetr a;pef.so.w:si~ Q::P: b~baff Qf: or forJhe Corp0ra:tioJJ; they should their title nextto·the ~~~-that it Will be' oleai tba.l they are iiC:tifig:as-atu1gent ofthe

·~~=ra:rd::f:~:~~~n':i!~~~h!~=~~:t:.~!::~:~just C"i:\nlrJiet, ~to.u mn he held ·p~:r&~Jfy;J!a.hlie for: tbi'l ~~t)ttae]; .Al13~X11mp1e l)f~ 1.'.0f'tla(':t .~igtlafure' W()~l!I ~: . ... " . , .

Helvetia.Asset.Reoovery~ me.

( \

n

r)

Byi~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

... -~--· ·)<>'htr:Ooi .Presii:U;nt l'r,~u~!{c~)~u8, Nl~u~~~ lrat~actiu.R1> ttfft¥i,i#g 1J11i:. Cuiyunilluu :d1uulu bo , documented itr'the. minufobook by minutes ot'meetkgs,oflhe sll&eholdet:S and oftlie BO.a.rd.of : ·. ". ·-~. Direct(>rs or other appropriate.dooutnentatfon, inelurung:· ' . .,•

Alimaj~==~;~~~~~==~!;1~=-=~:~t::~:r~i~=· lilp.i~·lrability h~{)kerage ~: inve~rrt ~mcounts $oillifbe,ni.ade·ih the name artd 011 b~alf ofthc Corporation an&willi.fuereqilifed qflptovaiL

'the esta.biishinentand';adJustnient.-0.fa:lhruw~,and bom:i_se~ of qffi~r.Nmd e:mpfoyee.s, if ClfiY, .. : :. '

~;

~. ~

of•ke ·-oratloi.

Cijtp . - ·; ··'

... W ... .·. .

·~~~no!:d!~:=;i:~~eJ!;ti'~=:~!;!['change·fu·StodfshoUJci•bereflecte-0 '.Restr:foti-Ons on fhe:fi:~fer o.f.S;iock.

,-

·'' ~· ~

4

.-;·.r~· !

, •• •'!_,

•

·•.· ·--~- ..... ;..... '.".:. ". "". ;:<:--~-~-. ·- . -· .. :.·.·.-,,,. --:·;:~;.-.'!. '; : . ...... _,._,,.;.·:: .. ·. ..

: :~. ,.~ :.. ..... .:.-~ ..: .___; .....

( ··,,\ .. ; •'~:.:. -

.• ::~ •• i." .'~:.~ • J . .·.J - r:'.){~~

•.· ....,

• · ·!n:n:u.~ .M:e~t:higsi 1-h~~l)al m®:tingsmtistbe h~ld~s JH.oWd~d in t4e .EJyfaws. The time and J)lacenrtlie annwilm~tmgtjtth.E) ;Board; drl}it¢ctoi;S;may be.changed by r~solutfon ·Qf ~ . - ~ -.~· .~}:.:};.~~ :. ·,. ~ ...•..

§f§E1ae~~;~ ··:)

1'\,,

•·; ~ .

helping youptq?arethe;requisite: resolutions·andJnin.utes·arrecotds to-d0cnment:any Sp¢dal. or Rnn\ml H'i:efitJn~~;. -%'.!

:;-~,~~-~r~ Books-auu:M:mute:s. tn:e·Co : ·mto.n lnuiebook must be maintained and. ke tu to-

<l,qte~ ~g a'(~l~~1~(~·.;~~~Q~~:¢i~~4~t~~' Tli~·i~ol~s of't:t;<a•:9o~~ation·~ah~Jd J;h~de, -:·!~!'{ );~ ,: J~~ t1J;e'f*l1owillg 1te~: ··

All res61utions 1 miiiutes of.meetiiJis; ootlces, wrlttw eonsents, etc., that are pfepare(f'htthe niti.ire . ,,:: __ .

A.cur.r¢n+ t~sttifs~JAers:;iiu~l\Jdµlg. {~) tl;tecdaJ:e·o1'J.. whfoh ~im p1::r:>.Of!. b~ame µ,· s~elloldvt, . ~.;.~: ~ :!

·;:;r.;_,;;· {bJ.th~·~JW4!n~lim.twd~i>~;(~}'thi:: n~'.bey qf:sl;tar!(Sirrthe Corporation ht}Id byibe • !-· :--1-. ~r:

shareholder, and (n) the ooliStdefatfon p&dfl\it the.stock. ..:; ~'

··. <:: :.: -~ "'!.'

_.k!·; ···~

Copies,of federal. statecfilld focal .infon:nati.M·or 'iil.(l()trtetax. returns. ·~, r::!} ;,:~ :·';!,::

Otheri.Corpor:ate,Matte;rs.

:Sfgnlfiettnt Chn~gtt.ll¢aS<fC011tatt tinsJmn. mwediaiely-it"any;important change OCCJ.illl -·~ .·.1' 'j· ·t.hti!.w.9:W4:W-f.~t'.th..~,¢9tPiir:(ltl~n, . .tnciudfug wl\ert.a i~tiider fii~~nJr ·'beeom:~.:divorced'" a s

•

-~ ..·..:.. :...; . .,::.:..;;~-.:~ -· - - . ··---...::.... ._ . ·"~.--~-~··,,_.,_,. ..• .,.. .. ,_ .•.,,. ·-·····',"•;'..:.'-·\····:·.>.:.·.\,•,.: _.,,:.:; •..• ~.:,;~; ...J;(•:.• ~ .•-,;:_,...,j,,,._,,,.; .,.;., .. :.,,. I'~:, ''.~ ·-·~.:":·:-i.--1-~ - -:•:·.:·:J

Assumed Nanu.t lfth; C~atimtwill trans~t businesitor qperate und~r a namt that is µtt'feremt11)m.y way !i'omi'{b.~ ~;·Ji~,~ ~(qtli;¥r·~ ~_tfll~l~·~)f''.fp~~,11: tiled.wi(Q. the Secretary of8tate,Jne~Cntperationwi1Lneedm:file m assumed .riame certifi.care; This certillcatemust:l>efileii Witlttlie::Seeretaty;·,of State,md'the:.C.ounfy clerk ofthe county fuwhich =~~::o:~:~t~~im=~fs~:~;:i~i~~~~::::::::.:~~i:~~ty· county ,?.sw.eU. Al$0, ;M:eetj:ificaie w.ill,p.e¢ ti;>-~rene~ ~i~·Six mQnth$ pri~rto its exptrati-On.

t

.\~ . ... ·..

... '

./ .·.,

,:,~~ . . ,. . /i

•

'!

• .;: .. : .. · .. ,.\.

I \. __ ;

•

., '"' ·c .•• ' ""lJ:Y.LA.ws'- -'-··" ..........

-~_

BELWTt\~~~~q,nR.¥.~'.INc~ ,ARTICLkf~ OFFICE~'

l_ IiEGt.~XERit:.0 6'.Eit'Telli:AN.0 ~~ENT

=tlr=SSiti~1:;;~ SeQtefufy' ofState. · ·

" • A 7 .\

3. -91'1IEI.t QV:tlel;S .

Alt'!lCLKn,:"SlIAIYrJJOLD.liiBS-

:l.. rLAtE:-o:rME:;ETING :

F.:lf.~;:J~fSSE!f~ Directors~ shareholqe1.·:rn.~~ J~bysicajl;y .PIXlS~ta.t>~·i;n,e~tll.tgiQfsh~hQlc;ler~ :\>y· ~ ofre.mofo \;UlLll.ll'J~\.iuuma;y pruti9~ h1 oc-u~hlf;I iif·6~cl:iok:fo.rl\; cmq~ m~y-~-;l"X!u~idcn;d·pl·.:;,:;.;11L ill personaudmayvote.atameetlngtifslfu.teh.olders held ma cles;fgpated;place·orhei<l solely by ~:!~~r::t::tf:!~::.~Jeet.totheoonditlija&; impos.ed by sectimt~.002(b) of the

2. ANNUAL MEJil'-Ffl'S;G· ·The-mmuat tnredtig:of.shatelrolders Sh-aii be hekl.onllie:date and timesetby·tlie .Board of .Directors.

; ,> The ~µa.J .w~g:~y~·i;ajl~i,lby-:resr:lti:ifkn of 'the Boar.ff .ofI)Jtectors :or by ~Av.l;iti.l)g filed- \._ /. ·withlhe·Seoretacy:·.Sfgci~il-either·hY.:a. •rit¥ ofthe·direc~;Qi W$ttareh(')lders•pwrilng·a

•

.: . ..

~·;;..;.:..;.~.;.:,; .:...-.:·_.~.~-~.:,. ~. ·.;:...:...:.~ ·-

'

·'·!~:t~t1~::~::;::I:;;:ttrii:~~'ko"fi}i¢·0~6fiiti~-1~~~~1:~ii!~~i1; and·

.·Wri.tte:rv:oi: pimt.¢4 MfiM s~gfi'iith an.:y~pi,'(jpose.d.afu¢.nifuwht.t& $e. t'e~eate ·ofF.om1alden (:·:·.~:.'i' ·~~~=::~~=to~::~c~~;:r!~~~:;~:~i~.;~a:~~!~:~cord Org;wir-?Jiops CQ!fl!! for ·thlll g1vi~g:(tf'll(IUCe ofmee'tioo~:ofsl;i.m:¢l'toldi::..ts~ If:fb.e m~~~g h~ :a.~ ·;=~'riiee~n:: the.pri)P.oSed.amendmeiit.ritsutlisnnW.a&·nl.ay·fa~::iootud~futhe nntice•of such.

·-dii:!1[:1rj;~~·;e=:.~7:~t=~:.=::s~~M:.;;:~

7

nd~=~:;~;

if{l }notice oftwo .consecutive annilltlJ meetings and all ooifues mi' meetings held:

shareh~Ider

.;:z:~~<Yt~:;~s~;: ~~~~t;fu;,:;,~:·:~ ;:~%;;:~=-:s;::o:'

3

~~=~~~1:~~:~~!~~~!~~~-~~~~~v~=i~~ ~~~~J~r~:~ lll~ting takeri Qr h~g witl11J1.~t:·,n,~t,iC'l·t!>. ~~11;pe~.~l;lall 4iawthe sam~-ib.~ anti .effept as if

··~11rt!~!;~~!it~ti!::r~~f:!~~~~~~~~~~~~~!£~~!~1at petson.shait~ieinsta.tciL

:~ , .' -·~ ,, • ,.. ,;.-; •.;..:., •' ·. •..• ' •. t ..., ' ... ' .... ~ . • : • - •.

·.-/

N<Jtiye:hy ¢l~P:wtlc t,ra~1~iP11J~ ®ern~ giy~ ~11 the notic'e is: (1) ~Ute<l t9 a:

~~~~i:-~~ ·~=~~=iE~~t;;l~~~=:rfraud, t''. ' . . . 4, ;$J:1~Ql.z\L S~JlOX;b~S' MEETJNq$- ' ~ptlCi'almeetihgs, of'~e:'sliirreho!aets;m~jrte.·canm:(1)-i)y:the P.~ident,,.anyVtoo Preside:flt. the B9~cb:i:f.DicectDrs:~ or(i) by the:. widens• mat~~ :t¢tt:fiD) peteent-o:faii .tlie ·shares entitled, to-

~· .. .

~!1~!:Z,i:;::1~~=;=~=,~:~1~~:~~''orcexecm~ wruver of

1

·z:.~~=::::~::-:~~:1~! lC!::::~8:~!T!~;:;:~:.;ary.

~i~ltiif~i§i'j~g~ ~~ ll,l:~e.tjµg=may·ftx the·timerJf:meeting ·and-mvethenotice·in lli@mannerpmvided.in these

~::;~~~~=;l~~~~~=~::N:~,a~~i}:~~~Q~e held. .

s, YOTIN6;0F~~-

\ .... )

·. -~

/

:Sllarehclil~~ate,l#oblhitea'_from,~utatmg:thelt i'ates:iil any ~¢eti0n,of direewm of the ~G:;"f~~9*' . . ··.

;;:Et:S..5?a~~:&.r;;~:r

\_··· :·'

~~~-@~Eii~~E~ ·a€:~:ar:~s•%=1~~.:· ~=~ni.:S:9$£~=:=< ~~~i:$ll)~P.(;.1f~~~~.9.:f·v~JV.~~;~r,;ii;iy~1\mt~:'(r@.~f~~f'$.h.~;.;

:e:::z!~~==~!f~::rr!:~~=:J!f:~~~ae:i~·:~~::1~.!~uirea··11y '!:!:~!:~==1=~::1:~f~~ <:ihll'l'~·h\'\lcfor.~, J.,u lF:S.~nt'h~,ll~:prqvro~~~~µ fb'~f~rtlifiP.~t~ ryf;F4;1rmArio~. 1:1:r: thP-<J!~ J\ylm~.

~uy v~r111:J:y'f.1t·~J;~y::w1~;tl~ ~w·gqr~•ff;_l~-y;ul~:,;~·<1.~~l:J.YNl:3'~!Lt.p;llf<J t1.:1- v-1:1t;;;,,i:;ii.LJ.cy iu .peri;op :Qr Qy,pr~~Y ofaj'ec~ iinvfii@:~~~tbaJlpf~;$ball tie'usqd,

;:;=:~::~~!==~~1:r.~:!1!::~::t:!~=~~::~t~· ·are-r~pires~nte.d aHhe,::rn~tg_ii;J ~~ ~1r,'l}y::pi:~~run~S:~~~~pf9V;);d:~ l,)y la;:w or tll,e · .Certifi.cateiof Fotri'imon. NotwitbBfandfug an~to=tne·c~m;fu th~seJ'Jwlaws or'tlie: :~:=(vi::~:~:tlil~::.!t!quon~:of:~ s~cl)bl<l~tsc,oJid:sfofiesstfuui:

Unless other.w.i'se·pmYidtd;in;the emnficat-e o.f:Fonnation'ot 'the8$ ~ylaws•. once a .guorumis

•

. -

• a~1E:ii!@a1@ 00

,~ltS!r=:~~~:~ ·'~uch. reoor<ls ~-~:dpsei.tfot at lea.St~· Q) ,day,sl~ediate}y:pr~dll1g suehmeeting~ In ~.:~:!l)i~::~:;:::::~a"~~~,~ii~;~t:i:;;~y;~.:.r:!;~~~la:f ilie ~~~=~~!!?;.~=:s. j~i§§~~~~~~' if~2~~!£@1f~ 8~ F~G.J~E(,;t.;)tm ~Al'.~~gN$FlN~~ '.f~JoAC,flON

'VillessJi. ~4da~1;11~hm.1 ..mw~ J%e¥l:QusLy ~ fiz,~d:Qt dewmililti.tpur..:;Wtit !P iliii:s~~tou,

~~f~if~~~~ 0nd tM prior aetionof1.ll~ Raard:ti(Dfre,qtcir~ 1$· \l~ 'fc>:41~)'ed py 1he'Tex,ID!i~~t.lill'fle$S ·

•

./··-~-.- .. ,\ ~.. )r -._,. ...

~~~:1!.!:\~:at:.:;~as~=~~=;~;:~!t~~~~~=:~::;::a'f. meeti:ngofsharehulrlersi.may]l(!'i;i:ak;en:Viithoutameeti.ng; without prior notice; mid'mth~ut ~

~~.~~, :t:~rct:~ir:1~=~::tfl~~<1.':\~~~;:~~;~~t~CG:~a·

3

sab' eci o.f:fue'co.

. ·~...... sent .

······· .... A·······

1tth~ QQrf),9~ati.9!l&'~~t~ o{f~~Qµ. so·pi.'QYi9~,.;my~tlQ11~i;edby·th.e Texas Busine8s Organizatioos.:€00e·io·oo'tak.en.a't-·anyjn,1nual-or'.~per;i~ ~ting;pfsb.,arelrolders,orany ·

~=~~:;~~~:~:;i::n:~~~=~i:~~: r::::;~ii::~~·::1tin~.

I \ "-- ~v~·~~·

l ·' which ooldef:$::Qf aU. shares eiitlt1-ed to vote on the acti01vwere presenta.nd.'.voted.

:;!~:=:~:~:!=~=~~~~:~~~~~~~~:~~~~n.::~:!~:oi!h shfu:drnld~r wha sq~;;:,j:}~eOMJlRl'mt., Nri,Wl'fttM :~~ent i;:fene<l'hy·fhf'! l'irildt1rTtf·l1',S.~fh51)1, ::ill th~ $~;ootl1led-:W:'Vtiteiwlth.r,es~,t~,.th~E®ti(;!nth'iiti5~tf1¢,{iubject>-ofth:e cOO:SenLihaU·oo

~s=~~~sa~~~~~1:: mt~lllU11~Qf'~9~f!1at,W®.l;~l?fue'~!'9~~tp'~~,~~~JiO.lt1Mti$;t"lie ~u\ll~Qfthe: oo.u:;eut dL"(; dclivc;1:e<"! to iii.ls Cou:iui:atieli DY, d.;;liv1;;ry to it! .ro~i5~~ofti~c; lv~~;b:u:cal og1.>u1i ·.

~:::ie~:;ti=::&;~~=~~l~~~:~~:£=:::~:~;~;~:e et;:K::;~~!~~~~~~1,!=~f~;:~:btJ::~~~~=e~e:~;e~:;;:~ or pi.inci~ ~cutive; Offi®"·dHhe, QQ!Pemti~

:mmt>t'nn'tlre:of the.·filkfu!i o.f',anyoofi.ruY.by;14bareh01<lers'Wi.thout:ac!neetine.bY' less than unan1m¢$:W;ritten:~~tslw.:l,~·gi~·tP'.'.tf!Qsg'ti>'lx~h9l'&~r$'W.fi<liti.4 n~t:to'Mertthl.Wtitit).g:tt)' the :action..

............... _________________

~··- ... ~: .• ...:., .< ;,.. ~:.,,.-...:.. ..• --... ~· - ·.... -;, -- .~.:..:.:.; ••..: ··:-:•: '•. •...:,.• .!,.".; : ••••~ ·~· ·-~~ :•••.::.--:.· " ' · · . . . : " :.<.·~-:~ ~·- :. . ••..••.• '.·. ·'· .•. . .·-··.

~~i~~n;~~:~~:~i~:~t=Jii!:~;=~~=r~~¥~s secuon:unwarran:):ed.· '

,,.JiF:m'.·fuE»· k'l\tn·'ti!i:-ti.c··:·T···r·'o·:· L"'I Ut~.LQ. •A.'-·~-.,;u; .11~.

ft;j o'''.ljl'~v~'-nQ'

· :· .l~ -, ~·:.-V.·J:ll.lll~.~l..UR~.

• 1.· ·.; .· ''. ':

(J =:~~=~~~$:Si!~~ shorlerilng the:t~ bf-ail.X'incumhent:dit:eCtor' ..

=~=~~~=~~~~~~~:-;:, $.: ·~•9Yl:\L

Except asofiretWise i1ttlVlde"d'bY'thelexas Busln.ess ~tlruis COOe;, tbeseB\rlaws otthe

~~i~~,~~~~: pmvis.il-mRnftlIB,Certff'irJ'lfe ofFrlmil'ltinn., mt1y:fh~·hrilaf'r,<1.:of\qhsn>. stnfth.11t.·~foAA·nr~e.•to~

!i?Z~~:?l;i;!5~£~7~.!~~~t wtes ciwt::against)iiS:.o:r h~r r,~y~l ~'.0µ~Jtfie:.sUmGient :eI~tlJim ff tb.;n cllijlnla;tively voted to ·. ~t·~t;;~:fi~:9ftb,eJmf;4-~,,a~4 of:~f~~ qr:J:fm~·~~G\las~~·'i;rf~e<:tuts; ~:an.election.of ·-·---~~)) tht; 1:;ki.,"";:;t:v'.fdkt<Ctl.),i;~·~f'.V\'hfohJ,_~,a1" ~·'.¥>· ~ ~~· :I.(!#i;; ~W:lµrsJ~yp p~;~l~siliaj:,l:tlS'

pCtmi:tttd by ..

thc..To:i@S :B:i:l3'incaa OFgwllzi:itiom .

COde,,,nlril.c::m"th~ ... Corlilic&fo of Po~ati'qn

•

~ RES!GNA.TION Atfit~fQ'.f..may:,~&igp,cPY pJQYiQfi.ig J:J.Qb hrwritiJl.g o.i:'by.~fe(;.ifonip tr~ssici11of'stl~l 'resignation to tb.e;COrporati°t'!ln. The resignaliionrshaJ:Lbe effectiveupdnthe date ofreceipt of the ~:~:=~=;th:~~=:~e:~1:;~eh nmitz. Accepran~-nf tlie reslgnMion sh~llnot $~. V4GANC~~, 4~ Q!tt~$l!Lll'l'.NJ,tlim~~.QJ.i1 '.Qtl.$(tt'Ql$.

,.

.~5-~~~Si1E~r: '' ~· ..; ;. ·~ ;, .

~iigfft~~~k $Jiareh~ldel'5,, ·· · (~,).

==~r~=~=s::;~ of~~l~ or·;~eri~ lQ;.beii;ll~ (:iyr~~Qtt Qf~.·~~~-~iib. ~~<\! nUtJ,t~¢f,Ofs\lclt directvr~:may: be filled:by·th,Miffirma~e.vote:c:f amaj:ority.·oftru: <lireetots,~iected;by"mch class of series~. or by uu~h:~9~, th®.;in..~,:9x, b)i'li ®i~ ~:Riiiiiryng dk~t:Qi' ®:·~~ol&~:Q:i' l.>~··fh~.•:•<>w !"'ifth.4;1 hold;i.ri; ·fthe.t.rutstandmg sliares oE:SUcli. :cl&S -,l'f series oo·of suelf WollP. and·such ditedtorships shml not .~Miy·cas¢ lie· filf~ ·~ ~ v~~~fth:r:m~iDing;Qlt®tQ~ ~r1h¢"hoUl¢r8 offue ontst@~g .. :ijillut;;i ~$)~. '~UiJl~ wd~l~hithq~W.S.1$¢ fl~~;i_u~ 4JJii~ :Q~£)ii1Wa('.y 9f~W#~«a~~1": .

·&.. ~lJ.~M,Jifl~G."QE~w:TOIW

::1::ri~$f!\tra~t:n~~~;:;:=;:~tt:~::r~::::i~:c~ ,other .bll8iness~as shall wme meetjng, bef~:Jh~ µree.ting-of:tiw ~~-timc;.~:}lla~pfltte· aqnlJaj .

·&m:dt>.f'.nl.r®t~ts.~ay, ~ &_1~;byJe$,uli4b i;)f'tb!ii 13,o~ Qf:Ql.~c.1Pr$" · 7~ .l.lEG.U:L¢i;R,: M~~ING o~:n.i:1"JtW~~s

•

·' ...• ~.;~. " .. :.

· · . ,..,. "Uie.'s~i1Uy straii d.~:~i~,~t~g~_i-*;:~t,t:;,f~&;r~;~~~~:~;q;,~i~~ d.;so ( ···--~ ~:~~spem::r!'tfi°!~~;;;::rors. SUcli specml .meeting sruul.be held at·the date

:';'. niilei~1t~~ 1 ·M&ET1NG.S

==~~=~*~;=;::;:r~h· to~ ~QflCJ1;0Jr'fi-~of{$~~t.'fiNG$:

.~~&ssg;~~ee~= . .. m~miy ~· ~:an.:~ee ~·~x~cite.~:~it¢r,-0rncmce'ot!;1:~·an~.ptace·o~~eting,. no,none .t}l 1'e9 • halt .. .req, U:¢d, and;my sue!i~ng shalHre .. . . .fP,e mneand a tb.

~!~~~==m~s~· ~~:~:!a~~:;:;~~=~i~i:J:t~~:::;:~~:!:!:~e-Bbardbt

•

. ·~~~i:~=~=:!2!~:.::~!:t~~~:~==:/::;~;~~~~n.,o!tllv · atterldance a4;~yiji~:~fihe:!lbafd:oiDirectoiS. A director·shfil1:f!.OI be preclud,ed'fi;Qi.ll

.· • ·;-~~n:·;:;~:;;tt~l~~~:~~;,oo~=:i~-==~i::::::~~tor, ~ll~~'Oll;\~tlll~.:~~-S";

~tml~~l1SfW~'.tlr.E~:~$E~(!F. JfiltEORlRSQJl. ~MWT'liEE

~r~~~~:e=:=~~e::nt:t;:~:~t~~s~$~~=rtr!::~~-~e~U:d

¥ote at a meeting} N. '.¢<>.tttMrt\t~$0~''t~ jj(i~'91f :QJ.:ijitCltQ~

"

NitcomnrlttaH>ftlie Bosrd ofDirecmts shalfhliV:e'fue· a:utho.ri;ty::Of'the::Bmrrd ofJ)irrotors in refur¢Il.ce 'LQ? '

r,·. j '"'·~_;_,,.:

•

·-- ~:~·~~.~~--·· ···-- ---- ·---

'bf·~~~TI:l~~~:()~:s=r~:n~f~g~~ip~;iu·~.m.anner.pe~itteJ

(4}ft!co1mm:,nding wihe ~h0.14er~ the ~1ej;l~¥~f.'¥:ic~ge ~f~Uor su:bsfiµltially illl ofth:e pra~.sriii il&uiefaoft~:'P.hli:iri~atlnn·otne~se±h~n·in tk nsmil and regulAr ~,')utOO nf ·;'*" :h·•"11<t;i;.- l:wi, '

' <U\:);JIJ.~~;'

:,wvoqa~re::;m~?J$ii';\ ~~ tlfuu'.~~l~ ~·~~iu~:~iaa:<Slµ~(;!~.Qf~i~p~i;trot!.Ql); 9i'CL

t'irfium,g,~~ci~ w.~~:;o.rJJ~@~~;;

:{~).fill~;~~~ m.~~~~~al~W'.~~~'.~rpfiaJ;lyc,such.c~n;µnitt~e;, ~):±11lfu;~:~:~~p·to"b~.ruieifby.~asSii·('.}f lrlilrtc~se:tntlienliiltbor. of-directors;

~f' ~.IJJI2.!~orremc>~ol&e~ qftJie··Cmp(Jl:tmOJ:l'Qr t®tn:IJers9r altefimw.membets of

(1 l):fixtrtg_ w~~H''9~DSatlOThnLahf'meiiibei'. ot•aJtemfilemembeFS. of such. cbniitdttee; .Or

;ptroiide~~~=t:{Jf!::::.n~hli:;~;:~:ti~~~~£·~i~w~~~t'hy it¢ ~~fins

==~:a?!d::i!~=°!4!!; . :rhe,desJgnation;Ofa~mmi®ejjffutfBoo.ta·elDiteetP:tsimi<fihe:de.k.igafion·thereto.of authority f!~·::r~~;;: t0:relieve;tfu¥J~oiitd:o'f1Jirectot$~ :-Or:~ mem00tihereot;.-0f ailY responsibility:

.AJllJ(;:.Ll!a'f:- OFllCJBS 1. NUMBER OF OFFICERS

•

. ,. ,;. ~~r:~ iiia!E~~\i4ibf:·:ale;;.f1Y:I~w'S.~' ~njt1!Wti'fl)~1i-more·offiiies:maibe'*-ial1¥'.tfic·········"·-··,·· · .....,. . .

0

/I Sariie·person.

2. ELEC'.J:'ION Qit6.Ji'J.t'.lt'E&~

!~¥l~·~~S7E: A~~:t1e~£iiiii;f::

Atl.qffiee.t$ an4..a$$iS.tIDl(J1.if~;~a:u ~ ~~eJlt'.¢) $iv¢:®til:th~Ji¢xt aB1lual m.eeth1g of

;~ ~qar<( '9~1)~~\:QrS;, , · . . ..

3. POWElS.Oitt>QlCEtts;

===~~::~:.i:~===~;tllis 4. ~RESIDENT

·•¥"" •• ~ . . • · . · •• ' •

·~J!:?:r::==~!i~!~~!~:Ji!.~:ft:1::::;=r:~d:e:i!olh~ :;te~~~=~~§::~~~~~~1t~:~;,~tJ~~:;~~1:,s:!~~:-::ther -officereofthe.Corporat!on:. Tht"P:~si@nt Qt~J'V~~~esi4~t$.bail '~XeGll:~ b~>UP$..n.;tP:11~g~s-amt mber-_mstnirnents .

Sf~&~£¥~:~~=~~ Th~f'.Pt¢S'ident shall w~~f:P'Q~Qiit.l®Jrthet of·~ilfsfat;i~ connnittees.

t,=~s::~~';:-~.:J:r~"::~%,':

5; VlCEi.oi?JtE$mltNJ1S: ~'VW:e~~~d@,t,-~r Yj~~~$i~$n~~rqf'~~;~ ~fi~~~l1>5(1he ~4QfD1r~~rs; shall~ in the ..absence ;ordThability·oftbii·;Profilai>li'ti, pm,f'urm the dutiestmd.mccrcisc ·fut; powers.Of ( "';) the'.ireSident;.:andthev shall ue¥fonns~h etti£f,~·asiihe a9·atd.0£!J)irecrors sh~ll prescribe. . .• ~ ..._.;··~·

i. TiiE s'EitR;J.t:tn¥·~;~s1s-rANr s.ll!~'.J!AJuEs

'f:h(} $~-~.Wm attend)_all·p:te~~~f 1)~ ~ard:PfDfr~~toci a.rnf,;a{Jmeetin.gs fu~· qf -~ehPl~ ~llXd •slul.J.l.reeQrd all . vates:andthe minutes nhll •rr.r-.ee;effi.ngs. and shall perform like

;::::·~taft.m~7~t~~'f~s~=~;ll~~~~t'=l!i±lli:•:J:::i1en -~:;:s!t~-~~:.l.~~~~~~:t~~~~vv=:u~~::~~=~iti:!~=~:a~:s ,am~ $e. sant~:~ 1:1,ny ~~fae.qmrit1g i4;ana;w.1lt;:1r@-a~~' il:~~®JU:xni:Ucstqd l>ylh.e .

S~!4:~'s:s~~,or by th.¢. S.J~~f~J;;s.~i~1t $~q;~.

==r~E:'.£5:!~::~ ~3~~~-~';=~=;::o:;m

/

j

-~-·- --·-

T#~ l'rea:sniyr~~~L~~b~~ ~~:fu.,nii&'t:tfth~ ~QJVQJ:atiQf! ~;~ybe 0.l\i~.d l;ly fM.Bolltd of ·nfrPT.tnTi;r, hki'fJ{fp'F-Oper.·vo,uC:he~ fhr !i'ileh di imn'N:P.mentA. '1'he''fTeR:s1w"'.r·i.hvtU 4""'!' AtH.f. mAint11h1

( ··:;; ~:.:::,.,.·'"'

AJlTICL)h-V: ~;Sit.UUfSr;i~]Q,PlS;'.t1.it~TIF:ICA'tEi,,.l§~y$,NCEt·~~i(!'E!, ~T&~

1·.·~ l··R.n3:.0·.. F.·. ·:s· F";T.lnrrmi'n'"'_·"'l'u.c., ~:Jl;n;_.l ·J:.F;IA,;.;~~ . . .TAC:

.u. . v':

ft •

·" .. .· .

. ·..,--········~ ... .:.. ...... _...

·~ ·~· ,~ .. ~

the Coni~ratloo ai.if.S!~ai nfactii-ofb~iness:orre¢.istered offit~: ERE:P,,~~~;i;~1\Ql:g,~l,l;llt~,Pfth~'iG1:tl'J!O~tl9:q;~~l ~i;ip~n ~l:w fa~ ~~oti

{r)~}h~ ciir_porfuianis organmett'iiliae:ifthe:1aws ottnfa ~; (~) :T~ilai:t¢ ~:t~Q)'.>eroi:i~tCi:Wh@·~~~ •.

. ft) The:p.~~4'4~~"(lf $~~~\ij~·@ll~~<m:o,fth~M~~,Jfa;ty. w.bicfrsuch -· ccitifi\<A(i\d~p:tesciits;

)Jo '.teqliir~tl1-ettt; <.>f:t:h.¢;T:~~J}~eii~~ei.m'Jzj;i:µ_~·(;l:,41a ~~~~~~-i,·w ~i:~ tc:>'Wiset.fqrth_ Qrt ~i:lka.~ ~pr,eS~og shares ofifa~,{;orpw.irAfQti; ~ll appty-to or Mfee~ ~rtin~~

:~tn:£!iE!S~~#~=:::i::-: Jn -~·even~·MY ~rrtc.rton onmur4.'!lsftlr, pr :r:egt~tt~~.o:ttbe uwt.q; Q:Cl$.hare.$ sha.lfby

~~~~rn=~===t~·' SiS~~~~!i:-$[:.h, rnincipal ulaee ofbusiness.QtteIDl-1mff,-O'ffillec•a oot'Y.'.ot'°'the ~cffieCf,ftoo1hnent nr (hJ ff:such

'\, ,, SiSt;a~~;r~~~~"!:=· .afthe Soorerary.of'Stateat·dretime of:llie;~-:t111e Cofitrirdtiiin whit_hfaik:Withh1 a

(' ~--··-· ··-·--·····

4.

·AR.'l'l(jLifr.VI .... DIVID\ENDAND DISTRIRUTIONS

l. DECLARAT10l'l

T~(jl 60~¢9fµi~t.or~i:®lYQ®J~ .~anr· ~~' I'.e&~ 9f!$P®jR!' ~¢litjg;~Jthe :\;IQard of Direct0m and tJie,CfoJ]Omli.cm ma.yJ1ay; divideaa~ 01rth~eutstanmng'fiharesJn cash~:prop.E\rty:oI .tn th~ shar~ ~fth6. CQip~oti·fuithU*t$i1.~p~itriltted'~{artds\lbjtcHo ilie pio~fons·o~ tile· law.R oftb~:stat~·~f Tex~> ·: - · .

•

Alll\lUl.Ym~·~€-@t.~EQUS · l;. ~0.~.~CU.Q~··

t W,~ :OF NOTICE

W~er ·ar:.y nafi¢¢;fac1ieq~w ~gii~n:t9'~;~efJ;~1~·1'.it :~tff'Oftbe-t~~ot.r. ~ttile- pro,'ds.iens «ft\11:..T~'n.u~ss·O.~~efrons·O~®'.ortm<i~ifi~:v~tons·oftlJ.e:. C~rttti1;.~qi;tJf,~;;i,m;i.!1-lii.u.nw:Q~'IfY#t~~; ~ ll'f~'v~t ~~r~ ~+#~~ ~4(;\J; t,:y- UJF fl"HIU1~ '-!!'

-::~~w::e~~~t:~~~~!ii~r~=~::~J:;f:~;!~~~'. neti-a.

.:t uSJr.-OFE.l"ECfllONIC:~$M!S$10~

e:~.a=a~~~=~ •i~l~fr9~c·¢m~~~l(ll1~ a fQt:m: pfWll)t\lW.®a.U'on.tb.at:_ \~) ·d!le!f.JJ.Qt;d,ir.~~tl:y mvQweil1.¢'·

•

·····i;,~~1~r~r~~PiiJ)i.~:~r~~ie~;;¢c.~:tliaG;s'liiei.~iiie~r~;~eit:~i-6Y.fowea·- -·-"···-~······· .· · ·· · ·· ·· . · ·. · · · ,. ,· · ·· · ·· ···· · · · · · . . ··· · b.y :th!:;;11<1,;i'pit;;.a~ uru:l('c) ~y:W:Ufu;;c.ti)l"t~tl\-'1:ldJfu·p~r ~by ib.~·1~pieniJ tirmugli:u.n ,~~~wa';;~~~.

11~ .(WjjjJ!lT;UN~;U.¥.·l'!iJ;i~ii!BOR~:i,'UNJlEI-«$.~C.lil~Ult~BY·,at:LEC:.J'BUNlCUK :t>THER.BM:o~J.J ¢.O~tA'rlONS'i1ildHNotO@t

!i.; ~· Tutt.:Cotpm~on m~ ·Q(jQpH\''oo'fPOtate s.~aCUi:suGfi t.bmu$ t~lfuani ii>fD~erol'S may . d. te.rfuin:· · iflfu,CJ~mioo ~·· ·ot::~ r.~ult® t0:u:re·tbe ~rim}~ ~JM,:hwk.0ftl e ~~:~~;;}Uifr~~t~i~t-J~~. ~~4•ttin~@t;gt.otneffus~~t.~~~uted.~y~~ 'Coil'Ot.atiott;; ' '.6~ :Q:mtCK$~:DRAFTS,,:ETC.

~~:~~~~':~~=~:.::.:~:;:!~~:!!.~te~:/:~~=~:r;;:1 be . ~e;.~:·~~;&r. R.~~1@.~!'J:"t)t~~J¥¥i;\t4.~:ft:t~~k~~'

7~· -~~qAL, XEA.R. Titdiscai;.eatQf''tbe;C-Oqlonmnn shaltb.e'as :determine(fby the ~ar<l.m'.Direcro.ts;

Al(j'.'td:tj~~:7 (;tp.$~'.J:!:<Y:C.J'I~:

J. un:o··'ai'.T('kl'Jl'.'H:! ~"D ..E.:.l~ ,_·.i~~yl.....-~ . ...

ImADJNGS =~" .· ,. :·.

ar~:ees::i!i~~ ;1~ .mv~01:r.1n1~~~ /''~:>:..

· u.:Y,.·l&i.·~raftb:ese<B:u. 0";"'.'"r.tm.Hi:•:i<i!i1(J$:t~...,,.f'"m; such. · -•Jsi"ntn t L,l .. ~;,· b'tie ot:.more:Qftlie.

If;itw. .... p.~ Y"'1\ ........- .... - .... ;r i. ~l'"''" -· . PF ..... ~!-). v. ~il . Pf:.. l'., ··'""'··· · - · 'O.

::.;!U:~~=:!'.:~;~r:~:!fe==~:~:::~ ·::J~l,~[~~~=~;~'1-¥seBytaws~.~~er a_pplieatiom•ofcany.S\lcll ·

AR'fl~~ ... AiiEND.MR!f 01tB).'~WJ:

.'I'hcJJl)ar~ ,Qf,!1..~l~J~~;~~ 1::~~:.!ll$:~~:~ir~d~.¢ fl.~:BYlawi?; µnl~ th~­ Ceqift~t~·~-F~itm,~lthe, Texa&Busmess Oi~oJlS,Code:re'servdtbe:power

.mJii~fi;~=;; A.dopQa.by ~.:a~ ·Qf'})ireefutiJ>Q;j\ttsust ~ 20QJ~.

~=

..• \: '·'°

•

\

1 :~ t J

·.'!

··. ~/'

•

----- . ··-----· -------------------

EXHIBIT J

MINUTES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION

The organizational meeting of the Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc., a Texas business corporation (hereinafter "Business Corporation"). was held at 1715 Hadbury Lane, San Antoruo, Texas 18248, on August 8, :LUU"/.

The undersigned, being the sole member of the initial Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset Recovery, Im;;. ruuni;d .U1 tht: Businc::.-s Coiporatiou'~ Cc::ttific<Ue ofFunnal.iun filed with the Secretary of State of Texas, was present. The undersigned waived notice of the meeting as evidenced by the attached Waiver of Notice signed and appended hereto.

Lloyd George was appointed Chairman of the meeting and Lloyd George was appointe.d Secretary of the meeting.

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

The Secretary then presented and read to the meeting a copy of the Certificate of Formation and reported that the original thereof was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Texas on August 1, 2007, and that the Secretary of State issued a formal Acknowledgment of Filing to the Business Corporation on that date. The Secretary presented the Acknowledgment of Filing armexed to an approved duplicate of the Certificate of Formation as filed Wld it was ordered inserted into the corporate record book.

BYLAWS

The Secretary then presented a proposed form of bylaws. The proposed bylaws were read to the meeting, considered und upon motion duly mo.de, seconded nnd curried, were adopted as nnd for the Bylaws of the Business Corporation and ordered signed and inserted into the corporate record book. The Secretary ofthe Business Corporation was instructed to rnairitain a copy of the Bylaws at the princip:d office of the Business Corporation available for inspection by the shareholders ofthe Business Corporation.

PRINCIPAL OFFICE

1.Jpon motion duly made, seconded and carri~ it was

\ -~Oj;~bat the ~sine~s Ci.)lyoration's principal office be located and maintained at i l ~ \Y'6U Y LA!V't. .£\0.b hn\-on \'O , Texas782q,Sand that meetings of the Board of Directors from time to time may be held either at the principal office or at such other place as the board of directors s11a11 from time to time order.

EXHIBIT

I ISSUANCE OF SHARES

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, tliat the Business Corporation issue l 000 shares of the Business Corporation's authorized shares of common stock (no par value), for a purchase price of $ - · each, as follows: .

Name No. of Shares ~9DSi{jei_:3ffol! Yalue Vued-o V C\ cie: \ ·11 c \ooo Cash $-

Cash $

Cash $

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that upon receipt of the consideration, the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to issue share certificates to the persons named above and to obtain, if advisable, representations from any purchaser that the shares are being acquired for investment purp-0ses and not for distribution, and further

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Business Corporation may upon such terms as the Board of Directors in its discretion may determine, issue authorized shares of the Bllilincss Corporation for consideration consisting of an}« tangible or intangible benefit to tht; Business Corporation or other property of any kind or nature, including cash, promissory notes, services performed, contracts for services to be performed, other securities of the Business Corporation; or securities of any other corporation, .domestic or foreign, or other entity.

, BANK ACCOUNT

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the Business Corporation establish in its name one or more accounts with one or more financial institutions on such terms and conditions as may be agreed with said · financial institutions, and that the officers ofthe Business Corporation are authorized to execute any resolutions required by said financial institutions for sucl1 accounts and to designate the !

person or persons authorized to write checks on such accounts on behalf of the Business Corporation.

ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS

Upon motion duly made, sec-0nded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the attorney's fees, fili.ii.g fees and other expenses and charges incurred and that may be incurred by the Business Corporation or persons acting on behalf of the Business

I I ( Corp0ration in connection with the fom1ation oftJie Business Corporation are reasonable and shall be paid or reimbursed by the Business Corporation.

FISCAL YEAR

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carrie<l, it was

RESOLVED, that the fiscal year of the Business Corporation shall pegin on January l and end on December 31, provided that the initial fiscal year of the Business Corporation shall begin as otthe date hereot: '

TAXES

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation obtain infonnation and instructions from the Internal Revenue Service, Comptroller of the State of Texas and other applicable taxing authorities regarding withholding and other taxes.

LICENSES AND PERMITS

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to obtain on behalf of the Business Corporation all licenses and permits that may be required for the Business Corporation to carry out its lawful business and activities, and further,

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to do all tlrings and take all action necessary to qualify the Business Corporation to carry out its lawful business and activities in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations.

QUALU1CATION IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

Upon motion duly made, seconded and cruried, it was

RE.SOLVED, that for the purpose of authorizing the Business Corporation to do business in :my st~te, territory or dependency of1he TTnite<l ~t.::itl':s or imy forP.ign cnuntry in which it i~ necessary or expedient for the Business Corporation to transact business, the proper officers of the Business Corporation are hereby authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service ofJ)rocess, to designate and chan~e the location of all necessary statuto1y offices and to make and file all necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney and other instruments a<\ may be required by the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to authorize the Business Corporation to transact business therein.

I

/ / FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFICERS

( /Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED, that the officers of the Business Corporation are authorized to do all things and take all action necessary and helpful to carry out the above resolutions and all acts of the .oJlicers and any persons acting tor the Business Corporation which are consistent with the above resolutions are ratified and adopted as the acts of the Business Corporation.

Upon motion duly made, seconded mrl carried, it was

RESOLVED that the signing of these minutes shall constitute full r!Urucation thereof and waiver of notice of the meeting by the signatories.

Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was

RESOLVED that Lloyd George resigned as an office and director of the Business Corporation. and that resignation was accepted.

111e Chairman asked v.nether there was any fwiher business to come before the Directors at lhis meeting, and there being no response, the meeting was adjourned.

,, .....

DATE: August 8, 2007.

_c/P.· /~~ LloydG~.!.

WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT

RESOLVED, that the undersigned, being the sole member ofthe initial Board of Directors of Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc_ named in the Business Corporation's rertiffoate of Formation filed with the Secretary of State of Texas, by approving the Minutes of the Organizational Meeting of the Directors, and by this resolutien, does hereby waive notice of the time and place of the meeting, consents to the meeting and approves the contents of the Minutes of the Organizational Meeting of the Directors.

Lloyd~~h< Date signed: August 8, 2007 (

5

I