In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
68 N.E.2d 39, 295 N.Y. 939, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1086
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 N.Y. 897 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument of motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. The order of reversal by the Appellate Division was not an interlocutory order within section 590 of the Civil Practice Act. [See 295 N. Y. 897.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard, 68 N.E.2d 39, 295 N.Y. 939, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. 1946).
68 N.E.2d 39 (In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
67 N.E.2d 528 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)