In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Young

Arizona Supreme Court

In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Young

823 P.2d 1282, 170 Ariz. 274, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 16

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 1992

DocketNo. SB-90-0026-D; Disc. Comm. Nos. 88-0441, 86-1243, 87-1636, 88-1128, 88-0407, 87-1258, 88-0034 and 84-0981

StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1282 (In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Young, 823 P.2d 1282, 170 Ariz. 274, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 16 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to the Opinion of this Court dated the 26th day of June, 1990, and pursuant to the State Bar’s motion for an order/mandate nunc pro tunc denominated “Judgment,”

IT IS ORDERED that EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., be and hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Arizona, effective the 11th day of May, 1990.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63(a), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., shall notify all of his clients, within ten (10) days from the date hereof, of his inability to continue to represent them and that they should promptly retain new counsel, and shall promptly inform this court of his compliance with this Order as provided by Rule 63(d), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Rule 53(e)(3), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., shall pay [275]*275$11,480.59 in costs and expenses to the State Bar of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., pay restitution to the victims of his misconduct in an amount to be ascertained and recommended by the State Bar, and to be imposed by later order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to the Opinion of this Court dated the 26th day of June, 1990, and pursuant to the State Bar’s motion for an order/mandate nunc pro tunc denominated “Judgment,”

IT IS ORDERED that EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., be and hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Arizona, effective the 11th day of May, 1990.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63(a), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., shall notify all of his clients, within ten (10) days from the date hereof, of his inability to continue to represent them and that they should promptly retain new counsel, and shall promptly inform this court of his compliance with this Order as provided by Rule 63(d), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Rule 53(e)(3), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., shall pay [275]*275$11,480.59 in costs and expenses to the State Bar of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that EDWIN PIERCE YOUNG, JR., pay restitution to the victims of his misconduct in an amount to be ascertained and recommended by the State Bar, and to be imposed by later order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

823 P.2d 1282, 170 Ariz. 274, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-a-member-of-the-state-bar-of-arizona-young-ariz-1992.