In re a Certain Contract Filed in the Office of the Comptroller of the City of New York
This text of 243 A.D. 598 (In re a Certain Contract Filed in the Office of the Comptroller of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion to strike out the notice and demand under section 36-d of the Lien Law served upon the contractor, requiring it to serve the verified statement mentioned in said section granted, and the cross-motion denied; and the motion directing service of the verified statement by the contractor upon Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company denied. Section 36-d of the Lien Law does not apply to contracts made before its provisions went into effect. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Townley and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-a-certain-contract-filed-in-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-city-nyappdiv-1935.