In re 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C.

92 N.E.3d 876, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1403

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 2018

Docket2017–1375

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.E.3d 876 (In re 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C., 92 N.E.3d 876, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1403 (Ohio 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On appellant's motion to supplement record. Motion denied. On appellee's motion to dismiss and intervening appellee's motion to dismiss. Motions granted in part and denied in part. Appellant's assignment of error No. 2 dismissed. All other assignments of error remain pending.

O'Donnell, J., dissents and would grant the motion to supplement the record and the motions to dismiss the cause.

Kennedy and Fischer, JJ., would grant the motion to supplement the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appellant's motion to supplement record. Motion denied. On appellee's motion to dismiss and intervening appellee's motion to dismiss. Motions granted in part and denied in part. Appellant's assignment of error No. 2 dismissed. All other assignments of error remain pending.

O'Donnell, J., dissents and would grant the motion to supplement the record and the motions to dismiss the cause.

Kennedy and Fischer, JJ., would grant the motion to supplement the record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.E.3d 876, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-6011-greenwich-windpark-llc-ohio-2018.