in Re 4X Industrial, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2021
Docket14-20-00849-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re 4X Industrial, LLC (in Re 4X Industrial, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re 4X Industrial, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Order filed January 21, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00849-CV ____________

IN RE 4X INDUSTRIAL, LLC, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-65517

ABATEMENT ORDER

On December 22, 2020, relator 4X Industrial, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Steven Kirkland, Judge of the 334th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside his December 13, 2020 order granting the motion to compel responses to real party in interest Russell Marine, LLC’s first set of requests for production of documents to the extent the order overrules relator’s objections to certain specified requests for production.

Because Judge Kirkland ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 334th District Court, Harris County, Texas, we are required to abate this mandamus proceeding to permit the respondent’s successor, the Honorable Dawn Deshea Rogers, to consider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former one did.”).

Therefore, we abate this proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and remove it from the court’s active docket. This original proceeding is abated until February 22, 2021 to permit Judge Rogers to consider the order underlying relator’s request for relief. On or before that date, Judge Rogers shall advise the court of the action taken on relators’ request by filing a signed order reflecting her ruling concerning relators’ request for relief with this court. The court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss the original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Poissant, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Baylor Medical Center at Garland
280 S.W.3d 227 (Texas Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re 4X Industrial, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-4x-industrial-llc-texapp-2021.