In re 36370 Vine St.
This text of 2021 Ohio 2891 (In re 36370 Vine St.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re 36370 Vine St., 2021-Ohio-2891.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
IN RE: CASE NO. 2021-L-050
36370 VINE STREET Civil Appeal from the Willoughby Municipal Court
Trial Court No. 2019 MIS 00001
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: August 23, 2021 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
J. Jeffrey Holland, Holland & Muirden, 1343 Sharon-Copley Road, P.O. Box 345, Sharon Center, OH 44274 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Michela J. Huth, P.O. Box 17, Bolivar, OH 44612 (For Defendant-Appellant).
MATT LYNCH, J.
{¶1} On April 27, 2021, appellant, Nadine Bechtel, filed a notice of appeal from
an October 12, 2020 “Judgment” from the Willoughby Municipal Court.
{¶2} On April 28, 2021, appellant filed a motion for a delayed appeal. Appellee
filed a brief in opposition to the motion for a delayed appeal and a motion to dismiss on
June 23, 2021. On July 12, 2021, appellant filed her opposition to the motion to dismiss
and a reply to appellee’s opposition to the motion to file a delayed appeal. {¶3} Appellant’s motion for delayed appeal is overruled since this is a civil appeal
and it does not fall into any of the categories listed in App.R. 5(A)(1).
{¶4} Appellee’s motion to dismiss is also overruled. In the motion, appellee
states the appeal should be dismissed because appellant lacks standing, she cannot be
granted the relief requested, and the appeal was untimely filed. However, none of the
reasons listed in appellee’s motion warrant dismissal. Instead, it is our position that this
appeal should be dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.1
{¶5} This court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments. Noble v.
Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Under Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio
Constitution, a trial court judgment can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court
only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-
L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then we do not have
jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v.
Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). For a judgment to be final and
appealable, it must satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and if applicable, Civ.R.
54(B). See Children’s Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Tomaiko, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2011-P-0103,
2011-Ohio-6838, ¶ 3.
{¶6} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of
appealable judgments, and if a trial court judgment satisfies any of them, it will be deemed
a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals.
1. We note that this appeal would have been considered untimely filed had there been a final appealable order. 2
Case No. 2021-L-050 {¶7} This court has held there is no final judgment where a trial court fails to both
adopt a magistrate’s decision and enter a judgment stating the relief to be afforded
because “orders are not court orders unless certain formalities are met.” In re 36370 Vine
St., 11th Dist. Lake No. 2019-L-041, 2019-Ohio-3448, ¶ 5. Only judges, not magistrates,
may terminate claims or actions by entering judgment. Id.
{¶8} Here, the October 12, 2020 “Judgment” simply adopted the May 3, 2019
magistrate’s decision, but the trial court failed to enter judgment stating the relief to be
afforded. At this juncture, we have no entry that fits within any of the categories of R.C.
2505.02. Thus, there is no final appealable order, and this court does not have jurisdiction
to hear this appeal. This appeal has been filed prematurely. Nothing is preventing
appellant from obtaining effective relief through an appeal once the trial court has entered
a final judgment stating the relief to be afforded in the action.
{¶9} Based upon the foregoing analysis, the judgment of the trial court is not a
final appealable order. This appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as prematurely filed.
{¶10} Appeal dismissed.
CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2021-L-050
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 Ohio 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-36370-vine-st-ohioctapp-2021.