In Re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury
This text of In Re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury (In Re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
IN RE: THE TWENTY-SEVENTH : No. 171 EM 2014 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY : INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY : : : PETITION OF: OFFICE OF ATTORNEY : GENERAL :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2015, the Application for Extraordinary
Relief is DENIED. Per Supervising Judge Diana L. Anhalt’s in camera answer, the
protective order issued out of concern over retaliation and intimidation against
employees of Office of Attorney General as a result of their grand jury testimony. The
order is intended to prohibit only obstruction, intimidation, or retaliation against any
witnesses subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury; it is not intended to limit the law
enforcement or prosecutorial authority of the Office of Attorney General.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-27th-phila-county-inves-grand-jury-pa-2015.