in Re 25th Judicial District Attorney v. Hon. Gary Steel, Judge, 274th District Court- Dittman, Charles Sr.(real Party in Interest)
This text of in Re 25th Judicial District Attorney v. Hon. Gary Steel, Judge, 274th District Court- Dittman, Charles Sr.(real Party in Interest) (in Re 25th Judicial District Attorney v. Hon. Gary Steel, Judge, 274th District Court- Dittman, Charles Sr.(real Party in Interest)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Womack, J., filed a concurring statement, in which Johnson, Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., joined.
I join the Court's order dismissing the relator's petition with the understanding that the dismissal is based, not on the merits of the petition, but on the relator's failure to follow the requirement of Rule of Appellate Procedure 72.1: "A motion for leave to file must accompany an original petition for mandamus ."
Filed: September 15, 2010.
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re 25th Judicial District Attorney v. Hon. Gary Steel, Judge, 274th District Court- Dittman, Charles Sr.(real Party in Interest), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-25th-judicial-district-attorney-v-hon-gary-s-texcrimapp-2010.