In Re: 20th Judicial District - (Huntingdon)
This text of In Re: 20th Judicial District - (Huntingdon) (In Re: 20th Judicial District - (Huntingdon)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
IN RE: 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT - : No. 33 MM 2020 DECLARATION OF JUDICIAL : EMERGENCY (HUNTINGDON) :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2021, the Petition for Extension and Modification
of Declaration of Judicial Emergency is GRANTED, IN PART.
To the extent the Petition seeks authorization for the President Judge of the 20th
Judicial District to continue suspending Rule of Criminal Procedure 600 and any
procedural rules related to the use of advanced communication technology (ACT) through
August 31, 2021, the Petition is GRANTED. Judges shall be present in the courthouse,
judicial center, or other court facility whenever a proceeding is being conducted by ACT,
except for extraordinary circumstances, such as when court properties have been closed
due to inclement weather or other emergency under Pa.R.J.A. Nos. 1950-1954, or when
a proceeding is not being conducted during normal business hours.
In all other respects, the Petition is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: 20th Judicial District - (Huntingdon), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-20th-judicial-district-huntingdon-pa-2021.