In re 161 Columbus Avenue Corp.
279 A.D. 1002, 111 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We do not pass upon the question as to whether the trial court might make any provision for modification of the increased rents in the event that there be proof that after a given date the rent from the entire premises would furnish a reasonable return without any increase from the present tenants. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Shientag and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re 161 Columbus Avenue Corp., 279 A.D. 1002, 111 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1002 (In re 161 Columbus Avenue Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Trustees of the Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund
136 N.E.2d 889 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
In re Alibel Corp.
285 A.D. 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)