In re 13th Jud. Cir. Div. 4

2014 Ark. 235
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 15, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. 235 (In re 13th Jud. Cir. Div. 4) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re 13th Jud. Cir. Div. 4, 2014 Ark. 235 (Ark. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. 235

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered May 15, 2014

IN RE 13th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, DIVISION 4—APPROVAL FOR DIGITAL ELECTRONIC RECORDING

PER CURIAM

Circuit Judge Robin Carroll of El Dorado, 13th Judicial Circuit, Division 4, requests

permission from this court, pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No.

4(e), to use digital electronic recording to make the official court record. Judge Carroll has

submitted this request because his court has been without a regular court reporter for several

months, and efforts to fill the position have not been successful.

Administrative Order No. 4 permits the use of digital electronic recording in the

circuit courts under special circumstances, such as presented here, upon request to, and

approval by, the supreme court. Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 18, digital electronic

recording may be used by state district judges who are presiding over matters pending in the

circuit courts. The use of digital electronic recording is also permitted in many state and

federal courts throughout the country. See the National Center for State Court’s publication,

Making the Record Utilizing Digital Electronic Recording.1

We grant this request for a one-year period. The use of digital electronic recording in

1 Lee Suskin, James McMillan, and Daniel J. Hall, Making the Record Utilizing Digital Electronic Recording, National Center for State Courts (September 2013), http://www.ncsc.org/services-and-experts/court-reengineering/~/media/files/pdf/service s%20and%20experts/court%20reengineering/09012013-making-the-digital-record.ashx. Cite as 2014 Ark. 235

Judge Carroll’s court shall comply with Administrative Order No. 4, the Administrative

Office of the Court’s Provisional Guidelines for Digital Audio Recording,2 and the terms set out

in Judge Carroll’s “Proposal for the Use of Electronic Reporting in the 4th Division of the

13th Judicial Circuit of Arkansas.”

2 Administrative Office of the Courts, Provisional Guidelines for Digital Audio Recording in State District Courts (July 1, 2011), https://courts.arkansas.gov/sites/default/files/tree/guidelines.pdf.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re 13th Jud. Distr.
2015 Ark. 418 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-13th-jud-cir-div-4-ark-2014.