In re 10 Garvies Point Road Corp. v. Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re 10 Garvies Point Road Corp. v. Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency

28 A.D.3d 569, 812 N.Y.S.2d 357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 A.D.3d 569 (In re 10 Garvies Point Road Corp. v. Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re 10 Garvies Point Road Corp. v. Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency, 28 A.D.3d 569, 812 N.Y.S.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of the Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency dated February 1, 2005, made after a public hearing, authorizing the acquisition of the petitioner’s property.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the proposed acquisition of the property is “within” the respondent’s “statutory jurisdiction or authority” (EDPL 207 [C] [2]; see General Municipal Law § 919; Matter of Waldo’s, Inc. v Village of Johnson City, 74 NY2d 718, 722 [1989]; Matter of Gyrodyne Co. of Am., Inc. v State Univ. of N.Y. at Stony Brook, 17 AD3d 675 [2005], Iv denied 5 NY3d 716 [2005]). The petitioner’s contention that the proposed acquisition would not serve a “public use, benefit or purpose” is without merit (see Kelo v City of New London, — US —, 125 S Ct 2655 [June 23, 2005]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of the Glen Cove Industrial Development Agency dated February 1, 2005, made after a public hearing, authorizing the acquisition of the petitioner’s property.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the proposed acquisition of the property is “within” the respondent’s “statutory jurisdiction or authority” (EDPL 207 [C] [2]; see General Municipal Law § 919; Matter of Waldo’s, Inc. v Village of Johnson City, 74 NY2d 718, 722 [1989]; Matter of Gyrodyne Co. of Am., Inc. v State Univ. of N.Y. at Stony Brook, 17 AD3d 675 [2005], Iv denied 5 NY3d 716 [2005]). The petitioner’s contention that the proposed acquisition would not serve a “public use, benefit or purpose” is without merit (see Kelo v City of New London, — US —, 125 S Ct 2655 [June 23, 2005]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 569, 812 N.Y.S.2d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-10-garvies-point-road-corp-v-glen-cove-industrial-development-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack