In Re: 1 Coventry Court, LLC, Moshe Feldhendler, and Leah Feldhendler v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 3, 2023
• Docket: 05-23-00397-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DENIED and Opinion Filed May 3, 2023

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00397-CV

IN RE 1 COVENTRY COURT, LLC, MOSHE FELDHENDLER, AND LEAH FELDHENDLER, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-01541

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III In their May 1, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators seek relief from

the trial court’s contempt order.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to demonstrate that the trial

court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). Relators bear the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record

to show they are entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding). Relators’ record does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(2). Without a

sufficient record, relators have failed to carry their burden.

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/Bill Pedersen, III// 230397f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

–2–