in Re: 1 Coventry Court, LLC, Moshe Feldhendler and Leah Feldhendler
This text of in Re: 1 Coventry Court, LLC, Moshe Feldhendler and Leah Feldhendler (in Re: 1 Coventry Court, LLC, Moshe Feldhendler and Leah Feldhendler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed November 4, 2022
SIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01106-CV
IN RE 1 COVENTRY COURT, LLC, MOSHE FELDHENDLER, AND LEAH FELDHENDLER, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-01541
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Relators’ October 17, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus seeks relief from
the trial court’s contempt order. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to
demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an
adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–
36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Relators’ record does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1)–(2). Accordingly, we deny the petition.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
221106F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: 1 Coventry Court, LLC, Moshe Feldhendler and Leah Feldhendler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-1-coventry-court-llc-moshe-feldhendler-and-leah-feldhendler-texapp-2022.