In Matter of Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Matter of Yarborough

483 S.E.2d 473, 326 S.C. 62, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 72

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 3, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*63 ORDER

Respondent was convicted of obstruction of justice. Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition for interim suspension seeking to have respondent suspended from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is temporarily suspended from the practice of law until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A. J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ A. J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*63 ORDER

Respondent was convicted of obstruction of justice. Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition for interim suspension seeking to have respondent suspended from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is temporarily suspended from the practice of law until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A. J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ A. J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

In Matter of Yarborough, 483 S.E.2d 473, 326 S.C. 62, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 72 (S.C. 1997).

Pincite

483 S.E.2d 473 (In Matter of Yarborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related